Oracle Critical Patch Update January 2023
Released January 2023 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, October 2022 · Critical Patch Update, April 2023 →
183 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
29Protected by Waratek4Mitigation candidate62No exploit published13Outside Waratek scope74Not applicable1Withdrawn CVE
10Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 39 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 9 matches · 6 protected · 4 exploited · 2 CISA KEV · 6 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
6
66.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
3
33.3%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
6
66.7%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
3
33.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
4
44.4%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
5
55.6%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 3 / quarter
Q2 181
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Q3 180
Q4 180
Q1 190
Q2 190
Q3 190
Q4 191
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Proof of concept only1
Q1 200
Q2 200
Q3 200
Q4 200
Q1 210
Q2 210
Q3 210
Q4 210
Q1 221
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Proof of concept only1
Q2 223
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
Critical3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked1
Exploited2
Proof of concept only1
Q3 221
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q4 222
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Proof of concept only1
Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21Q2 22Q4 22
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-31692 | Critical | 2022-10-31 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | Spring Security, versions 5.7 prior to 5.7.5 and 5.6 prior to 5.6.9 could be susceptible to authorization rules bypass via forward or include dispatcher types. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all of the following are true: The application expects that Spring Security applies security to forward and include dispatcher types. The application uses the AuthorizationFilter either manually or via the authorizeHttpRequests() method. The application configures the FilterChainProxy to apply to forward and/or include requests (e.g. spring.security.filter.dispatcher-types = request, error, async, forward, include). The application may forward or include the request to a higher privilege-secured endpoint.The application configures Spring Security to apply to every dispatcher type via authorizeHttpRequests().shouldFilterAllDispatcherTypes(true) |
| CVE-2022-42889 | Critical | 2022-10-13 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Commons Text performs variable interpolation, allowing properties to be dynamically evaluated and expanded. The standard format for interpolation is "${prefix:name}", where "prefix" is used to locate an instance of org.apache.commons.text.lookup.StringLookup that performs the interpolation. Starting with version 1.5 and continuing through 1.9, the set of default Lookup instances included interpolators that could result in arbitrary code execution or contact with remote servers. These lookups are: - "script" - execute expressions using the JVM script execution engine (javax.script) - "dns" - resolve dns records - "url" - load values from urls, including from remote servers Applications using the interpolation defaults in the affected versions may be vulnerable to remote code execution or unintentional contact with remote servers if untrusted configuration values are used. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Commons Text 1.10.0, which disables the problematic interpolators by default. |
| CVE-2022-33980 | Critical | 2022-07-06 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | Apache Commons Configuration performs variable interpolation, allowing properties to be dynamically evaluated and expanded. The standard format for interpolation is "${prefix:name}", where "prefix" is used to locate an instance of org.apache.commons.configuration2.interpol.Lookup that performs the interpolation. Starting with version 2.4 and continuing through 2.7, the set of default Lookup instances included interpolators that could result in arbitrary code execution or contact with remote servers. These lookups are: - "script" - execute expressions using the JVM script execution engine (javax.script) - "dns" - resolve dns records - "url" - load values from urls, including from remote servers Applications using the interpolation defaults in the affected versions may be vulnerable to remote code execution or unintentional contact with remote servers if untrusted configuration values are used. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Commons Configuration 2.8.0, which disables the problematic interpolators by default. |
| CVE-2022-22978 | Critical | 2022-05-19 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | In spring security versions prior to 5.4.11+, 5.5.7+ , 5.6.4+ and older unsupported versions, RegexRequestMatcher can easily be misconfigured to be bypassed on some servlet containers. Applications using RegexRequestMatcher with `.` in the regular expression are possibly vulnerable to an authorization bypass. |
| CVE-2021-31805 | Critical | 2022-04-12 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The fix issued for CVE-2020-17530 was incomplete. So from Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.29, still some of the tag’s attributes could perform a double evaluation if a developer applied forced OGNL evaluation by using the %{...} syntax. Using forced OGNL evaluation on untrusted user input can lead to a Remote Code Execution and security degradation. |
| CVE-2022-22965 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. |
| CVE-2022-23305 | Critical | 2022-01-18 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. |
| CVE-2019-17571 | Critical | 2019-12-20 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data. This affects Log4j versions up to 1.2 up to 1.2.17. |
| CVE-2018-1273 | Critical | 2018-04-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Spring Data Commons, versions prior to 1.13 to 1.13.10, 2.0 to 2.0.5, and older unsupported versions, contain a property binder vulnerability caused by improper neutralization of special elements. An unauthenticated remote malicious user (or attacker) can supply specially crafted request parameters against Spring Data REST backed HTTP resources or using Spring Data's projection-based request payload binding hat can lead to a remote code execution attack. |