Overview 9 matches · 8 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 1 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
9matches
8in Waratek scope88.9%
0protected0.0%
1exploited11.1%
1CISA KEV11.1%
1public PoC11.1%
1EPSS ≥ 0.511.1%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
11.1%
No exploit published
7
77.8%
Outside Waratek scope
1
11.1%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
11.1%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
3
33.3%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
5
55.6%
split by
peak 1 / quarter
Q3 221
No exploit published1
Low1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 220
Q1 230
Q2 230
Q3 231
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 231
Mitigation candidate1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q1 241
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q2 240
Q3 240
Q4 241
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q1 250
Q2 251
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 251
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 250
Q1 261
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 261
No exploit published1
Critical1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q4 22Q2 23Q4 23Q2 24Q4 24Q2 25Q4 25Q2 26
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-2332 | Critical | 2026-04-14 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | In Eclipse Jetty, the HTTP/1.1 parser is vulnerable to request smuggling when chunk extensions are used, similar to the "funky chunks" techniques outlined here: * https://w4ke.info/2025/06/18/funky-chunks.html * https://w4ke.info/2025/10/29/funky-chunks-2.html Jetty terminates chunk extension parsing at \r\n inside quoted strings instead of treating this as an error. POST / HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost Transfer-Encoding: chunked 1;ext="val X 0 GET /smuggled HTTP/1.1 ... Note how the chunk extension does not close the double quotes, and it is able to inject a smuggled request. |
| CVE-2025-11143 | Medium | 2026-03-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Jetty URI parser has some key differences to other common parsers when evaluating invalid or unusual URIs. Differential parsing of URIs in systems using multiple components may result in security by-pass. For example a component that enforces a black list may interpret the URIs differently from one that generates a response. At the very least, differential parsing may divulge implementation details. |
| CVE-2025-5115 | High | 2025-08-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Jetty, versions <=9.4.57, <=10.0.25, <=11.0.25, <=12.0.21, <=12.1.0.alpha2, an HTTP/2 client may trigger the server to send RST_STREAM frames, for example by sending frames that are malformed or that should not be sent in a particular stream state, therefore forcing the server to consume resources such as CPU and memory. For example, a client can open a stream and then send WINDOW_UPDATE frames with window size increment of 0, which is illegal. Per specification https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update , the server should send a RST_STREAM frame. The client can now open another stream and send another bad WINDOW_UPDATE, therefore causing the server to consume more resources than necessary, as this case does not exceed the max number of concurrent streams, yet the client is able to create an enormous amount of streams in a short period of time. The attack can be performed with other conditions (for example, a DATA frame for a closed stream) that cause the server to send a RST_STREAM frame. Links: * https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h |
| CVE-2025-1948 | High | 2025-05-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Jetty versions 12.0.0 to 12.0.16 included, an HTTP/2 client can specify a very large value for the HTTP/2 settings parameter SETTINGS_MAX_HEADER_LIST_SIZE. The Jetty HTTP/2 server does not perform validation on this setting, and tries to allocate a ByteBuffer of the specified capacity to encode HTTP responses, likely resulting in OutOfMemoryError being thrown, or even the JVM process exiting. |
| CVE-2024-6763 | Medium | 2024-10-14 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | Eclipse Jetty is a lightweight, highly scalable, Java-based web server and Servlet engine . It includes a utility class, HttpURI, for URI/URL parsing. The HttpURI class does insufficient validation on the authority segment of a URI. However the behaviour of HttpURI differs from the common browsers in how it handles a URI that would be considered invalid if fully validated against the RRC. Specifically HttpURI and the browser may differ on the value of the host extracted from an invalid URI and thus a combination of Jetty and a vulnerable browser may be vulnerable to a open redirect attack or to a SSRF attack if the URI is used after passing validation checks. |
| CVE-2024-22201 | High | 2024-02-26 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | Jetty is a Java based web server and servlet engine. An HTTP/2 SSL connection that is established and TCP congested will be leaked when it times out. An attacker can cause many connections to end up in this state, and the server may run out of file descriptors, eventually causing the server to stop accepting new connections from valid clients. The vulnerability is patched in 9.4.54, 10.0.20, 11.0.20, and 12.0.6. |
| CVE-2023-44487 | High | 2023-10-10 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. |
| CVE-2023-40167 | Medium | 2023-09-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jetty is a Java based web server and servlet engine. Prior to versions 9.4.52, 10.0.16, 11.0.16, and 12.0.1, Jetty accepts the `+` character proceeding the content-length value in a HTTP/1 header field. This is more permissive than allowed by the RFC and other servers routinely reject such requests with 400 responses. There is no known exploit scenario, but it is conceivable that request smuggling could result if jetty is used in combination with a server that does not close the connection after sending such a 400 response. Versions 9.4.52, 10.0.16, 11.0.16, and 12.0.1 contain a patch for this issue. There is no workaround as there is no known exploit scenario. |
| CVE-2022-2047 | Low | 2022-07-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 thru 9.4.46, and 10.0.0 thru 10.0.9, and 11.0.0 thru 11.0.9 versions, the parsing of the authority segment of an http scheme URI, the Jetty HttpURI class improperly detects an invalid input as a hostname. This can lead to failures in a Proxy scenario. |