Spring Advanced Message Queuing Protocol CVEs
13 CVEs, 5 protected by Waratek
Overview 13 matches · 5 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
5
38.5%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
8
61.5%
blocked by ARMR today
5
38.5%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
8
61.5%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
1
7.7%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
12
92.3%
split by
peak 7 / year
20172
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today2
No public exploit2
20181
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20190
20200
20212
Protected by Waratek2
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today2
No public exploit2
20220
20231
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
Proof of concept only1
20240
20250
20267
No exploit published7
Medium7
not blocked7
No public exploit7
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-59320 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When a container-level ErrorHandler is configured (the mitigation for finding 221000), each delivery whose processing throws still permanently consumes one link credit. After initialCredits (default 100) failing messages the receiver's credit reaches zero and the broker stops delivering, leaving the listener silently stalled while isRunning() remains true. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 |
| CVE-2026-59275 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A single hostile AMQP message can terminate the entire consumer JVM (System.exit(99)), not just the listener thread — full availability loss for every workload co-located in that process. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 Spring AMQP 4.0.0 - 4.0.4 Spring AMQP 3.2.0 - 3.2.12 Spring AMQP 2.4.18 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59272 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Any application shipping logs to RabbitMQ over TLS via the Log4j2 appender, relying on the documented default, is exposed to man-in-the-middle interception of every log event. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 Spring AMQP 4.0.0 - 4.0.4 Spring AMQP 3.2.0 - 3.2.12 Spring AMQP 2.4.18 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59271 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When the RabbitMQ management aliveness check fails, the configured admin password is embedded in cleartext in the thrown exception message. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 Spring AMQP 4.0.0 - 4.0.4 Spring AMQP 3.2.0 - 3.2.12 Spring AMQP 2.4.18 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47860 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An attacker who can publish to a queue consumed by an application that has enabled message decompression can crash the consumer JVM with a single ~1 MB message. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 Spring AMQP 4.0.0 - 4.0.4 Spring AMQP 3.2.0 - 3.2.12 Spring AMQP 2.4.18 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-41714 | Medium | 2026-06-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Applications that configure their broker connection via RabbitConnectionFactoryBean.setUri("amqps://...") without also calling setUseSSL(true) get TLS encryption with no certificate validation and no hostname verification. Affected versions: Spring AMQP 4.0.0 through 4.0.3; 3.2.0 through 3.2.10; 3.1.0 through 3.1.15; 2.4.0 through 2.4.17. |
| CVE-2026-41701 | Medium | 2026-06-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Correlation IDs for replies in the RabbitTemplate.sendAndReceive() with the fixed reply queue are predictable due to internal simple counter. Affected versions: Spring AMQP 4.0.0 through 4.0.3; 3.2.0 through 3.2.10; 3.1.0 through 3.1.15; 2.4.0 through 2.4.17. |
| CVE-2023-34050 | Medium | 2023-10-19 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | In spring AMQP versions 1.0.0 to 2.4.16 and 3.0.0 to 3.0.9 , allowed list patterns for deserializable class names were added to Spring AMQP, allowing users to lock down deserialization of data in messages from untrusted sources; however by default, when no allowed list was provided, all classes could be deserialized. Specifically, an application is vulnerable if * the SimpleMessageConverter or SerializerMessageConverter is used * the user does not configure allowed list patterns * untrusted message originators gain permissions to write messages to the RabbitMQ broker to send malicious content |
| CVE-2021-22095 | Medium | 2021-11-30 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Spring AMQP versions 2.2.0 - 2.2.19 and 2.3.0 - 2.3.11, the Spring AMQP Message object, in its toString() method, will create a new String object from the message body, regardless of its size. This can cause an OOM Error with a large message |
| CVE-2021-22097 | Medium | 2021-10-28 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Spring AMQP versions 2.2.0 - 2.2.18 and 2.3.0 - 2.3.10, the Spring AMQP Message object, in its toString() method, will deserialize a body for a message with content type application/x-java-serialized-object. It is possible to construct a malicious java.util.Dictionary object that can cause 100% CPU usage in the application if the toString() method is called. |
| CVE-2018-11087 | Medium | 2018-09-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Pivotal Spring AMQP, 1.x versions prior to 1.7.10 and 2.x versions prior to 2.0.6, expose a man-in-the-middle vulnerability due to lack of hostname validation. A malicious user that has the ability to intercept traffic would be able to view data in transit. |
| CVE-2017-8045 | Critical | 2017-11-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Pivotal Spring AMQP versions prior to 1.7.4, 1.6.11, and 1.5.7, an org.springframework.amqp.core.Message may be unsafely deserialized when being converted into a string. A malicious payload could be crafted to exploit this and enable a remote code execution attack. |
| CVE-2016-2173 | Critical | 2017-04-21 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | org.springframework.core.serializer.DefaultDeserializer in Spring AMQP before 1.5.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. |