Oracle Critical Patch Update January 2018
Released January 2018 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, October 2017 · Critical Patch Update, April 2018 →
197 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
16Protected by Waratek1Mitigation candidate94No exploit published25Outside Waratek scope61Not applicable
3Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 94 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 102 matches · 62 in Waratek scope · 8 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
102matches
62in Waratek scope60.8%
8protected7.8%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
3public PoC2.9%
4EPSS ≥ 0.53.9%
Protected by Waratek
8
7.8%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
54
52.9%
Outside Waratek scope
14
13.7%
Not applicable
26
25.5%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
8
7.8%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
94
92.2%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
3
2.9%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
2
2.0%
No public exploit
97
95.1%
split by
peak 93 / quarter
Q1 131
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
Q2 130
Q3 130
Q4 130
Q1 140
Q2 140
Q3 140
Q4 140
Q1 150
Q2 150
Q3 150
Q4 151
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 161
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 161
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q3 160
Q4 160
Q1 170
Q2 172
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q3 170
Q4 173
Not applicable3
Medium3
not blocked3
Forecast only1
No public exploit2
Q1 1893
Protected by Waratek8
No exploit published54
Outside Waratek scope12
Not applicable19
Medium93
blocked by ARMR today8
not blocked85
Working exploit published2
No public exploit91
Q1 13Q3 13Q1 14Q3 14Q1 15Q3 15Q1 16Q3 16Q1 17Q3 17Q1 18
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-7940 | Medium | 2015-11-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.51 does not validate a point is withing the elliptic curve, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private keys via a series of crafted elliptic curve Diffie Hellman (ECDH) key exchanges, aka an "invalid curve attack." |
| CVE-2013-2566 | Medium | 2013-03-15 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of ciphertext in a large number of sessions that use the same plaintext. |