Overview 8,318 matches · 1,041 protected · 161 exploited · 64 CISA KEV · 473 public PoC · 270 EPSS ≥ 0.5
8,318matches
1,041protected12.5%
161exploited1.9%
64CISA KEV0.8%
473public PoC5.7%
270EPSS ≥ 0.53.2%
Protected by Waratek
1,047
12.6%
Rule in development
3
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
285
3.4%
No exploit published
6,983
84.0%
split by
peak 1,086 / year
19961
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19970
19980
19992
No exploit published2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
200012
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published6
High5
Medium7
not blocked12
Working exploit published6
No public exploit6
200113
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published10
High7
Medium6
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked12
Working exploit published2
No public exploit11
200237
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate8
No exploit published26
High11
Medium23
Low3
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked34
Working exploit published8
Forecast only2
No public exploit27
200339
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate7
No exploit published30
High9
Medium24
Low6
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked37
Working exploit published8
No public exploit31
200427
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published24
High6
Medium18
Low3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked25
Working exploit published1
No public exploit26
200582
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published75
Critical1
High30
Medium46
Low5
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked79
Working exploit published5
No public exploit77
2006133
Protected by Waratek8
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published121
High66
Medium56
Low11
blocked by ARMR today8
not blocked125
Exploited1
Working exploit published5
No public exploit127
2007150
Protected by Waratek6
Mitigation candidate10
No exploit published134
High68
Medium71
Low11
blocked by ARMR today6
not blocked144
Working exploit published11
No public exploit139
2008136
Protected by Waratek7
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published120
High46
Medium83
Low7
blocked by ARMR today7
not blocked129
Exploited2
Working exploit published12
No public exploit122
2009203
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate13
No exploit published181
High52
Medium129
Low22
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked194
Exploited1
Working exploit published16
No public exploit186
2010183
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published162
Critical1
High27
Medium133
Low22
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked174
Exploited3
Working exploit published14
Forecast only1
No public exploit165
2011193
Protected by Waratek6
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published178
High20
Medium139
Low34
blocked by ARMR today6
not blocked187
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit181
2012311
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate24
No exploit published278
Critical3
High29
Medium199
Low80
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked300
not established2
Exploited8
Working exploit published19
No public exploit284
2013349
Protected by Waratek26
Mitigation candidate18
No exploit published305
Critical1
High45
Medium249
Low54
blocked by ARMR today26
not blocked322
not established1
Exploited9
Working exploit published17
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit321
2014335
Protected by Waratek41
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published282
High30
Medium256
Low49
blocked by ARMR today41
not blocked294
Exploited4
Working exploit published14
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only2
No public exploit314
2015323
Protected by Waratek32
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published285
Critical4
High42
Medium226
Low51
blocked by ARMR today32
not blocked291
Exploited4
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit310
2016535
Protected by Waratek58
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published465
Critical47
High134
Medium321
Low33
blocked by ARMR today57
partly blocked1
not blocked476
not established1
Exploited8
Working exploit published18
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only5
No public exploit503
2017800
Protected by Waratek104
Mitigation candidate14
No exploit published682
Critical82
High338
Medium355
Low25
blocked by ARMR today102
partly blocked2
not blocked696
Exploited17
Working exploit published19
Proof of concept only3
Forecast only1
No public exploit760
2018889
Protected by Waratek176
Mitigation candidate16
No exploit published697
Critical86
High302
Medium487
Low14
blocked by ARMR today175
partly blocked1
not blocked713
Exploited15
Working exploit published15
Proof of concept only7
Forecast only1
No public exploit851
2019903
Protected by Waratek122
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate24
No exploit published756
Critical86
High332
Medium454
Low31
blocked by ARMR today120
partly blocked2
not blocked780
not established1
Exploited19
Working exploit published22
Proof of concept only11
Forecast only3
No public exploit848
20201,086
Protected by Waratek154
Mitigation candidate34
No exploit published898
Critical114
High386
Medium546
Low40
blocked by ARMR today154
not blocked932
Exploited29
Working exploit published19
Proof of concept only17
Forecast only8
No public exploit1,013
2021798
Protected by Waratek124
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate24
No exploit published649
Critical104
High346
Medium331
Low17
blocked by ARMR today124
not blocked674
Exploited25
Working exploit published13
Proof of concept only18
Forecast only24
No public exploit718
2022778
Protected by Waratek145
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate16
No exploit published616
Critical80
High215
Medium472
Low11
blocked by ARMR today145
not blocked633
Exploited16
Working exploit published10
Proof of concept only34
Forecast only13
No public exploit705
199820012004200720102013201620192022
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-37023 | Medium | 2022-08-31 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Geode versions prior to 1.15.0 are vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using REST API on Java 8 or Java 11. Any user wishing to protect against deserialization attacks involving REST APIs should upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15 and follow the documentation for details on enabling "validate-serializable-objects=true" and specifying any user classes that may be serialized/deserialized with "serializable-object-filter". Enabling "validate-serializable-objects" may impact performance. |
| CVE-2022-37022 | High | 2022-08-31 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Geode versions up to 1.12.2 and 1.13.2 are vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using JMX over RMI on Java 11. Any user wishing to protect against deserialization attacks involving JMX or RMI should upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15. Use of 1.15 on Java 11 will automatically protect JMX over RMI against deserialization attacks. This should have no impact on performance since it only affects JMX/RMI which Gfsh uses to communicate with the JMX Manager which is hosted on a Locator. |
| CVE-2022-37021 | Critical | 2022-08-31 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Geode versions up to 1.12.5, 1.13.4 and 1.14.0 are vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using JMX over RMI on Java 8. Any user still on Java 8 who wishes to protect against deserialization attacks involving JMX or RMI should upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15 and Java 11. If upgrading to Java 11 is not possible, then upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15 and specify "--J=-Dgeode.enableGlobalSerialFilter=true" when starting any Locators or Servers. Follow the documentation for details on specifying any user classes that may be serialized/deserialized with the "serializable-object-filter" configuration option. Using a global serial filter will impact performance. |
| CVE-2022-2466 | Critical | 2022-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was found that Quarkus 2.10.x does not terminate HTTP requests header context which may lead to unpredictable behavior. |
| CVE-2022-1319 | High | 2022-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow. For an AJP 400 response, EAP 7 is improperly sending two response packets, and those packets have the reuse flag set even though JBoss EAP closes the connection. A failure occurs when the connection is reused after a 400 by CPING since it reads in the second SEND_HEADERS response packet instead of a CPONG. |
| CVE-2022-1259 | High | 2022-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow. A potential security issue in flow control handling by the browser over HTTP/2 may cause overhead or a denial of service in the server. This flaw exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2021-3629. |
| CVE-2022-25857 | High | 2022-08-30 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The package org.yaml:snakeyaml from 0 and before 1.31 are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) due missing to nested depth limitation for collections. |
| CVE-2022-36033 | Medium | 2022-08-29 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | jsoup is a Java HTML parser, built for HTML editing, cleaning, scraping, and cross-site scripting (XSS) safety. jsoup may incorrectly sanitize HTML including `javascript:` URL expressions, which could allow XSS attacks when a reader subsequently clicks that link. If the non-default `SafeList.preserveRelativeLinks` option is enabled, HTML including `javascript:` URLs that have been crafted with control characters will not be sanitized. If the site that this HTML is published on does not set a Content Security Policy, an XSS attack is then possible. This issue is patched in jsoup 1.15.3. Users should upgrade to this version. Additionally, as the unsanitized input may have been persisted, old content should be cleaned again using the updated version. To remediate this issue without immediately upgrading: - disable `SafeList.preserveRelativeLinks`, which will rewrite input URLs as absolute URLs - ensure an appropriate [Content Security Policy](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CSP) is defined. (This should be used regardless of upgrading, as a defence-in-depth best practice.) |
| CVE-2022-36537 | High | 2022-08-26 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | ZK Framework v9.6.1, 9.6.0.1, 9.5.1.3, 9.0.1.2 and 8.6.4.1 allows attackers to access sensitive information via a crafted POST request sent to the component AuUploader. |
| CVE-2022-0225 | Medium | 2022-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw allows a privileged attacker to use the malicious payload as the group name while creating a new group from the admin console, leading to a stored Cross-site scripting (XSS) attack. |
| CVE-2022-0084 | High | 2022-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in XNIO, specifically in the notifyReadClosed method. The issue revealed this method was logging a message to another expected end. This flaw allows an attacker to send flawed requests to a server, possibly causing log contention-related performance concerns or an unwanted disk fill-up. |
| CVE-2021-3859 | High | 2022-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow that tripped the client-side invocation timeout with certain calls made over HTTP2. This flaw allows an attacker to carry out denial of service attacks. |
| CVE-2021-3856 | Medium | 2022-08-26 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | ClassLoaderTheme and ClasspathThemeResourceProviderFactory allows reading any file available as a resource to the classloader. By sending requests for theme resources with a relative path from an external HTTP client, the client will receive the content of random files if available. |
| CVE-2021-3754 | Medium | 2022-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in keycloak where an attacker is able to register himself with the username same as the email ID of any existing user. This may cause trouble in getting password recovery email in case the user forgets the password. |
| CVE-2021-3644 | Low | 2022-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in wildfly-core in all versions. If a vault expression is in the form of a single attribute that contains multiple expressions, a user who was granted access to the management interface can potentially access a vault expression they should not be able to access and possibly retrieve the item which was stored in the vault. The highest threat from this vulnerability is data confidentiality and integrity. |
| CVE-2021-3632 | High | 2022-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Keycloak. This vulnerability allows anyone to register a new security device or key when there is not a device already registered for any user by using the WebAuthn password-less login flow. |
| CVE-2022-36527 | Medium | 2022-08-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jfinal CMS v5.1.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the post title text field under the publish blog module. |
| CVE-2021-3914 | Medium | 2022-08-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was found that the smallrye health metrics UI component did not properly sanitize some user inputs. An attacker could use this flaw to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. |
| CVE-2021-25642 | High | 2022-08-25 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | ZKConfigurationStore which is optionally used by CapacityScheduler of Apache Hadoop YARN deserializes data obtained from ZooKeeper without validation. An attacker having access to ZooKeeper can run arbitrary commands as YARN user by exploiting this. Users should upgrade to Apache Hadoop 2.10.2, 3.2.4, 3.3.4 or later (containing YARN-11126) if ZKConfigurationStore is used. |
| CVE-2021-4178 | Medium | 2022-08-24 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A arbitrary code execution flaw was found in the Fabric 8 Kubernetes client affecting versions 5.0.0-beta-1 and above. Due to an improperly configured YAML parsing, this will allow a local and privileged attacker to supply malicious YAML. |
| CVE-2021-4040 | Medium | 2022-08-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in AMQ Broker. This issue can cause a partial interruption to the availability of AMQ Broker via an Out of memory (OOM) condition. This flaw allows an attacker to partially disrupt availability to the broker through a sustained attack of maliciously crafted messages. The highest threat from this vulnerability is system availability. |
| CVE-2022-38665 | Medium | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins CollabNet Plugins Plugin 2.0.8 and earlier stores a RabbitMQ password unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins controller where it can be viewed by users with access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-38664 | Medium | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Job Configuration History Plugin 1165.v8cc9fd1f4597 and earlier does not escape the job name on the System Configuration History page, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers able to configure job names. |
| CVE-2022-38663 | Medium | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Git Plugin 4.11.4 and earlier does not properly mask (i.e., replace with asterisks) credentials in the build log provided by the Git Username and Password (`gitUsernamePassword`) credentials binding. |
| CVE-2022-37223 | Critical | 2022-08-23 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | JFinal CMS 5.1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection via /jfinal_cms/system/role/list. |
| CVE-2022-37199 | Critical | 2022-08-23 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | JFinal CMS 5.1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection via /jfinal_cms/system/user/list. |
| CVE-2022-35278 | Medium | 2022-08-23 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Apache ActiveMQ Artemis prior to 2.24.0, an attacker could show malicious content and/or redirect users to a malicious URL in the web console by using HTML in the name of an address or queue. |
| CVE-2021-3827 | Medium | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in keycloak, where the default ECP binding flow allows other authentication flows to be bypassed. By exploiting this behavior, an attacker can bypass the MFA authentication by sending a SOAP request with an AuthnRequest and Authorization header with the user's credentials. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality and integrity. |
| CVE-2021-3690 | High | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow. A buffer leak on the incoming WebSocket PONG message may lead to memory exhaustion. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is availability. |
| CVE-2020-35509 | Medium | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in keycloak affecting versions 11.0.3 and 12.0.0. An expired certificate would be accepted by the direct-grant authenticator because of missing time stamp validations. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity. |
| CVE-2019-25075 | Medium | 2022-08-23 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | HTML injection combined with path traversal in the Email service in Gravitee API Management before 1.25.3 allows anonymous users to read arbitrary files via a /management/users/register request. |
| CVE-2021-3513 | High | 2022-08-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in keycloak where a brute force attack is possible even when the permanent lockout feature is enabled. This is due to a wrong error message displayed when wrong credentials are entered. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. |
| CVE-2022-34916 | Critical | 2022-08-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Flume versions 1.4.0 through 1.10.0 are vulnerable to a remote code execution (RCE) attack when a configuration uses a JMS Source with a JNDI LDAP data source URI when an attacker has control of the target LDAP server. This issue is fixed by limiting JNDI to allow only the use of the java protocol or no protocol. |
| CVE-2022-36157 | High | 2022-08-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XXL-JOB all versions as of 11 July 2022 are vulnerable to Insecure Permissions resulting in the ability to execute admin function with low Privilege account. |
| CVE-2022-37422 | High | 2022-08-18 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Payara through 5.2022.2 allows directory traversal without authentication. This affects Payara Server, Payara Micro, and Payara Server Embedded. |
| CVE-2020-14379 | Medium | 2022-08-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Red Hat AMQ Broker in a way that a XEE attack can be done via Broker's configuration files, leading to denial of service and information disclosure. |
| CVE-2022-36007 | Medium | 2022-08-15 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | Venice is a Clojure inspired sandboxed Lisp dialect with excellent Java interoperability. A partial path traversal issue exists within the functions `load-file` and `load-resource`. These functions can be limited to load files from a list of load paths. Assuming Venice has been configured with the load paths: `[ "/Users/foo/resources" ]` When passing **relative** paths to these two vulnerable functions everything is fine: `(load-resource "test.png")` => loads the file "/Users/foo/resources/test.png" `(load-resource "../resources-alt/test.png")` => rejected, outside the load path When passing **absolute** paths to these two vulnerable functions Venice may return files outside the configured load paths: `(load-resource "/Users/foo/resources/test.png")` => loads the file "/Users/foo/resources/test.png" `(load-resource "/Users/foo/resources-alt/test.png")` => loads the file "/Users/foo/resources-alt/test.png" !!! The latter call suffers from the _Partial Path Traversal_ vulnerability. This issue’s scope is limited to absolute paths whose name prefix matches a load path. E.g. for a load-path `"/Users/foo/resources"`, the actor can cause loading a resource also from `"/Users/foo/resources-alt"`, but not from `"/Users/foo/images"`. Versions of Venice before and including v1.10.17 are affected by this issue. Upgrade to Venice >= 1.10.18, if you are on a version < 1.10.18. There are currently no known workarounds. |
| CVE-2020-23622 | High | 2022-08-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An issue in the UPnP protocol in 4thline cling 2.0.0 through 2.1.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via an unchecked CALLBACK parameter in the request header |
| CVE-2022-38180 | Medium | 2022-08-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In JetBrains Ktor before 2.1.0 the wrong authentication provider could be selected in some cases |
| CVE-2022-38179 | Medium | 2022-08-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | JetBrains Ktor before 2.1.0 was vulnerable to the Reflect File Download attack |
| CVE-2022-37423 | High | 2022-08-12 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Neo4j APOC (Awesome Procedures on Cypher) before 4.3.0.7 and 4.x before 4.4.0.8 allows Directory Traversal to sibling directories via apoc.log.stream. |
| CVE-2022-35980 | High | 2022-08-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | OpenSearch Security is a plugin for OpenSearch that offers encryption, authentication and authorization. Versions 2.0.0.0 and 2.1.0.0 of the security plugin are affected by an information disclosure vulnerability. Requests to an OpenSearch cluster configured with advanced access control features document level security (DLS), field level security (FLS), and/or field masking will not be filtered when the query's search pattern matches an aliased index. OpenSearch Dashboards creates an alias to `.kibana` by default, so filters with the index pattern of `*` to restrict access to documents or fields will not be applied. This issue allows requests to access sensitive information when customer have acted to restrict access that specific information. OpenSearch 2.2.0, which is compatible with OpenSearch Security 2.2.0.0, contains the fix for this issue. There is no recommended work around. |
| CVE-2022-35697 | Medium | 2022-08-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager Core Components version 2.20.6 (and earlier) is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If an attacker is able to convince a victim to visit a URL referencing a vulnerable page, malicious JavaScript content may be executed within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires a low author privilege access. |
| CVE-2022-2668 | High | 2022-08-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Keycloak that allows arbitrary Javascript to be uploaded for the SAML protocol mapper even if the UPLOAD_SCRIPTS feature is disabled |
| CVE-2022-2053 | High | 2022-08-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When a POST request comes through AJP and the request exceeds the max-post-size limit (maxEntitySize), Undertow's AjpServerRequestConduit implementation closes a connection without sending any response to the client/proxy. This behavior results in that a front-end proxy marking the backend worker (application server) as an error state and not forward requests to the worker for a while. In mod_cluster, this continues until the next STATUS request (10 seconds intervals) from the application server updates the server state. So, in the worst case, it can result in "All workers are in error state" and mod_cluster responds "503 Service Unavailable" for a while (up to 10 seconds). In mod_proxy_balancer, it does not forward requests to the worker until the "retry" timeout passes. However, luckily, mod_proxy_balancer has "forcerecovery" setting (On by default; this parameter can force the immediate recovery of all workers without considering the retry parameter of the workers if all workers of a balancer are in error state.). So, unlike mod_cluster, mod_proxy_balancer does not result in responding "503 Service Unavailable". An attacker could use this behavior to send a malicious request and trigger server errors, resulting in DoS (denial of service). This flaw was fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2. |
| CVE-2022-34158 | High | 2022-08-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A carefully crafted invocation on the Image plugin could trigger an CSRF vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki before 2.11.3, which could allow a group privilege escalation of the attacker's account. Further examination of this issue established that it could also be used to modify the email associated with the attacked account, and then a reset password request from the login page. |
| CVE-2022-28732 | Medium | 2022-08-04 | No exploit published | Forecast only | A carefully crafted request on WeblogPlugin could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. Apache JSPWiki users should upgrade to 2.11.3 or later. |
| CVE-2022-28731 | Medium | 2022-08-04 | No exploit published | Forecast only | A carefully crafted request on UserPreferences.jsp could trigger an CSRF vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki before 2.11.3, which could allow the attacker to modify the email associated with the attacked account, and then a reset password request from the login page. |
| CVE-2022-28730 | Medium | 2022-08-04 | No exploit published | Forecast only | A carefully crafted request on AJAXPreview.jsp could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. This vulnerability leverages CVE-2021-40369, where the Denounce plugin dangerously renders user-supplied URLs. Upon re-testing CVE-2021-40369, it appears that the patch was incomplete as it was still possible to insert malicious input via the Denounce plugin. Apache JSPWiki users should upgrade to 2.11.3 or later. |
| CVE-2022-27166 | Medium | 2022-08-04 | No exploit published | Forecast only | A carefully crafted request on XHRHtml2Markup.jsp could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki up to and including 2.11.2, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. |
| CVE-2022-31197 | High | 2022-08-03 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | PostgreSQL JDBC Driver (PgJDBC for short) allows Java programs to connect to a PostgreSQL database using standard, database independent Java code. The PGJDBC implementation of the `java.sql.ResultRow.refreshRow()` method is not performing escaping of column names so a malicious column name that contains a statement terminator, e.g. `;`, could lead to SQL injection. This could lead to executing additional SQL commands as the application's JDBC user. User applications that do not invoke the `ResultSet.refreshRow()` method are not impacted. User application that do invoke that method are impacted if the underlying database that they are querying via their JDBC application may be under the control of an attacker. The attack requires the attacker to trick the user into executing SQL against a table name who's column names would contain the malicious SQL and subsequently invoke the `refreshRow()` method on the ResultSet. Note that the application's JDBC user and the schema owner need not be the same. A JDBC application that executes as a privileged user querying database schemas owned by potentially malicious less-privileged users would be vulnerable. In that situation it may be possible for the malicious user to craft a schema that causes the application to execute commands as the privileged user. Patched versions will be released as `42.2.26` and `42.4.1`. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. |
| CVE-2022-25867 | High | 2022-08-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The package io.socket:socket.io-client before 2.0.1 are vulnerable to NULL Pointer Dereference when parsing a packet with with invalid payload format. |
| CVE-2022-31195 | High | 2022-08-01 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | DSpace open source software is a repository application which provides durable access to digital resources. In affected versions the ItemImportServiceImpl is vulnerable to a path traversal vulnerability. This means a malicious SAF (simple archive format) package could cause a file/directory to be created anywhere the Tomcat/DSpace user can write to on the server. However, this path traversal vulnerability is only possible by a user with special privileges (either Administrators or someone with command-line access to the server). This vulnerability impacts the XMLUI, JSPUI and command-line. Users are advised to upgrade. As a basic workaround, users may block all access to the following URL paths: If you are using the XMLUI, block all access to /admin/batchimport path (this is the URL of the Admin Batch Import tool). Keep in mind, if your site uses the path "/xmlui", then you'd need to block access to /xmlui/admin/batchimport. If you are using the JSPUI, block all access to /dspace-admin/batchimport path (this is the URL of the Admin Batch Import tool). Keep in mind, if your site uses the path "/jspui", then you'd need to block access to /jspui/dspace-admin/batchimport. Keep in mind, only an Administrative user or a user with command-line access to the server is able to import/upload SAF packages. Therefore, assuming those users do not blindly upload untrusted SAF packages, then it is unlikely your site could be impacted by this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-31194 | High | 2022-08-01 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | DSpace open source software is a repository application which provides durable access to digital resources. dspace-jspui is a UI component for DSpace. The JSPUI resumable upload implementations in SubmissionController and FileUploadRequest are vulnerable to multiple path traversal attacks, allowing an attacker to create files/directories anywhere on the server writable by the Tomcat/DSpace user, by modifying some request parameters during submission. This path traversal can only be executed by a user with special privileges (submitter rights). This vulnerability only impacts the JSPUI. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds. However, this vulnerability cannot be exploited by an anonymous user or a basic user. The user must first have submitter privileges to at least one Collection and be able to determine how to modify the request parameters to exploit the vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-31193 | High | 2022-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | DSpace open source software is a repository application which provides durable access to digital resources. dspace-jspui is a UI component for DSpace. The JSPUI controlled vocabulary servlet is vulnerable to an open redirect attack, where an attacker can craft a malicious URL that looks like a legitimate DSpace/repository URL. When that URL is clicked by the target, it redirects them to a site of the attacker's choice. This issue has been patched in versions 5.11 and 6.4. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workaround for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-31192 | High | 2022-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | DSpace open source software is a repository application which provides durable access to digital resources. dspace-jspui is a UI component for DSpace. The JSPUI "Request a Copy" feature does not properly escape values submitted and stored from the "Request a Copy" form. This means that item requests could be vulnerable to XSS attacks. This vulnerability only impacts the JSPUI. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-31191 | High | 2022-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | DSpace open source software is a repository application which provides durable access to digital resources. dspace-jspui is a UI component for DSpace. The JSPUI spellcheck "Did you mean" HTML escapes the data-spell attribute in the link, but not the actual displayed text. Similarly, the JSPUI autocomplete HTML does not properly escape text passed to it. Both are vulnerable to XSS. This vulnerability only impacts the JSPUI. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. |
| CVE-2022-31190 | Medium | 2022-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | DSpace open source software is a repository application which provides durable access to digital resources. dspace-xmlui is a UI component for DSpace. In affected versions metadata on a withdrawn Item is exposed via the XMLUI "mets.xml" object, as long as you know the handle/URL of the withdrawn Item. This vulnerability only impacts the XMLUI. Users are advised to upgrade to version 6.4 or newer. |
| CVE-2022-31189 | Medium | 2022-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | DSpace open source software is a repository application which provides durable access to digital resources. dspace-jspui is a UI component for DSpace. When an "Internal System Error" occurs in the JSPUI, then entire exception (including stack trace) is available. Information in this stacktrace may be useful to an attacker in launching a more sophisticated attack. This vulnerability only impacts the JSPUI. This issue has been fixed in version 6.4. users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should disable the display of error messages in their internal.jsp file. |
| CVE-2022-31183 | Critical | 2022-08-01 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | fs2 is a compositional, streaming I/O library for Scala. When establishing a server-mode `TLSSocket` using `fs2-io` on Node.js, the parameter `requestCert = true` is ignored, peer certificate verification is skipped, and the connection proceeds. The vulnerability is limited to: 1. `fs2-io` running on Node.js. The JVM TLS implementation is completely independent. 2. `TLSSocket`s in server-mode. Client-mode `TLSSocket`s are implemented via a different API. 3. mTLS as enabled via `requestCert = true` in `TLSParameters`. The default setting is `false` for server-mode `TLSSocket`s. It was introduced with the initial Node.js implementation of fs2-io in 3.1.0. A patch is released in v3.2.11. The requestCert = true parameter is respected and the peer certificate is verified. If verification fails, a SSLException is raised. If using an unpatched version on Node.js, do not use a server-mode TLSSocket with requestCert = true to establish a mTLS connection. |
| CVE-2022-2576 | High | 2022-07-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.7.2 and 3.0.0-3.5.0 a DTLS resumption handshake falls back to a DTLS full handshake on a parameter mismatch without using a HelloVerifyRequest. Especially, if used with certificate based cipher suites, that results in message amplification (DDoS other peers) and high CPU load (DoS own peer). The misbehavior occurs only with DTLS_VERIFY_PEERS_ON_RESUMPTION_THRESHOLD values larger than 0. |
| CVE-2022-36364 | High | 2022-07-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Calcite Avatica JDBC driver creates HTTP client instances based on class names provided via `httpclient_impl` connection property; however, the driver does not verify if the class implements the expected interface before instantiating it, which can lead to code execution loaded via arbitrary classes and in rare cases remote code execution. To exploit the vulnerability: 1) the attacker needs to have privileges to control JDBC connection parameters; 2) and there should be a vulnerable class (constructor with URL parameter and ability to execute code) in the classpath. From Apache Calcite Avatica 1.22.0 onwards, it will be verified that the class implements the expected interface before invoking its constructor. |
| CVE-2022-36922 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Lucene-Search Plugin 370.v62a5f618cd3a and earlier does not escape the search query parameter displayed on the 'search' result page, resulting in a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-36921 | High | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Coverity Plugin 1.11.4 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36920 | High | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Coverity Plugin 1.11.4 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36919 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Coverity Plugin 1.11.4 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36918 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Buckminster Plugin 1.1.1 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-36917 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Google Cloud Backup Plugin 0.6 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to request a manual backup. |
| CVE-2022-36916 | High | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Google Cloud Backup Plugin 0.6 and earlier allows attackers to request a manual backup. |
| CVE-2022-36915 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Android Signing Plugin 2.2.5 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Item/Read permission but without Item/Workspace or Item/Configure permission to check whether attacker-specified file patterns match workspace contents. |
| CVE-2022-36914 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Files Found Trigger Plugin 1.5 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-36913 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Openstack Heat Plugin 1.5 and earlier does not perform permission checks in methods implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-36912 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Openstack Heat Plugin 1.5 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL. |
| CVE-2022-36911 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Openstack Heat Plugin 1.5 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL. |
| CVE-2022-36910 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Lucene-Search Plugin 370.v62a5f618cd3a and earlier does not perform a permission check in several HTTP endpoints, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to reindex the database and to obtain information about jobs otherwise inaccessible to them. |
| CVE-2022-36909 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system and to upload a SSH key file from the Jenkins controller file system to an attacker-specified URL. |
| CVE-2022-36908 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system and to upload a SSH key file from the Jenkins controller file system to an attacker-specified URL. |
| CVE-2022-36907 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified username and password. |
| CVE-2022-36906 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified username and password. |
| CVE-2022-36905 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Maven Metadata Plugin for Jenkins CI server Plugin 2.2 and earlier does not perform URL validation for the Repository Base URL of List maven artifact versions parameters, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Item/Configure permission. |
| CVE-2022-36904 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Repository Connector Plugin 2.2.0 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-36903 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Repository Connector Plugin 2.2.0 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36902 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Dynamic Extended Choice Parameter Plugin 1.0.1 and earlier does not escape several fields of Moded Extended Choice parameters, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Item/Configure permission. |
| CVE-2022-36901 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins HTTP Request Plugin 1.15 and earlier stores HTTP Request passwords unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-36900 | High | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Compuware zAdviser API Plugin 1.0.3 and earlier does not restrict execution of a controller/agent message to agents, allowing attackers able to control agent processes to retrieve Java system properties. |
| CVE-2022-36899 | High | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Compuware ISPW Operations Plugin 1.0.8 and earlier does not restrict execution of a controller/agent message to agents, allowing attackers able to control agent processes to retrieve Java system properties. |
| CVE-2022-36898 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Compuware ISPW Operations Plugin 1.0.8 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate hosts and ports of Compuware configurations and credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36897 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Compuware Xpediter Code Coverage Plugin 1.0.7 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate hosts and ports of Compuware configurations and credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36896 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Compuware Source Code Download for Endevor, PDS, and ISPW Plugin 2.0.12 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate hosts and ports of Compuware configurations and credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36895 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Compuware Topaz Utilities Plugin 1.0.8 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate hosts and ports of Compuware configurations and credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36894 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | An arbitrary file write vulnerability in Jenkins CLIF Performance Testing Plugin 64.vc0d66de1dfb_f and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to create or replace arbitrary files on the Jenkins controller file system with attacker-specified content. |
| CVE-2022-36893 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins rpmsign-plugin Plugin 0.5.0 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Item/Read permission but without Item/Workspace or Item/Configure permission to check whether attacker-specified file patterns match workspace contents. |
| CVE-2022-36892 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins rhnpush-plugin Plugin 0.5.1 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Item/Read permission but without Item/Workspace or Item/Configure permission to check whether attacker-specified file patterns match workspace contents. |
| CVE-2022-36891 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Deployer Framework Plugin 85.v1d1888e8c021 and earlier allows attackers with Item/Read permission but without Deploy Now/Deploy permission to read deployment logs. |
| CVE-2022-36890 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins Deployer Framework Plugin 85.v1d1888e8c021 and earlier does not restrict the name of files in methods implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Item/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-36889 | High | 2022-07-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins Deployer Framework Plugin 85.v1d1888e8c021 and earlier does not restrict the application path of the applications when configuring a deployment, allowing attackers with Item/Configure permission to upload arbitrary files from the Jenkins controller file system to the selected service. |
| CVE-2022-36888 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins HashiCorp Vault Plugin 354.vdb_858fd6b_f48 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to obtain credentials stored in Vault with attacker-specified path and keys. |
| CVE-2022-36887 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Job Configuration History Plugin 1155.v28a_46a_cc06a_5 and earlier allows attackers to delete entries from job, agent, and system configuration history, or restore older versions of job, agent, and system configurations. |
| CVE-2022-36886 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins External Monitor Job Type Plugin 191.v363d0d1efdf8 and earlier allows attackers to create runs of an external job. |
| CVE-2022-36885 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins GitHub Plugin 1.34.4 and earlier uses a non-constant time comparison function when checking whether the provided and computed webhook signatures are equal, allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook signature. |