WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Protection: None✕Oracle product: Oracle MySQL✕
Overview 5 matches · 0 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
5matches 0protected0.0% 1exploited20.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 2public PoC40.0% 1EPSS ≥ 0.520.0%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 2 40.0% No exploit published 3 60.0%
Critical 5 100.0% High 0 0.0% Medium 0 0.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 5 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 1 20.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 1 20.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 3 60.0%
split by peak 2 / year
No exploit published: 3Mitigation candidate: 2 Critical: 5 not blocked: 5 No public exploit: 3Proof of concept only: 1Exploited: 1
20161 No exploit published1 Critical1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20171 No exploit published1 Critical1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20180 20190 20200 20210 20221 Mitigation candidate1 Critical1 not blocked1 Proof of concept only1 20232 Mitigation candidate1 No exploit published1 Critical2 not blocked2 Exploited1 No public exploit1
20162017201820192020202120222023
5 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2023-50164 Critical 2023-12-07 Mitigation candidate Exploited An attacker can manipulate file upload params to enable paths traversal and under some circumstances this can lead to uploading a malicious file which can be used to perform Remote Code Execution. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions Struts 2.5.33 or Struts 6.3.0.2 or greater to fix this issue.
CVE-2023-34034 Critical 2023-07-19 No exploit published No public exploit Using "**" as a pattern in Spring Security configuration for WebFlux creates a mismatch in pattern matching between Spring Security and Spring WebFlux, and the potential for a security bypass.
CVE-2022-31692 Critical 2022-10-31 Mitigation candidate Proof of concept only Spring Security, versions 5.7 prior to 5.7.5 and 5.6 prior to 5.6.9 could be susceptible to authorization rules bypass via forward or include dispatcher types. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all of the following are true: The application expects that Spring Security applies security to forward and include dispatcher types. The application uses the AuthorizationFilter either manually or via the authorizeHttpRequests() method. The application configures the FilterChainProxy to apply to forward and/or include requests (e.g. spring.security.filter.dispatcher-types = request, error, async, forward, include). The application may forward or include the request to a higher privilege-secured endpoint.The application configures Spring Security to apply to every dispatcher type via authorizeHttpRequests().shouldFilterAllDispatcherTypes(true)
CVE-2017-5651 Critical 2017-04-17 No exploit published No public exploit In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M18 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.12, the refactoring of the HTTP connectors introduced a regression in the send file processing. If the send file processing completed quickly, it was possible for the Processor to be added to the processor cache twice. This could result in the same Processor being used for multiple requests which in turn could lead to unexpected errors and/or response mix-up.
CVE-2016-4436 Critical 2016-10-03 No exploit published No public exploit Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.29 and 2.5.x before 2.5.1 allow attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors related to improper action name clean up.