Database CVEs
78 CVEs, 1 exploited, 19 protected by Waratek
Overview 78 matches · 18 protected · 1 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
19
24.4%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
59
75.6%
blocked by ARMR today
18
23.1%
partly blocked
1
1.3%
not blocked
59
75.6%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 16 / year
20042
No exploit published2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20051
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20061
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20072
No exploit published2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20083
No exploit published3
High3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20090
20100
20110
20120
201316
No exploit published16
Medium16
not blocked16
No public exploit16
20140
20153
No exploit published3
Medium3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20160
20172
Protected by Waratek2
Critical1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
partly blocked1
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20189
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published6
Critical1
High2
Medium6
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked6
No public exploit9
201911
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published8
Critical3
High2
Medium6
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked8
No public exploit11
20209
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published7
Critical1
High5
Medium2
Low1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked7
Working exploit published1
No public exploit8
20217
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published4
High3
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked4
No public exploit7
20226
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published5
Critical4
High2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked5
No public exploit6
20232
Protected by Waratek2
Critical1
High1
blocked by ARMR today2
Proof of concept only2
20244
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published1
High3
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit3
20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-12744 | High | 2024-12-24 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A SQL injection in the Amazon Redshift JDBC Driver in v2.1.0.31 allows a user to gain escalated privileges via the getSchemas, getTables, or getColumns Metadata APIs. Users should upgrade to the driver version 2.1.0.32 or revert to driver version 2.1.0.30. |
| CVE-2024-47881 | High | 2024-10-24 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | OpenRefine is a free, open source tool for working with messy data. Starting in version 3.4-beta and prior to version 3.8.3, in the `database` extension, the "enable_load_extension" property can be set for the SQLite integration, enabling an attacker to load (local or remote) extension DLLs and so run arbitrary code on the server. The attacker needs to have network access to the OpenRefine instance. Version 3.8.3 fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2024-21233 | Medium | 2024-10-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Database Core component of Oracle Database Server. Supported versions that are affected are 19.3-19.24, 21.3-21.15 and 23.4-23.5. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker having Create Session privilege with network access via Oracle Net to compromise Oracle Database Core. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Database Core accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2024-23833 | High | 2024-02-12 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | OpenRefine is a free, open source power tool for working with messy data and improving it. A jdbc attack vulnerability exists in OpenRefine(version<=3.7.7) where an attacker may construct a JDBC query which may read files on the host filesystem. Due to the newer MySQL driver library in the latest version of OpenRefine (8.0.30), there is no associated deserialization utilization point, so original code execution cannot be achieved, but attackers can use this vulnerability to read sensitive files on the target server. This issue has been addressed in version 3.7.8. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-41887 | Critical | 2023-09-15 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | OpenRefine is a powerful free, open source tool for working with messy data. Prior to version 3.7.5, a remote code execution vulnerability allows any unauthenticated user to execute code on the server. Version 3.7.5 has a patch for this issue. |
| CVE-2023-41886 | High | 2023-09-15 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | OpenRefine is a powerful free, open source tool for working with messy data. Prior to version 3.7.5, an arbitrary file read vulnerability allows any unauthenticated user to read a file on a server. Version 3.7.5 fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2022-41853 | Critical | 2022-10-06 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Those using java.sql.Statement or java.sql.PreparedStatement in hsqldb (HyperSQL DataBase) to process untrusted input may be vulnerable to a remote code execution attack. By default it is allowed to call any static method of any Java class in the classpath resulting in code execution. The issue can be prevented by updating to 2.7.1 or by setting the system property "hsqldb.method_class_names" to classes which are allowed to be called. For example, System.setProperty("hsqldb.method_class_names", "abc") or Java argument -Dhsqldb.method_class_names="abc" can be used. From version 2.7.1 all classes by default are not accessible except those in java.lang.Math and need to be manually enabled. |
| CVE-2022-41828 | High | 2022-09-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Amazon AWS Redshift JDBC Driver (aka amazon-redshift-jdbc-driver or redshift-jdbc42) before 2.1.0.8, the Object Factory does not check the class type when instantiating an object from a class name. |
| CVE-2020-35169 | Critical | 2022-07-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Dell BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, versions before 4.1.5, and Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions before 4.5.2, contain an Improper Input Validation Vulnerability. |
| CVE-2020-35166 | Critical | 2022-07-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Dell BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, versions before 4.1.5, and Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions before 4.6, contain an Observable Timing Discrepancy Vulnerability. |
| CVE-2020-29508 | Critical | 2022-07-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Dell BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, versions before 4.1.5, and Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions before 4.6, contain an Improper Input Validation Vulnerability. |
| CVE-2020-26185 | High | 2022-06-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions prior to 4.5.1, contain a Buffer Over-Read Vulnerability. |
| CVE-2021-2351 | High | 2021-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Advanced Networking Option component of Oracle Database Server. Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.0.2, 12.2.0.1 and 19c. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via Oracle Net to compromise Advanced Networking Option. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Advanced Networking Option, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Advanced Networking Option. Note: The July 2021 Critical Patch Update introduces a number of Native Network Encryption changes to deal with vulnerability CVE-2021-2351 and prevent the use of weaker ciphers. Customers should review: "Changes in Native Network Encryption with the July 2021 Critical Patch Update" (Doc ID 2791571.1). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2021-36374 | Medium | 2021-07-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When reading a specially crafted ZIP archive, or a derived formats, an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Commonly used derived formats from ZIP archives are for instance JAR files and many office files. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected. |
| CVE-2021-36373 | Medium | 2021-07-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When reading a specially crafted TAR archive an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that finally leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected. |
| CVE-2021-21409 | Medium | 2021-03-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Netty is an open-source, asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients. In Netty (io.netty:netty-codec-http2) before version 4.1.61.Final there is a vulnerability that enables request smuggling. The content-length header is not correctly validated if the request only uses a single Http2HeaderFrame with the endStream set to to true. This could lead to request smuggling if the request is proxied to a remote peer and translated to HTTP/1.1. This is a followup of GHSA-wm47-8v5p-wjpj/CVE-2021-21295 which did miss to fix this one case. This was fixed as part of 4.1.61.Final. |
| CVE-2021-25329 | High | 2021-03-01 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue. |
| CVE-2021-25122 | High | 2021-03-01 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | When responding to new h2c connection requests, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 could duplicate request headers and a limited amount of request body from one request to another meaning user A and user B could both see the results of user A's request. |
| CVE-2021-21290 | Medium | 2021-02-08 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Netty is an open-source, asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients. In Netty before version 4.1.59.Final there is a vulnerability on Unix-like systems involving an insecure temp file. When netty's multipart decoders are used local information disclosure can occur via the local system temporary directory if temporary storing uploads on the disk is enabled. On unix-like systems, the temporary directory is shared between all user. As such, writing to this directory using APIs that do not explicitly set the file/directory permissions can lead to information disclosure. Of note, this does not impact modern MacOS Operating Systems. The method "File.createTempFile" on unix-like systems creates a random file, but, by default will create this file with the permissions "-rw-r--r--". Thus, if sensitive information is written to this file, other local users can read this information. This is the case in netty's "AbstractDiskHttpData" is vulnerable. This has been fixed in version 4.1.59.Final. As a workaround, one may specify your own "java.io.tmpdir" when you start the JVM or use "DefaultHttpDataFactory.setBaseDir(...)" to set the directory to something that is only readable by the current user. |
| CVE-2020-5359 | Medium | 2020-12-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions prior to 4.5, are vulnerable to an Unchecked Return Value Vulnerability. An unauthenticated remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to modify and corrupt the encrypted data. |
| CVE-2020-8908 | Low | 2020-12-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A temp directory creation vulnerability exists in all versions of Guava, allowing an attacker with access to the machine to potentially access data in a temporary directory created by the Guava API com.google.common.io.Files.createTempDir(). By default, on unix-like systems, the created directory is world-readable (readable by an attacker with access to the system). The method in question has been marked @Deprecated in versions 30.0 and later and should not be used. For Android developers, we recommend choosing a temporary directory API provided by Android, such as context.getCacheDir(). For other Java developers, we recommend migrating to the Java 7 API java.nio.file.Files.createTempDirectory() which explicitly configures permissions of 700, or configuring the Java runtime's java.io.tmpdir system property to point to a location whose permissions are appropriately configured. |
| CVE-2020-11979 | High | 2020-10-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | As mitigation for CVE-2020-1945 Apache Ant 1.10.8 changed the permissions of temporary files it created so that only the current user was allowed to access them. Unfortunately the fixcrlf task deleted the temporary file and created a new one without said protection, effectively nullifying the effort. This would still allow an attacker to inject modified source files into the build process. |
| CVE-2020-2242 | Medium | 2020-09-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins database Plugin 1.6 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read access to Jenkins to connect to an attacker-specified database server using attacker-specified credentials. |
| CVE-2020-2241 | High | 2020-09-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins database Plugin 1.6 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified database server using attacker-specified credentials. |
| CVE-2020-2240 | High | 2020-09-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins database Plugin 1.6 and earlier allows attackers to execute arbitrary SQL scripts. |
| CVE-2020-7712 | High | 2020-08-30 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | This affects the package json before 10.0.0. It is possible to inject arbritary commands using the parseLookup function. |
| CVE-2020-9484 | High | 2020-05-20 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed. |
| CVE-2020-1953 | Critical | 2020-03-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Commons Configuration uses a third-party library to parse YAML files which by default allows the instantiation of classes if the YAML includes special statements. Apache Commons Configuration versions 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 did not change the default settings of this library. So if a YAML file was loaded from an untrusted source, it could therefore load and execute code out of the control of the host application. |
| CVE-2019-10219 | Medium | 2019-11-08 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack. |
| CVE-2019-16942 | Critical | 2019-10-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the commons-dbcp (1.4) jar in the classpath, and an attacker can find an RMI service endpoint to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. This issue exists because of org.apache.commons.dbcp.datasources.SharedPoolDataSource and org.apache.commons.dbcp.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource mishandling. |
| CVE-2019-3739 | Medium | 2019-09-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys. |
| CVE-2019-3738 | Medium | 2019-09-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to a Missing Required Cryptographic Step vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key. |
| CVE-2019-0201 | Medium | 2019-05-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An issue is present in Apache ZooKeeper 1.0.0 to 3.4.13 and 3.5.0-alpha to 3.5.4-beta. ZooKeeper’s getACL() command doesn’t check any permission when retrieves the ACLs of the requested node and returns all information contained in the ACL Id field as plaintext string. DigestAuthenticationProvider overloads the Id field with the hash value that is used for user authentication. As a consequence, if Digest Authentication is in use, the unsalted hash value will be disclosed by getACL() request for unauthenticated or unprivileged users. |
| CVE-2019-1003077 | Medium | 2019-04-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Audit to Database Plugin in the DbAuditPublisherDescriptorImpl#doTestJdbcConnection form validation method allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server. |
| CVE-2019-1003076 | Medium | 2019-04-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Audit to Database Plugin in the DbAuditPublisherDescriptorImpl#doTestJdbcConnection form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server. |
| CVE-2019-1003075 | High | 2019-04-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Audit to Database Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2018-1320 | High | 2019-01-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Thrift Java client library versions 0.5.0 through 0.11.0 can bypass SASL negotiation isComplete validation in the org.apache.thrift.transport.TSaslTransport class. An assert used to determine if the SASL handshake had successfully completed could be disabled in production settings making the validation incomplete. |
| CVE-2018-14719 | Critical | 2019-01-02 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.7 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging failure to block the blaze-ds-opt and blaze-ds-core classes from polymorphic deserialization. |
| CVE-2018-14718 | Critical | 2019-01-02 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.7 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging failure to block the slf4j-ext class from polymorphic deserialization. |
| CVE-2018-1000873 | Medium | 2018-12-20 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Fasterxml Jackson version Before 2.9.8 contains a CWE-20: Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Jackson-Modules-Java8 that can result in Causes a denial-of-service (DoS). This attack appear to be exploitable via The victim deserializes malicious input, specifically very large values in the nanoseconds field of a time value. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 2.9.8. |
| CVE-2018-15769 | High | 2018-11-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite versions prior to 4.0.11 (in 4.0.x series) and versions prior to 4.1.6.2 (in 4.1.x series) contain a key management error issue. A malicious TLS server could potentially cause a Denial Of Service (DoS) on TLS clients during the handshake when a very large prime value is sent to the TLS client, and an Ephemeral or Anonymous Diffie-Hellman cipher suite (DHE or ADH) is used. |
| CVE-2018-11056 | Medium | 2018-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, prior to 4.1.6.1 (in 4.1.x), and RSA BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition versions prior to 4.0.5.3 (in 4.0.x) contain an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption ('Resource Exhaustion') vulnerability when parsing ASN.1 data. A remote attacker could use maliciously constructed ASN.1 data that would exhaust the stack, potentially causing a Denial Of Service. |
| CVE-2018-1288 | Medium | 2018-07-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Kafka 0.9.0.0 to 0.9.0.1, 0.10.0.0 to 0.10.2.1, 0.11.0.0 to 0.11.0.2, and 1.0.0, authenticated Kafka users may perform action reserved for the Broker via a manually created fetch request interfering with data replication, resulting in data loss. |
| CVE-2018-11039 | Medium | 2018-06-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Framework (versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.7, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.18, and older unsupported versions) allow web applications to change the HTTP request method to any HTTP method (including TRACE) using the HiddenHttpMethodFilter in Spring MVC. If an application has a pre-existing XSS vulnerability, a malicious user (or attacker) can use this filter to escalate to an XST (Cross Site Tracing) attack. |
| CVE-2018-1258 | High | 2018-05-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Framework version 5.0.5 when used in combination with any versions of Spring Security contains an authorization bypass when using method security. An unauthorized malicious user can gain unauthorized access to methods that should be restricted. |
| CVE-2018-1257 | Medium | 2018-05-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Framework, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.6, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.17, and older unsupported versions allows applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a regular expression, denial of service attack. |
| CVE-2018-10237 | Medium | 2018-04-26 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Unbounded memory allocation in Google Guava 11.0 through 24.x before 24.1.1 allows remote attackers to conduct denial of service attacks against servers that depend on this library and deserialize attacker-provided data, because the AtomicDoubleArray class (when serialized with Java serialization) and the CompoundOrdering class (when serialized with GWT serialization) perform eager allocation without appropriate checks on what a client has sent and whether the data size is reasonable. |
| CVE-2017-15095 | Critical | 2018-02-06 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind in versions before 2.8.10 and 2.9.1, which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. This issue extends the previous flaw CVE-2017-7525 by blacklisting more classes that could be used maliciously. |
| CVE-2017-12617 | High | 2017-10-04 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | When running Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0, 8.5.0 to 8.5.22, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.46 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.81 with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the readonly initialisation parameter of the Default servlet to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server. |
| CVE-2017-5645 | Critical | 2017-04-17 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2015-4735 | Medium | 2015-07-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager for Oracle Database component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 11.1.0.1, and EM DB Control 11.2.0.3 and 11.2.0.4, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via vectors related to RAC Management. |
| CVE-2015-2647 | Medium | 2015-07-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager for Oracle Database component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 11.1.0.1; EM Plugin for DB 12.1.0.5, 12.1.0.6, 12.1.0.7; and EM DB Control 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.3, and 11.2.0.4 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Content Management. |
| CVE-2015-2646 | Medium | 2015-07-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager for Oracle Database component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform: 11.1.0.1; EM Plugin for DB: 12.1.0.5, 12.1.0.6, 12.1.0.7; EM DB Control: 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.3, and 11.2.0.4 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Content Management. |
| CVE-2013-5828 | Medium | 2013-10-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and 11.1.0.1; EM DB Control 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3; and EM Plugin for DB 12.1.0.2 and 12.1.0.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Storage Management. |
| CVE-2013-5827 | Medium | 2013-10-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and 11.1.0.1; EM DB Control 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3; and EM Plugin for DB 12.1.0.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Storage Management. |
| CVE-2013-5766 | Medium | 2013-10-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and 11.1.0.1; EM DB Control 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3; and EM Plugin for DB 12.1.0.2 and 12.1.0.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to DB Performance Advisories/UIs. |
| CVE-2013-3762 | Medium | 2013-10-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and 11.1.0.1; EM DB Control 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3; and EM Plugin for DB 12.1.0.2, 12.1.0.3, and 12.1.0.4 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Schema Management. |
| CVE-2013-3791 | Medium | 2013-07-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Enterprise Manager (EM) Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and EM DB Control 11.1.0.7 in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to User Interface Framework. |
| CVE-2013-3758 | Medium | 2013-07-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager (EM) Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and 11.1.0.1; EM DB Control 10.2.0.4, 10.2.0.5, 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3; and EM Plugin for DB 12.1.0.2 and 12.1.0.3 in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Schema Management. |
| CVE-2013-0374 | Medium | 2013-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and 11.1.0.1; EM DB Control 10.2.0.3, 10.2.0.4, 10.2.0.5, 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3; and EM Plugin for DB 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Database Cloning. |
| CVE-2013-0373 | Medium | 2013-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and 11.1.0.1; EM DB Control 10.2.0.3, 10.2.0.4, 10.2.0.5, 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3; and EM Plugin for DB 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Distributed/Cross DB Features. |
| CVE-2013-0372 | Medium | 2013-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 11.1.0.1 and 12.1.0.1; EM DB Control 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3; and EM Plugin for DB 12.1.0.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Distributed/Cross DB Features. |
| CVE-2013-0358 | Medium | 2013-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and 11.1.0.1; EM DB Control 10.2.0.3, 10.2.0.4, 10.2.0.5, 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3; and EM Plugin for DB 12.1.0.1 and 12.1.0.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Resource Manager. |
| CVE-2013-0355 | Medium | 2013-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and 11.1.0.1, and EM DB Control 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3, allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Distributed/Cross DB Features. |
| CVE-2013-0354 | Medium | 2013-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 10.2.0.5, and EM DB Control 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3, allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Policy Framework. |
| CVE-2013-0353 | Medium | 2013-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and 11.1.0.1; EM DB Control 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3; and EM Plugin for DB 12.1.0.1 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Enterprise Configuration Management. |
| CVE-2013-0352 | Medium | 2013-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and 11.1.0.1; EM DB Control 10.2.0.3, 10.2.0.4, 10.2.0.5, 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3; and EM Plugin for DB 12.1.0.1 and 12.1.0.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Content Management. |
| CVE-2012-5062 | Medium | 2013-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and EM DB Control 10.2.0.3, 10.2.0.4, 10.2.0.5, 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to User Interface Framework. |
| CVE-2012-3219 | Medium | 2013-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control EM Base Platform 10.2.0.5 and 11.1.0.1; EM DB Control 10.2.0.3, 10.2.0.4, 10.2.0.5, 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3; and EM Plugin for DB 12.1.0.1 and 12.1.0.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Storage Management. |
| CVE-2008-0349 | High | 2008-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the PeopleTools component in Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne 8.48.15 and 8.49.07 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka PSE02. |
| CVE-2008-0348 | High | 2008-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the PeopleTools component in Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne 8.22.18, 8.48.15, and 8.49.07 have unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka (1) PSE01, (2) PSE03, and (3) PSE04. |
| CVE-2008-0347 | High | 2008-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Ultra Search component in Oracle Collaboration Suite 10.1.2; Database 9.2.0.8, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3; and Application Server 9.0.4.3 and 10.1.2.0.2; has unknown impact and local attack vectors, aka OCS01. NOTE: Oracle has not disputed a reliable claim that this issue is related to WKSYS schema privileges. |
| CVE-2007-5531 | High | 2007-10-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Help for Web, as used in Oracle Application Server, Oracle Database 10.2.0.3, and Enterprise Manager 10.1.0.6, has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka EM02. |
| CVE-2007-2119 | Medium | 2007-04-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in boundary_rules.jsp in the Administration Front End for Oracle Enterprise (Ultra) Search, as used in Database Server 9.2.0.8, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.2, and in Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.2.0.2, and 10.1.2.2.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or web script via the EXPTYPE parameter, aka SES01. |
| CVE-2006-1884 | High | 2006-04-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Thesaurus Management System component in Oracle E-Business Suite and OPA 4.5.2 Applications has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Vuln# OPA01. |
| CVE-2005-3460 | High | 2005-11-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Agent in Oracle Enterprise Manager 9.0.4.1 up to 10.1.0.4 has unknown impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# EM01. |
| CVE-2004-1368 | High | 2004-08-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | ISQL*Plus in Oracle 10g Application Server allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary files via an absolute pathname in the file parameter to the load.uix script. |
| CVE-2004-1366 | Medium | 2004-08-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Oracle 10g Database Server stores the password for the SYSMAN account in cleartext in the world-readable emoms.properties file, which could allow local users to gain DBA privileges. |