WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Product application testing suite✕Has a public PoC✕
Overview 16 matches · 10 in Waratek scope · 6 protected · 3 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 10 EPSS ≥ 0.5
16matches 10in Waratek scope62.5% 6protected37.5% 3exploited18.8% 1CISA KEV6.2% 10EPSS ≥ 0.562.5%
Protected by Waratek 6 37.5% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 4 25.0% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 6 37.5% Not applicable 0 0.0% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 3 18.8% High 7 43.8% Medium 6 37.5% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 6 37.5% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 10 62.5% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 3 18.8% Working exploit published 5 31.2% Proof of concept only 8 50.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 3 / quarter
Outside Waratek scope: 6Mitigation candidate: 4Protected by Waratek: 6 Medium: 6High: 7Critical: 3 not blocked: 10blocked by ARMR today: 6 Proof of concept only: 8Working exploit published: 5Exploited: 3
Q1 162 Protected by Waratek1 Mitigation candidate1 Medium2 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked1 Working exploit published2 Q2 160 Q3 160 Q4 160 Q1 170 Q2 171 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1 Q3 170 Q4 171 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 not blocked1 Proof of concept only1 Q1 180 Q2 182 Protected by Waratek2 Critical1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today2 Working exploit published1 Proof of concept only1 Q3 180 Q4 180 Q1 190 Q2 192 Outside Waratek scope2 High1 Medium1 not blocked2 Exploited1 Working exploit published1 Q3 190 Q4 191 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Proof of concept only1 Q1 201 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 not blocked1 Proof of concept only1 Q2 202 Outside Waratek scope2 Medium2 not blocked2 Exploited2 Q3 200 Q4 201 Mitigation candidate1 High1 not blocked1 Proof of concept only1 Q1 213 Protected by Waratek1 Mitigation candidate2 High3 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked2 Proof of concept only3
Q1 16Q3 16Q1 17Q3 17Q1 18Q3 18Q1 19Q3 19Q1 20Q3 20Q1 21
16 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2020-36179 High 2021-01-07 Mitigation candidate Proof of concept only FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to oadd.org.apache.commons.dbcp.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS.
CVE-2020-36188 High 2021-01-06 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to com.newrelic.agent.deps.ch.qos.logback.core.db.JNDIConnectionSource.
CVE-2020-36184 High 2021-01-06 Mitigation candidate Proof of concept only FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp2.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource.
CVE-2020-35728 High 2020-12-27 Mitigation candidate Proof of concept only FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to com.oracle.wls.shaded.org.apache.xalan.lib.sql.JNDIConnectionPool (aka embedded Xalan in org.glassfish.web/javax.servlet.jsp.jstl).
CVE-2020-11023 Medium 2020-04-29 Outside Waratek scope Exploited In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.0.3 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0.
CVE-2020-11022 Medium 2020-04-29 Outside Waratek scope Exploited In jQuery starting with 1.12.0 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0.
CVE-2020-5398 High 2020-01-17 Outside Waratek scope Proof of concept only In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a "Content-Disposition" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input.
CVE-2019-17571 Critical 2019-12-20 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data. This affects Log4j versions up to 1.2 up to 1.2.17.
CVE-2019-0227 High 2019-05-01 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affected the Apache Axis 1.4 distribution that was last released in 2006. Security and bug commits commits continue in the projects Axis 1.x Subversion repository, legacy users are encouraged to build from source. The successor to Axis 1.x is Axis2, the latest version is 1.7.9 and is not vulnerable to this issue.
CVE-2019-11358 Medium 2019-04-20 Outside Waratek scope Exploited jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype.
CVE-2018-1271 Medium 2018-04-06 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources (e.g. CSS, JS, images). When static resources are served from a file system on Windows (as opposed to the classpath, or the ServletContext), a malicious user can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack.
CVE-2018-1270 Critical 2018-04-06 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack.
CVE-2016-8610 High 2017-11-13 Outside Waratek scope Proof of concept only A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients.
CVE-2017-5645 Critical 2017-04-17 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2016-0492 Medium 2016-01-21 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Application Testing Suite component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control 12.4.0.2 and 12.5.0.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Load Testing for Web Apps, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0488. NOTE: the previous information is from the January 2016 CPU. Oracle has not commented on third-party claims that this is a directory traversal vulnerability in the isAllowedUrl function, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via directory traversal sequences following a URI entry that does not require authentication, as demonstrated by olt/Login.do/../../olt/UploadFileUpload.do.
CVE-2016-0491 Medium 2016-01-21 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Application Testing Suite component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control 12.4.0.2 and 12.5.0.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity and availability via unknown vectors related to Load Testing for Web Apps. NOTE: the previous information is from the January 2016 CPU. Oracle has not commented on third-party claims that the UploadFileAction servlet allows remote authenticated users to upload and execute arbitrary files via an * (asterisk) character in the fileType parameter.