Overview 32 matches · 19 protected · 21 exploited · 9 CISA KEV · 30 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
19
59.4%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
12
37.5%
No exploit published
1
3.1%
blocked by ARMR today
19
59.4%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
13
40.6%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
21
65.6%
Working exploit published
9
28.1%
Proof of concept only
1
3.1%
Forecast only
1
3.1%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 6 / year
20061
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20070
20080
20091
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
20101
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20110
20123
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
Critical1
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
20136
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate4
Critical1
High4
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked4
Exploited3
Working exploit published3
20143
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
High2
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
Exploited3
20150
20162
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20174
Protected by Waratek4
Critical3
High1
blocked by ARMR today4
Exploited4
20181
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20191
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20205
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published1
Critical2
High2
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked1
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
20210
20221
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20231
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20241
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20250
20261
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-68493 | High | 2026-01-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Missing XML Validation vulnerability in Apache Struts, Apache Struts. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 before 2.2.1; Apache Struts: from 2.2.1 through 6.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.1.1, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2024-53677 | Critical | 2024-12-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | File upload logic in Apache Struts is flawed. An attacker can manipulate file upload params to enable paths traversal and under some circumstances this can lead to uploading a malicious file which can be used to perform Remote Code Execution. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 before 6.4.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.4.0 at least and migrate to the new file upload mechanism https://struts.apache.org/core-developers/file-upload . If you are not using an old file upload logic based on FileuploadInterceptor your application is safe. You can find more details in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-067 |
| CVE-2023-50164 | Critical | 2023-12-07 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | An attacker can manipulate file upload params to enable paths traversal and under some circumstances this can lead to uploading a malicious file which can be used to perform Remote Code Execution. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions Struts 2.5.33 or Struts 6.3.0.2 or greater to fix this issue. |
| CVE-2021-31805 | Critical | 2022-04-12 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The fix issued for CVE-2020-17530 was incomplete. So from Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.29, still some of the tag’s attributes could perform a double evaluation if a developer applied forced OGNL evaluation by using the %{...} syntax. Using forced OGNL evaluation on untrusted user input can lead to a Remote Code Execution and security degradation. |
| CVE-2020-26259 | Medium | 2020-12-16 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.15, is vulnerable to an Arbitrary File Deletion on the local host when unmarshalling. The vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to delete arbitrary know files on the host as log as the executing process has sufficient rights only by manipulating the processed input stream. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.15. The reported vulnerability does not exist running Java 15 or higher. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's Security Framework with a whitelist! Anyone relying on XStream's default blacklist can immediately switch to a whilelist for the allowed types to avoid the vulnerability. Users of XStream 1.4.14 or below who still want to use XStream default blacklist can use a workaround described in more detailed in the referenced advisories. |
| CVE-2020-26258 | High | 2020-12-16 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.15, a Server-Side Forgery Request vulnerability can be activated when unmarshalling. The vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.15. The reported vulnerability does not exist if running Java 15 or higher. No user is affected who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's Security Framework with a whitelist! Anyone relying on XStream's default blacklist can immediately switch to a whilelist for the allowed types to avoid the vulnerability. Users of XStream 1.4.14 or below who still want to use XStream default blacklist can use a workaround described in more detailed in the referenced advisories. |
| CVE-2020-17530 | Critical | 2020-12-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Forced OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution. Affected software : Apache Struts 2.0.0 - Struts 2.5.25. |
| CVE-2019-0233 | High | 2020-09-14 | No exploit published | Forecast only | An access permission override in Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.20 may cause a Denial of Service when performing a file upload. |
| CVE-2019-0230 | Critical | 2020-09-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.20 forced double OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution. |
| CVE-2011-3923 | Critical | 2019-11-01 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Apache Struts before 2.3.1.2 allows remote attackers to bypass security protections in the ParameterInterceptor class and execute arbitrary commands. |
| CVE-2018-11776 | High | 2018-08-22 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts versions 2.3 to 2.3.34 and 2.5 to 2.5.16 suffer from possible Remote Code Execution when alwaysSelectFullNamespace is true (either by user or a plugin like Convention Plugin) and then: results are used with no namespace and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace and similar to results, same possibility when using url tag which doesn't have value and action set and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace. |
| CVE-2017-12611 | Critical | 2017-09-20 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.33 and 2.5 through 2.5.10.1, using an unintentional expression in a Freemarker tag instead of string literals can lead to a RCE attack. |
| CVE-2017-9805 | High | 2017-09-15 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The REST Plugin in Apache Struts 2.1.1 through 2.3.x before 2.3.34 and 2.5.x before 2.5.13 uses an XStreamHandler with an instance of XStream for deserialization without any type filtering, which can lead to Remote Code Execution when deserializing XML payloads. |
| CVE-2017-9791 | Critical | 2017-07-10 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Struts 1 plugin in Apache Struts 2.1.x and 2.3.x might allow remote code execution via a malicious field value passed in a raw message to the ActionMessage. |
| CVE-2017-5638 | Critical | 2017-03-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Jakarta Multipart parser in Apache Struts 2 2.3.x before 2.3.32 and 2.5.x before 2.5.10.1 has incorrect exception handling and error-message generation during file-upload attempts, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted Content-Type, Content-Disposition, or Content-Length HTTP header, as exploited in the wild in March 2017 with a Content-Type header containing a #cmd= string. |
| CVE-2016-3087 | Critical | 2016-06-07 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to an ! (exclamation mark) operator to the REST Plugin. |
| CVE-2016-3081 | High | 2016-04-26 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via method: prefix, related to chained expressions. |
| CVE-2014-0114 | High | 2014-04-30 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Commons BeanUtils, as distributed in lib/commons-beanutils-1.8.0.jar in Apache Struts 1.x through 1.3.10 and in other products requiring commons-beanutils through 1.9.2, does not suppress the class property, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code via the class parameter, as demonstrated by the passing of this parameter to the getClass method of the ActionForm object in Struts 1. |
| CVE-2014-0113 | High | 2014-04-29 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | CookieInterceptor in Apache Struts before 2.3.20, when a wildcard cookiesName value is used, does not properly restrict access to the getClass method, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code via a crafted request. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-0094. |
| CVE-2014-0094 | Medium | 2014-03-11 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The ParametersInterceptor in Apache Struts before 2.3.16.2 allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader via the class parameter, which is passed to the getClass method. |
| CVE-2013-2251 | Critical | 2013-07-20 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL expressions via a parameter with a crafted (1) action:, (2) redirect:, or (3) redirectAction: prefix. |
| CVE-2013-2248 | Medium | 2013-07-20 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple open redirect vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15 allow remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in a parameter using the (1) redirect: or (2) redirectAction: prefix. |
| CVE-2013-2134 | High | 2013-07-16 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a request with a crafted action name that is not properly handled during wildcard matching, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-2135. |
| CVE-2013-2115 | High | 2013-07-10 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted request that is not properly handled when using the includeParams attribute in the (1) URL or (2) A tag. NOTE: this issue is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-1966. |
| CVE-2013-1966 | High | 2013-07-10 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted request that is not properly handled when using the includeParams attribute in the (1) URL or (2) A tag. |
| CVE-2013-1965 | High | 2013-07-10 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts Showcase App 2.0.0 through 2.3.13, as used in Struts 2 before 2.3.14.3, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted parameter name that is not properly handled when invoking a redirect. |
| CVE-2012-1006 | Medium | 2012-02-07 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.14 and 2.2.3 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) name or (2) lastName parameter to struts2-showcase/person/editPerson.action, or the (3) clientName parameter to struts2-rest-showcase/orders. |
| CVE-2012-0392 | Medium | 2012-01-08 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The CookieInterceptor component in Apache Struts before 2.3.1.1 does not use the parameter-name whitelist, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted HTTP Cookie header that triggers Java code execution through a static method. |
| CVE-2012-0391 | Critical | 2012-01-08 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during certain exception handling for mismatched data types of properties, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code via a crafted parameter. |
| CVE-2010-1870 | Medium | 2010-08-17 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The OGNL extensive expression evaluation capability in XWork in Struts 2.0.0 through 2.1.8.1, as used in Atlassian Fisheye, Crucible, and possibly other products, uses a permissive whitelist, which allows remote attackers to modify server-side context objects and bypass the "#" protection mechanism in ParameterInterceptors via the (1) #context, (2) #_memberAccess, (3) #root, (4) #this, (5) #_typeResolver, (6) #_classResolver, (7) #_traceEvaluations, (8) #_lastEvaluation, (9) #_keepLastEvaluation, and possibly other OGNL context variables, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-6504. |
| CVE-2008-6505 | Medium | 2009-03-23 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.x before 2.0.12 and 2.1.x before 2.1.3 allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a ..%252f (encoded dot dot slash) in a URI with a /struts/ path, related to (1) FilterDispatcher in 2.0.x and (2) DefaultStaticContentLoader in 2.1.x. |
| CVE-2006-1547 | High | 2006-03-30 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | ActionForm in Apache Software Foundation (ASF) Struts before 1.2.9 with BeanUtils 1.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a multipart/form-data encoded form with a parameter name that references the public getMultipartRequestHandler method, which provides further access to elements in the CommonsMultipartRequestHandler implementation and BeanUtils. |