WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Published to 2026-08-31✕
Overview 14,784 matches · 1,686 protected · 257 exploited · 88 CISA KEV · 640 public PoC · 363 EPSS ≥ 0.5
14,784matches 1,686protected11.4% 257exploited1.7% 88CISA KEV0.6% 640public PoC4.3% 363EPSS ≥ 0.52.5%
Protected by Waratek 1,693 11.5% Rule in development 7 0.0% Mitigation candidate 409 2.8% No exploit published 12,675 85.7%
Critical 1,787 12.1% High 5,132 34.7% Medium 7,093 48.0% Low 768 5.2% None 3 0.0% Unknown 1 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 1,686 11.4% partly blocked 7 0.0% not blocked 13,080 88.5% not established 11 0.1% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 257 1.7% Working exploit published 340 2.3% Proof of concept only 623 4.2% Forecast only 84 0.6% No public exploit 13,480 91.2%
split by peak 3,430 / year
No exploit published: 12,675Mitigation candidate: 409Rule in development: 7Protected by Waratek: 1,693 Unknown: 1None: 3Low: 768Medium: 7,093High: 5,132Critical: 1,787 not established: 11not blocked: 13,080partly blocked: 7blocked by ARMR today: 1,686 No public exploit: 13,480Forecast only: 84Proof of concept only: 623Working exploit published: 340Exploited: 257
19961 No exploit published1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 19970 19980 19992 No exploit published2 High2 not blocked2 No public exploit2 200012 Mitigation candidate6 No exploit published6 High5 Medium7 not blocked12 Working exploit published6 No public exploit6 200113 Protected by Waratek1 Mitigation candidate2 No exploit published10 High7 Medium6 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked12 Working exploit published2 No public exploit11 200237 Protected by Waratek3 Mitigation candidate8 No exploit published26 High11 Medium23 Low3 blocked by ARMR today3 not blocked34 Working exploit published8 Forecast only2 No public exploit27 200339 Protected by Waratek2 Mitigation candidate7 No exploit published30 High9 Medium24 Low6 blocked by ARMR today2 not blocked37 Working exploit published8 No public exploit31 200427 Protected by Waratek2 Mitigation candidate1 No exploit published24 High6 Medium18 Low3 blocked by ARMR today2 not blocked25 Working exploit published1 No public exploit26 200582 Protected by Waratek3 Mitigation candidate4 No exploit published75 Critical1 High30 Medium46 Low5 blocked by ARMR today3 not blocked79 Working exploit published5 No public exploit77 2006133 Protected by Waratek8 Mitigation candidate4 No exploit published121 High66 Medium56 Low11 blocked by ARMR today8 not blocked125 Exploited1 Working exploit published5 No public exploit127 2007150 Protected by Waratek6 Mitigation candidate10 No exploit published134 High68 Medium71 Low11 blocked by ARMR today6 not blocked144 Working exploit published11 No public exploit139 2008136 Protected by Waratek7 Mitigation candidate9 No exploit published120 High46 Medium83 Low7 blocked by ARMR today7 not blocked129 Exploited2 Working exploit published12 No public exploit122 2009203 Protected by Waratek9 Mitigation candidate13 No exploit published181 High52 Medium129 Low22 blocked by ARMR today9 not blocked194 Exploited1 Working exploit published16 No public exploit186 2010183 Protected by Waratek9 Mitigation candidate12 No exploit published162 Critical1 High27 Medium133 Low22 blocked by ARMR today9 not blocked174 Exploited3 Working exploit published14 Forecast only1 No public exploit165 2011193 Protected by Waratek6 Mitigation candidate9 No exploit published178 High20 Medium139 Low34 blocked by ARMR today6 not blocked187 Working exploit published11 Proof of concept only1 No public exploit181 2012311 Protected by Waratek9 Mitigation candidate24 No exploit published278 Critical3 High29 Medium199 Low80 blocked by ARMR today9 not blocked300 not established2 Exploited8 Working exploit published19 No public exploit284 2013349 Protected by Waratek26 Mitigation candidate18 No exploit published305 Critical1 High45 Medium249 Low54 blocked by ARMR today26 not blocked322 not established1 Exploited9 Working exploit published17 Proof of concept only1 Forecast only1 No public exploit321 2014335 Protected by Waratek41 Mitigation candidate12 No exploit published282 High30 Medium256 Low49 blocked by ARMR today41 not blocked294 Exploited4 Working exploit published14 Proof of concept only1 Forecast only2 No public exploit314 2015323 Protected by Waratek32 Mitigation candidate6 No exploit published285 Critical4 High42 Medium226 Low51 blocked by ARMR today32 not blocked291 Exploited4 Working exploit published8 Proof of concept only1 No public exploit310 2016535 Protected by Waratek58 Mitigation candidate12 No exploit published465 Critical47 High134 Medium321 Low33 blocked by ARMR today57 partly blocked1 not blocked476 not established1 Exploited8 Working exploit published18 Proof of concept only1 Forecast only5 No public exploit503 2017800 Protected by Waratek104 Mitigation candidate14 No exploit published682 Critical82 High338 Medium355 Low25 blocked by ARMR today102 partly blocked2 not blocked696 Exploited17 Working exploit published19 Proof of concept only3 Forecast only1 No public exploit760 2018889 Protected by Waratek176 Mitigation candidate16 No exploit published697 Critical86 High302 Medium487 Low14 blocked by ARMR today175 partly blocked1 not blocked713 Exploited15 Working exploit published15 Proof of concept only7 Forecast only1 No public exploit851 2019903 Protected by Waratek122 Rule in development1 Mitigation candidate24 No exploit published756 Critical86 High332 Medium454 Low31 blocked by ARMR today120 partly blocked2 not blocked780 not established1 Exploited19 Working exploit published22 Proof of concept only11 Forecast only3 No public exploit848 20201,086 Protected by Waratek154 Mitigation candidate34 No exploit published898 Critical114 High386 Medium546 Low40 blocked by ARMR today154 not blocked932 Exploited29 Working exploit published19 Proof of concept only17 Forecast only8 No public exploit1,013 2021798 Protected by Waratek124 Rule in development1 Mitigation candidate24 No exploit published649 Critical104 High346 Medium331 Low17 blocked by ARMR today124 not blocked674 Exploited25 Working exploit published13 Proof of concept only18 Forecast only24 No public exploit718 20221,130 Protected by Waratek213 Rule in development1 Mitigation candidate21 No exploit published895 Critical150 High330 Medium631 Low19 blocked by ARMR today213 not blocked917 Exploited20 Working exploit published11 Proof of concept only84 Forecast only16 No public exploit999 20231,077 Protected by Waratek161 Mitigation candidate40 No exploit published876 Critical226 High355 Medium479 Low17 blocked by ARMR today161 not blocked914 not established2 Exploited22 Working exploit published27 Proof of concept only176 Forecast only12 No public exploit840 2024752 Protected by Waratek106 Mitigation candidate29 No exploit published617 Critical124 High255 Medium344 Low28 Unknown1 blocked by ARMR today105 partly blocked1 not blocked646 Exploited24 Working exploit published14 Proof of concept only79 Forecast only7 No public exploit628 2025855 Protected by Waratek103 Rule in development4 Mitigation candidate25 No exploit published723 Critical77 High212 Medium524 Low41 None1 blocked by ARMR today103 not blocked750 not established2 Exploited31 Working exploit published12 Proof of concept only97 Forecast only1 No public exploit714 20263,430 Protected by Waratek208 Mitigation candidate25 No exploit published3,197 Critical681 High1,646 Medium956 Low145 None2 blocked by ARMR today208 not blocked3,220 not established2 Exploited15 Working exploit published13 Proof of concept only126 No public exploit3,276
19961999200220052008201120142017202020232026
14,784 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed. ‹ prev page 1 of 148 next ›
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2026-81624 High 2026-08-31 No exploit published No public exploit Undertow is a flexible performant web server used in JBoss EAP and WildFly. A flaw was found in how Undertow handles WebSocket connections. Specifically, certain configuration limits like message buffer sizes and session timeouts cannot be adjusted and default to being unlimited. This allows a remote attacker to send large amounts of data or maintain connections indefinitely, potentially crashing the server by exhausting its memory or other resources.
CVE-2026-76986 Medium 2026-08-31 No exploit published No public exploit Improper neutralization of input during web page generation in Apache Wicket. org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.AbstractSingleSelectChoice, the base class of DropDownChoice, writes the body of the default option — the entry shown when no choice is selected — into the markup as it is, while every other option body in the same select is escaped according to the escape-model-strings setting. The body comes from getNullValidDisplayValue() or getNullKeyDisplayValue(), both of which are protected, so what they return is not necessarily the plain text the default implementation reads from a resource bundle. An application is affected where it overrides one of those methods and returns a value holding data an attacker can influence, or where its own nullValid or null bundle entry holds such a value. The bundles shipped with Wicket contain plain text. RadioChoice overrides getDefaultChoice to emit no default option and is not affected. As a workaround, escape the value in the override. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Older, unsupported releases from 1.5.0 onwards are also affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue.
CVE-2026-76985 Medium 2026-08-31 No exploit published No public exploit Improper neutralization of input during web page generation in Apache Wicket. org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.form.palette.component.AbstractOptions, which renders the two option lists of a Palette, escapes the id and the display value of each option according to the escape-model-strings setting, and wrote the attribute names and values returned by getAdditionalAttributes into the <option> tag as they came. An application is affected where it overrides Palette.getAdditionalAttributesForChoices, Palette.getAdditionalAttributesForSelection or AbstractOptions.getAdditionalAttributes and returns a value holding data an attacker can influence. These methods return null by default, so an application that does not override them is not affected. As a workaround, escape the values in the override. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Older, unsupported releases from 1.4.0 onwards are also affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue.
CVE-2026-76984 Medium 2026-08-31 No exploit published No public exploit Improper neutralization of input during web page generation in Apache Wicket. org.apache.wicket.markup.head.MetaDataHeaderItem generates <meta> and <link> header tags. It escaped the attribute names it wrote, but ran the attribute values through a replacement of " with \". A backslash before a double quote means nothing in HTML, so a value containing a double quote ends its own attribute and what follows is parsed as further attributes of the generated tag. An application is affected where it supplies an attribute value holding data an attacker can influence, through addTagAttribute or the forMetaTag and forLinkTag factory methods. A value may be given as an IModel, so it is not necessarily a literal. There is no setting to change; an application can only avoid supplying a value that contains a double quote. Note that these values have never been escaped effectively: before the change released in 6.24.0, 7.4.0 and 8.0.0 they were written with no escaping at all. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Older, unsupported releases from 6.17.0 onwards are also affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue.
CVE-2026-76983 Medium 2026-08-31 No exploit published No public exploit Improper neutralization of input during web page generation in Apache Wicket. The <wicket:label> tag is provided by org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.AutoLabelTextResolver, which is registered by default in every WebApplication. The resolver writes the label it finds into the markup as it is, and reads no escaping setting at all, so markup in a label is rendered as markup. When the label comes from the labelled component's label model, set through FormComponent#setLabel(IModel), it is written to the markup unescaped. An application is affected where the label of a form component holds data an attacker can influence. Wicket cannot determine where a model value comes from, so whether it reaches the page from a request or from storage is a property of the application. There is no workaround. Unlike every other rendering path in Wicket, the resolver never consulted the escape-model-strings setting, so an application had no way to ask for the label to be escaped. The body of a <wicket:label> tag is markup by design and is not affected; it remains the supported way to place markup in a label. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Older, unsupported releases from 1.5.0 onwards are also affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue.
CVE-2026-76982 Medium 2026-08-31 No exploit published No public exploit Improper neutralization of input during web page generation in Apache Wicket. org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Button clears the escape-model-strings flag in its constructor, so that the value attribute it writes is not encoded twice — ComponentTag already encodes attribute values when it writes the tag. That reasoning holds only for the attribute. When the component is attached to a <button> element rather than an <input>, it writes its model object into the element body instead, and nothing encodes an element body, so markup in the model is rendered as markup. An application is affected where it renders a Button on a <button> element and that button's model holds data an attacker can influence. Wicket cannot determine where a model value comes from, so whether it reaches the page from a request or from storage is a property of the application. The subclasses that inherit this constructor — AjaxButton, AjaxFallbackButton and WizardButton — are affected on the same terms. As a workaround, calling setEscapeModelStrings(true) on a button that renders as a <button> element escapes the body correctly, and does not cause double encoding, because the value attribute is written only for <input> elements. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Older, unsupported releases from 6.25.0 and 7.5.0 onwards are also affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue.
CVE-2026-75802 Medium 2026-08-31 No exploit published No public exploit AjaxEditableChoiceLabel in wicket-extensions, when constructed with a non-null IChoiceRenderer, writes the display value obtained from that renderer into the label's markup without applying the HTML escaping Wicket performs by default for component model values. An attacker who can influence the choice or model data rendered by such a label can inject HTML or script that executes in the browser of any user who views the page. The same value is correctly escaped when the component's dropdown editor renders it as an option, so only the label rendering is affected. AjaxEditableLabel, AjaxEditableChoiceLabel and AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel write the value returned by the protected defaultNullLabel() method into the label's markup the same way when the component's model is empty, while the model value they show otherwise is escaped. The default implementation returns a constant, so an application is affected where it overrides that method and returns a value an attacker can influence. Neither value could be escaped by configuration, because escapeModelStrings had no effect on any of the three components: it is read by the label they render with rather than by the component itself, and nothing carried the setting across. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Older, unsupported releases are also affected; the display value from the renderer since 6.22.0 and the null label since 1.4.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue.
CVE-2026-71378 Medium 2026-08-31 No exploit published No public exploit ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener protects a Wicket application against cross-site request forgery by rejecting requests that a resource isolation policy judges to come from another origin. Its default policy, FetchMetadataResourceIsolationPolicy, was derived from a reference implementation written to guard static resources, and it inherited two allowances that are unsafe when the thing being guarded is an action on a page: * Every "simple top-level navigation" was allowed. Any GET request carrying Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate whose Sec-Fetch-Dest was neither object nor embed was allowed, whatever Sec-Fetch-Site said — including cross-site. Wicket invokes component listeners (Link.onClick(), form submits, behaviour callbacks) through ordinary GET navigations, so a page under an attacker's control could navigate the victim's browser to a listener URL and have that listener run inside the victim's authenticated session. Browsers send SameSite=Lax cookies — the effective default when no SameSite attribute is set — on cross-site top-level GET navigations, so the victim's session cookie accompanied the request. * Sec-Fetch-Site: same-site was allowed unconditionally. That value means the same registrable domain and scheme but a different origin — another subdomain or another port. Any sibling origin could therefore invoke any listener by any method, POST form submits included, and cookies are always sent on same-site requests regardless of SameSite. A hostile sibling origin obtained through a subdomain takeover, through delegated user content, or through an XSS elsewhere on the site could act as the authenticated user. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. Affected versions * Apache Wicket 9.1.0 through 9.23.0 * Apache Wicket 10.0.0 through 10.10.0 Not affected Any release older than 9.1.0: * Apache Wicket 8.x (8.0.0 through 8.17.0). The resource isolation classes do not exist in the 8.x line, which offers only the Origin/Referer-based CsrfPreventionRequestCycleListener. No 8.x release requires a fix. * Apache Wicket 9.0.0. ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener and FetchMetadataResourceIsolationPolicy were introduced by WICKET-6786 and first shipped in 9.1.0 (released 2020-10-07).
CVE-2026-71257 High 2026-08-31 No exploit published No public exploit Apache Wicket enforces the upload limits configured on a form or upload field while parsing a multipart request with Apache Commons FileUpload. If the request body has already been consumed by another component, Commons FileUpload returns no items and Wicket falls back to reading the upload through HttpServletRequest#getParts(). The per-file size limit (for example Form#setFileMaxSize) and the file count limit (Form#setFileCountMax) are not applied to the parts obtained that way, and no exception is raised, so the upload is processed as though those limits had been satisfied. A remote uploader can therefore submit files that are larger, or more numerous, than the application permits, up to whatever the component that parsed the request allows. A part carrying no Content-Type header is additionally read into memory in full during parsing, so the size of that allocation is determined by the request and bounded only by those same external limits. The total upload size limit (Form#setMaxSize) is not affected. Commons FileUpload compares the declared Content-Length against it before reading the body, so a request declaring an oversized length is rejected before the fallback is reached. The fallback is reached in deployments where a servlet or filter has already parsed the request body — for example a servlet annotated with @MultipartConfig, Spring Boot's multipart resolver, or any filter that calls HttpServletRequest#getParameter() on a multipart request. It applies to the Wicket components that accept uploads on that path, including Form with FileUploadField, FileUploadToResourceField and AjaxFileDropBehavior. Applications that configure neither a per-file nor a file-count limit are not affected, as Wicket applies neither by default. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. Users of Apache Wicket 7.x or older, which are no longer supported, should upgrade to a supported version. As a workaround, configure equivalent limits in the component that parses the request — for example spring.servlet.multipart.max-file-size and max-request-size, or maxFileSize and maxRequestSize in @MultipartConfig or in the web.xml <multipart-config> element.
CVE-2026-70449 Medium 2026-08-31 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Improper validation of resource URL attributes in Apache Wicket allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to read files from the web application, including files under WEB-INF that the servlet container would not otherwise serve. The locale, style and variation attributes decoded from a package resource URL are spliced into the resource lookup path without being checked for path separators. The IPackageResourceGuard — whose rejection of .. is one of the two intended controls — is applied to the resource name before those attributes are appended, and WebApplicationPath rejects only paths literally beginning with WEB-INF/. Neither control ever inspects the attacker-controlled portion of the path. On servlet containers that normalize .. in ServletContext.getResource(), a crafted request therefore escapes the intended package directory. The set of readable files is limited to the file extensions permitted by the configured IPackageResourceGuard. The default SecurePackageResourceGuard permits only js, css, png, jpg, jpeg, gif, ico, cur, map, html, txt, swf, bmp, svg, avif, eot, ttf, woff and woff2, which excludes configuration formats. Applications that have added patterns to the guard, or replaced it with the blocklist-based PackageResourceGuard, can additionally disclose configuration files such as web.xml. Independently of the extension, the lookup performed before the guard runs acts as an existence oracle for arbitrary paths. This issue affects Apache Wicket 8.18.0 and before, 9.23.0 and before and 10.10.0 and before. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. Users of Apache Wicket 7.x or older, which are no longer supported, should upgrade to a supported version.
CVE-2026-58301 Medium 2026-08-31 No exploit published No public exploit When Apache Shiro is used with the Jakarta EE integration module, a low-privileged user can craft an HTTP request that causes the server to initiate a connection to an attacker-controlled URL and transmit attacker-controlled data. This vulnerability affects Apache Shiro versions 2.x through 3.0.0 only in deployments that use the Jakarta EE integration module. Mitigation: Upgrade to version 3.0.1 or later, which fixes the issue. + Alternatively, you can set the `org.apache.shiro.form-resubmit-host` (String) and `org.apache.shiro.form-resubmit-port` (Integer) system properties to restrict the host and port that Shiro will connect to when resubmitting a form.
CVE-2026-17615 High 2026-08-31 Protected by Waratek No public exploit A flaw was found in RESTEasy's SourceProvider. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to perform an unauthenticated remote file read. By sending a specially crafted XML body with a DOCTYPE declaration referencing external entities to an endpoint that accepts application/xml and returns Source or StreamSource, the server can be tricked into resolving the entity and including sensitive file contents in the HTTP response. This is due to the SourceProvider.writeTo() method creating a SAXParser without disabling external entity resolution, leading to an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability.
CVE-2026-12894 High 2026-08-31 No exploit published No public exploit A flaw was found in the Qute template engine, which is used by Quarkus to generate dynamic content like HTML pages or emails. The issue exists in the component responsible for looking up data values (ReflectionValueResolver), which fails to properly block access to sensitive Java internal functions when processing certain data types like Enums. An attacker who can provide or influence the template text can exploit this bypass to take control of the server by executing unauthorized commands.
CVE-2026-55867 Medium 2026-08-28 No exploit published No public exploit Graylog is a free and open log management platform. From 6.2.0 until 6.3.12, 7.0.7, and 7.1.2, the DELETE /users/{userId}/tokens/{idOrToken} endpoint implemented by UsersResource.revokeToken() in graylog2-server/src/main/java/org/graylog2/rest/resources/users/UsersResource.java checks USERS_TOKENREMOVE permission against the attacker-controlled userId path parameter before resolving the token selected by idOrToken. An authenticated user can provide an authorized userId while accessTokenService.loadById() or accessTokenService.load() resolves a token belonging to another user, including a service account or administrator, after which accessTokenService.destroy() deletes that token without checking AccessToken.getUserName(). The issue does not expose token contents, but unauthorized deletion causes integrity impact and can disrupt access-token-based integrations. This issue is fixed in versions 6.3.12, 7.0.7, and 7.1.2.
CVE-2026-55860 Medium 2026-08-28 No exploit published No public exploit MariaDB Connector/R2DBC is a non-blocking MariaDB and MySQL client implemented in Java. Prior to 1.4.1, org.mariadb:r2dbc-mariadb does not gate clear-text password authentication plugins on transport encryption because the AuthenticationPlugin interface has no capability for a plugin to require a secure connection. A hostile or man-in-the-middle MariaDB server can send an AuthSwitchRequest naming mysql_clear_password or dialog (PAM) over a plain-TCP unencrypted connection, and AuthenticationFlow permits ClearPasswordPluginFlow or PamPluginFlow to return the user's password as cleartext bytes on the wire. The disclosed credentials can subsequently be used to authenticate directly to the database server. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.1.
CVE-2026-55859 Medium 2026-08-28 No exploit published No public exploit MariaDB Connector/R2DBC is a non-blocking MariaDB and MySQL client implemented in Java. Prior to 1.4.1, org.mariadb:r2dbc-mariadb encodes and decodes all character data under the assumption that the connection character set is UTF-8. A server can announce a mid-session change to character_set_client through the OK-packet session-state-tracking mechanism, including through SET NAMES executed by a stored routine or trigger, server configuration, or a hostile or man-in-the-middle server. If the new character set is not UTF-8, the driver continues to exchange UTF-8 while the server interprets the same bytes under a different encoding, causing silent data corruption and a client/server charset-confusion mismatch that can defeat byte-wise quoting or escaping. The fix accepts only utf8, utf8mb3, or utf8mb4 after initialization; any other value raises R2dbcNonTransientResourceException with SQLState 08000 and closes the connection. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.1.
CVE-2026-55858 Medium 2026-08-28 No exploit published No public exploit MariaDB Connector/J is used to connect applications developed in Java to MariaDB and MySQL databases. Prior to 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9, the connector encodes and decodes protocol text and performs client-side escaping under the assumption that the connection character set is UTF-8. The server can report a mid-session change to character_set_client through OK-packet session-state tracking, including a change caused by SET NAMES, a stored routine or trigger, server configuration, or a hostile server. If character_set_client changes to a non-UTF-8 value, the driver continues to read and write UTF-8 while the server interprets the same bytes under another encoding, causing silent data corruption and a client/server charset-confusion mismatch that can defeat byte-wise quoting or escaping. The fix accepts only utf8, utf8mb3, or utf8mb4 after initialization; any other value causes SQLException with SQLState 08000 and closes the connection. This issue is fixed in versions 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9.
CVE-2026-55857 Medium 2026-08-28 No exploit published No public exploit MariaDB Connector/J is used to connect applications developed in Java to MariaDB and MySQL databases. Prior to 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9, PAM dialog authentication can be coerced into transmitting the account password over an insecure connection. The mysql_clear_password plugin is gated behind a secure transport, but the sibling PAM handler SendPamAuthPacketFactory, named dialog by the server, does not declare that requirement and inherits the default secure-required value false; older branches implement the same affected behavior in SendPamAuthPacket. A hostile or man-in-the-middle server can send an Authentication Switch Request for dialog over plain TCP, causing the driver to return the user's password in cleartext when sslMode=DISABLE and restrictedAuth=null, which is the default configuration. Properly verified TLS and local Unix sockets are not exposed to this transport vector. This issue is fixed in versions 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9.
CVE-2026-55856 Medium 2026-08-28 No exploit published No public exploit MariaDB Connector/J is used to connect applications developed in Java to MariaDB and MySQL databases. Prior to 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9, when a Java application connects with sslMode=verify-full or sslMode=verify-ca, supplies a password, and does not configure serverSslCert or trustStore, Connector/J can accept an untrusted self-signed certificate through the fallbackToSystemTrustStore=true ephemeral trust manager and record its certFingerprint for later identity binding. The OK-packet and authentication-switch paths enforce the certificate fingerprint, but the initial-handshake path does not. HandshakeResponse.encode() can therefore build and send a mysql_clear_password response before checking certFingerprint != null && !isMitMProof(), sslMode, or whether the authentication plugin is resistant to a man-in-the-middle, and the initial path also bypasses restrictedAuth. An active man-in-the-middle or hostile server can present a self-signed certificate, claim to be MariaDB, select mysql_clear_password as the initial authentication plugin, and receive the full database password before the connection is rejected. This issue is fixed in versions 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9.
CVE-2026-55848 High 2026-08-28 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only mapfish-print is a component of MapFish for printing templated cartographic maps. Prior to 3.28.30, 3.30.32, 3.31.24, 3.33.16, and 4.0.5, MapFish Print accepts an attacker-controlled GML layer url in requests to the /api/print3/print endpoint and fetches XML parsed by core/src/main/java/org/mapfish/print/map/geotools/GmlLayer.java without disabling external entities and external DTDs. A remote XML document and DTD can expand a local file entity, and the resulting content can be exposed through the GML parsing and error path. This allows unauthenticated attackers to read files such as operating-system account data, Kubernetes service-account tokens, and certificates. Replacing the file entity target with an internal HTTP endpoint also permits server-side request forgery. This issue is fixed in versions 3.28.30, 3.30.32, 3.31.24, 3.33.16, and 4.0.5.
CVE-2026-55841 High 2026-08-28 No exploit published No public exploit Graylog is a free and open log management platform. Prior to Graylog Server versions 6.3.12, 7.0.7, and 7.1.2 and Graylog Forwarder version 7.3, the FortiGate key-value syslog parser in graylog2-server/src/main/java/org/graylog2/inputs/codecs/GLFortiGateSyslogEvent.java and graylog2-server/src/main/java/org/graylog2/inputs/codecs/SyslogCodec.java mishandles field-like text inside quoted values. GLFortiGateSyslogEvent.getFields() uses KV_PATTERN and QUOTED_KV_PATTERN, while SyslogCodec.parse() invokes the FortiGateSyslogEvent parser; crafted values containing = or backslash-escaped quotes can cause embedded keys such as srcip, dstip, date, time, and tz to remove or overwrite original top-level fields or produce an invalid message that Graylog discards. An unauthenticated network sender who can submit syslog messages can therefore manipulate security-log fields or evade logging to obscure malicious activity. This issue is fixed in Graylog Server versions 6.3.12, 7.0.7, and 7.1.2 and Graylog Forwarder version 7.3.
CVE-2026-55673 High 2026-08-28 Protected by Waratek No public exploit PowSyBl (Power System Blocks) is a framework to build power system oriented software. Prior to 7.2.2, UnixLocalCommandExecutor and WindowsLocalCommandExecutor concatenate command arguments and environment variables into strings interpreted through bash -c or cmd /c without sufficient escaping. Attacker-controlled values reaching UnixLocalCommandExecutor.execute, WindowsLocalCommandExecutor.execute, LocalComputationManager.execute, ParallelLoadFlowActionSimulator.run, ActionSimulatorTool.run, AmplModelRunner.run, or AmplModelRunner.runAsync can break out of the intended command and execute arbitrary shell commands as the JVM user. The affected itools paths include action-simulator with task-count, security-analysis with external, and dynamic-security-analysis. Downstream CLI tools, libraries, REST front ends, and multi-tenant grid-analysis services that forward less-trusted contingency identifiers or computation parameters into these APIs can expose the injection remotely. This issue is fixed in version 7.2.2.
CVE-2026-55566 Medium 2026-08-28 No exploit published Proof of concept only Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.12.8 and 5.13.2, Yamcs processes attacker-controlled data from the /ext URL route in yamcs-web/src/main/webapp/projects/webapp/src/app/core/routes/extension.matcher.ts, extension.component.ts, and app.component.ts without checking registered plugin IDs before DOM rendering through innerHTML. A crafted URL can execute JavaScript when opened by a user. The script can read data available to the Yamcs web application and perform actions in the user context. This issue is fixed in versions 5.12.8 and 5.13.2.
CVE-2026-55565 Critical 2026-08-28 No exploit published Proof of concept only Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.12.8 and 5.13.2, Yamcs LikeExpression.fillCode_getValueReturn in yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/yarch/streamsql/LikeExpression.java inserts an unescaped LIKE pattern into Java source compiled by Expression.getCompiledExpression through SimpleCompiler.cook instead of applying ValueExpression.escapeJavaString. The pattern can originate from POST /api/archive/{instance}:executeSql, POST /api/archive/{instance}:streamSql, POST /api/archive/{instance}/tables/{table}:readRows, GET /api/archive/{instance}/events, or activity searches, including paths available with ReadTables, ReadEvents, or ReadActivities. A quote in the pattern can inject Java that runs as the Yamcs server process. This issue is fixed in versions 5.12.8 and 5.13.2.
CVE-2026-55559 Critical 2026-08-28 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.12.8 and 5.13.2, Yamcs inserts templateArgs from POST /api/instances and PATCH /api/instances/{instance} into YAML through VarStatement.append in yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/templating/VarStatement.java without YAML-context escaping. The rendered configuration is parsed by YamcsServer.createInstance and loaded by YamcsServerInstance, allowing an attacker to inject a services entry for org.yamcs.ProcessRunner. Deployments without security.yaml expose the operation through the guest superuser, while secured deployments require SystemPrivilege.CreateInstances. Successful exploitation executes commands as the Yamcs service account. This issue is fixed in versions 5.12.8 and 5.13.2.
CVE-2026-55552 High 2026-08-28 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.11.13, Yamcs StaticFileHandler.locateFile resolves an unauthenticated request path without using Path.normalize and Path.toAbsolutePath to confirm that the absolute path remains within the configured staticRoots. A path containing traversal segments can escape the intended web root and return an arbitrary readable host file. The flaw is in yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/http/StaticFileHandler.java and can disclose sensitive operating-system and application data. This issue is fixed in version 5.11.13, and the 5.12 line is fixed from version 5.12.0.
CVE-2026-55549 Medium 2026-08-28 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.9.4, Yamcs reflects an attacker-controlled redirect_uri parameter from GET /auth/authorize into yamcs-core/src/main/resources/auth/templates/authorize.html without adequate HTML escaping by yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/http/auth/AuthHandler.java and yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/http/HandlerContext.java. A crafted authorization URL can execute JavaScript when opened by a Yamcs user. The script can access browser-held authentication material and transmit it to an attacker, enabling account compromise. This issue is fixed in version 5.9.4.
CVE-2026-55547 Medium 2026-08-28 No exploit published Proof of concept only Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.12.8 and 5.13.2, Yamcs omits SystemPrivilege.ControlAccess checks from IamApi.listRoles, IamApi.getRole, and IamApi.listPrivileges in yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/http/api/IamApi.java. Any authenticated account can call GET /api/roles, GET /api/roles/{name}, and GET /api/privileges to enumerate available system privileges and configured role mappings. The disclosure reveals security configuration that can support targeted privilege-escalation attempts. This issue is fixed in versions 5.12.8 and 5.13.2.
CVE-2026-55545 Medium 2026-08-28 No exploit published No public exploit Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.12.8 and 5.13.2, Yamcs WebSocket subscription handlers fail to enforce the privileges required by equivalent REST endpoints. PacketsApi.subscribePackets exposes the packets WebSocket topic without ObjectPrivilegeType.ReadPacket, ProcessingApi.subscribeAlgorithmStatus exposes the algorithm-status WebSocket topic without ObjectPrivilegeType.ReadAlgorithm, and MdbOverrideApi.subscribeMdbChanges exposes the mdb-changes WebSocket topic without SystemPrivilege.GetMissionDatabase. A low-privilege authenticated user can receive telemetry packets, algorithm status, and mission database change information outside the assigned authorization scope. This issue is fixed in versions 5.12.8 and 5.13.2.
CVE-2026-55521 High 2026-08-28 No exploit published Proof of concept only Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.12.8 and 5.13.2, Yamcs omits authorization checks in IndexesApi.listPacketIndex, IndexesApi.listEventIndex, Cop1Api.disable, Cop1Api.resume, Cop1Api.initialize, Cop1Api.updateConfig, and TimeApi.setTime. An authenticated low-privilege user can read packet and event index metadata without ObjectPrivilegeType.ReadPacket, alter COP-1 link state without SystemPrivilege.ControlLinks, and manipulate simulation time. These operations can disclose telemetry metadata, disrupt telecommand handling, and affect system integrity and availability. This issue is fixed in versions 5.12.8 and 5.13.2.
CVE-2026-55511 Critical 2026-08-28 No exploit published Proof of concept only Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.12.8 and 5.13.2, Yamcs allows a user with SystemPrivilege.ControlArchiving to create a double-quoted StreamSQL column name that is interpolated into generated Java source by Expression.fillCode_InputDefVars and Expression.sanitizeName. A sum aggregate reaches yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/yarch/streamsql/CompilableAggregateExpression.java and yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/yarch/streamsql/funct/SumExpression.java through SelectExpression.compile, where Janino SimpleCompiler.cook compiles the injected source. POST /api/archive/{instance}:executeSql can therefore execute arbitrary Java in the Yamcs server process, exposing mission data and credentials and permitting telemetry tampering or denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 5.12.8 and 5.13.2.
CVE-2026-55425 Medium 2026-08-28 No exploit published No public exploit Graylog is a free and open log management platform. From 7.1.0 until 7.1.4 and 7.2.0-alpha.2, the System Catalog entity titles endpoint in graylog2-server/src/main/java/org/graylog2/rest/resources/system/contentpacks/titles/EntityTitleServiceImpl.java allows an authenticated user to request composite display fields without verifying that every selected field is readable. A user can retrieve protected values, including the password hash on a readable user record; ordinary users are limited to their own permitted records, while administrators can retrieve hashes for all users. This issue is fixed in versions 7.1.4 and 7.2.0-alpha.2.
CVE-2026-59355 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit In versions of Spring Authorization Server 1.5.0 through 1.5.7, the authorization endpoint performs insufficient validation of the request_uri parameter. An attacker can craft a request containing an invalid request_uri paired with an unvalidated redirect_uri, which can result in an open redirect to an attacker-controlled site.
CVE-2026-59354 Critical 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit In versions of Spring Security's OAuth2 Authorization Server module 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, when Dynamic Client Registration is explicitly enabled, the registration endpoint performs insufficient validation of certain client metadata fields supplied by the registering client. An attacker who possesses a valid Initial Access Token can register a malicious client with crafted metadata, which, depending on server configuration and how the metadata is later rendered or used, may result in Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Privilege Escalation, or Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
CVE-2026-59324 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit When an IntegrationFlow uses .fluxTransform() with an asynchronous/reordering fluxFunction that emits raw payloads, concurrent requests on the same FluxMessageChannel subscription have their reply headers (replyChannel, errorChannel, correlationId, any propagated security/tenant headers) copied from whichever message was most recently consumed upstream. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier
CVE-2026-59322 Medium 2026-08-27 Protected by Waratek No public exploit The EmbeddedHeadersJsonMessageMapper defaults to an overly permissive header parsing posture in its constructor. When decodeNativeFormat processes raw byte payloads, it deserializes embedded JSON headers into a plain Map and constructs a GenericMessage with MutableMessageHeaders without sanitizing or filtering untrusted header names by default. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier
CVE-2026-59321 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit A single ScriptEngine instance is reused for every message on a script-backed channel. For JSR-223 engines that report THREADING=null (not thread-safe, e.g. the Kotlin kts engine), concurrent message processing can corrupt engine-internal state, potentially leaking one message's payload/headers bindings into another message's script evaluation or throwing spurious exceptions. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier
CVE-2026-59320 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit When a container-level ErrorHandler is configured (the mitigation for finding 221000), each delivery whose processing throws still permanently consumes one link credit. After initialCredits (default 100) failing messages the receiver's credit reaches zero and the broker stops delivering, leaving the listener silently stalled while isRunning() remains true. Spring AMQP 4.1.0
CVE-2026-59319 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit RedisChatMemoryRepository.findByMetadata() builds RediSearch tag and text queries from caller-supplied metadata values without applying RediSearchUtil.escape(), unlike get(), clear(), and findByTimeRange() in the same class which do escape their inputs. An application that passes user-controlled values to findByMetadata() on a tag-typed metadata field allows an attacker to inject RediSearch syntax (e.g. x} | *) that breaks out of the tag clause and matches all indexed chat messages across every conversation in the index. Spring AI 2.0.0
CVE-2026-59317 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit DeadLetterPublishingRecovererFactory reads the retry_topic-original-timestamp header from an inbound ConsumerRecord and passes its raw bytes directly to new BigInteger(header.value()) with no length or format validation. Spring for Apache Kafka 4.1.0 Spring for Apache Kafka 4.0.0 - 4.0.6 Spring for Apache Kafka 3.0.0 - 3.3.16 Spring for Apache Kafka 2.9.0 - 2.9.14 Spring for Apache Kafka 2.8.12 and earlier
CVE-2026-59316 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Spring Authorization Server's default consent page renders user-controlled values without HTML entity encoding. When using the DefaultConsentPage, an attacker can craft an OAuth2 authorization request containing a malicious value that is stored server-side and later rendered unencoded in the default consent page presented to the end user. Spring Authorization Server 1.5.0 - 1.5.8 Spring Authorization Server 1.4.0 - 1.4.11
CVE-2026-59315 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit The Spring Cloud Config Monitor is susceptible to Denial of Service attacks via malicious payloads. Spring Cloud Config 5.0.0 - 5.0.4 Spring Cloud Config 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Config 4.0.0 - 4.2.8 Spring Cloud Config 3.1.14 and earlier
CVE-2026-59314 Low 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Applications that build a Content-Disposition header value from untrusted input may be vulnerable to HTTP response splitting when the input is a malicious file name. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier
CVE-2026-59313 Critical 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Spring MVC applications using the functional web framework are vulnerable to stream corruption when using Server-Sent Events (SSE). Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49
CVE-2026-59311 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit A local unprivileged user on the same host can redirect all Zip/UnZip transformer output into a directory of their choosing by pre-creating /tmp/ziptransformer as a symlink before the application starts. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12
CVE-2026-59307 High 2026-08-27 Protected by Waratek No public exploit An operator who calls JdbcMessageStore.addAllowedPatterns(...) to restrict deserialization receives no protection at all when the store is a Spring-managed bean. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12
CVE-2026-59306 Low 2026-08-27 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Potential for deserialization of untrusted types in Spring Cloud Stream. Spring Cloud Stream 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Stream 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Stream 4.2.0 - 4.2.6
CVE-2026-59305 Low 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Partition interceptor may be improperly added while sending message. Spring Cloud Stream 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Stream 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Stream 4.2.0 - 4.2.6
CVE-2026-59304 Low 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Improper caching of the original content type in Spring Cloud Stream Avro. Spring Cloud Stream 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Stream 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Stream 4.2.0 - 4.2.6
CVE-2026-59303 Low 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Dynamic destination cache size is not properly bound in Spring Cloud Stream. Spring Cloud Stream 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Stream 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Stream 4.2.0 - 4.2.6
CVE-2026-59302 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Potential for logging sensitive data in Spring Cloud Stream. Spring Cloud Stream 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Stream 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Stream 4.2.0 - 4.2.6
CVE-2026-59301 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Potential for logging sensitive data in Spring Cloud Function Azure. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7
CVE-2026-59300 Low 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Potential for logging sensitive data in Spring Cloud Function AWS. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7 Spring Cloud Function 3.2.16 and earlier
CVE-2026-59299 Low 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Composition lookup can potentially poison base function in Spring Cloud Function. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7 Spring Cloud Function 3.2.16 and earlier
CVE-2026-59298 Low 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Potential for improper filtering of HTTP headers in Spring Cloud Function. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7 Spring Cloud Function 3.2.16 and earlier
CVE-2026-59297 Low 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Implementation of isSecure() call of ServerlessHttpServletRequest does not verify the actual scheme. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7
CVE-2026-59294 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit ResourceCacheService.getCacheName() builds the on-disk filename by appending the URI fragment verbatim, without stripping path separators or .. sequences, and passes the result to new File(resourceParentFolder, newFileName) before writing the downloaded bytes there. Spring AI 2.0.0 Spring AI 1.1.0 - 1.1.8 Spring AI 1.0.9 and earlier
CVE-2026-59293 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Unless the application explicitly raises smbMinVersion, the jCIFS client will negotiate down to SMB1/CIFS, which lacks mandatory signing/encryption and is vulnerable to NTLM relay and content-tampering MITM. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12
CVE-2026-59292 Low 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit PropertiesPersistingMetadataStore, the default file-based ConcurrentMetadataStore, persists its state to ${java.io.tmpdir}/spring-integration/metadata-store.properties with world-readable permissions. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier
CVE-2026-59291 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Potential arbitrary file read and SSRF vulnerability in Spring Cloud Function. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7
CVE-2026-59289 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Spring for GraphQL's Spring Data pagination support resolves arguments of a scrollable query and forwards the client-supplied values to the underlying repository. An attacker can forge a malicious query for a Connection field that can exhaust application memory or place significant, prolonged load on the underlying datastore, resulting in a Denial of Service. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4 Spring for GraphQL 1.4.0 - 1.4.6 Spring for GraphQL 1.2.0 - 1.3.9
CVE-2026-59288 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit The GraphiQL page bundled with Spring for GraphQL sends requests to the GraphQL endpoints of the application. An attacker can share a malicious URL so that the victim's browser might leak confidential information to the attacker's website. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4 Spring for GraphQL 1.4.0 - 1.4.6 Spring for GraphQL 1.1.0 - 1.3.9 Spring for GraphQL 1.0.0 - 1.0.7
CVE-2026-59287 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Spring for GraphQL is vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks when using the WebSocket client with keepAlive enabled. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4 Spring for GraphQL 1.4.0 - 1.4.6 Spring for GraphQL 1.3.0 - 1.3.9
CVE-2026-59286 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit The GraphiQL page bundled with Spring for GraphQL loads JavaScript libraries from a public CDN, without Subresource Integrity checks. An attacker can inject malicious code in those scripts and execute arbitrary code on the browser loading the GraphiQL page. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4 Spring for GraphQL 1.4.0 - 1.4.6 Spring for GraphQL 1.1.0 - 1.3.9 Spring for GraphQL 1.0.0 - 1.0.7
CVE-2026-59285 High 2026-08-27 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Spring for GraphQL applications are vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization when processing paginated GraphQL queries. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4
CVE-2026-59284 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit There is no allow list for property keys when Spring Cloud Commons writable /actuator/env is enabled. Spring Cloud Commons 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Commons 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Commons 4.0.0 - 4.2.6 Spring Cloud Commons 3.1.10 and earlier
CVE-2026-59283 Critical 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Applications that evaluate Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expressions using SimpleEvaluationContext may be vulnerable to a safety guard bypass when the SpEL expression compiler is active. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier
CVE-2026-59282 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Spring Framework applications that use Spring's data binding infrastructure to apply user-supplied property paths onto a target object may be vulnerable to a Denial of Service (DoS) attack. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier
CVE-2026-59281 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Spring MVC and WebFlux applications that obtain a data-binding Errors instance with HTML escaping enabled and then render field errors using the no-argument Errors.getFieldErrors() or Errors.getFieldError() accessors are vulnerable to arbitrary HTML/JavaScript code injection, potentially resulting in a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier
CVE-2026-59280 Medium 2026-08-27 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Applications using Spring Framework's FreeMarker integration may be vulnerable to a path traversal attack when a controller returns a view name derived from untrusted input and FreeMarker is configured to resolve templates through SpringTemplateLoader. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier
CVE-2026-59278 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit JsonKafkaHeaderMapper and DefaultKafkaHeaderMapper include java.net in their default trusted packages list. When these mappers are used — which is the default configuration for all @KafkaListener consumers — an external Kafka producer can inject a java.net.InetAddress type via the spring_json_header_types message header. Spring for Apache Kafka 4.1.0 Spring for Apache Kafka 4.0.0 - 4.0.6 Spring for Apache Kafka 3.0.0 - 3.3.16 Spring for Apache Kafka 2.9.0 - 2.9.14 Spring for Apache Kafka 2.8.12 and earlier
CVE-2026-59277 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Spring Security's InetAddressMatchers utility provides matchInternal() and matchExternal() builders for constructing an InetAddressMatcher that classifies a given IP address as belonging to an internal (private) or external (public) network. Spring Security 7.1.0
CVE-2026-59276 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Several components in Spring Security compare security-sensitive values using standard string equality (String.equals()) rather than a constant-time comparison. Because String.equals() returns as soon as it finds a differing character, the time taken to reject an incorrect value is proportional to the number of leading characters that match the expected value. Spring Security 7.1.0 Spring Security 7.0.0 - 7.0.6 Spring Security 6.5.0 - 6.5.11 Spring Security 6.4.0 - 6.4.18 Spring Security 5.8.0 - 5.8.27 Spring Security 5.7.0 - 5.7.25
CVE-2026-59275 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit A single hostile AMQP message can terminate the entire consumer JVM (System.exit(99)), not just the listener thread — full availability loss for every workload co-located in that process. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 Spring AMQP 4.0.0 - 4.0.4 Spring AMQP 3.2.0 - 3.2.12 Spring AMQP 2.4.18 and earlier
CVE-2026-59274 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit The UnZipTransformer does not limit decompressed entry size or entry count when processing archives. Consequently, an attacker can send a zip archive that can exhaust JVM heap memory, causing a denial-of-service outage. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12
CVE-2026-59272 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Any application shipping logs to RabbitMQ over TLS via the Log4j2 appender, relying on the documented default, is exposed to man-in-the-middle interception of every log event. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 Spring AMQP 4.0.0 - 4.0.4 Spring AMQP 3.2.0 - 3.2.12 Spring AMQP 2.4.18 and earlier
CVE-2026-59271 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit When the RabbitMQ management aliveness check fails, the configured admin password is embedded in cleartext in the thrown exception message. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 Spring AMQP 4.0.0 - 4.0.4 Spring AMQP 3.2.0 - 3.2.12 Spring AMQP 2.4.18 and earlier
CVE-2026-59270 Critical 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Spring Security's embedded UnboundID LDAP server (UnboundIdContainer) unconditionally registers an administrative credential and binds its listener to all available network interfaces. Spring Security 7.1.0 Spring Security 7.0.0 - 7.0.6 Spring Security 6.5.0 - 6.5.11 Spring Security 6.4.0 - 6.4.18 Spring Security 5.8.0 - 5.8.27 Spring Security 5.7.0 - 5.7.25
CVE-2026-5680 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit A flaw was found in Undertow. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending specially crafted WebSocket messages with permessage-deflate negotiated. This could lead to excessive memory consumption due to the PerMessageDeflateFunction.largerBuffer() method using exponential doubling, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the affected application.
CVE-2026-47894 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Spring Cloud Config Server native environment repository allows exposure of configuration files outside of the configured repository path. Spring Cloud Config 5.0.0 - 5.0.4 Spring Cloud Config 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Config 4.0.0 - 4.2.8 Spring Cloud Config 3.1.14 and earlier
CVE-2026-47893 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit A Spring WebFlux application that supports WebSocket connections may expose indirectly sensitive user information by including request headers in an exception reason. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier
CVE-2026-47892 Critical 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit A WebFlux application using functional endpoints and deployed with DispatcherServlet may be vulnerable to a header predicate bypass in a pre-flight request. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.5.RELEASE - 5.2.25.RELEASE
CVE-2026-47891 Critical 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit A Spring WebFlux application that relies on the Aalto XML processor to parse XML input does not correctly enforce the maxInMemorySize limit. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier
CVE-2026-47890 Critical 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to stream corruption when using Server-Sent Events (SSE) with view fragments. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19
CVE-2026-47889 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit A WebFlux application running on the Jetty 12 Core reactive adapter serializes response cookies without the sameSite attribute. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19
CVE-2026-47888 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit A Spring RSocket application is exposed to a memory leak via a malformed SETUP frame. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.0.RELEASE - 5.2.25.RELEASE
CVE-2026-47887 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit A Spring MVC application that uses UrlFileNameViewController that is mapped with an end-of-path, and does not have a configured prefix is vulnerable to an open redirect. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier
CVE-2026-47886 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Applications that evaluate user-supplied Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expressions may be vulnerable to a Denial of Service (DoS) attack when the power operator (^) is used with a BigDecimal or BigInteger operand and a large exponent value. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier
CVE-2026-47885 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit The PartEventHttpMessageReader in Spring WebFlux does not enforce the maxPartSize limit when maxInMemorySize is set to -1. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28
CVE-2026-47884 Critical 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Use of XsltView in a Spring MVC application can result in SSRF and RCE attack if the application has an "/**" mapping that results in view rendering, and where the view name is not explicitly specified. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier
CVE-2026-47883 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit UrlHandlerFilter can be vulnerable to an open redirect when configured with very broadly matching patterns. The issue applies to the filter variants in both Spring MVC and Spring WebFlux. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19
CVE-2026-47881 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Spring Batch's FlatFileItemReader supports files where a single logical record spans multiple physical lines — for example, a CSV field that contains embedded newlines wrapped in quotes. A specially crafted input file could exploit the way the reader assembles those multi-line records to consume excessive CPU time and memory, causing the batch job to stall or run out of memory. Spring Batch 6.0.0 - 6.0.4 Spring Batch 5.2.0 - 5.2.6 Spring Batch 4.3.0 - 4.3.13
CVE-2026-47880 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit A producer who can publish to a JMS destination consumed by any Spring Integration JMS inbound component can set String JMS properties named replyChannel, errorChannel, or json__TypeId__ which are copied verbatim into the Spring Integration MessageHeaders. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier
CVE-2026-47879 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Spring Cloud Gateway JsonToGrpcGatewayFilterFactory allows arbitrary Spring Resource locations for defining the proto descriptor. Spring Cloud Gateway 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Gateway 4.3.0 - 4.3.5 Spring Cloud Gateway 4.0.0 - 4.2.9 Spring Cloud Gateway 3.1.13 and earlier
CVE-2026-47878 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit DefaultExecutionContextSerializer, used by default in Spring Batch's JDBC job repository, passes Base64-decoded bytes directly to ObjectInputStream.readObject() without an ObjectInputFilter that restricts types to a trusted class allowlist. Spring Batch 6.0.0 - 6.0.4 Spring Batch 5.2.6 and earlier
CVE-2026-47877 High 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit Spring Security Authorization Server's default consent page renders user-controlled values without HTML entity encoding. Spring Security 7.1.0 Spring Security 7.0.0 - 7.0.6
CVE-2026-47875 Critical 2026-08-27 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Applications that deserialize execution contexts with Jackson2ExecutionContextStringSerializer are vulnerable to a deserialization attack if they use an untrusted data source for the job repository. The JobParameterDeserializer does not properly enforce the trusted-types allowlist, allowing an attacker to craft malicious input that can lead to arbitrary code execution, including known Jackson RCE gadgets. Spring Batch 6.0.0 - 6.0.4 Spring Batch 5.2.0 - 5.2.6
CVE-2026-47864 Critical 2026-08-27 Protected by Waratek No public exploit SerializingHttpMessageConverter deserializes the body of incoming HTTP requests with a raw java.io.ObjectInputStream and no class filtering. Any request with Content-Type application/x-java-serialized-object whose body resolves to a Serializable type is read directly via readObject(). If an application using this converter on an inbound HTTP endpoint has any known Java deserialization "gadget" on its classpath, a remote, unauthenticated attacker can achieve arbitrary code execution. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier
CVE-2026-47862 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit An attacker who can set the file_name header on a message reaching a ZipTransformer with ZipResultType.FILE (the default) can cause the resulting .zip archive to be written to an arbitrary filesystem path outside the configured workDirectory. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12
CVE-2026-47861 Medium 2026-08-27 No exploit published No public exploit An unauthenticated remote attacker who can send a single UDP packet to a Spring Integration UDP inbound adapter can cause the server to emit an outbound UDP datagram to an arbitrary internal or external host and port of the attacker's choosing. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier
‹ prev page 1 of 148 next ›