Oracle Critical Patch Update January 2021
Released January 2021 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, October 2020 · Critical Patch Update, April 2021 →
202 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
25Protected by Waratek3Mitigation candidate78No exploit published59Outside Waratek scope37Not applicable
7Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 66 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 16 matches · 8 in Waratek scope · 6 protected · 7 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 14 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
6
37.5%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
6.2%
No exploit published
1
6.2%
Outside Waratek scope
7
43.8%
Not applicable
1
6.2%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
6
37.5%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
10
62.5%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
7
43.8%
Working exploit published
3
18.8%
Proof of concept only
4
25.0%
Forecast only
2
12.5%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 3 / quarter
Q2 151
Outside Waratek scope1
Low1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q3 150
Q4 150
Q1 160
Q2 160
Q3 160
Q4 160
Q1 170
Q2 170
Q3 170
Q4 170
Q1 180
Q2 180
Q3 180
Q4 180
Q1 190
Q2 192
Outside Waratek scope2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Q3 191
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Forecast only1
Q4 190
Q1 202
Protected by Waratek1
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Proof of concept only1
Q2 203
Protected by Waratek1
Outside Waratek scope2
High2
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
Q3 203
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical2
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
Q4 201
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q1 213
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published1
Critical1
High2
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked1
Exploited2
Forecast only1
Q3 15Q1 16Q3 16Q1 17Q3 17Q1 18Q3 18Q1 19Q3 19Q1 20Q3 20Q1 21
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-2114 | High | 2021-01-20 | No exploit published | Forecast only | Vulnerability in the Oracle Common Applications Calendar product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Applications Calendar). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.1-12.1.3 and 12.2.3-12.2.10. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Common Applications Calendar. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Common Applications Calendar, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Common Applications Calendar accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Common Applications Calendar accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2021-2109 | High | 2021-01-20 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Console). Supported versions that are affected are 10.3.6.0.0, 12.1.3.0.0, 12.2.1.3.0, 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.1.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebLogic Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebLogic Server. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2020-14756 | Critical | 2021-01-20 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Vulnerability in the Oracle Coherence product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Core Components). Supported versions that are affected are 3.7.1.0, 12.1.3.0.0, 12.2.1.3.0, 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.1.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via IIOP, T3 to compromise Oracle Coherence. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Coherence. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2020-8277 | High | 2020-11-19 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A Node.js application that allows an attacker to trigger a DNS request for a host of their choice could trigger a Denial of Service in versions < 15.2.1, < 14.15.1, and < 12.19.1 by getting the application to resolve a DNS record with a larger number of responses. This is fixed in 15.2.1, 14.15.1, and 12.19.1. |
| CVE-2019-0230 | Critical | 2020-09-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.20 forced double OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution. |
| CVE-2020-11984 | Critical | 2020-08-07 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | Apache HTTP server 2.4.32 to 2.4.44 mod_proxy_uwsgi info disclosure and possible RCE |
| CVE-2020-13935 | High | 2020-07-14 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated in Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56 and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service. |
| CVE-2020-9484 | High | 2020-05-20 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed. |
| CVE-2020-11022 | Medium | 2020-04-29 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | In jQuery starting with 1.12.0 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0. |
| CVE-2020-1967 | High | 2020-04-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f). |
| CVE-2020-5398 | High | 2020-01-17 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a "Content-Disposition" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input. |
| CVE-2020-2555 | Critical | 2020-01-15 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Vulnerability in the Oracle Coherence product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Caching,CacheStore,Invocation). Supported versions that are affected are 3.7.1.0, 12.1.3.0.0, 12.2.1.3.0 and 12.2.1.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via T3 to compromise Oracle Coherence. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Coherence. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2019-10173 | Critical | 2019-07-23 | Protected by Waratek | Forecast only | It was found that xstream API version 1.4.10 before 1.4.11 introduced a regression for a previous deserialization flaw. If the security framework has not been initialized, it may allow a remote attacker to run arbitrary shell commands when unmarshalling XML or any supported format. e.g. JSON. (regression of CVE-2013-7285) |
| CVE-2019-0227 | High | 2019-05-01 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affected the Apache Axis 1.4 distribution that was last released in 2006. Security and bug commits commits continue in the projects Axis 1.x Subversion repository, legacy users are encouraged to build from source. The successor to Axis 1.x is Axis2, the latest version is 1.7.9 and is not vulnerable to this issue. |
| CVE-2019-11358 | Medium | 2019-04-20 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. |
| CVE-2015-4000 | Low | 2015-05-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. |