Oracle Critical Patch Update July 2018
Released July 2018 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, April 2018 · Critical Patch Update, October 2018 →
247 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
16Protected by Waratek126No exploit published41Outside Waratek scope64Not applicable
7Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 125 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 10 matches · 2 in Waratek scope · 2 protected · 1 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
10matches
2in Waratek scope20.0%
2protected20.0%
1exploited10.0%
1CISA KEV10.0%
2public PoC20.0%
1EPSS ≥ 0.510.0%
Protected by Waratek
2
20.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
3
30.0%
Not applicable
5
50.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
2
20.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
8
80.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
10.0%
Working exploit published
1
10.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
8
80.0%
split by
peak 2 / quarter
Q3 151
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 150
Q1 161
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 161
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 162
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable1
High2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
No public exploit2
Q4 162
Protected by Waratek1
Outside Waratek scope1
High2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
No public exploit1
Q1 171
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q2 172
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q3 15Q4 15Q1 16Q2 16Q3 16Q4 16Q1 17Q2 17
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-5664 | High | 2017-06-06 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The error page mechanism of the Java Servlet Specification requires that, when an error occurs and an error page is configured for the error that occurred, the original request and response are forwarded to the error page. This means that the request is presented to the error page with the original HTTP method. If the error page is a static file, expected behaviour is to serve content of the file as if processing a GET request, regardless of the actual HTTP method. The Default Servlet in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M20, 8.5.0 to 8.5.14, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.43 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.77 did not do this. Depending on the original request this could lead to unexpected and undesirable results for static error pages including, if the DefaultServlet is configured to permit writes, the replacement or removal of the custom error page. Notes for other user provided error pages: (1) Unless explicitly coded otherwise, JSPs ignore the HTTP method. JSPs used as error pages must must ensure that they handle any error dispatch as a GET request, regardless of the actual method. (2) By default, the response generated by a Servlet does depend on the HTTP method. Custom Servlets used as error pages must ensure that they handle any error dispatch as a GET request, regardless of the actual method. |
| CVE-2017-5662 | High | 2017-04-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Apache Batik before 1.9, files lying on the filesystem of the server which uses batik can be revealed to arbitrary users who send maliciously formed SVG files. The file types that can be shown depend on the user context in which the exploitable application is running. If the user is root a full compromise of the server - including confidential or sensitive files - would be possible. XXE can also be used to attack the availability of the server via denial of service as the references within a xml document can trivially trigger an amplification attack. |
| CVE-2017-6074 | High | 2017-02-18 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The dccp_rcv_state_process function in net/dccp/input.c in the Linux kernel through 4.9.11 mishandles DCCP_PKT_REQUEST packet data structures in the LISTEN state, which allows local users to obtain root privileges or cause a denial of service (double free) via an application that makes an IPV6_RECVPKTINFO setsockopt system call. |
| CVE-2016-9878 | High | 2016-12-29 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Framework before 3.2.18, 4.2.x before 4.2.9, and 4.3.x before 4.3.5. Paths provided to the ResourceServlet were not properly sanitized and as a result exposed to directory traversal attacks. |
| CVE-2016-5195 | High | 2016-11-10 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | Race condition in mm/gup.c in the Linux kernel 2.x through 4.x before 4.8.3 allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging incorrect handling of a copy-on-write (COW) feature to write to a read-only memory mapping, as exploited in the wild in October 2016, aka "Dirty COW." |
| CVE-2016-3506 | High | 2016-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the JDBC component in Oracle Database Server 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2; the Oracle Retail Xstore Point of Service 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.1, 15.0, and 16.0; the Oracle Retail Warehouse Management System 14.04, 14.1.3, and 15.0.1; the Oracle Retail Workforce Management 1.60.7, and 1.64.0; the Oracle Retail Clearance Optimization Engine 13.4; the Oracle Retail Markdown Optimization 13.4 and 14.0; and Oracle Retail Merchandising System 16.0 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-1181 | High | 2016-07-04 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | ActionServlet.java in Apache Struts 1 1.x through 1.3.10 mishandles multithreaded access to an ActionForm instance, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (unexpected memory access) via a multipart request, a related issue to CVE-2015-0899. |
| CVE-2016-2176 | High | 2016-05-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The X509_NAME_oneline function in crypto/x509/x509_obj.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process stack memory or cause a denial of service (buffer over-read) via crafted EBCDIC ASN.1 data. |
| CVE-2016-0714 | High | 2016-02-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The session-persistence implementation in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.45, 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 mishandles session attributes, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager restrictions and execute arbitrary code in a privileged context via a web application that places a crafted object in a session. |
| CVE-2015-5600 | High | 2015-08-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The kbdint_next_device function in auth2-chall.c in sshd in OpenSSH through 6.9 does not properly restrict the processing of keyboard-interactive devices within a single connection, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute-force attacks or cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a long and duplicative list in the ssh -oKbdInteractiveDevices option, as demonstrated by a modified client that provides a different password for each pam element on this list. |