Overview 60 matches · 57 in Waratek scope · 13 protected · 18 exploited · 6 CISA KEV · 28 public PoC · 26 EPSS ≥ 0.5
60matches
57in Waratek scope95.0%
13protected21.7%
18exploited30.0%
6CISA KEV10.0%
28public PoC46.7%
26EPSS ≥ 0.543.3%
Protected by Waratek
13
21.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
14
23.3%
No exploit published
30
50.0%
Outside Waratek scope
3
5.0%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
13
21.7%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
47
78.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
18
30.0%
Working exploit published
10
16.7%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
1
1.7%
No public exploit
31
51.7%
split by
peak 10 / year
20092
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20101
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20111
Mitigation candidate1
Low1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20125
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published2
Critical1
High1
Medium3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked4
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit2
201310
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
High6
Medium3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked8
Exploited3
Working exploit published3
No public exploit4
20145
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope2
High2
Medium3
not blocked5
Exploited3
No public exploit2
20151
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
201610
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published8
Critical4
High2
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked9
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit8
20179
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published7
Critical2
High4
Medium3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked7
Exploited2
No public exploit7
20181
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20192
Mitigation candidate2
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20204
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published2
Critical2
High1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked2
Exploited2
Forecast only1
No public exploit1
20210
20221
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20234
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published3
Critical1
High2
Medium1
not blocked4
Exploited1
No public exploit3
20241
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20252
No exploit published2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20261
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-68493 | High | 2026-01-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Missing XML Validation vulnerability in Apache Struts, Apache Struts. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 before 2.2.1; Apache Struts: from 2.2.1 through 6.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.1.1, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2025-66675 | High | 2025-12-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Denial of Service vulnerability in Apache Struts, file leak in multipart request processing causes disk exhaustion. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 through 6.7.4, from 7.0.0 through 7.0.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.8.0 or 7.1.1, which fixes the issue. It's related to https://cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64775 - this CVE addresses missing affected version 6.7.4 |
| CVE-2025-64775 | High | 2025-12-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Denial of Service vulnerability in Apache Struts, file leak in multipart request processing causes disk exhaustion. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 through 6.7.0, from 7.0.0 through 7.0.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.8.0 or 7.1.1, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2024-53677 | Critical | 2024-12-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | File upload logic in Apache Struts is flawed. An attacker can manipulate file upload params to enable paths traversal and under some circumstances this can lead to uploading a malicious file which can be used to perform Remote Code Execution. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 before 6.4.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.4.0 at least and migrate to the new file upload mechanism https://struts.apache.org/core-developers/file-upload . If you are not using an old file upload logic based on FileuploadInterceptor your application is safe. You can find more details in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-067 |
| CVE-2023-50164 | Critical | 2023-12-07 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | An attacker can manipulate file upload params to enable paths traversal and under some circumstances this can lead to uploading a malicious file which can be used to perform Remote Code Execution. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions Struts 2.5.33 or Struts 6.3.0.2 or greater to fix this issue. |
| CVE-2023-41835 | High | 2023-12-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When a Multipart request is performed but some of the fields exceed the maxStringLength limit, the upload files will remain in struts.multipart.saveDir even if the request has been denied. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions Struts 2.5.32 or 6.1.2.2 or Struts 6.3.0.1 or greater, which fixe this issue. |
| CVE-2023-34396 | High | 2023-06-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Struts.This issue affects Apache Struts: through 2.5.30, through 6.1.2. Upgrade to Struts 2.5.31 or 6.1.2.1 or greater |
| CVE-2023-34149 | Medium | 2023-06-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Struts.This issue affects Apache Struts: through 2.5.30, through 6.1.2. Upgrade to Struts 2.5.31 or 6.1.2.1 or greater. |
| CVE-2021-31805 | Critical | 2022-04-12 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The fix issued for CVE-2020-17530 was incomplete. So from Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.29, still some of the tag’s attributes could perform a double evaluation if a developer applied forced OGNL evaluation by using the %{...} syntax. Using forced OGNL evaluation on untrusted user input can lead to a Remote Code Execution and security degradation. |
| CVE-2020-17530 | Critical | 2020-12-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Forced OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution. Affected software : Apache Struts 2.0.0 - Struts 2.5.25. |
| CVE-2019-0233 | High | 2020-09-14 | No exploit published | Forecast only | An access permission override in Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.20 may cause a Denial of Service when performing a file upload. |
| CVE-2019-0230 | Critical | 2020-09-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.20 forced double OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution. |
| CVE-2015-2992 | Medium | 2020-02-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts before 2.3.20 has a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2012-1592 | High | 2019-12-05 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | A local code execution issue exists in Apache Struts2 when processing malformed XSLT files, which could let a malicious user upload and execute arbitrary files. |
| CVE-2011-3923 | Critical | 2019-11-01 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Apache Struts before 2.3.1.2 allows remote attackers to bypass security protections in the ParameterInterceptor class and execute arbitrary commands. |
| CVE-2018-11776 | High | 2018-08-22 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts versions 2.3 to 2.3.34 and 2.5 to 2.5.16 suffer from possible Remote Code Execution when alwaysSelectFullNamespace is true (either by user or a plugin like Convention Plugin) and then: results are used with no namespace and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace and similar to results, same possibility when using url tag which doesn't have value and action set and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace. |
| CVE-2016-4461 | High | 2017-10-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.29 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a "%{}" sequence in a tag attribute, aka forced double OGNL evaluation. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2016-0785. |
| CVE-2015-5169 | Medium | 2017-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache Struts before 2.3.20. |
| CVE-2017-9804 | High | 2017-09-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Struts 2.3.7 through 2.3.33 and 2.5 through 2.5.12, if an application allows entering a URL in a form field and built-in URLValidator is used, it is possible to prepare a special URL which will be used to overload server process when performing validation of the URL. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for S2-047 / CVE-2017-7672. |
| CVE-2017-12611 | Critical | 2017-09-20 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.33 and 2.5 through 2.5.10.1, using an unintentional expression in a Freemarker tag instead of string literals can lead to a RCE attack. |
| CVE-2016-8738 | Medium | 2017-09-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Struts 2.5 through 2.5.5, if an application allows entering a URL in a form field and the built-in URLValidator is used, it is possible to prepare a special URL which will be used to overload server process when performing validation of the URL. |
| CVE-2015-5209 | High | 2017-08-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.24.1 allows remote attackers to manipulate Struts internals, alter user sessions, or affect container settings via vectors involving a top object. |
| CVE-2017-9787 | High | 2017-07-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When using a Spring AOP functionality to secure Struts actions it is possible to perform a DoS attack. Solution is to upgrade to Apache Struts version 2.5.12 or 2.3.33. |
| CVE-2017-7672 | Medium | 2017-07-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | If an application allows enter an URL in a form field and built-in URLValidator is used, it is possible to prepare a special URL which will be used to overload server process when performing validation of the URL. Solution is to upgrade to Apache Struts version 2.5.12. |
| CVE-2017-5638 | Critical | 2017-03-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Jakarta Multipart parser in Apache Struts 2 2.3.x before 2.3.32 and 2.5.x before 2.5.10.1 has incorrect exception handling and error-message generation during file-upload attempts, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted Content-Type, Content-Disposition, or Content-Length HTTP header, as exploited in the wild in March 2017 with a Content-Type header containing a #cmd= string. |
| CVE-2016-4436 | Critical | 2016-10-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.29 and 2.5.x before 2.5.1 allow attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors related to improper action name clean up. |
| CVE-2016-4465 | Medium | 2016-07-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The URLValidator class in Apache Struts 2 2.3.20 through 2.3.28.1 and 2.5.x before 2.5.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a null value for a URL field. |
| CVE-2016-4438 | Critical | 2016-07-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The REST plugin in Apache Struts 2 2.3.19 through 2.3.28.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted expression. |
| CVE-2016-3093 | Medium | 2016-06-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.24.1 does not properly cache method references when used with OGNL before 3.0.12, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (block access to a web site) via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2016-3087 | Critical | 2016-06-07 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to an ! (exclamation mark) operator to the REST Plugin. |
| CVE-2016-3082 | Critical | 2016-04-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XSLTResult in Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.20.2, 2.3.24.x before 2.3.24.2, and 2.3.28.x before 2.3.28.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the stylesheet location parameter. |
| CVE-2016-3081 | High | 2016-04-26 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via method: prefix, related to chained expressions. |
| CVE-2016-4003 | Medium | 2016-04-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the URLDecoder function in JRE before 1.8, as used in Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.28, when using a single byte page encoding, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via multi-byte characters in a url-encoded parameter. |
| CVE-2016-2162 | Medium | 2016-04-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.25 does not sanitize text in the Locale object constructed by I18NInterceptor, which might allow remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via unspecified vectors involving language display. |
| CVE-2016-0785 | High | 2016-04-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.28 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a "%{}" sequence in a tag attribute, aka forced double OGNL evaluation. |
| CVE-2015-1831 | High | 2015-07-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The default exclude patterns (excludeParams) in Apache Struts 2.3.20 allow remote attackers to "compromise internal state of an application" via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2014-7809 | Medium | 2014-12-10 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.x before 2.3.20 uses predictable <s:token/> values, which allows remote attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism. |
| CVE-2014-0116 | Medium | 2014-05-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | CookieInterceptor in Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.20, when a wildcard cookiesName value is used, does not properly restrict access to the getClass method, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and modify session state via a crafted request. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-0113. |
| CVE-2014-0113 | High | 2014-04-29 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | CookieInterceptor in Apache Struts before 2.3.20, when a wildcard cookiesName value is used, does not properly restrict access to the getClass method, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code via a crafted request. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-0094. |
| CVE-2014-0112 | High | 2014-04-29 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | ParametersInterceptor in Apache Struts before 2.3.20 does not properly restrict access to the getClass method, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code via a crafted request. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-0094. |
| CVE-2014-0094 | Medium | 2014-03-11 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The ParametersInterceptor in Apache Struts before 2.3.16.2 allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader via the class parameter, which is passed to the getClass method. |
| CVE-2013-6348 | Medium | 2013-11-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.3.15.3 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the namespace parameter to (1) actionNames.action and (2) showConfig.action in config-browser/. |
| CVE-2013-4316 | High | 2013-09-30 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15.1 enables Dynamic Method Invocation by default, which has unknown impact and attack vectors. |
| CVE-2013-4310 | Medium | 2013-09-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15.1 allows remote attackers to bypass access controls via a crafted action: prefix. |
| CVE-2013-2251 | Critical | 2013-07-20 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL expressions via a parameter with a crafted (1) action:, (2) redirect:, or (3) redirectAction: prefix. |
| CVE-2013-2248 | Medium | 2013-07-20 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple open redirect vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15 allow remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in a parameter using the (1) redirect: or (2) redirectAction: prefix. |
| CVE-2013-2135 | High | 2013-07-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a request with a crafted value that contains both "${}" and "%{}" sequences, which causes the OGNL code to be evaluated twice. |
| CVE-2013-2134 | High | 2013-07-16 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a request with a crafted action name that is not properly handled during wildcard matching, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-2135. |
| CVE-2013-2115 | High | 2013-07-10 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted request that is not properly handled when using the includeParams attribute in the (1) URL or (2) A tag. NOTE: this issue is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-1966. |
| CVE-2013-1966 | High | 2013-07-10 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted request that is not properly handled when using the includeParams attribute in the (1) URL or (2) A tag. |
| CVE-2013-1965 | High | 2013-07-10 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts Showcase App 2.0.0 through 2.3.13, as used in Struts 2 before 2.3.14.3, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted parameter name that is not properly handled when invoking a redirect. |
| CVE-2012-4386 | Medium | 2012-09-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The token check mechanism in Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 does not properly validate the token name configuration parameter, which allows remote attackers to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks by setting the token name configuration parameter to a session attribute. |
| CVE-2012-0838 | High | 2012-03-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2 before 2.2.3.1 evaluates a string as an OGNL expression during the handling of a conversion error, which allows remote attackers to modify run-time data values, and consequently execute arbitrary code, via invalid input to a field. |
| CVE-2012-0393 | Medium | 2012-01-08 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The ParameterInterceptor component in Apache Struts before 2.3.1.1 does not prevent access to public constructors, which allows remote attackers to create or overwrite arbitrary files via a crafted parameter that triggers the creation of a Java object. |
| CVE-2012-0392 | Medium | 2012-01-08 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The CookieInterceptor component in Apache Struts before 2.3.1.1 does not use the parameter-name whitelist, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted HTTP Cookie header that triggers Java code execution through a static method. |
| CVE-2012-0391 | Critical | 2012-01-08 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during certain exception handling for mismatched data types of properties, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code via a crafted parameter. |
| CVE-2011-1772 | Low | 2011-05-13 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in XWork in Apache Struts 2.x before 2.2.3, and OpenSymphony XWork in OpenSymphony WebWork, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving (1) an action name, (2) the action attribute of an s:submit element, or (3) the method attribute of an s:submit element. |
| CVE-2010-1870 | Medium | 2010-08-17 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The OGNL extensive expression evaluation capability in XWork in Struts 2.0.0 through 2.1.8.1, as used in Atlassian Fisheye, Crucible, and possibly other products, uses a permissive whitelist, which allows remote attackers to modify server-side context objects and bypass the "#" protection mechanism in ParameterInterceptors via the (1) #context, (2) #_memberAccess, (3) #root, (4) #this, (5) #_typeResolver, (6) #_classResolver, (7) #_traceEvaluations, (8) #_lastEvaluation, (9) #_keepLastEvaluation, and possibly other OGNL context variables, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-6504. |
| CVE-2008-6682 | Medium | 2009-04-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.x before 2.0.11.1 and 2.1.x before 2.1.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors associated with improper handling of (1) " (double quote) characters in the href attribute of an s:a tag and (2) parameters in the action attribute of an s:url tag. |
| CVE-2008-6505 | Medium | 2009-03-23 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.x before 2.0.12 and 2.1.x before 2.1.3 allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a ..%252f (encoded dot dot slash) in a URI with a /struts/ path, related to (1) FilterDispatcher in 2.0.x and (2) DefaultStaticContentLoader in 2.1.x. |