Oracle Critical Patch Update July 2016
Released July 2016 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, April 2016 · Critical Patch Update, October 2016 →
222 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
4Protected by Waratek1Mitigation candidate108No exploit published30Outside Waratek scope79Not applicable
4Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 108 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 14 matches · 3 in Waratek scope · 3 protected · 4 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 10 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
3
21.4%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
7
50.0%
Not applicable
4
28.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
3
21.4%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
11
78.6%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
4
28.6%
Working exploit published
4
28.6%
Proof of concept only
2
14.3%
Forecast only
4
28.6%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 3 / quarter
Q1 131
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
Q2 130
Q3 130
Q4 130
Q1 140
Q2 141
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q3 140
Q4 141
Outside Waratek scope1
Low1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q1 153
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable1
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Forecast only1
Q2 151
Outside Waratek scope1
Low1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
Q3 152
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
Forecast only1
Q4 150
Q1 161
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q2 162
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable1
High1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Q3 161
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
Q4 160
Q1 170
Q2 170
Q3 170
Q4 171
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Q2 13Q4 13Q2 14Q4 14Q2 15Q4 15Q2 16Q4 16Q2 17Q4 17
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-7501 | Critical | 2017-11-09 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. |
| CVE-2016-3510 | Critical | 2016-07-21 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 10.3.6.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to WLS Core Components, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-3586. |
| CVE-2016-2107 | Medium | 2016-05-05 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169. |
| CVE-2016-3081 | High | 2016-04-26 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via method: prefix, related to chained expressions. |
| CVE-2016-0800 | Medium | 2016-03-01 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The SSLv2 protocol, as used in OpenSSL before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g and other products, requires a server to send a ServerVerify message before establishing that a client possesses certain plaintext RSA data, which makes it easier for remote attackers to decrypt TLS ciphertext data by leveraging a Bleichenbacher RSA padding oracle, aka a "DROWN" attack. |
| CVE-2015-3183 | Medium | 2015-07-20 | Not applicable | Forecast only | The chunked transfer coding implementation in the Apache HTTP Server before 2.4.14 does not properly parse chunk headers, which allows remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks via a crafted request, related to mishandling of large chunk-size values and invalid chunk-extension characters in modules/http/http_filters.c. |
| CVE-2015-1793 | Medium | 2015-07-09 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | The X509_verify_cert function in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1n, 1.0.1o, 1.0.2b, and 1.0.2c does not properly process X.509 Basic Constraints cA values during identification of alternative certificate chains, which allows remote attackers to spoof a Certification Authority role and trigger unintended certificate verifications via a valid leaf certificate. |
| CVE-2015-2808 | Low | 2015-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue. |
| CVE-2014-9708 | Medium | 2015-03-31 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | Embedthis Appweb before 4.6.6 and 5.x before 5.2.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) via a Range header with an empty value, as demonstrated by "Range: x=,". |
| CVE-2015-0235 | High | 2015-01-28 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | Heap-based buffer overflow in the __nss_hostname_digits_dots function in glibc 2.2, and other 2.x versions before 2.18, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to the (1) gethostbyname or (2) gethostbyname2 function, aka "GHOST." |
| CVE-2015-0204 | Medium | 2015-01-09 | Not applicable | Exploited | The ssl3_get_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k allows remote SSL servers to conduct RSA-to-EXPORT_RSA downgrade attacks and facilitate brute-force decryption by offering a weak ephemeral RSA key in a noncompliant role, related to the "FREAK" issue. NOTE: the scope of this CVE is only client code based on OpenSSL, not EXPORT_RSA issues associated with servers or other TLS implementations. |
| CVE-2014-3566 | Low | 2014-10-15 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, aka the "POODLE" issue. |
| CVE-2014-0224 | High | 2014-06-05 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the "CCS Injection" vulnerability. |
| CVE-2013-2566 | Medium | 2013-03-15 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of ciphertext in a large number of sessions that use the same plaintext. |