Oracle Critical Patch Update July 2018
Released July 2018 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, April 2018 · Critical Patch Update, October 2018 →
247 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
16Protected by Waratek126No exploit published41Outside Waratek scope64Not applicable
7Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 125 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 12 matches · 4 in Waratek scope · 3 protected · 2 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
12matches
4in Waratek scope33.3%
3protected25.0%
2exploited16.7%
1CISA KEV8.3%
2public PoC16.7%
2EPSS ≥ 0.516.7%
Protected by Waratek
3
25.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
1
8.3%
Outside Waratek scope
3
25.0%
Not applicable
5
41.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
3
25.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9
75.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
16.7%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
10
83.3%
split by
peak 2 / quarter
Q4 111
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 120
Q2 120
Q3 120
Q4 120
Q1 130
Q2 130
Q3 130
Q4 130
Q1 140
Q2 140
Q3 141
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q4 140
Q1 151
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q2 150
Q3 151
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 151
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 161
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 162
Not applicable2
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q3 162
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable1
High2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
No public exploit2
Q4 162
Protected by Waratek1
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
No public exploit1
Q4 11Q2 12Q4 12Q2 13Q4 13Q2 14Q4 14Q2 15Q4 15Q2 16Q4 16
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-5195 | High | 2016-11-10 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | Race condition in mm/gup.c in the Linux kernel 2.x through 4.x before 4.8.3 allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging incorrect handling of a copy-on-write (COW) feature to write to a read-only memory mapping, as exploited in the wild in October 2016, aka "Dirty COW." |
| CVE-2016-5019 | Critical | 2016-10-03 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | CoreResponseStateManager in Apache MyFaces Trinidad 1.0.0 through 1.0.13, 1.2.x before 1.2.15, 2.0.x before 2.0.2, and 2.1.x before 2.1.2 might allow attackers to conduct deserialization attacks via a crafted serialized view state string. |
| CVE-2016-3506 | High | 2016-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the JDBC component in Oracle Database Server 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2; the Oracle Retail Xstore Point of Service 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.1, 15.0, and 16.0; the Oracle Retail Warehouse Management System 14.04, 14.1.3, and 15.0.1; the Oracle Retail Workforce Management 1.60.7, and 1.64.0; the Oracle Retail Clearance Optimization Engine 13.4; the Oracle Retail Markdown Optimization 13.4 and 14.0; and Oracle Retail Merchandising System 16.0 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-1181 | High | 2016-07-04 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | ActionServlet.java in Apache Struts 1 1.x through 1.3.10 mishandles multithreaded access to an ActionForm instance, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (unexpected memory access) via a multipart request, a related issue to CVE-2015-0899. |
| CVE-2016-2099 | Critical | 2016-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Use-after-free vulnerability in validators/DTD/DTDScanner.cpp in Apache Xerces C++ 3.1.3 and earlier allows context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact via an invalid character in an XML document. |
| CVE-2016-2176 | High | 2016-05-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The X509_NAME_oneline function in crypto/x509/x509_obj.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process stack memory or cause a denial of service (buffer over-read) via crafted EBCDIC ASN.1 data. |
| CVE-2016-0714 | High | 2016-02-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The session-persistence implementation in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.45, 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 mishandles session attributes, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager restrictions and execute arbitrary code in a privileged context via a web application that places a crafted object in a session. |
| CVE-2015-7940 | Medium | 2015-11-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.51 does not validate a point is withing the elliptic curve, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private keys via a series of crafted elliptic curve Diffie Hellman (ECDH) key exchanges, aka an "invalid curve attack." |
| CVE-2015-5600 | High | 2015-08-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The kbdint_next_device function in auth2-chall.c in sshd in OpenSSH through 6.9 does not properly restrict the processing of keyboard-interactive devices within a single connection, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute-force attacks or cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a long and duplicative list in the ssh -oKbdInteractiveDevices option, as demonstrated by a modified client that provides a different password for each pam element on this list. |
| CVE-2015-0204 | Medium | 2015-01-09 | Not applicable | Exploited | The ssl3_get_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k allows remote SSL servers to conduct RSA-to-EXPORT_RSA downgrade attacks and facilitate brute-force decryption by offering a weak ephemeral RSA key in a noncompliant role, related to the "FREAK" issue. NOTE: the scope of this CVE is only client code based on OpenSSL, not EXPORT_RSA issues associated with servers or other TLS implementations. |
| CVE-2014-3577 | Medium | 2014-08-21 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | org.apache.http.conn.ssl.AbstractVerifier in Apache HttpComponents HttpClient before 4.3.5 and HttpAsyncClient before 4.0.2 does not properly verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a "CN=" string in a field in the distinguished name (DN) of a certificate, as demonstrated by the "foo,CN=www.apache.org" string in the O field. |
| CVE-2011-4461 | Medium | 2011-12-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jetty 8.1.0.RC2 and earlier computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters. |