Oracle Critical Patch Update October 2019
Released October 2019 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, July 2019 · Critical Patch Update, January 2020 →
180 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
23Protected by Waratek63No exploit published57Outside Waratek scope37Not applicable
6Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 56 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 5 matches · 2 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 2 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
1
20.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
1
20.0%
Outside Waratek scope
3
60.0%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
20.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4
80.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
40.0%
Working exploit published
1
20.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
2
40.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 2 / month
Apr 192
Protected by Waratek1
Outside Waratek scope1
High2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited2
May 191
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Jun 191
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
Jul 190
Aug 191
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
Apr 19May 19Jun 19Jul 19Aug 19
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-9511 | High | 2019-08-13 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. |
| CVE-2019-10072 | High | 2019-06-21 | No exploit published | Forecast only | The fix for CVE-2019-0199 was incomplete and did not address HTTP/2 connection window exhaustion on write in Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.19 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.40 . By not sending WINDOW_UPDATE messages for the connection window (stream 0) clients were able to cause server-side threads to block eventually leading to thread exhaustion and a DoS. |
| CVE-2019-0227 | High | 2019-05-01 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affected the Apache Axis 1.4 distribution that was last released in 2006. Security and bug commits commits continue in the projects Axis 1.x Subversion repository, legacy users are encouraged to build from source. The successor to Axis 1.x is Axis2, the latest version is 1.7.9 and is not vulnerable to this issue. |
| CVE-2019-0232 | High | 2019-04-15 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | When running on Windows with enableCmdLineArguments enabled, the CGI Servlet in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.17, 8.5.0 to 8.5.39 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.93 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution due to a bug in the way the JRE passes command line arguments to Windows. The CGI Servlet is disabled by default. The CGI option enableCmdLineArguments is disable by default in Tomcat 9.0.x (and will be disabled by default in all versions in response to this vulnerability). For a detailed explanation of the JRE behaviour, see Markus Wulftange's blog (https://codewhitesec.blogspot.com/2016/02/java-and-command-line-injections-in-windows.html) and this archived MSDN blog (https://web.archive.org/web/20161228144344/https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/twistylittlepassagesallalike/2011/04/23/everyone-quotes-command-line-arguments-the-wrong-way/). |
| CVE-2019-0211 | High | 2019-04-08 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | In Apache HTTP Server 2.4 releases 2.4.17 to 2.4.38, with MPM event, worker or prefork, code executing in less-privileged child processes or threads (including scripts executed by an in-process scripting interpreter) could execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the parent process (usually root) by manipulating the scoreboard. Non-Unix systems are not affected. |