Overview 9 matches · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
9
100.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
1
11.1%
No public exploit
8
88.9%
split by
peak 2 / year
20171
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20182
No exploit published2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20191
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20200
20211
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
20221
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20230
20240
20251
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20262
No exploit published2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-7708 | High | 2026-07-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | For requests that have a body, but reading the body may end up in reading 0 bytes, there is a buffer leak. This is particularly the case for 100-Continue, but any request where the network is slow can leak. |
| CVE-2026-1605 | High | 2026-03-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Jetty, versions 12.0.0-12.0.31 and 12.1.0-12.0.5, class GzipHandler exposes a vulnerability when a compressed HTTP request, with Content-Encoding: gzip, is processed and the corresponding response is not compressed. This happens because the JDK Inflater is allocated for decompressing the request, but it is not released because the release mechanism is tied to the compressed response. In this case, since the response is not compressed, the release mechanism does not trigger, causing the leak. |
| CVE-2024-13009 | High | 2025-05-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 to 9.4.56 a buffer can be incorrectly released when confronted with a gzip error when inflating a request body. This can result in corrupted and/or inadvertent sharing of data between requests. |
| CVE-2022-2191 | High | 2022-07-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Jetty versions 10.0.0 thru 10.0.9, and 11.0.0 thru 11.0.9 versions, SslConnection does not release ByteBuffers from configured ByteBufferPool in case of error code paths. |
| CVE-2021-28165 | High | 2021-04-01 | No exploit published | Forecast only | In Eclipse Jetty 7.2.2 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.1, CPU usage can reach 100% upon receiving a large invalid TLS frame. |
| CVE-2018-12545 | High | 2019-03-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Jetty version 9.3.x and 9.4.x, the server is vulnerable to Denial of Service conditions if a remote client sends either large SETTINGs frames container containing many settings, or many small SETTINGs frames. The vulnerability is due to the additional CPU and memory allocations required to handle changed settings. |
| CVE-2017-7656 | High | 2018-06-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), HTTP/0.9 is handled poorly. An HTTP/1 style request line (i.e. method space URI space version) that declares a version of HTTP/0.9 was accepted and treated as a 0.9 request. If deployed behind an intermediary that also accepted and passed through the 0.9 version (but did not act on it), then the response sent could be interpreted by the intermediary as HTTP/1 headers. This could be used to poison the cache if the server allowed the origin client to generate arbitrary content in the response. |
| CVE-2018-12538 | High | 2018-06-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 through 9.4.8, when using the optional Jetty provided FileSessionDataStore for persistent storage of HttpSession details, it is possible for a malicious user to access/hijack other HttpSessions and even delete unmatched HttpSessions present in the FileSystem's storage for the FileSessionDataStore. |
| CVE-2017-9735 | High | 2017-06-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jetty through 9.4.x is prone to a timing channel in util/security/Password.java, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access by observing elapsed times before rejection of incorrect passwords. |