Overview 421 matches · 88 protected · 16 exploited · 10 CISA KEV · 84 public PoC · 52 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
89
21.1%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
57
13.5%
No exploit published
275
65.3%
blocked by ARMR today
88
20.9%
partly blocked
1
0.2%
not blocked
332
78.9%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 89 / year
20003
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published1
Medium3
not blocked3
Working exploit published2
No public exploit1
20013
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published2
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
200212
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published5
High3
Medium9
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked11
Working exploit published6
No public exploit6
20037
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published4
High1
Medium6
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked6
Working exploit published3
No public exploit4
20041
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20059
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published7
High1
Medium7
Low1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked8
Working exploit published2
No public exploit7
20065
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate2
High2
Medium3
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked2
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit2
200718
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published10
High1
Medium14
Low3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked16
Working exploit published7
No public exploit11
20089
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published5
Medium9
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked7
Working exploit published4
No public exploit5
200918
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published9
High2
Medium15
Low1
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked15
Working exploit published8
No public exploit10
201020
Protected by Waratek4
Mitigation candidate5
No exploit published11
Critical1
High1
Medium15
Low3
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked16
Working exploit published6
Forecast only1
No public exploit13
201120
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published17
High2
Medium15
Low3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked19
Working exploit published2
No public exploit18
201237
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate7
No exploit published28
Critical1
High2
Medium33
Low1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked35
Exploited1
Working exploit published7
No public exploit29
201334
Protected by Waratek8
Mitigation candidate8
No exploit published18
Critical1
High10
Medium23
blocked by ARMR today8
not blocked26
Exploited4
Working exploit published6
No public exploit24
201438
Protected by Waratek12
Mitigation candidate3
No exploit published23
High8
Medium27
Low3
blocked by ARMR today12
not blocked26
Exploited3
Working exploit published2
No public exploit33
201526
Protected by Waratek9
No exploit published17
High9
Medium17
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked17
Working exploit published2
No public exploit24
201672
Protected by Waratek22
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published46
Critical14
High31
Medium27
blocked by ARMR today21
partly blocked1
not blocked50
Exploited4
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit58
201789
Protected by Waratek18
No exploit published71
Critical17
High45
Medium27
blocked by ARMR today18
not blocked71
Exploited3
Working exploit published2
No public exploit84
200120032005200720092011201320152017
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-3163 | High | 2017-08-30 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | When using the Index Replication feature, Apache Solr nodes can pull index files from a master/leader node using an HTTP API which accepts a file name. However, Solr before 5.5.4 and 6.x before 6.4.1 did not validate the file name, hence it was possible to craft a special request involving path traversal, leaving any file readable to the Solr server process exposed. Solr servers protected and restricted by firewall rules and/or authentication would not be at risk since only trusted clients and users would gain direct HTTP access. |
| CVE-2016-5001 | Medium | 2017-08-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | This is an information disclosure vulnerability in Apache Hadoop before 2.6.4 and 2.7.x before 2.7.2 in the short-circuit reads feature of HDFS. A local user on an HDFS DataNode may be able to craft a block token that grants unauthorized read access to random files by guessing certain fields in the token. |
| CVE-2017-3155 | Medium | 2017-08-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Atlas versions 0.6.0-incubating and 0.7.0-incubating were found vulnerable to cross frame scripting. |
| CVE-2017-3154 | High | 2017-08-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Error responses from Apache Atlas versions 0.6.0-incubating and 0.7.0-incubating included stack trace, exposing excessive information. |
| CVE-2017-3153 | Medium | 2017-08-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Atlas versions 0.6.0-incubating and 0.7.0-incubating were found vulnerable to Reflected XSS in the search functionality. |
| CVE-2017-3152 | Medium | 2017-08-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Atlas versions 0.6.0-incubating and 0.7.0-incubating were found vulnerable to DOM XSS in the edit-tag functionality. |
| CVE-2017-3151 | Medium | 2017-08-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Atlas versions 0.6.0-incubating and 0.7.0-incubating were found vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in the edit-tag functionality. |
| CVE-2017-3150 | Medium | 2017-08-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Atlas versions 0.6.0-incubating and 0.7.0-incubating use cookies that could be accessible to client-side script. |
| CVE-2016-8752 | High | 2017-08-29 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Atlas versions 0.6.0 (incubating), 0.7.0 (incubating), and 0.7.1 (incubating) allow access to the webapp directory contents by pointing to URIs like /js and /img. |
| CVE-2015-5209 | High | 2017-08-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.24.1 allows remote attackers to manipulate Struts internals, alter user sessions, or affect container settings via vectors involving a top object. |
| CVE-2017-7675 | High | 2017-08-11 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The HTTP/2 implementation in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M21 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.15 bypassed a number of security checks that prevented directory traversal attacks. It was therefore possible to bypass security constraints using a specially crafted URL. |
| CVE-2017-7674 | Medium | 2017-08-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The CORS Filter in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M21, 8.5.0 to 8.5.15, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.44 and 7.0.41 to 7.0.78 did not add an HTTP Vary header indicating that the response varies depending on Origin. This permitted client and server side cache poisoning in some circumstances. |
| CVE-2016-6796 | High | 2017-08-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A malicious web application running on Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70 and 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 was able to bypass a configured SecurityManager via manipulation of the configuration parameters for the JSP Servlet. |
| CVE-2017-3156 | High | 2017-08-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The OAuth2 Hawk and JOSE MAC Validation code in Apache CXF prior to 3.0.13 and 3.1.x prior to 3.1.10 is not using a constant time MAC signature comparison algorithm which may be exploited by sophisticated timing attacks. |
| CVE-2016-8745 | High | 2017-08-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A bug in the error handling of the send file code for the NIO HTTP connector in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M13, 8.5.0 to 8.5.8, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.39, 7.0.0 to 7.0.73 and 6.0.16 to 6.0.48 resulted in the current Processor object being added to the Processor cache multiple times. This in turn meant that the same Processor could be used for concurrent requests. Sharing a Processor can result in information leakage between requests including, not not limited to, session ID and the response body. The bug was first noticed in 8.5.x onwards where it appears the refactoring of the Connector code for 8.5.x onwards made it more likely that the bug was observed. Initially it was thought that the 8.5.x refactoring introduced the bug but further investigation has shown that the bug is present in all currently supported Tomcat versions. |
| CVE-2016-8739 | High | 2017-08-10 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The JAX-RS module in Apache CXF prior to 3.0.12 and 3.1.x prior to 3.1.9 provides a number of Atom JAX-RS MessageBodyReaders. These readers use Apache Abdera Parser which expands XML entities by default which represents a major XXE risk. |
| CVE-2016-6817 | High | 2017-08-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The HTTP/2 header parser in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M11 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.6 entered an infinite loop if a header was received that was larger than the available buffer. This made a denial of service attack possible. |
| CVE-2016-6812 | Medium | 2017-08-10 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The HTTP transport module in Apache CXF prior to 3.0.12 and 3.1.x prior to 3.1.9 uses FormattedServiceListWriter to provide an HTML page which lists the names and absolute URL addresses of the available service endpoints. The module calculates the base URL using the current HttpServletRequest. The calculated base URL is used by FormattedServiceListWriter to build the service endpoint absolute URLs. If the unexpected matrix parameters have been injected into the request URL then these matrix parameters will find their way back to the client in the services list page which represents an XSS risk to the client. |
| CVE-2016-6797 | High | 2017-08-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The ResourceLinkFactory implementation in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70 and 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 did not limit web application access to global JNDI resources to those resources explicitly linked to the web application. Therefore, it was possible for a web application to access any global JNDI resource whether an explicit ResourceLink had been configured or not. |
| CVE-2016-6794 | Medium | 2017-08-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When a SecurityManager is configured, a web application's ability to read system properties should be controlled by the SecurityManager. In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70, 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 the system property replacement feature for configuration files could be used by a malicious web application to bypass the SecurityManager and read system properties that should not be visible. |
| CVE-2016-5018 | Critical | 2017-08-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70 and 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 a malicious web application was able to bypass a configured SecurityManager via a Tomcat utility method that was accessible to web applications. |
| CVE-2017-9799 | High | 2017-08-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was found that under some situations and configurations of Apache Storm 1.x before 1.0.4 and 1.1.x before 1.1.1, it is theoretically possible for the owner of a topology to trick the supervisor to launch a worker as a different, non-root, user. In the worst case this could lead to secure credentials of the other user being compromised. |
| CVE-2012-0803 | Critical | 2017-08-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The WS-SP UsernameToken policy in Apache CXF 2.4.5 and 2.5.1 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending an empty UsernameToken as part of a SOAP request. |
| CVE-2011-4343 | High | 2017-08-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Information disclosure vulnerability in Apache MyFaces Core 2.0.1 through 2.0.10 and 2.1.0 through 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to inject EL expressions via crafted parameters. |
| CVE-2017-9801 | High | 2017-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When a call-site passes a subject for an email that contains line-breaks in Apache Commons Email 1.0 through 1.4, the caller can add arbitrary SMTP headers. |
| CVE-2016-6798 | Critical | 2017-07-19 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In the XSS Protection API module before 1.0.12 in Apache Sling, the method XSS.getValidXML() uses an insecure SAX parser to validate the input string, which allows for XXE attacks in all scripts which use this method to validate user input, potentially allowing an attacker to read sensitive data on the filesystem, perform same-site-request-forgery (SSRF), port-scanning behind the firewall or DoS the application. |
| CVE-2016-5394 | Medium | 2017-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In the XSS Protection API module before 1.0.12 in Apache Sling, the encoding done by the XSSAPI.encodeForJSString() method is not restrictive enough and for some input patterns allows script tags to pass through unencoded, leading to potential XSS vulnerabilities. |
| CVE-2017-7688 | High | 2017-07-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 updates user password in insecure manner. |
| CVE-2017-7685 | Medium | 2017-07-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 responds to the following insecure HTTP methods: PUT, DELETE, HEAD, and PATCH. |
| CVE-2017-7684 | High | 2017-07-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 doesn't check contents of files being uploaded. An attacker can cause a denial of service by uploading multiple large files to the server. |
| CVE-2017-7683 | High | 2017-07-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 displays Tomcat version and detailed error stack trace, which is not secure. |
| CVE-2017-7682 | High | 2017-07-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache OpenMeetings 3.2.0 is vulnerable to parameter manipulation attacks, as a result attacker has access to restricted areas. |
| CVE-2017-7681 | High | 2017-07-17 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. This allows authenticated users to modify the structure of the existing query and leak the structure of other queries being made by the application in the back-end. |
| CVE-2017-7680 | High | 2017-07-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 has an overly permissive crossdomain.xml file. This allows for flash content to be loaded from untrusted domains. |
| CVE-2017-7673 | Critical | 2017-07-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 uses not very strong cryptographic storage, captcha is not used in registration and forget password dialogs and auth forms missing brute force protection. |
| CVE-2017-7666 | High | 2017-07-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks, XSS attacks, click-jacking, and MIME based attacks. |
| CVE-2017-7664 | Critical | 2017-07-17 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Uploaded XML documents were not correctly validated in Apache OpenMeetings 3.1.0. |
| CVE-2017-7663 | Medium | 2017-07-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Both global and Room chat are vulnerable to XSS attack in Apache OpenMeetings 3.2.0. |
| CVE-2017-9787 | High | 2017-07-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When using a Spring AOP functionality to secure Struts actions it is possible to perform a DoS attack. Solution is to upgrade to Apache Struts version 2.5.12 or 2.3.33. |
| CVE-2017-7672 | Medium | 2017-07-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | If an application allows enter an URL in a form field and built-in URLValidator is used, it is possible to prepare a special URL which will be used to overload server process when performing validation of the URL. Solution is to upgrade to Apache Struts version 2.5.12. |
| CVE-2017-7678 | Medium | 2017-07-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Spark before 2.2.0, it is possible for an attacker to take advantage of a user's trust in the server to trick them into visiting a link that points to a shared Spark cluster and submits data including MHTML to the Spark master, or history server. This data, which could contain a script, would then be reflected back to the user and could be evaluated and executed by MS Windows-based clients. It is not an attack on Spark itself, but on the user, who may then execute the script inadvertently when viewing elements of the Spark web UIs. |
| CVE-2017-9791 | Critical | 2017-07-10 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Struts 1 plugin in Apache Struts 2.1.x and 2.3.x might allow remote code execution via a malicious field value passed in a raw message to the ActionMessage. |
| CVE-2017-7660 | High | 2017-07-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Solr uses a PKI based mechanism to secure inter-node communication when security is enabled. It is possible to create a specially crafted node name that does not exist as part of the cluster and point it to a malicious node. This can trick the nodes in cluster to believe that the malicious node is a member of the cluster. So, if Solr users have enabled BasicAuth authentication mechanism using the BasicAuthPlugin or if the user has implemented a custom Authentication plugin, which does not implement either "HttpClientInterceptorPlugin" or "HttpClientBuilderPlugin", his/her servers are vulnerable to this attack. Users who only use SSL without basic authentication or those who use Kerberos are not affected. |
| CVE-2017-7686 | High | 2017-06-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Ignite 1.0.0-RC3 to 2.0 uses an update notifier component to update the users about new project releases that include additional functionality, bug fixes and performance improvements. To do that the component communicates to an external PHP server (http://ignite.run) where it needs to send some system properties like Apache Ignite or Java version. Some of the properties might contain user sensitive information. |
| CVE-2017-7677 | Medium | 2017-06-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In environments that use external location for hive tables, Hive Authorizer in Apache Ranger before 0.7.1 should be checking RWX permission for create table. |
| CVE-2017-7676 | Critical | 2017-06-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Policy resource matcher in Apache Ranger before 0.7.1 ignores characters after '*' wildcard character - like my*test, test*.txt. This can result in unintended behavior. |
| CVE-2016-8751 | Medium | 2017-06-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Ranger before 0.6.3 is vulnerable to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting in when entering custom policy conditions. Admin users can store some arbitrary javascript code to be executed when normal users login and access policies. |
| CVE-2016-8746 | Medium | 2017-06-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Ranger before 0.6.3 policy engine incorrectly matches paths in certain conditions when policy does not contain wildcards and has recursion flag set to true. |
| CVE-2017-7667 | High | 2017-06-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache NiFi before 0.7.4 and 1.x before 1.3.0 need to establish the response header telling browsers to only allow framing with the same origin. |
| CVE-2017-7665 | Medium | 2017-06-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache NiFi before 0.7.4 and 1.x before 1.3.0, there are certain user input components in the UI which had been guarding for some forms of XSS issues but were insufficient. |
| CVE-2015-5175 | High | 2017-06-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Application plugins in Apache CXF Fediz before 1.1.3 and 1.2.x before 1.2.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service. |
| CVE-2016-5004 | Medium | 2017-06-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Content-Encoding HTTP header feature in ws-xmlrpc 3.1.3 as used in Apache Archiva allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) by decompressing a large file containing zeroes. |
| CVE-2017-7669 | High | 2017-06-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Hadoop 2.8.0, 3.0.0-alpha1, and 3.0.0-alpha2, the LinuxContainerExecutor runs docker commands as root with insufficient input validation. When the docker feature is enabled, authenticated users can run commands as root. |
| CVE-2016-3083 | High | 2017-05-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Hive (JDBC + HiveServer2) implements SSL for plain TCP and HTTP connections (it supports both transport modes). While validating the server's certificate during the connection setup, the client in Apache Hive before 1.2.2 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 doesn't seem to be verifying the common name attribute of the certificate. In this way, if a JDBC client sends an SSL request to server abc.com, and the server responds with a valid certificate (certified by CA) but issued to xyz.com, the client will accept that as a valid certificate and the SSL handshake will go through. |
| CVE-2017-5646 | Medium | 2017-05-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | For versions of Apache Knox from 0.2.0 to 0.11.0 - an authenticated user may use a specially crafted URL to impersonate another user while accessing WebHDFS through Apache Knox. This may result in escalated privileges and unauthorized data access. While this activity is audit logged and can be easily associated with the authenticated user, this is still a serious security issue. All users are recommended to upgrade to the Apache Knox 0.12.0 release. |
| CVE-2017-5657 | High | 2017-05-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Several REST service endpoints of Apache Archiva are not protected against Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. A malicious site opened in the same browser as the archiva site, may send an HTML response that performs arbitrary actions on archiva services, with the same rights as the active archiva session (e.g. administrator rights). |
| CVE-2015-5241 | Medium | 2017-05-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | After logging into the portal, the logout jsp page redirects the browser back to the login page after. It is feasible for malicious users to redirect the browser to an unintended web page in Apache jUDDI 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.4, and 3.1.5 when utilizing the portlets based user interface also known as 'Pluto', 'jUDDI Portal', 'UDDI Portal' or 'uddi-console'. User session data, credentials, and auth tokens are cleared before the redirect. |
| CVE-2017-7662 | High | 2017-05-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache CXF Fediz ships with an OpenId Connect (OIDC) service which has a Client Registration Service, which is a simple web application that allows clients to be created, deleted, etc. A CSRF (Cross Style Request Forgery) style vulnerability has been found in this web application in Apache CXF Fediz prior to 1.4.0 and 1.3.2, meaning that a malicious web application could create new clients, or reset secrets, etc, after the admin user has logged on to the client registration service and the session is still active. |
| CVE-2017-7661 | High | 2017-05-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache CXF Fediz ships with a number of container-specific plugins to enable WS-Federation for applications. A CSRF (Cross Style Request Forgery) style vulnerability has been found in the Spring 2, Spring 3, Jetty 8 and Jetty 9 plugins in Apache CXF Fediz prior to 1.4.0, 1.3.2 and 1.2.4. |
| CVE-2016-8741 | High | 2017-05-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Apache Qpid Broker for Java can be configured to use different so called AuthenticationProviders to handle user authentication. Among the choices are the SCRAM-SHA-1 and SCRAM-SHA-256 AuthenticationProvider types. It was discovered that these AuthenticationProviders in Apache Qpid Broker for Java 6.0.x before 6.0.6 and 6.1.x before 6.1.1 prematurely terminate the SCRAM SASL negotiation if the provided user name does not exist thus allowing remote attacker to determine the existence of user accounts. The Vulnerability does not apply to AuthenticationProviders other than SCRAM-SHA-1 and SCRAM-SHA-256. |
| CVE-2017-3162 | High | 2017-04-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | HDFS clients interact with a servlet on the DataNode to browse the HDFS namespace. The NameNode is provided as a query parameter that is not validated in Apache Hadoop before 2.7.0. |
| CVE-2017-3161 | Medium | 2017-04-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The HDFS web UI in Apache Hadoop before 2.7.0 is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack through an unescaped query parameter. |
| CVE-2017-5661 | High | 2017-04-18 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Apache FOP before 2.2, files lying on the filesystem of the server which uses FOP can be revealed to arbitrary users who send maliciously formed SVG files. The file types that can be shown depend on the user context in which the exploitable application is running. If the user is root a full compromise of the server - including confidential or sensitive files - would be possible. XXE can also be used to attack the availability of the server via denial of service as the references within a xml document can trivially trigger an amplification attack. |
| CVE-2017-5656 | High | 2017-04-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache CXF's STSClient before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 uses a flawed way of caching tokens that are associated with delegation tokens, which means that an attacker could craft a token which would return an identifer corresponding to a cached token for another user. |
| CVE-2017-5653 | Medium | 2017-04-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers. |
| CVE-2017-5651 | Critical | 2017-04-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M18 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.12, the refactoring of the HTTP connectors introduced a regression in the send file processing. If the send file processing completed quickly, it was possible for the Processor to be added to the processor cache twice. This could result in the same Processor being used for multiple requests which in turn could lead to unexpected errors and/or response mix-up. |
| CVE-2017-5650 | High | 2017-04-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M18 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.12, the handling of an HTTP/2 GOAWAY frame for a connection did not close streams associated with that connection that were currently waiting for a WINDOW_UPDATE before allowing the application to write more data. These waiting streams each consumed a thread. A malicious client could therefore construct a series of HTTP/2 requests that would consume all available processing threads. |
| CVE-2017-5648 | Critical | 2017-04-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | While investigating bug 60718, it was noticed that some calls to application listeners in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M17, 8.5.0 to 8.5.11, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.41, and 7.0.0 to 7.0.75 did not use the appropriate facade object. When running an untrusted application under a SecurityManager, it was therefore possible for that untrusted application to retain a reference to the request or response object and thereby access and/or modify information associated with another web application. |
| CVE-2017-5647 | High | 2017-04-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A bug in the handling of the pipelined requests in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M18, 8.5.0 to 8.5.12, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.42, 7.0.0 to 7.0.76, and 6.0.0 to 6.0.52, when send file was used, results in the pipelined request being lost when send file processing of the previous request completed. This could result in responses appearing to be sent for the wrong request. For example, a user agent that sent requests A, B and C could see the correct response for request A, the response for request C for request B and no response for request C. |
| CVE-2017-5645 | Critical | 2017-04-17 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2016-4970 | High | 2017-04-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | handler/ssl/OpenSslEngine.java in Netty 4.0.x before 4.0.37.Final and 4.1.x before 4.1.1.Final allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop). |
| CVE-2016-6811 | High | 2017-04-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Hadoop 2.x before 2.7.4, a user who can escalate to yarn user can possibly run arbitrary commands as root user. |
| CVE-2016-6805 | Medium | 2017-04-07 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Ignite before 1.9 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read arbitrary files via XXE in modified update-notifier documents. |
| CVE-2016-8735 | Critical | 2017-04-06 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Remote code execution is possible with Apache Tomcat before 6.0.48, 7.x before 7.0.73, 8.x before 8.0.39, 8.5.x before 8.5.7, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M12 if JmxRemoteLifecycleListener is used and an attacker can reach JMX ports. The issue exists because this listener wasn't updated for consistency with the CVE-2016-3427 Oracle patch that affected credential types. |
| CVE-2016-6809 | Critical | 2017-04-06 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Tika before 1.14 allows Java code execution for serialized objects embedded in MATLAB files. The issue exists because Tika invokes JMatIO to do native deserialization. |
| CVE-2017-5649 | High | 2017-04-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Geode before 1.1.1, when a cluster has enabled security by setting the security-manager property, allows remote authenticated users with CLUSTER:READ but not DATA:READ permission to access the data browser page in Pulse and consequently execute an OQL query that exposes data stored in the cluster. |
| CVE-2016-4976 | Medium | 2017-03-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Ambari 2.x before 2.4.0 includes KDC administrator passwords on the kadmin command line, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information via a process listing. |
| CVE-2016-8749 | Critical | 2017-03-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Camel's Jackson and JacksonXML unmarshalling operation are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution attacks. |
| CVE-2016-6807 | Critical | 2017-03-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Custom commands may be executed on Ambari Agent (2.4.x, before 2.4.2) hosts without authorization, leading to unauthorized access to operations that may affect the underlying system. Such operations are invoked by the Ambari Agent process on Ambari Agent hosts, as the user executing the Ambari Agent process. |
| CVE-2017-5644 | Medium | 2017-03-24 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache POI in versions prior to release 3.15 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a specially crafted OOXML file, aka an XML Entity Expansion (XEE) attack. |
| CVE-2016-9775 | High | 2017-03-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The postrm script in the tomcat6 package before 6.0.45+dfsg-1~deb7u3 on Debian wheezy, before 6.0.45+dfsg-1~deb8u1 on Debian jessie, before 6.0.35-1ubuntu3.9 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS; the tomcat7 package before 7.0.28-4+deb7u7 on Debian wheezy, before 7.0.56-3+deb8u6 on Debian jessie, before 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, and on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, 16.04 LTS, and 16.10; and the tomcat8 package before 8.0.14-1+deb8u5 on Debian jessie, before 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.3 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, before 8.0.37-1ubuntu0.1 on Ubuntu 16.10, and before 8.0.38-2ubuntu1 on Ubuntu 17.04 might allow local users with access to the tomcat account to gain root privileges via a setgid program in the Catalina directory, as demonstrated by /etc/tomcat8/Catalina/attack. |
| CVE-2016-9774 | High | 2017-03-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The postinst script in the tomcat6 package before 6.0.45+dfsg-1~deb7u4 on Debian wheezy, before 6.0.35-1ubuntu3.9 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS; the tomcat7 package before 7.0.28-4+deb7u8 on Debian wheezy, before 7.0.56-3+deb8u6 on Debian jessie, before 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, and on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, 16.04 LTS, and 16.10; and the tomcat8 package before 8.0.14-1+deb8u5 on Debian jessie, before 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.3 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, before 8.0.37-1ubuntu0.1 on Ubuntu 16.10, and before 8.0.38-2ubuntu1 on Ubuntu 17.04 might allow local users with access to the tomcat account to obtain sensitive information or gain root privileges via a symlink attack on the Catalina localhost directory. |
| CVE-2014-0229 | Medium | 2017-03-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Hadoop 0.23.x before 0.23.11 and 2.x before 2.4.1, as used in Cloudera CDH 5.0.x before 5.0.2, do not check authorization for the (1) refreshNamenodes, (2) deleteBlockPool, and (3) shutdownDatanode HDFS admin commands, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (DataNodes shutdown) or perform unnecessary operations by issuing a command. |
| CVE-2016-6816 | High | 2017-03-20 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | The code in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M11, 8.5.0 to 8.5.6, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.38, 7.0.0 to 7.0.72, and 6.0.0 to 6.0.47 that parsed the HTTP request line permitted invalid characters. This could be exploited, in conjunction with a proxy that also permitted the invalid characters but with a different interpretation, to inject data into the HTTP response. By manipulating the HTTP response the attacker could poison a web-cache, perform an XSS attack and/or obtain sensitive information from requests other then their own. |
| CVE-2017-5643 | High | 2017-03-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Camel's Validation Component is vulnerable against SSRF via remote DTDs and XXE. |
| CVE-2016-8747 | High | 2017-03-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An information disclosure issue was discovered in Apache Tomcat 8.5.7 to 8.5.9 and 9.0.0.M11 to 9.0.0.M15 in reverse-proxy configurations. Http11InputBuffer.java allows remote attackers to read data that was intended to be associated with a different request. |
| CVE-2017-5638 | Critical | 2017-03-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Jakarta Multipart parser in Apache Struts 2 2.3.x before 2.3.32 and 2.5.x before 2.5.10.1 has incorrect exception handling and error-message generation during file-upload attempts, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted Content-Type, Content-Disposition, or Content-Length HTTP header, as exploited in the wild in March 2017 with a Content-Type header containing a #cmd= string. |
| CVE-2017-3159 | Critical | 2017-03-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Camel's camel-snakeyaml component is vulnerable to Java object de-serialization vulnerability. De-serializing untrusted data can lead to security flaws. |
| CVE-2015-3188 | Critical | 2017-01-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The UI daemon in Apache Storm 0.10.0 before 0.10.0-beta1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2015-3271 | Medium | 2016-12-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tika server (aka tika-server) in Apache Tika 1.9 might allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via the HTTP fileUrl header. |
| CVE-2016-5393 | High | 2016-11-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Hadoop 2.6.x before 2.6.5 and 2.7.x before 2.7.3, a remote user who can authenticate with the HDFS NameNode can possibly run arbitrary commands with the same privileges as the HDFS service. |
| CVE-2016-1000031 | Critical | 2016-10-25 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Commons FileUpload before 1.3.3 DiskFileItem File Manipulation Remote Code Execution |
| CVE-2016-6325 | High | 2016-10-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Tomcat package on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5 through 7, JBoss Web Server 3.0, and JBoss EWS 2 uses weak permissions for (1) /etc/sysconfig/tomcat and (2) /etc/tomcat/tomcat.conf, which allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging membership in the tomcat group. |
| CVE-2016-5425 | High | 2016-10-13 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The Tomcat package on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 7, Fedora, CentOS, Oracle Linux, and possibly other Linux distributions uses weak permissions for /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/tomcat.conf, which allows local users to gain root privileges by leveraging membership in the tomcat group. |
| CVE-2016-5019 | Critical | 2016-10-03 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | CoreResponseStateManager in Apache MyFaces Trinidad 1.0.0 through 1.0.13, 1.2.x before 1.2.15, 2.0.x before 2.0.2, and 2.1.x before 2.1.2 might allow attackers to conduct deserialization attacks via a crafted serialized view state string. |
| CVE-2016-4436 | Critical | 2016-10-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.29 and 2.5.x before 2.5.1 allow attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors related to improper action name clean up. |
| CVE-2016-1240 | High | 2016-10-03 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The Tomcat init script in the tomcat7 package before 7.0.56-3+deb8u4 and tomcat8 package before 8.0.14-1+deb8u3 on Debian jessie and the tomcat6 and libtomcat6-java packages before 6.0.35-1ubuntu3.8 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, the tomcat7 and libtomcat7-java packages before 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.7 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, and tomcat8 and libtomcat8-java packages before 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.2 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS allows local users with access to the tomcat account to gain root privileges via a symlink attack on the Catalina log file, as demonstrated by /var/log/tomcat7/catalina.out. |
| CVE-2016-4978 | High | 2016-09-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The getObject method of the javax.jms.ObjectMessage class in the (1) JMS Core client, (2) Artemis broker, and (3) Artemis REST component in Apache ActiveMQ Artemis before 1.4.0 might allow remote authenticated users with permission to send messages to the Artemis broker to deserialize arbitrary objects and execute arbitrary code by leveraging gadget classes being present on the Artemis classpath. |
| CVE-2016-5395 | Medium | 2016-09-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the create user functionality in the policy admin tool in Apache Ranger before 0.6.1 allows remote authenticated administrators to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to policies. |
| CVE-2016-6801 | High | 2016-09-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the CSRF content-type check in Jackrabbit-Webdav in Apache Jackrabbit 2.4.x before 2.4.6, 2.6.x before 2.6.6, 2.8.x before 2.8.3, 2.10.x before 2.10.4, 2.12.x before 2.12.4, and 2.13.x before 2.13.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that create a resource via an HTTP POST request with a (1) missing or (2) crafted Content-Type header. |