Overview 7,266 matches · 0 protected · 46 exploited · 2 CISA KEV · 271 public PoC · 126 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
3
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
280
3.9%
No exploit published
6,983
96.1%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
7,266
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 932 / year
19961
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19970
19980
19992
No exploit published2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
200012
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published6
High5
Medium7
not blocked12
Working exploit published6
No public exploit6
200112
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published10
High6
Medium6
not blocked12
Working exploit published2
No public exploit10
200234
Mitigation candidate8
No exploit published26
High10
Medium21
Low3
not blocked34
Working exploit published8
Forecast only2
No public exploit24
200337
Mitigation candidate7
No exploit published30
High9
Medium22
Low6
not blocked37
Working exploit published7
No public exploit30
200425
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published24
High5
Medium17
Low3
not blocked25
Working exploit published1
No public exploit24
200579
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published75
Critical1
High30
Medium43
Low5
not blocked79
Working exploit published4
No public exploit75
2006125
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published121
High62
Medium52
Low11
not blocked125
Working exploit published4
No public exploit121
2007144
Mitigation candidate10
No exploit published134
High65
Medium69
Low10
not blocked144
Working exploit published10
No public exploit134
2008129
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published120
High43
Medium79
Low7
not blocked129
Working exploit published9
No public exploit120
2009194
Mitigation candidate13
No exploit published181
High49
Medium124
Low21
not blocked194
Exploited1
Working exploit published12
No public exploit181
2010174
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published162
High25
Medium127
Low22
not blocked174
Exploited1
Working exploit published11
Forecast only1
No public exploit161
2011187
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published178
High19
Medium135
Low33
not blocked187
Working exploit published9
No public exploit178
2012300
Mitigation candidate22
No exploit published278
High27
Medium193
Low80
not blocked300
Exploited3
Working exploit published19
No public exploit278
2013322
Mitigation candidate17
No exploit published305
High33
Medium236
Low53
not blocked322
Exploited2
Working exploit published14
Forecast only1
No public exploit305
2014294
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published282
High21
Medium224
Low49
not blocked294
Exploited2
Working exploit published10
No public exploit282
2015291
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published285
Critical1
High34
Medium206
Low50
not blocked291
Exploited1
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit285
2016476
Mitigation candidate11
No exploit published465
Critical33
High115
Medium295
Low33
not blocked476
Working exploit published11
Forecast only1
No public exploit464
2017696
Mitigation candidate14
No exploit published682
Critical46
High297
Medium331
Low22
not blocked696
Exploited4
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only1
No public exploit681
2018713
Mitigation candidate16
No exploit published697
Critical35
High232
Medium436
Low10
not blocked713
Exploited3
Working exploit published12
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit697
2019780
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate23
No exploit published756
Critical46
High295
Medium419
Low20
not blocked780
Exploited6
Working exploit published17
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only2
No public exploit754
2020932
Mitigation candidate34
No exploit published898
Critical72
High322
Medium511
Low27
not blocked932
Exploited10
Working exploit published14
Proof of concept only11
Forecast only8
No public exploit889
2021674
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate24
No exploit published649
Critical59
High299
Medium302
Low14
not blocked674
Exploited9
Working exploit published9
Proof of concept only11
Forecast only22
No public exploit623
2022633
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate16
No exploit published616
Critical40
High164
Medium422
Low7
not blocked633
Exploited4
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only20
Forecast only10
No public exploit593
199820012004200720102013201620192022
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-2466 | Critical | 2022-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was found that Quarkus 2.10.x does not terminate HTTP requests header context which may lead to unpredictable behavior. |
| CVE-2022-1319 | High | 2022-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow. For an AJP 400 response, EAP 7 is improperly sending two response packets, and those packets have the reuse flag set even though JBoss EAP closes the connection. A failure occurs when the connection is reused after a 400 by CPING since it reads in the second SEND_HEADERS response packet instead of a CPONG. |
| CVE-2022-1259 | High | 2022-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow. A potential security issue in flow control handling by the browser over HTTP/2 may cause overhead or a denial of service in the server. This flaw exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2021-3629. |
| CVE-2022-36537 | High | 2022-08-26 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | ZK Framework v9.6.1, 9.6.0.1, 9.5.1.3, 9.0.1.2 and 8.6.4.1 allows attackers to access sensitive information via a crafted POST request sent to the component AuUploader. |
| CVE-2022-0225 | Medium | 2022-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw allows a privileged attacker to use the malicious payload as the group name while creating a new group from the admin console, leading to a stored Cross-site scripting (XSS) attack. |
| CVE-2022-0084 | High | 2022-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in XNIO, specifically in the notifyReadClosed method. The issue revealed this method was logging a message to another expected end. This flaw allows an attacker to send flawed requests to a server, possibly causing log contention-related performance concerns or an unwanted disk fill-up. |
| CVE-2021-3859 | High | 2022-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow that tripped the client-side invocation timeout with certain calls made over HTTP2. This flaw allows an attacker to carry out denial of service attacks. |
| CVE-2021-3754 | Medium | 2022-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in keycloak where an attacker is able to register himself with the username same as the email ID of any existing user. This may cause trouble in getting password recovery email in case the user forgets the password. |
| CVE-2021-3644 | Low | 2022-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in wildfly-core in all versions. If a vault expression is in the form of a single attribute that contains multiple expressions, a user who was granted access to the management interface can potentially access a vault expression they should not be able to access and possibly retrieve the item which was stored in the vault. The highest threat from this vulnerability is data confidentiality and integrity. |
| CVE-2021-3632 | High | 2022-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Keycloak. This vulnerability allows anyone to register a new security device or key when there is not a device already registered for any user by using the WebAuthn password-less login flow. |
| CVE-2022-36527 | Medium | 2022-08-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jfinal CMS v5.1.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the post title text field under the publish blog module. |
| CVE-2021-3914 | Medium | 2022-08-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was found that the smallrye health metrics UI component did not properly sanitize some user inputs. An attacker could use this flaw to conduct cross-site scripting attacks. |
| CVE-2021-4040 | Medium | 2022-08-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in AMQ Broker. This issue can cause a partial interruption to the availability of AMQ Broker via an Out of memory (OOM) condition. This flaw allows an attacker to partially disrupt availability to the broker through a sustained attack of maliciously crafted messages. The highest threat from this vulnerability is system availability. |
| CVE-2022-38665 | Medium | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins CollabNet Plugins Plugin 2.0.8 and earlier stores a RabbitMQ password unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins controller where it can be viewed by users with access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-38664 | Medium | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Job Configuration History Plugin 1165.v8cc9fd1f4597 and earlier does not escape the job name on the System Configuration History page, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers able to configure job names. |
| CVE-2022-38663 | Medium | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Git Plugin 4.11.4 and earlier does not properly mask (i.e., replace with asterisks) credentials in the build log provided by the Git Username and Password (`gitUsernamePassword`) credentials binding. |
| CVE-2021-3827 | Medium | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in keycloak, where the default ECP binding flow allows other authentication flows to be bypassed. By exploiting this behavior, an attacker can bypass the MFA authentication by sending a SOAP request with an AuthnRequest and Authorization header with the user's credentials. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality and integrity. |
| CVE-2021-3690 | High | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow. A buffer leak on the incoming WebSocket PONG message may lead to memory exhaustion. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is availability. |
| CVE-2020-35509 | Medium | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in keycloak affecting versions 11.0.3 and 12.0.0. An expired certificate would be accepted by the direct-grant authenticator because of missing time stamp validations. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity. |
| CVE-2021-3513 | High | 2022-08-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in keycloak where a brute force attack is possible even when the permanent lockout feature is enabled. This is due to a wrong error message displayed when wrong credentials are entered. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. |
| CVE-2022-34916 | Critical | 2022-08-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Flume versions 1.4.0 through 1.10.0 are vulnerable to a remote code execution (RCE) attack when a configuration uses a JMS Source with a JNDI LDAP data source URI when an attacker has control of the target LDAP server. This issue is fixed by limiting JNDI to allow only the use of the java protocol or no protocol. |
| CVE-2022-36157 | High | 2022-08-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XXL-JOB all versions as of 11 July 2022 are vulnerable to Insecure Permissions resulting in the ability to execute admin function with low Privilege account. |
| CVE-2020-23622 | High | 2022-08-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An issue in the UPnP protocol in 4thline cling 2.0.0 through 2.1.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via an unchecked CALLBACK parameter in the request header |
| CVE-2022-38180 | Medium | 2022-08-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In JetBrains Ktor before 2.1.0 the wrong authentication provider could be selected in some cases |
| CVE-2022-38179 | Medium | 2022-08-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | JetBrains Ktor before 2.1.0 was vulnerable to the Reflect File Download attack |
| CVE-2022-35980 | High | 2022-08-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | OpenSearch Security is a plugin for OpenSearch that offers encryption, authentication and authorization. Versions 2.0.0.0 and 2.1.0.0 of the security plugin are affected by an information disclosure vulnerability. Requests to an OpenSearch cluster configured with advanced access control features document level security (DLS), field level security (FLS), and/or field masking will not be filtered when the query's search pattern matches an aliased index. OpenSearch Dashboards creates an alias to `.kibana` by default, so filters with the index pattern of `*` to restrict access to documents or fields will not be applied. This issue allows requests to access sensitive information when customer have acted to restrict access that specific information. OpenSearch 2.2.0, which is compatible with OpenSearch Security 2.2.0.0, contains the fix for this issue. There is no recommended work around. |
| CVE-2022-35697 | Medium | 2022-08-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager Core Components version 2.20.6 (and earlier) is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If an attacker is able to convince a victim to visit a URL referencing a vulnerable page, malicious JavaScript content may be executed within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires a low author privilege access. |
| CVE-2022-2668 | High | 2022-08-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Keycloak that allows arbitrary Javascript to be uploaded for the SAML protocol mapper even if the UPLOAD_SCRIPTS feature is disabled |
| CVE-2022-2053 | High | 2022-08-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When a POST request comes through AJP and the request exceeds the max-post-size limit (maxEntitySize), Undertow's AjpServerRequestConduit implementation closes a connection without sending any response to the client/proxy. This behavior results in that a front-end proxy marking the backend worker (application server) as an error state and not forward requests to the worker for a while. In mod_cluster, this continues until the next STATUS request (10 seconds intervals) from the application server updates the server state. So, in the worst case, it can result in "All workers are in error state" and mod_cluster responds "503 Service Unavailable" for a while (up to 10 seconds). In mod_proxy_balancer, it does not forward requests to the worker until the "retry" timeout passes. However, luckily, mod_proxy_balancer has "forcerecovery" setting (On by default; this parameter can force the immediate recovery of all workers without considering the retry parameter of the workers if all workers of a balancer are in error state.). So, unlike mod_cluster, mod_proxy_balancer does not result in responding "503 Service Unavailable". An attacker could use this behavior to send a malicious request and trigger server errors, resulting in DoS (denial of service). This flaw was fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2. |
| CVE-2022-34158 | High | 2022-08-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A carefully crafted invocation on the Image plugin could trigger an CSRF vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki before 2.11.3, which could allow a group privilege escalation of the attacker's account. Further examination of this issue established that it could also be used to modify the email associated with the attacked account, and then a reset password request from the login page. |
| CVE-2022-28732 | Medium | 2022-08-04 | No exploit published | Forecast only | A carefully crafted request on WeblogPlugin could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. Apache JSPWiki users should upgrade to 2.11.3 or later. |
| CVE-2022-28731 | Medium | 2022-08-04 | No exploit published | Forecast only | A carefully crafted request on UserPreferences.jsp could trigger an CSRF vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki before 2.11.3, which could allow the attacker to modify the email associated with the attacked account, and then a reset password request from the login page. |
| CVE-2022-28730 | Medium | 2022-08-04 | No exploit published | Forecast only | A carefully crafted request on AJAXPreview.jsp could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. This vulnerability leverages CVE-2021-40369, where the Denounce plugin dangerously renders user-supplied URLs. Upon re-testing CVE-2021-40369, it appears that the patch was incomplete as it was still possible to insert malicious input via the Denounce plugin. Apache JSPWiki users should upgrade to 2.11.3 or later. |
| CVE-2022-27166 | Medium | 2022-08-04 | No exploit published | Forecast only | A carefully crafted request on XHRHtml2Markup.jsp could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki up to and including 2.11.2, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. |
| CVE-2022-25867 | High | 2022-08-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The package io.socket:socket.io-client before 2.0.1 are vulnerable to NULL Pointer Dereference when parsing a packet with with invalid payload format. |
| CVE-2022-31193 | High | 2022-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | DSpace open source software is a repository application which provides durable access to digital resources. dspace-jspui is a UI component for DSpace. The JSPUI controlled vocabulary servlet is vulnerable to an open redirect attack, where an attacker can craft a malicious URL that looks like a legitimate DSpace/repository URL. When that URL is clicked by the target, it redirects them to a site of the attacker's choice. This issue has been patched in versions 5.11 and 6.4. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workaround for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-31192 | High | 2022-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | DSpace open source software is a repository application which provides durable access to digital resources. dspace-jspui is a UI component for DSpace. The JSPUI "Request a Copy" feature does not properly escape values submitted and stored from the "Request a Copy" form. This means that item requests could be vulnerable to XSS attacks. This vulnerability only impacts the JSPUI. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-31191 | High | 2022-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | DSpace open source software is a repository application which provides durable access to digital resources. dspace-jspui is a UI component for DSpace. The JSPUI spellcheck "Did you mean" HTML escapes the data-spell attribute in the link, but not the actual displayed text. Similarly, the JSPUI autocomplete HTML does not properly escape text passed to it. Both are vulnerable to XSS. This vulnerability only impacts the JSPUI. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. |
| CVE-2022-31190 | Medium | 2022-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | DSpace open source software is a repository application which provides durable access to digital resources. dspace-xmlui is a UI component for DSpace. In affected versions metadata on a withdrawn Item is exposed via the XMLUI "mets.xml" object, as long as you know the handle/URL of the withdrawn Item. This vulnerability only impacts the XMLUI. Users are advised to upgrade to version 6.4 or newer. |
| CVE-2022-31189 | Medium | 2022-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | DSpace open source software is a repository application which provides durable access to digital resources. dspace-jspui is a UI component for DSpace. When an "Internal System Error" occurs in the JSPUI, then entire exception (including stack trace) is available. Information in this stacktrace may be useful to an attacker in launching a more sophisticated attack. This vulnerability only impacts the JSPUI. This issue has been fixed in version 6.4. users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should disable the display of error messages in their internal.jsp file. |
| CVE-2022-31183 | Critical | 2022-08-01 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | fs2 is a compositional, streaming I/O library for Scala. When establishing a server-mode `TLSSocket` using `fs2-io` on Node.js, the parameter `requestCert = true` is ignored, peer certificate verification is skipped, and the connection proceeds. The vulnerability is limited to: 1. `fs2-io` running on Node.js. The JVM TLS implementation is completely independent. 2. `TLSSocket`s in server-mode. Client-mode `TLSSocket`s are implemented via a different API. 3. mTLS as enabled via `requestCert = true` in `TLSParameters`. The default setting is `false` for server-mode `TLSSocket`s. It was introduced with the initial Node.js implementation of fs2-io in 3.1.0. A patch is released in v3.2.11. The requestCert = true parameter is respected and the peer certificate is verified. If verification fails, a SSLException is raised. If using an unpatched version on Node.js, do not use a server-mode TLSSocket with requestCert = true to establish a mTLS connection. |
| CVE-2022-2576 | High | 2022-07-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.7.2 and 3.0.0-3.5.0 a DTLS resumption handshake falls back to a DTLS full handshake on a parameter mismatch without using a HelloVerifyRequest. Especially, if used with certificate based cipher suites, that results in message amplification (DDoS other peers) and high CPU load (DoS own peer). The misbehavior occurs only with DTLS_VERIFY_PEERS_ON_RESUMPTION_THRESHOLD values larger than 0. |
| CVE-2022-36364 | High | 2022-07-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Calcite Avatica JDBC driver creates HTTP client instances based on class names provided via `httpclient_impl` connection property; however, the driver does not verify if the class implements the expected interface before instantiating it, which can lead to code execution loaded via arbitrary classes and in rare cases remote code execution. To exploit the vulnerability: 1) the attacker needs to have privileges to control JDBC connection parameters; 2) and there should be a vulnerable class (constructor with URL parameter and ability to execute code) in the classpath. From Apache Calcite Avatica 1.22.0 onwards, it will be verified that the class implements the expected interface before invoking its constructor. |
| CVE-2022-36922 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Lucene-Search Plugin 370.v62a5f618cd3a and earlier does not escape the search query parameter displayed on the 'search' result page, resulting in a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-36921 | High | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Coverity Plugin 1.11.4 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36920 | High | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Coverity Plugin 1.11.4 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36919 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Coverity Plugin 1.11.4 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36918 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Buckminster Plugin 1.1.1 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-36917 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Google Cloud Backup Plugin 0.6 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to request a manual backup. |
| CVE-2022-36916 | High | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Google Cloud Backup Plugin 0.6 and earlier allows attackers to request a manual backup. |
| CVE-2022-36915 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Android Signing Plugin 2.2.5 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Item/Read permission but without Item/Workspace or Item/Configure permission to check whether attacker-specified file patterns match workspace contents. |
| CVE-2022-36914 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Files Found Trigger Plugin 1.5 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-36913 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Openstack Heat Plugin 1.5 and earlier does not perform permission checks in methods implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-36912 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Openstack Heat Plugin 1.5 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL. |
| CVE-2022-36911 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Openstack Heat Plugin 1.5 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL. |
| CVE-2022-36910 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Lucene-Search Plugin 370.v62a5f618cd3a and earlier does not perform a permission check in several HTTP endpoints, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to reindex the database and to obtain information about jobs otherwise inaccessible to them. |
| CVE-2022-36909 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system and to upload a SSH key file from the Jenkins controller file system to an attacker-specified URL. |
| CVE-2022-36908 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system and to upload a SSH key file from the Jenkins controller file system to an attacker-specified URL. |
| CVE-2022-36907 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified username and password. |
| CVE-2022-36906 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified username and password. |
| CVE-2022-36905 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Maven Metadata Plugin for Jenkins CI server Plugin 2.2 and earlier does not perform URL validation for the Repository Base URL of List maven artifact versions parameters, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Item/Configure permission. |
| CVE-2022-36904 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Repository Connector Plugin 2.2.0 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-36903 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Repository Connector Plugin 2.2.0 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36902 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Dynamic Extended Choice Parameter Plugin 1.0.1 and earlier does not escape several fields of Moded Extended Choice parameters, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Item/Configure permission. |
| CVE-2022-36901 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins HTTP Request Plugin 1.15 and earlier stores HTTP Request passwords unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with access to the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-36900 | High | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Compuware zAdviser API Plugin 1.0.3 and earlier does not restrict execution of a controller/agent message to agents, allowing attackers able to control agent processes to retrieve Java system properties. |
| CVE-2022-36899 | High | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Compuware ISPW Operations Plugin 1.0.8 and earlier does not restrict execution of a controller/agent message to agents, allowing attackers able to control agent processes to retrieve Java system properties. |
| CVE-2022-36898 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Compuware ISPW Operations Plugin 1.0.8 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate hosts and ports of Compuware configurations and credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36897 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Compuware Xpediter Code Coverage Plugin 1.0.7 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate hosts and ports of Compuware configurations and credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36896 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Compuware Source Code Download for Endevor, PDS, and ISPW Plugin 2.0.12 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate hosts and ports of Compuware configurations and credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36895 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Compuware Topaz Utilities Plugin 1.0.8 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate hosts and ports of Compuware configurations and credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2022-36893 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins rpmsign-plugin Plugin 0.5.0 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Item/Read permission but without Item/Workspace or Item/Configure permission to check whether attacker-specified file patterns match workspace contents. |
| CVE-2022-36892 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins rhnpush-plugin Plugin 0.5.1 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Item/Read permission but without Item/Workspace or Item/Configure permission to check whether attacker-specified file patterns match workspace contents. |
| CVE-2022-36891 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Deployer Framework Plugin 85.v1d1888e8c021 and earlier allows attackers with Item/Read permission but without Deploy Now/Deploy permission to read deployment logs. |
| CVE-2022-36888 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins HashiCorp Vault Plugin 354.vdb_858fd6b_f48 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to obtain credentials stored in Vault with attacker-specified path and keys. |
| CVE-2022-36887 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Job Configuration History Plugin 1155.v28a_46a_cc06a_5 and earlier allows attackers to delete entries from job, agent, and system configuration history, or restore older versions of job, agent, and system configurations. |
| CVE-2022-36886 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins External Monitor Job Type Plugin 191.v363d0d1efdf8 and earlier allows attackers to create runs of an external job. |
| CVE-2022-36885 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins GitHub Plugin 1.34.4 and earlier uses a non-constant time comparison function when checking whether the provided and computed webhook signatures are equal, allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook signature. |
| CVE-2022-36884 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The webhook endpoint in Jenkins Git Plugin 4.11.3 and earlier provide unauthenticated attackers information about the existence of jobs configured to use an attacker-specified Git repository. |
| CVE-2022-36883 | High | 2022-07-27 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | A missing permission check in Jenkins Git Plugin 4.11.3 and earlier allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger builds of jobs configured to use an attacker-specified Git repository and to cause them to check out an attacker-specified commit. |
| CVE-2022-36882 | High | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Git Plugin 4.11.3 and earlier allows attackers to trigger builds of jobs configured to use an attacker-specified Git repository and to cause them to check out an attacker-specified commit. |
| CVE-2022-36881 | High | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Git client Plugin 3.11.0 and earlier does not perform SSH host key verification when connecting to Git repositories via SSH, enabling man-in-the-middle attacks. |
| CVE-2022-34113 | Critical | 2022-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An issue in the component /api/plugin/upload of Dataease v1.11.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted plugin. |
| CVE-2022-34112 | Medium | 2022-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An access control issue in the component /api/plugin/uninstall Dataease v1.11.1 allows attackers to arbitrarily uninstall the plugin, a right normally reserved for the administrator. |
| CVE-2022-32430 | High | 2022-07-21 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | An access control issue in Lin CMS Spring Boot v0.2.1 allows attackers to access the backend information and functions within the application. |
| CVE-2022-35912 | Critical | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In grails-databinding in Grails before 3.3.15, 4.x before 4.1.1, 5.x before 5.1.9, and 5.2.x before 5.2.1 (at least when certain Java 8 configurations are used), data binding allows a remote attacker to execute code by gaining access to the class loader. |
| CVE-2022-21586 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Banking Trade Finance product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: Infrastructure). The supported version that is affected is 14.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Banking Trade Finance. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2022-21585 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Banking Trade Finance product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: Infrastructure). The supported version that is affected is 14.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Banking Trade Finance. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Banking Trade Finance. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.7 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L). |
| CVE-2022-21584 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Banking Trade Finance product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: Infrastructure). The supported version that is affected is 14.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Banking Trade Finance. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2022-21583 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Banking Trade Finance product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: Infrastructure). The supported version that is affected is 14.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Banking Trade Finance. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Banking Trade Finance. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.4 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L). |
| CVE-2022-21582 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Banking Trade Finance product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: Infrastructure). The supported version that is affected is 14.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Banking Trade Finance. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Banking Trade Finance. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.7 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L). |
| CVE-2022-21581 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Banking Trade Finance product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: Infrastructure). The supported version that is affected is 14.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Banking Trade Finance. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Banking Trade Finance. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L). |
| CVE-2022-21580 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Financial Services Revenue Management and Billing product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: Infrastructure). Supported versions that are affected are 2.9.0.0.0, 2.9.0.1.0, 3.0.0.0.0-3.2.0.0.0 and 4.0.0.0.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Financial Services Revenue Management and Billing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Financial Services Revenue Management and Billing accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Financial Services Revenue Management and Billing accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Financial Services Revenue Management and Billing. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L). |
| CVE-2022-21579 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: Infrastructure). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1-12.4, 14.0-14.3 and 14.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2022-21578 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: Infrastructure). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1-12.4, 14.0-14.3 and 14.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.7 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L). |
| CVE-2022-21577 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: Infrastructure). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1-12.4, 14.0-14.3 and 14.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2022-21576 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: Infrastructure). Supported versions that are affected are 12.3, 12.4, 14.0-14.3 and 14.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.4 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L). |
| CVE-2022-21575 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Sites Support Tools product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: User Interface). The supported version that is affected is Prior to 4.4.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Sites Support Tools. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle WebCenter Sites Support Tools accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle WebCenter Sites Support Tools accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle WebCenter Sites Support Tools. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.0 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L). |
| CVE-2022-21574 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management product of Oracle Communications Applications (component: Connection Manager). Supported versions that are affected are 12.0.0.4.0-12.0.0.6.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L). |
| CVE-2022-21573 | Medium | 2022-07-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management product of Oracle Communications Applications (component: Billing Care). Supported versions that are affected are 12.0.0.4.0-12.0.0.6.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). |