Oracle Critical Patch Update October 2021
Released October 2021 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, July 2021 · Critical Patch Update, January 2022 →
231 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
26Protected by Waratek3Mitigation candidate72No exploit published42Outside Waratek scope88Not applicable
7Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 52 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 9 matches · 3 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 1 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 7 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
1
11.1%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
11.1%
No exploit published
1
11.1%
Outside Waratek scope
5
55.6%
Not applicable
1
11.1%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
11.1%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
8
88.9%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
11.1%
Working exploit published
4
44.4%
Proof of concept only
3
33.3%
Forecast only
1
11.1%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 3 / quarter
Q3 161
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q4 160
Q1 170
Q2 170
Q3 170
Q4 170
Q1 180
Q2 180
Q3 180
Q4 180
Q1 190
Q2 191
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q3 190
Q4 190
Q1 201
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q2 202
Protected by Waratek1
Outside Waratek scope1
High2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
Q3 200
Q4 200
Q1 211
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q2 213
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published1
Not applicable1
High3
not blocked3
Working exploit published2
Forecast only1
Q4 16Q2 17Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-23017 | High | 2021-06-01 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A security issue in nginx resolver was identified, which might allow an attacker who is able to forge UDP packets from the DNS server to cause 1-byte memory overwrite, resulting in worker process crash or potential other impact. |
| CVE-2021-29505 | High | 2021-05-28 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | XStream is software for serializing Java objects to XML and back again. A vulnerability in XStream versions prior to 1.4.17 may allow a remote attacker has sufficient rights to execute commands of the host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types is affected. The vulnerability is patched in version 1.4.17. |
| CVE-2021-28165 | High | 2021-04-01 | No exploit published | Forecast only | In Eclipse Jetty 7.2.2 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.1, CPU usage can reach 100% upon receiving a large invalid TLS frame. |
| CVE-2021-3156 | High | 2021-01-26 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | Sudo before 1.9.5p2 contains an off-by-one error that can result in a heap-based buffer overflow, which allows privilege escalation to root via "sudoedit -s" and a command-line argument that ends with a single backslash character. |
| CVE-2020-9484 | High | 2020-05-20 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed. |
| CVE-2020-1967 | High | 2020-04-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f). |
| CVE-2020-5398 | High | 2020-01-17 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a "Content-Disposition" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input. |
| CVE-2019-0227 | High | 2019-05-01 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affected the Apache Axis 1.4 distribution that was last released in 2006. Security and bug commits commits continue in the projects Axis 1.x Subversion repository, legacy users are encouraged to build from source. The successor to Axis 1.x is Axis2, the latest version is 1.7.9 and is not vulnerable to this issue. |
| CVE-2016-2183 | High | 2016-09-01 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack. |