Overview 24 matches · 2 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
24matches
2in Waratek scope8.3%
1protected4.2%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
1public PoC4.2%
3EPSS ≥ 0.512.5%
Protected by Waratek
1
4.2%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
1
4.2%
Outside Waratek scope
14
58.3%
Not applicable
8
33.3%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
4.2%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
23
95.8%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
3
12.5%
Forecast only
1
4.2%
No public exploit
20
83.3%
split by
peak 5 / year
20181
No exploit published1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20194
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable2
Critical4
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20201
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20215
Protected by Waratek1
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable1
Critical5
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked4
Forecast only1
No public exploit4
20225
Outside Waratek scope5
Critical5
not blocked5
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit2
20235
Not applicable5
Critical5
not blocked5
No public exploit5
20242
Outside Waratek scope2
Critical2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20251
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20182019202020212022202320242025
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-56171 | Critical | 2025-02-18 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | libxml2 before 2.12.10 and 2.13.x before 2.13.6 has a use-after-free in xmlSchemaIDCFillNodeTables and xmlSchemaBubbleIDCNodeTables in xmlschemas.c. To exploit this, a crafted XML document must be validated against an XML schema with certain identity constraints, or a crafted XML schema must be used. |
| CVE-2024-40896 | Critical | 2024-12-23 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In libxml2 2.11 before 2.11.9, 2.12 before 2.12.9, and 2.13 before 2.13.3, the SAX parser can produce events for external entities even if custom SAX handlers try to override entity content (by setting "checked"). This makes classic XXE attacks possible. |
| CVE-2024-36958 | Critical | 2024-05-30 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSD: Fix nfsd4_encode_fattr4() crasher Ensure that args.acl is initialized early. It is used in an unconditional call to kfree() on the way out of nfsd4_encode_fattr4(). |
| CVE-2023-38431 | Critical | 2023-07-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 6.3.8. fs/smb/server/connection.c in ksmbd does not validate the relationship between the NetBIOS header's length field and the SMB header sizes, via pdu_size in ksmbd_conn_handler_loop, leading to an out-of-bounds read. |
| CVE-2023-38430 | Critical | 2023-07-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 6.3.9. ksmbd does not validate the SMB request protocol ID, leading to an out-of-bounds read. |
| CVE-2023-38428 | Critical | 2023-07-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 6.3.4. fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c in ksmbd does not properly check the UserName value because it does not consider the address of security buffer, leading to an out-of-bounds read. |
| CVE-2023-38426 | Critical | 2023-07-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 6.3.4. ksmbd has an out-of-bounds read in smb2_find_context_vals when create_context's name_len is larger than the tag length. |
| CVE-2023-32254 | Critical | 2023-07-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's ksmbd, a high-performance in-kernel SMB server. The specific flaw exists within the processing of SMB2_TREE_DISCONNECT commands. The issue results from the lack of proper locking when performing operations on an object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the kernel. |
| CVE-2022-32207 | Critical | 2022-07-07 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | When curl < 7.84.0 saves cookies, alt-svc and hsts data to local files, it makes the operation atomic by finalizing the operation with a rename from a temporary name to the final target file name.In that rename operation, it might accidentally *widen* the permissions for the target file, leaving the updated file accessible to more users than intended. |
| CVE-2022-2068 | Critical | 2022-06-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze). |
| CVE-2022-1587 | Critical | 2022-05-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | An out-of-bounds read vulnerability was discovered in the PCRE2 library in the get_recurse_data_length() function of the pcre2_jit_compile.c file. This issue affects recursions in JIT-compiled regular expressions caused by duplicate data transfers. |
| CVE-2022-1586 | Critical | 2022-05-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | An out-of-bounds read vulnerability was discovered in the PCRE2 library in the compile_xclass_matchingpath() function of the pcre2_jit_compile.c file. This involves a unicode property matching issue in JIT-compiled regular expressions. The issue occurs because the character was not fully read in case-less matching within JIT. |
| CVE-2022-1292 | Critical | 2022-05-03 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd). |
| CVE-2021-42377 | Critical | 2021-11-15 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | An attacker-controlled pointer free in Busybox's hush applet leads to denial of service and possible code execution when processing a crafted shell command, due to the shell mishandling the &&& string. This may be used for remote code execution under rare conditions of filtered command input. |
| CVE-2021-3711 | Critical | 2021-08-24 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the "out" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a maximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically heap allocated. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). |
| CVE-2021-35942 | Critical | 2021-07-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The wordexp function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc) through 2.33 may crash or read arbitrary memory in parse_param (in posix/wordexp.c) when called with an untrusted, crafted pattern, potentially resulting in a denial of service or disclosure of information. This occurs because atoi was used but strtoul should have been used to ensure correct calculations. |
| CVE-2021-26987 | Critical | 2021-03-15 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Element Plug-in for vCenter Server incorporates SpringBoot Framework. SpringBoot Framework versions prior to 1.3.2 are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could lead to Remote Code Execution. All versions of Element Plug-in for vCenter Server, Management Services versions prior to 2.17.56 and Management Node versions through 12.2 contain vulnerable versions of SpringBoot Framework. |
| CVE-2020-8584 | Critical | 2021-01-08 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Element OS versions prior to 1.8P1 and 12.2 are susceptible to a vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2019-17006 | Critical | 2020-10-22 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.46, several cryptographic primitives had missing length checks. In cases where the application calling the library did not perform a sanity check on the inputs it could result in a crash due to a buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2019-18805 | Critical | 2019-11-07 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c in the Linux kernel before 5.0.11. There is a net/ipv4/tcp_input.c signed integer overflow in tcp_ack_update_rtt() when userspace writes a very large integer to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_min_rtt_wlen, leading to a denial of service or possibly unspecified other impact, aka CID-19fad20d15a6. |
| CVE-2019-10126 | Critical | 2019-06-14 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the Linux kernel. A heap based buffer overflow in mwifiex_uap_parse_tail_ies function in drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/ie.c might lead to memory corruption and possibly other consequences. |
| CVE-2019-11068 | Critical | 2019-04-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | libxslt through 1.1.33 allows bypass of a protection mechanism because callers of xsltCheckRead and xsltCheckWrite permit access even upon receiving a -1 error code. xsltCheckRead can return -1 for a crafted URL that is not actually invalid and is subsequently loaded. |
| CVE-2019-10125 | Critical | 2019-03-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in aio_poll() in fs/aio.c in the Linux kernel through 5.0.4. A file may be released by aio_poll_wake() if an expected event is triggered immediately (e.g., by the close of a pair of pipes) after the return of vfs_poll(), and this will cause a use-after-free. |
| CVE-2017-7658 | Critical | 2018-06-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization. |