Overview 42 matches · 25 protected · 22 exploited · 14 CISA KEV · 26 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
28
66.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
14
33.3%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
25
59.5%
partly blocked
3
7.1%
not blocked
14
33.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
22
52.4%
Working exploit published
10
23.8%
Proof of concept only
10
23.8%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 9 / year
20102
Protected by Waratek2
High1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited2
20110
20120
20131
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Proof of concept only1
20140
20152
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20165
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate2
Critical2
High3
blocked by ARMR today2
partly blocked1
not blocked2
Exploited1
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only1
20179
Protected by Waratek9
Critical6
High2
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today7
partly blocked2
Exploited6
Working exploit published3
20185
Protected by Waratek4
Mitigation candidate1
Critical5
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked1
Exploited2
Proof of concept only3
20199
Protected by Waratek5
Mitigation candidate4
Critical4
High4
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today5
not blocked4
Exploited5
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only3
20201
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20212
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
High1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20222
Mitigation candidate2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
20232
Mitigation candidate2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Exploited1
Proof of concept only1
20241
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20250
20261
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-34486 | High | 2026-04-09 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data vulnerability in Apache Tomcat due to the fix for CVE-2026-29146 allowing the bypass of the EncryptInterceptor. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: 11.0.20, 10.1.53, 9.0.116. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117, which fix the issue. |
| CVE-2024-8883 | Medium | 2024-09-19 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | A misconfiguration flaw was found in Keycloak. This issue can allow an attacker to redirect users to an arbitrary URL if a 'Valid Redirect URI' is set to http://localhost or http://127.0.0.1, enabling sensitive information such as authorization codes to be exposed to the attacker, potentially leading to session hijacking. |
| CVE-2023-44487 | High | 2023-10-10 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. |
| CVE-2023-0264 | Medium | 2023-08-04 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | A flaw was found in Keycloaks OpenID Connect user authentication, which may incorrectly authenticate requests. An authenticated attacker who could obtain information from a user request within the same realm could use that data to impersonate the victim and generate new session tokens. This issue could impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability. |
| CVE-2021-20323 | Medium | 2022-03-25 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | A POST based reflected Cross Site Scripting vulnerability on has been identified in Keycloak. |
| CVE-2022-0853 | High | 2022-03-11 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | A flaw was found in JBoss-client. The vulnerability occurs due to a memory leak on the JBoss client-side, when using UserTransaction repeatedly and leads to information leakage vulnerability. |
| CVE-2021-4104 | High | 2021-12-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. |
| CVE-2020-27838 | Medium | 2021-03-08 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | A flaw was found in keycloak in versions prior to 13.0.0. The client registration endpoint allows fetching information about PUBLIC clients (like client secret) without authentication which could be an issue if the same PUBLIC client changed to CONFIDENTIAL later. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. |
| CVE-2020-10770 | Medium | 2020-12-15 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | A flaw was found in Keycloak before 13.0.0, where it is possible to force the server to call out an unverified URL using the OIDC parameter request_uri. This flaw allows an attacker to use this parameter to execute a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. |
| CVE-2011-3923 | Critical | 2019-11-01 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Apache Struts before 2.3.1.2 allows remote attackers to bypass security protections in the ParameterInterceptor class and execute arbitrary commands. |
| CVE-2019-14540 | Critical | 2019-09-15 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.10. It is related to com.zaxxer.hikari.HikariConfig. |
| CVE-2019-14439 | High | 2019-07-30 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.9.2. This occurs when Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the logback jar in the classpath. |
| CVE-2019-12384 | Medium | 2019-06-24 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.9.1 might allow attackers to have a variety of impacts by leveraging failure to block the logback-core class from polymorphic deserialization. Depending on the classpath content, remote code execution may be possible. |
| CVE-2019-1003030 | Critical | 2019-03-08 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.63 and earlier in pom.xml, src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/cps/CpsGroovyShell.java that allows attackers able to control pipeline scripts to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2019-1003029 | Critical | 2019-03-08 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.53 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/scriptsecurity/sandbox/groovy/GroovySandbox.java, src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/scriptsecurity/sandbox/groovy/SecureGroovyScript.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2019-1003002 | High | 2019-01-22 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Pipeline: Declarative Plugin 1.3.3 and earlier in pipeline-model-definition/src/main/groovy/org/jenkinsci/plugins/pipeline/modeldefinition/parser/Converter.groovy that allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to provide a pipeline script to an HTTP endpoint that can result in arbitrary code execution on the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2019-1003001 | High | 2019-01-22 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.61 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/cps/CpsFlowDefinition.java, src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/cps/CpsGroovyShellFactory.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to provide a pipeline script to an HTTP endpoint that can result in arbitrary code execution on the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2019-1003000 | High | 2019-01-22 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Script Security Plugin 1.49 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/scriptsecurity/sandbox/groovy/GroovySandbox.java that allows attackers with the ability to provide sandboxed scripts to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2018-1000861 | Critical | 2018-12-10 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A code execution vulnerability exists in the Stapler web framework used by Jenkins 2.153 and earlier, LTS 2.138.3 and earlier in stapler/core/src/main/java/org/kohsuke/stapler/MetaClass.java that allows attackers to invoke some methods on Java objects by accessing crafted URLs that were not intended to be invoked this way. |
| CVE-2018-14667 | Critical | 2018-11-06 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The RichFaces Framework 3.X through 3.3.4 is vulnerable to Expression Language (EL) injection via the UserResource resource. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit this to execute arbitrary code using a chain of java serialized objects via org.ajax4jsf.resource.UserResource$UriData. |
| CVE-2018-12533 | Critical | 2018-06-18 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | JBoss RichFaces 3.1.0 through 3.3.4 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject expression language (EL) expressions and execute arbitrary Java code via a /DATA/ substring in a path with an org.richfaces.renderkit.html.Paint2DResource$ImageData object, aka RF-14310. |
| CVE-2018-1270 | Critical | 2018-04-06 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. |
| CVE-2017-7525 | Critical | 2018-02-06 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind, versions before 2.6.7.1, 2.7.9.1 and 2.8.9, which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. |
| CVE-2015-7501 | Critical | 2017-11-09 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. |
| CVE-2017-10355 | Medium | 2017-10-19 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Networking). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u161, 7u151, 8u144 and 9; Java SE Embedded: 8u144; JRockit: R28.3.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited through sandboxed Java Web Start applications and sandboxed Java applets. It can also be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, such as through a web service. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L). |
| CVE-2017-12629 | Critical | 2017-10-14 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Remote code execution occurs in Apache Solr before 7.1 with Apache Lucene before 7.1 by exploiting XXE in conjunction with use of a Config API add-listener command to reach the RunExecutableListener class. Elasticsearch, although it uses Lucene, is NOT vulnerable to this. Note that the XML external entity expansion vulnerability occurs in the XML Query Parser which is available, by default, for any query request with parameters deftype=xmlparser and can be exploited to upload malicious data to the /upload request handler or as Blind XXE using ftp wrapper in order to read arbitrary local files from the Solr server. Note also that the second vulnerability relates to remote code execution using the RunExecutableListener available on all affected versions of Solr. |
| CVE-2017-12617 | High | 2017-10-04 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | When running Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0, 8.5.0 to 8.5.22, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.46 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.81 with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the readonly initialisation parameter of the Default servlet to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server. |
| CVE-2017-12149 | Critical | 2017-10-04 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Jboss Application Server as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform 5.2, it was found that the doFilter method in the ReadOnlyAccessFilter of the HTTP Invoker does not restrict classes for which it performs deserialization and thus allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data. |
| CVE-2017-12615 | High | 2017-09-19 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | When running Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 to 7.0.79 on Windows with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the readonly initialisation parameter of the Default to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server. |
| CVE-2017-7504 | Critical | 2017-05-19 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | HTTPServerILServlet.java in JMS over HTTP Invocation Layer of the JbossMQ implementation, which is enabled by default in Red Hat Jboss Application Server <= Jboss 4.X does not restrict the classes for which it performs deserialization, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data. |
| CVE-2017-5645 | Critical | 2017-04-17 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2016-8735 | Critical | 2017-04-06 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Remote code execution is possible with Apache Tomcat before 6.0.48, 7.x before 7.0.73, 8.x before 8.0.39, 8.5.x before 8.5.7, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M12 if JmxRemoteLifecycleListener is used and an attacker can reach JMX ports. The issue exists because this listener wasn't updated for consistency with the CVE-2016-3427 Oracle patch that affected credential types. |
| CVE-2016-7065 | High | 2016-10-13 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | The JMX servlet in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 4 and 5 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized Java object. |
| CVE-2016-4437 | Critical | 2016-06-07 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Shiro before 1.2.5, when a cipher key has not been configured for the "remember me" feature, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or bypass intended access restrictions via an unspecified request parameter. |
| CVE-2016-0792 | High | 2016-04-07 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple unspecified API endpoints in Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via serialized data in an XML file, related to XStream and groovy.util.Expando. |
| CVE-2016-0793 | High | 2016-04-01 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Incomplete blacklist vulnerability in the servlet filter restriction mechanism in WildFly (formerly JBoss Application Server) before 10.0.0.Final on Windows allows remote attackers to read the sensitive files in the (1) WEB-INF or (2) META-INF directory via a request that contains (a) lowercase or (b) "meaningless" characters. |
| CVE-2015-5254 | Critical | 2016-01-08 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.13.0 does not restrict the classes that can be serialized in the broker, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized Java Message Service (JMS) ObjectMessage object. |
| CVE-2015-8103 | Critical | 2015-11-25 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | The Jenkins CLI subsystem in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized Java object, related to a problematic webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/lib/commons-collections-*.jar file and the "Groovy variant in 'ysoserial'". |
| CVE-2015-1427 | Critical | 2015-02-17 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Groovy scripting engine in Elasticsearch before 1.3.8 and 1.4.x before 1.4.3 allows remote attackers to bypass the sandbox protection mechanism and execute arbitrary shell commands via a crafted script. |
| CVE-2013-2186 | High | 2013-10-28 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | The DiskFileItem class in Apache Commons FileUpload, as used in Red Hat JBoss BRMS 5.3.1; JBoss Portal 4.3 CP07, 5.2.2, and 6.0.0; and Red Hat JBoss Web Server 1.0.2 allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a NULL byte in a file name in a serialized instance. |
| CVE-2010-1871 | High | 2010-08-05 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for JBoss Expression Language (EL) expressions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when the Java Security Manager is not properly configured. |
| CVE-2010-0738 | Medium | 2010-04-28 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The JMX-Console web application in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to send requests to this application's GET handler by using a different method. |