Oracle Critical Patch Update January 2017
Released January 2017 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, October 2016 · Critical Patch Update, April 2017 →
163 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
12Protected by Waratek89No exploit published16Outside Waratek scope46Not applicable
1Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 86 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 6 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
6matches
1in Waratek scope16.7%
1protected16.7%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
2EPSS ≥ 0.533.3%
Protected by Waratek
1
16.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
3
50.0%
Not applicable
2
33.3%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
16.7%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
5
83.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
1
16.7%
Forecast only
1
16.7%
No public exploit
4
66.7%
split by
peak 3 / month
Feb 161
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Mar 160
Apr 160
May 160
Jun 160
Jul 162
Protected by Waratek1
Outside Waratek scope1
High2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
No public exploit2
Aug 160
Sep 163
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable2
High3
not blocked3
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit1
Feb 16Mar 16Apr 16May 16Jun 16Jul 16Aug 16Sep 16
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-7052 | High | 2016-09-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) by triggering a CRL operation. |
| CVE-2016-6304 | High | 2016-09-26 | Not applicable | Forecast only | Multiple memory leaks in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u, 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i, and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via large OCSP Status Request extensions. |
| CVE-2016-2183 | High | 2016-09-01 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack. |
| CVE-2016-0635 | High | 2016-07-21 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Ops Center component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control 12.1.4, 12.2.2, and 12.3.2; the Oracle Health Sciences Information Manager component in Oracle Health Sciences Applications 1.2.8.3, 2.0.2.3, and 3.0.1.0; the Oracle Healthcare Master Person Index component in Oracle Health Sciences Applications 2.0.12, 3.0.0, and 4.0.1; the Oracle Documaker component in Oracle Insurance Applications before 12.5; the Oracle Insurance Calculation Engine component in Oracle Insurance Applications 9.7.1, 10.1.2, and 10.2.2; the Oracle Insurance Policy Administration J2EE and Oracle Insurance Rules Palette components in Oracle Insurance Applications 9.6.1, 9.7.1, 10.0.1, 10.1.2, 10.2.0, and 10.2.2; the Oracle Retail Integration Bus component in Oracle Retail Applications 15.0; the Oracle Retail Order Broker component in Oracle Retail Applications 5.1, 5.2, and 15.0; the Primavera Contract Management component in Oracle Primavera Products Suite 14.2; the Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management component in Oracle Primavera Products Suite 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 15.1, 15.2, and 16.1; the Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications Infrastructure component in Oracle Financial Services Applications 8.0.0, 8.0.1, 8.0.2, and 8.0.3; the Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager component in Oracle Commerce 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 11.0, 11.1, and 11.2; the Oracle Agile PLM component in Oracle Supply Chain Products Suite 9.3.4 and 9.3.5; the Oracle Communications BRM - Elastic Charging Engine 11.2.0.0.0 and 11.3.0.0.0; the Oracle Enterprise Repository Enterprise Repository 12.1.3.0.0; the Oracle Financial Services Behavior Detection Platform 8.0.1 and 8.0.2; the Oracle Hyperion Essbase 12.2.1.1; the Oracle Tuxedo System and Applications Monitor (TSAM) 11.1.1.2.0, 11.1.1.2.1, 11.1.1.2.1, 12.1.1.1.0, 12.1.3.0.0, and 12.2.2.0.0; the Oracle Communications WebRTC Session Controller component of Oracle Communications Applications (subcomponent: Security (Spring)) 7.0, 7.1 and 7.2; the Oracle Endeca Information Discovery Integrator 3.2; the Converged Commerce component of Oracle Retail Applications 16.0.1; the Oracle Identity Manager 11.1.2.3.0; Oracle Enterprise Manager for MySQL Database 12.1.0.4; Oracle Retail Invoice Matching 12.0, 13.0, 13.1, 13.2, 14.0, and 14.1; Oracle Communications Performance Intelligence Center (PIC) Software Prior to 10.2.1 and the Oracle Knowledge component of Oracle Siebel CRM (subcomponent: AnswerFlow (Spring Framework)) version 8.5.1.0 - 8.5.1.7 and 8.6.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-1182 | High | 2016-07-04 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | ActionServlet.java in Apache Struts 1 1.x through 1.3.10 does not properly restrict the Validator configuration, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks or cause a denial of service via crafted input, a related issue to CVE-2015-0899. |
| CVE-2016-0714 | High | 2016-02-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The session-persistence implementation in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.45, 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 mishandles session attributes, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager restrictions and execute arbitrary code in a privileged context via a web application that places a crafted object in a session. |