Oracle Critical Patch Update October 2016
Released October 2016 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, July 2016 · Critical Patch Update, January 2017 →
205 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
7Protected by Waratek2Mitigation candidate87No exploit published39Outside Waratek scope68Not applicable2Withdrawn CVE
4Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 83 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 39 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
39matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
1exploited2.6%
0CISA KEV0.0%
3public PoC7.7%
4EPSS ≥ 0.510.3%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
39
100.0%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
39
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
2.6%
Working exploit published
2
5.1%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
1
2.6%
No public exploit
35
89.7%
split by
peak 15 / quarter
Q1 131
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
Q2 131
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 130
Q4 130
Q1 142
Outside Waratek scope2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q2 141
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q3 140
Q4 141
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 156
Outside Waratek scope6
High2
Medium4
not blocked6
Working exploit published1
No public exploit5
Q2 154
Outside Waratek scope4
Medium4
not blocked4
No public exploit4
Q3 152
Outside Waratek scope2
Critical1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
Q4 152
Outside Waratek scope2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q1 163
Outside Waratek scope3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
Q2 160
Q3 161
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 1615
Outside Waratek scope15
Critical4
High1
Medium6
Low4
not blocked15
No public exploit15
Q2 13Q4 13Q2 14Q4 14Q2 15Q4 15Q2 16Q4 16
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-5597 | Medium | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u121, 7u111, 8u102; and Java SE Embedded 8u101 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via vectors related to Networking. |
| CVE-2016-5582 | Critical | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u121, 7u111, 8u102; and Java SE Embedded 8u101 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Hotspot, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-5573. |
| CVE-2016-5573 | High | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u121, 7u111, 8u102; and Java SE Embedded 8u101 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Hotspot, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-5582. |
| CVE-2016-5572 | Medium | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Kernel PDB component in Oracle Database Server 12.1.0.2 allows local users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-5568 | Critical | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u121, 7u111, and 8u102 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to AWT. |
| CVE-2016-5556 | Critical | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u121, 7u111, and 8u102 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to 2D. |
| CVE-2016-5555 | Critical | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the OJVM component in Oracle Database Server 11.2.0.4 and 12.1.0.2 allows remote administrators to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-5554 | Medium | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u121, 7u111, 8u102; and Java SE Embedded 8u101 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via vectors related to JMX. |
| CVE-2016-5542 | Low | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u121, 7u111, 8u102; and Java SE Embedded 8u101 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via vectors related to Libraries. |
| CVE-2016-5516 | Medium | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Kernel PDB component in Oracle Database Server 12.1.0.2 allows local users to affect availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-5505 | Medium | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the RDBMS Programmable Interface component in Oracle Database Server 11.2.0.4 and 12.1.0.2 allows local users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-5499 | Low | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the RDBMS Security component in Oracle Database Server 11.2.0.4 and 12.1.0.2 allows local users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-5498. |
| CVE-2016-5498 | Low | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the RDBMS Security component in Oracle Database Server 11.2.0.4 and 12.1.0.2 allows local users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-5499. |
| CVE-2016-5497 | Medium | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the RDBMS Security component in Oracle Database Server 12.1.0.2 allows local users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-3562 | Low | 2016-10-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the RDBMS Security and SQL*Plus components in Oracle Database Server 11.2.0.4 and 12.1.0.2 allows remote administrators to affect confidentiality via vectors related to DBA. |
| CVE-2016-0635 | High | 2016-07-21 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Ops Center component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control 12.1.4, 12.2.2, and 12.3.2; the Oracle Health Sciences Information Manager component in Oracle Health Sciences Applications 1.2.8.3, 2.0.2.3, and 3.0.1.0; the Oracle Healthcare Master Person Index component in Oracle Health Sciences Applications 2.0.12, 3.0.0, and 4.0.1; the Oracle Documaker component in Oracle Insurance Applications before 12.5; the Oracle Insurance Calculation Engine component in Oracle Insurance Applications 9.7.1, 10.1.2, and 10.2.2; the Oracle Insurance Policy Administration J2EE and Oracle Insurance Rules Palette components in Oracle Insurance Applications 9.6.1, 9.7.1, 10.0.1, 10.1.2, 10.2.0, and 10.2.2; the Oracle Retail Integration Bus component in Oracle Retail Applications 15.0; the Oracle Retail Order Broker component in Oracle Retail Applications 5.1, 5.2, and 15.0; the Primavera Contract Management component in Oracle Primavera Products Suite 14.2; the Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management component in Oracle Primavera Products Suite 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 15.1, 15.2, and 16.1; the Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications Infrastructure component in Oracle Financial Services Applications 8.0.0, 8.0.1, 8.0.2, and 8.0.3; the Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager component in Oracle Commerce 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 11.0, 11.1, and 11.2; the Oracle Agile PLM component in Oracle Supply Chain Products Suite 9.3.4 and 9.3.5; the Oracle Communications BRM - Elastic Charging Engine 11.2.0.0.0 and 11.3.0.0.0; the Oracle Enterprise Repository Enterprise Repository 12.1.3.0.0; the Oracle Financial Services Behavior Detection Platform 8.0.1 and 8.0.2; the Oracle Hyperion Essbase 12.2.1.1; the Oracle Tuxedo System and Applications Monitor (TSAM) 11.1.1.2.0, 11.1.1.2.1, 11.1.1.2.1, 12.1.1.1.0, 12.1.3.0.0, and 12.2.2.0.0; the Oracle Communications WebRTC Session Controller component of Oracle Communications Applications (subcomponent: Security (Spring)) 7.0, 7.1 and 7.2; the Oracle Endeca Information Discovery Integrator 3.2; the Converged Commerce component of Oracle Retail Applications 16.0.1; the Oracle Identity Manager 11.1.2.3.0; Oracle Enterprise Manager for MySQL Database 12.1.0.4; Oracle Retail Invoice Matching 12.0, 13.0, 13.1, 13.2, 14.0, and 14.1; Oracle Communications Performance Intelligence Center (PIC) Software Prior to 10.2.1 and the Oracle Knowledge component of Oracle Siebel CRM (subcomponent: AnswerFlow (Spring Framework)) version 8.5.1.0 - 8.5.1.7 and 8.6.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-1950 | High | 2016-03-13 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Heap-based buffer overflow in Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.19.2.3 and 3.20.x and 3.21.x before 3.21.1, as used in Mozilla Firefox before 45.0 and Firefox ESR 38.x before 38.7, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted ASN.1 data in an X.509 certificate. |
| CVE-2016-0714 | High | 2016-02-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The session-persistence implementation in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.45, 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 mishandles session attributes, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager restrictions and execute arbitrary code in a privileged context via a web application that places a crafted object in a session. |
| CVE-2015-3197 | Medium | 2016-02-15 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | ssl/s2_srvr.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1r and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not prevent use of disabled ciphers, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by performing computations on SSLv2 traffic, related to the get_client_master_key and get_client_hello functions. |
| CVE-2015-3195 | Medium | 2015-12-06 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE implementation in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e mishandles errors caused by malformed X509_ATTRIBUTE data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by triggering a decoding failure in a PKCS#7 or CMS application. |
| CVE-2015-7940 | Medium | 2015-11-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.51 does not validate a point is withing the elliptic curve, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private keys via a series of crafted elliptic curve Diffie Hellman (ECDH) key exchanges, aka an "invalid curve attack." |
| CVE-2015-3253 | Critical | 2015-08-13 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The MethodClosure class in runtime/MethodClosure.java in Apache Groovy 1.7.0 through 2.4.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via a crafted serialized object. |
| CVE-2015-1793 | Medium | 2015-07-09 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | The X509_verify_cert function in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1n, 1.0.1o, 1.0.2b, and 1.0.2c does not properly process X.509 Basic Constraints cA values during identification of alternative certificate chains, which allows remote attackers to spoof a Certification Authority role and trigger unintended certificate verifications via a valid leaf certificate. |
| CVE-2015-2568 | Medium | 2015-04-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.5.41 and earlier, and 5.6.22 and earlier, allows remote attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Server : Security : Privileges. |
| CVE-2015-0500 | Medium | 2015-04-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.6.23 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to affect availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2015-0433 | Medium | 2015-04-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.5.41 and earlier, and 5.6.22 and earlier, allows remote authenticated users to affect availability via vectors related to InnoDB : DML. |
| CVE-2015-0423 | Medium | 2015-04-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.6.22 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Optimizer. |
| CVE-2014-0227 | Medium | 2015-02-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | java/org/apache/coyote/http11/filters/ChunkedInputFilter.java in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.42, 7.x before 7.0.55, and 8.x before 8.0.9 does not properly handle attempts to continue reading data after an error has occurred, which allows remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks or cause a denial of service (resource consumption) by streaming data with malformed chunked transfer coding. |
| CVE-2015-0235 | High | 2015-01-28 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | Heap-based buffer overflow in the __nss_hostname_digits_dots function in glibc 2.2, and other 2.x versions before 2.18, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to the (1) gethostbyname or (2) gethostbyname2 function, aka "GHOST." |
| CVE-2015-0411 | High | 2015-01-21 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.5.40 and earlier, and 5.6.21 and earlier, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Server : Security : Encryption. |
| CVE-2015-0409 | Medium | 2015-01-21 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.6.21 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Optimizer. |
| CVE-2015-0382 | Medium | 2015-01-21 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.5.40 and earlier and 5.6.21 and earlier allows remote attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Server : Replication, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0381. |
| CVE-2015-0381 | Medium | 2015-01-21 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.5.40 and earlier and 5.6.21 and earlier allows remote attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Server : Replication, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0382. |
| CVE-2010-5312 | Medium | 2014-11-24 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jquery.ui.dialog.js in the Dialog widget in jQuery UI before 1.10.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the title option. |
| CVE-2014-0224 | High | 2014-06-05 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the "CCS Injection" vulnerability. |
| CVE-2014-2532 | Medium | 2014-03-18 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | sshd in OpenSSH before 6.6 does not properly support wildcards on AcceptEnv lines in sshd_config, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended environment restrictions by using a substring located before a wildcard character. |
| CVE-2013-4286 | Medium | 2014-02-26 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.47, and 8.x before 8.0.0-RC3, when an HTTP connector or AJP connector is used, does not properly handle certain inconsistent HTTP request headers, which allows remote attackers to trigger incorrect identification of a request's length and conduct request-smuggling attacks via (1) multiple Content-Length headers or (2) a Content-Length header and a "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" header. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2005-2090. |
| CVE-2013-2067 | Medium | 2013-06-01 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | java/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/FormAuthenticator.java in the form authentication feature in Apache Tomcat 6.0.21 through 6.0.36 and 7.x before 7.0.33 does not properly handle the relationships between authentication requirements and sessions, which allows remote attackers to inject a request into a session by sending this request during completion of the login form, a variant of a session fixation attack. |
| CVE-2013-2566 | Medium | 2013-03-15 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of ciphertext in a large number of sessions that use the same plaintext. |