Overview 33 matches · 32 in Waratek scope · 16 protected · 20 exploited · 8 CISA KEV · 28 EPSS ≥ 0.5
33matches
32in Waratek scope97.0%
16protected48.5%
20exploited60.6%
8CISA KEV24.2%
28EPSS ≥ 0.584.8%
Protected by Waratek
16
48.5%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
16
48.5%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
3.0%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
16
48.5%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
17
51.5%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
20
60.6%
Working exploit published
13
39.4%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 6 / year
20051
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
20060
20070
20080
20091
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
20101
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20111
Mitigation candidate1
Low1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20125
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate4
Critical1
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked4
Exploited1
Working exploit published4
20136
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate4
Critical1
High4
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked4
Exploited3
Working exploit published3
20143
Mitigation candidate2
Outside Waratek scope1
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
Exploited3
20150
20162
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20174
Protected by Waratek4
Critical3
High1
blocked by ARMR today4
Exploited4
20181
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20192
Mitigation candidate2
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20202
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited2
20210
20221
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20231
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20241
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20250
20261
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-68493 | High | 2026-01-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Missing XML Validation vulnerability in Apache Struts, Apache Struts. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 before 2.2.1; Apache Struts: from 2.2.1 through 6.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.1.1, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2024-53677 | Critical | 2024-12-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | File upload logic in Apache Struts is flawed. An attacker can manipulate file upload params to enable paths traversal and under some circumstances this can lead to uploading a malicious file which can be used to perform Remote Code Execution. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 before 6.4.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.4.0 at least and migrate to the new file upload mechanism https://struts.apache.org/core-developers/file-upload . If you are not using an old file upload logic based on FileuploadInterceptor your application is safe. You can find more details in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-067 |
| CVE-2023-50164 | Critical | 2023-12-07 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | An attacker can manipulate file upload params to enable paths traversal and under some circumstances this can lead to uploading a malicious file which can be used to perform Remote Code Execution. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions Struts 2.5.33 or Struts 6.3.0.2 or greater to fix this issue. |
| CVE-2021-31805 | Critical | 2022-04-12 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The fix issued for CVE-2020-17530 was incomplete. So from Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.29, still some of the tag’s attributes could perform a double evaluation if a developer applied forced OGNL evaluation by using the %{...} syntax. Using forced OGNL evaluation on untrusted user input can lead to a Remote Code Execution and security degradation. |
| CVE-2020-17530 | Critical | 2020-12-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Forced OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution. Affected software : Apache Struts 2.0.0 - Struts 2.5.25. |
| CVE-2019-0230 | Critical | 2020-09-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.20 forced double OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution. |
| CVE-2012-1592 | High | 2019-12-05 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | A local code execution issue exists in Apache Struts2 when processing malformed XSLT files, which could let a malicious user upload and execute arbitrary files. |
| CVE-2011-3923 | Critical | 2019-11-01 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Apache Struts before 2.3.1.2 allows remote attackers to bypass security protections in the ParameterInterceptor class and execute arbitrary commands. |
| CVE-2018-11776 | High | 2018-08-22 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts versions 2.3 to 2.3.34 and 2.5 to 2.5.16 suffer from possible Remote Code Execution when alwaysSelectFullNamespace is true (either by user or a plugin like Convention Plugin) and then: results are used with no namespace and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace and similar to results, same possibility when using url tag which doesn't have value and action set and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace. |
| CVE-2017-12611 | Critical | 2017-09-20 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.33 and 2.5 through 2.5.10.1, using an unintentional expression in a Freemarker tag instead of string literals can lead to a RCE attack. |
| CVE-2017-9805 | High | 2017-09-15 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The REST Plugin in Apache Struts 2.1.1 through 2.3.x before 2.3.34 and 2.5.x before 2.5.13 uses an XStreamHandler with an instance of XStream for deserialization without any type filtering, which can lead to Remote Code Execution when deserializing XML payloads. |
| CVE-2017-9791 | Critical | 2017-07-10 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Struts 1 plugin in Apache Struts 2.1.x and 2.3.x might allow remote code execution via a malicious field value passed in a raw message to the ActionMessage. |
| CVE-2017-5638 | Critical | 2017-03-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Jakarta Multipart parser in Apache Struts 2 2.3.x before 2.3.32 and 2.5.x before 2.5.10.1 has incorrect exception handling and error-message generation during file-upload attempts, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted Content-Type, Content-Disposition, or Content-Length HTTP header, as exploited in the wild in March 2017 with a Content-Type header containing a #cmd= string. |
| CVE-2016-3087 | Critical | 2016-06-07 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to an ! (exclamation mark) operator to the REST Plugin. |
| CVE-2016-3081 | High | 2016-04-26 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via method: prefix, related to chained expressions. |
| CVE-2014-0113 | High | 2014-04-29 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | CookieInterceptor in Apache Struts before 2.3.20, when a wildcard cookiesName value is used, does not properly restrict access to the getClass method, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code via a crafted request. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-0094. |
| CVE-2014-0112 | High | 2014-04-29 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | ParametersInterceptor in Apache Struts before 2.3.20 does not properly restrict access to the getClass method, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code via a crafted request. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-0094. |
| CVE-2014-0094 | Medium | 2014-03-11 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The ParametersInterceptor in Apache Struts before 2.3.16.2 allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader via the class parameter, which is passed to the getClass method. |
| CVE-2013-2251 | Critical | 2013-07-20 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL expressions via a parameter with a crafted (1) action:, (2) redirect:, or (3) redirectAction: prefix. |
| CVE-2013-2248 | Medium | 2013-07-20 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple open redirect vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15 allow remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in a parameter using the (1) redirect: or (2) redirectAction: prefix. |
| CVE-2013-2134 | High | 2013-07-16 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a request with a crafted action name that is not properly handled during wildcard matching, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-2135. |
| CVE-2013-2115 | High | 2013-07-10 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted request that is not properly handled when using the includeParams attribute in the (1) URL or (2) A tag. NOTE: this issue is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-1966. |
| CVE-2013-1966 | High | 2013-07-10 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted request that is not properly handled when using the includeParams attribute in the (1) URL or (2) A tag. |
| CVE-2013-1965 | High | 2013-07-10 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts Showcase App 2.0.0 through 2.3.13, as used in Struts 2 before 2.3.14.3, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted parameter name that is not properly handled when invoking a redirect. |
| CVE-2012-1007 | Medium | 2012-02-07 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 1.3.10 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) the name parameter to struts-examples/upload/upload-submit.do, or the message parameter to (2) struts-cookbook/processSimple.do or (3) struts-cookbook/processDyna.do. |
| CVE-2012-1006 | Medium | 2012-02-07 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.14 and 2.2.3 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) name or (2) lastName parameter to struts2-showcase/person/editPerson.action, or the (3) clientName parameter to struts2-rest-showcase/orders. |
| CVE-2012-0393 | Medium | 2012-01-08 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The ParameterInterceptor component in Apache Struts before 2.3.1.1 does not prevent access to public constructors, which allows remote attackers to create or overwrite arbitrary files via a crafted parameter that triggers the creation of a Java object. |
| CVE-2012-0392 | Medium | 2012-01-08 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The CookieInterceptor component in Apache Struts before 2.3.1.1 does not use the parameter-name whitelist, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted HTTP Cookie header that triggers Java code execution through a static method. |
| CVE-2012-0391 | Critical | 2012-01-08 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during certain exception handling for mismatched data types of properties, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code via a crafted parameter. |
| CVE-2011-1772 | Low | 2011-05-13 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in XWork in Apache Struts 2.x before 2.2.3, and OpenSymphony XWork in OpenSymphony WebWork, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving (1) an action name, (2) the action attribute of an s:submit element, or (3) the method attribute of an s:submit element. |
| CVE-2010-1870 | Medium | 2010-08-17 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The OGNL extensive expression evaluation capability in XWork in Struts 2.0.0 through 2.1.8.1, as used in Atlassian Fisheye, Crucible, and possibly other products, uses a permissive whitelist, which allows remote attackers to modify server-side context objects and bypass the "#" protection mechanism in ParameterInterceptors via the (1) #context, (2) #_memberAccess, (3) #root, (4) #this, (5) #_typeResolver, (6) #_classResolver, (7) #_traceEvaluations, (8) #_lastEvaluation, (9) #_keepLastEvaluation, and possibly other OGNL context variables, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-6504. |
| CVE-2008-6505 | Medium | 2009-03-23 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.x before 2.0.12 and 2.1.x before 2.1.3 allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a ..%252f (encoded dot dot slash) in a URI with a /struts/ path, related to (1) FilterDispatcher in 2.0.x and (2) DefaultStaticContentLoader in 2.1.x. |
| CVE-2005-3745 | Medium | 2005-11-22 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache Struts 1.2.7, and possibly other versions allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the query string, which is not properly quoted or filtered when the request handler generates an error message. |