Oracle Critical Patch Update April 2025
Released April 2025 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, January 2025 · Critical Patch Update, July 2025 →
255 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
22Protected by Waratek8Mitigation candidate88No exploit published16Outside Waratek scope121Not applicable
11Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 33 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 9 matches · 4 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
9matches
4in Waratek scope44.4%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
4
44.4%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
5
55.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
1
11.1%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
8
88.9%
split by
peak 4 / quarter
Q3 221
No exploit published1
Low1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 220
Q1 230
Q2 230
Q3 231
No exploit published1
Low1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 231
Not applicable1
Low1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 240
Q2 240
Q3 240
Q4 242
No exploit published1
Not applicable1
Low2
not blocked2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit1
Q1 250
Q2 254
No exploit published1
Not applicable3
Low4
not blocked4
No public exploit4
Q3 22Q4 22Q1 23Q2 23Q3 23Q4 23Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24Q4 24Q1 25Q2 25
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-30731 | Low | 2025-04-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Applications Technology Stack product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Configuration). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.14. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Applications Technology Stack executes to compromise Oracle Applications Technology Stack. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Applications Technology Stack accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Applications Technology Stack accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.6 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2025-30703 | Low | 2025-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the MySQL Server product of Oracle MySQL (component: InnoDB). Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.0-8.0.41, 8.4.0-8.4.4 and 9.0.0-9.2.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of MySQL Server accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 2.7 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2025-30700 | Low | 2025-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Solaris product of Oracle Systems (component: Pluggable authentication module). The supported version that is affected is 11. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Solaris. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Solaris accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2025-30681 | Low | 2025-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the MySQL Server product of Oracle MySQL (component: Server: Replication). Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.0-8.0.41, 8.4.0-8.4.4 and 9.0.0-9.2.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of MySQL Server. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 2.7 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L). |
| CVE-2024-12801 | Low | 2024-12-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in SaxEventRecorder by QOS.CH logback version 0.1 to 1.3.14 and 1.4.0 to 1.5.12 on the Java platform, allows an attacker to forge requests by compromising logback configuration files in XML. The attacks involves the modification of DOCTYPE declaration in XML configuration files. |
| CVE-2024-11053 | Low | 2024-12-11 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | When asked to both use a `.netrc` file for credentials and to follow HTTP redirects, curl could leak the password used for the first host to the followed-to host under certain circumstances. This flaw only manifests itself if the netrc file has an entry that matches the redirect target hostname but the entry either omits just the password or omits both login and password. |
| CVE-2023-38546 | Low | 2023-10-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | This flaw allows an attacker to insert cookies at will into a running program using libcurl, if the specific series of conditions are met. libcurl performs transfers. In its API, an application creates "easy handles" that are the individual handles for single transfers. libcurl provides a function call that duplicates en easy handle called [curl_easy_duphandle](https://curl.se/libcurl/c/curl_easy_duphandle.html). If a transfer has cookies enabled when the handle is duplicated, the cookie-enable state is also cloned - but without cloning the actual cookies. If the source handle did not read any cookies from a specific file on disk, the cloned version of the handle would instead store the file name as `none` (using the four ASCII letters, no quotes). Subsequent use of the cloned handle that does not explicitly set a source to load cookies from would then inadvertently load cookies from a file named `none` - if such a file exists and is readable in the current directory of the program using libcurl. And if using the correct file format of course. |
| CVE-2023-36479 | Low | 2023-09-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Eclipse Jetty Canonical Repository is the canonical repository for the Jetty project. Users of the CgiServlet with a very specific command structure may have the wrong command executed. If a user sends a request to a org.eclipse.jetty.servlets.CGI Servlet for a binary with a space in its name, the servlet will escape the command by wrapping it in quotation marks. This wrapped command, plus an optional command prefix, will then be executed through a call to Runtime.exec. If the original binary name provided by the user contains a quotation mark followed by a space, the resulting command line will contain multiple tokens instead of one. This issue was patched in version 9.4.52, 10.0.16, 11.0.16 and 12.0.0-beta2. |
| CVE-2021-43980 | Low | 2022-09-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The simplified implementation of blocking reads and writes introduced in Tomcat 10 and back-ported to Tomcat 9.0.47 onwards exposed a long standing (but extremely hard to trigger) concurrency bug in Apache Tomcat 10.1.0 to 10.1.0-M12, 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.18, 9.0.0-M1 to 9.0.60 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.77 that could cause client connections to share an Http11Processor instance resulting in responses, or part responses, to be received by the wrong client. |