Oracle Critical Patch Update October 2018
Released October 2018 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, July 2018 · Critical Patch Update, January 2019 →
226 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
22Protected by Waratek2Mitigation candidate81No exploit published46Outside Waratek scope75Not applicable
4Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 81 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 10 matches · 6 in Waratek scope · 6 protected · 3 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 9 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
6
60.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
2
20.0%
Not applicable
2
20.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
6
60.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4
40.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
3
30.0%
Working exploit published
5
50.0%
Proof of concept only
1
10.0%
Forecast only
1
10.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 2 / quarter
Q1 151
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q2 150
Q3 150
Q4 150
Q1 160
Q2 161
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q3 160
Q4 160
Q1 170
Q2 171
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
Q3 171
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q4 171
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Q1 181
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q2 181
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Forecast only1
Q3 181
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Q4 182
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today2
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
Q2 15Q4 15Q2 16Q4 16Q2 17Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-3245 | Critical | 2018-10-17 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: WLS Core Components). Supported versions that are affected are 10.3.6.0, 12.1.3.0 and 12.2.1.3. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via T3 to compromise Oracle WebLogic Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebLogic Server. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2018-3191 | Critical | 2018-10-17 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: WLS Core Components). Supported versions that are affected are 10.3.6.0, 12.1.3.0 and 12.2.1.3. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via T3 to compromise Oracle WebLogic Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebLogic Server. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2018-11776 | High | 2018-08-22 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts versions 2.3 to 2.3.34 and 2.5 to 2.5.16 suffer from possible Remote Code Execution when alwaysSelectFullNamespace is true (either by user or a plugin like Convention Plugin) and then: results are used with no namespace and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace and similar to results, same possibility when using url tag which doesn't have value and action set and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace. |
| CVE-2018-1275 | Critical | 2018-04-11 | Protected by Waratek | Forecast only | Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.16 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. This CVE addresses the partial fix for CVE-2018-1270 in the 4.3.x branch of the Spring Framework. |
| CVE-2017-5715 | Medium | 2018-01-04 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and indirect branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis. |
| CVE-2015-7501 | Critical | 2017-11-09 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. |
| CVE-2017-9798 | High | 2017-09-18 | Not applicable | Exploited | Apache httpd allows remote attackers to read secret data from process memory if the Limit directive can be set in a user's .htaccess file, or if httpd.conf has certain misconfigurations, aka Optionsbleed. This affects the Apache HTTP Server through 2.2.34 and 2.4.x through 2.4.27. The attacker sends an unauthenticated OPTIONS HTTP request when attempting to read secret data. This is a use-after-free issue and thus secret data is not always sent, and the specific data depends on many factors including configuration. Exploitation with .htaccess can be blocked with a patch to the ap_limit_section function in server/core.c. |
| CVE-2017-5645 | Critical | 2017-04-17 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2016-2107 | Medium | 2016-05-05 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169. |
| CVE-2015-0235 | High | 2015-01-28 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | Heap-based buffer overflow in the __nss_hostname_digits_dots function in glibc 2.2, and other 2.x versions before 2.18, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to the (1) gethostbyname or (2) gethostbyname2 function, aka "GHOST." |