Oracle Critical Patch Update April 2017
Released April 2017 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, January 2017 · Critical Patch Update, July 2017 →
227 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
17Protected by Waratek1Mitigation candidate95No exploit published13Outside Waratek scope101Not applicable
8Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 93 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 9 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
9matches
1in Waratek scope11.1%
0protected0.0%
1exploited11.1%
0CISA KEV0.0%
2public PoC22.2%
3EPSS ≥ 0.533.3%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
1
11.1%
Outside Waratek scope
2
22.2%
Not applicable
6
66.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
11.1%
Working exploit published
1
11.1%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
1
11.1%
No public exploit
6
66.7%
split by
peak 2 / quarter
Q4 121
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 131
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
Q2 131
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 130
Q4 130
Q1 140
Q2 140
Q3 141
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 140
Q1 151
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q2 151
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 150
Q4 151
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 160
Q2 162
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
Q4 12Q2 13Q4 13Q2 14Q4 14Q2 15Q4 15Q2 16
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-3739 | Medium | 2016-05-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The (1) mbed_connect_step1 function in lib/vtls/mbedtls.c and (2) polarssl_connect_step1 function in lib/vtls/polarssl.c in cURL and libcurl before 7.49.0, when using SSLv3 or making a TLS connection to a URL that uses a numerical IP address, allow remote attackers to spoof servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. |
| CVE-2016-2107 | Medium | 2016-05-05 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169. |
| CVE-2015-7940 | Medium | 2015-11-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.51 does not validate a point is withing the elliptic curve, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private keys via a series of crafted elliptic curve Diffie Hellman (ECDH) key exchanges, aka an "invalid curve attack." |
| CVE-2015-3237 | Medium | 2015-06-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The smb_request_state function in cURL and libcurl 7.40.0 through 7.42.1 allows remote SMB servers to obtain sensitive information from memory or cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and crash) via crafted length and offset values. |
| CVE-2015-0204 | Medium | 2015-01-09 | Not applicable | Exploited | The ssl3_get_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k allows remote SSL servers to conduct RSA-to-EXPORT_RSA downgrade attacks and facilitate brute-force decryption by offering a weak ephemeral RSA key in a noncompliant role, related to the "FREAK" issue. NOTE: the scope of this CVE is only client code based on OpenSSL, not EXPORT_RSA issues associated with servers or other TLS implementations. |
| CVE-2014-3596 | Medium | 2014-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The getCN function in Apache Axis 1.4 and earlier does not properly verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a certificate with a subject that specifies a common name in a field that is not the CN field. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-5784. |
| CVE-2013-1982 | Medium | 2013-06-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple integer overflows in X.org libXext 1.3.1 and earlier allow X servers to trigger allocation of insufficient memory and a buffer overflow via vectors related to the (1) XcupGetReservedColormapEntries, (2) XcupStoreColors, (3) XdbeGetVisualInfo, (4) XeviGetVisualInfo, (5) XShapeGetRectangles, and (6) XSyncListSystemCounters functions. |
| CVE-2013-2566 | Medium | 2013-03-15 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of ciphertext in a large number of sessions that use the same plaintext. |
| CVE-2012-5881 | Medium | 2012-11-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Flash component infrastructure in YUI 2.4.0 through 2.9.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to charts.swf, a similar issue to CVE-2010-4207. |