Overview 4,321 matches · 426 protected · 65 exploited · 29 CISA KEV · 263 public PoC · 117 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
429
9.9%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
181
4.2%
No exploit published
3,711
85.9%
split by
peak 800 / year
19961
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19970
19980
19992
No exploit published2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
200012
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published6
High5
Medium7
not blocked12
Working exploit published6
No public exploit6
200113
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published10
High7
Medium6
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked12
Working exploit published2
No public exploit11
200237
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate8
No exploit published26
High11
Medium23
Low3
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked34
Working exploit published8
Forecast only2
No public exploit27
200339
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate7
No exploit published30
High9
Medium24
Low6
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked37
Working exploit published8
No public exploit31
200427
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published24
High6
Medium18
Low3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked25
Working exploit published1
No public exploit26
200582
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published75
Critical1
High30
Medium46
Low5
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked79
Working exploit published5
No public exploit77
2006133
Protected by Waratek8
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published121
High66
Medium56
Low11
blocked by ARMR today8
not blocked125
Exploited1
Working exploit published5
No public exploit127
2007150
Protected by Waratek6
Mitigation candidate10
No exploit published134
High68
Medium71
Low11
blocked by ARMR today6
not blocked144
Working exploit published11
No public exploit139
2008136
Protected by Waratek7
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published120
High46
Medium83
Low7
blocked by ARMR today7
not blocked129
Exploited2
Working exploit published12
No public exploit122
2009203
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate13
No exploit published181
High52
Medium129
Low22
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked194
Exploited1
Working exploit published16
No public exploit186
2010183
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published162
Critical1
High27
Medium133
Low22
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked174
Exploited3
Working exploit published14
Forecast only1
No public exploit165
2011193
Protected by Waratek6
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published178
High20
Medium139
Low34
blocked by ARMR today6
not blocked187
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit181
2012311
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate24
No exploit published278
Critical3
High29
Medium199
Low80
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked300
not established2
Exploited8
Working exploit published19
No public exploit284
2013349
Protected by Waratek26
Mitigation candidate18
No exploit published305
Critical1
High45
Medium249
Low54
blocked by ARMR today26
not blocked322
not established1
Exploited9
Working exploit published17
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit321
2014335
Protected by Waratek41
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published282
High30
Medium256
Low49
blocked by ARMR today41
not blocked294
Exploited4
Working exploit published14
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only2
No public exploit314
2015323
Protected by Waratek32
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published285
Critical4
High42
Medium226
Low51
blocked by ARMR today32
not blocked291
Exploited4
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit310
2016535
Protected by Waratek58
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published465
Critical47
High134
Medium321
Low33
blocked by ARMR today57
partly blocked1
not blocked476
not established1
Exploited8
Working exploit published18
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only5
No public exploit503
2017800
Protected by Waratek104
Mitigation candidate14
No exploit published682
Critical82
High338
Medium355
Low25
blocked by ARMR today102
partly blocked2
not blocked696
Exploited17
Working exploit published19
Proof of concept only3
Forecast only1
No public exploit760
2018457
Protected by Waratek103
Mitigation candidate10
No exploit published344
Critical43
High160
Medium246
Low8
blocked by ARMR today103
not blocked354
Exploited8
Working exploit published10
Proof of concept only4
Forecast only1
No public exploit434
199619982000200220042006200820102012201420162018
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-1270 | Critical | 2018-04-06 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. |
| CVE-2018-1315 | Low | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Hive 2.1.0 to 2.3.2, when 'COPY FROM FTP' statement is run using HPL/SQL extension to Hive, a compromised/malicious FTP server can cause the file to be written to an arbitrary location on the cluster where the command is run from. This is because FTP client code in HPL/SQL does not verify the destination location of the downloaded file. This does not affect hive cli user and hiveserver2 user as hplsql is a separate command line script and needs to be invoked differently. |
| CVE-2018-1284 | Low | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Hive 0.6.0 to 2.3.2, malicious user might use any xpath UDFs (xpath/xpath_string/xpath_boolean/xpath_number/xpath_double/xpath_float/xpath_long/xpath_int/xpath_short) to expose the content of a file on the machine running HiveServer2 owned by HiveServer2 user (usually hive) if hive.server2.enable.doAs=false. |
| CVE-2018-1282 | Critical | 2018-04-05 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | This vulnerability in Apache Hive JDBC driver 0.7.1 to 2.3.2 allows carefully crafted arguments to be used to bypass the argument escaping/cleanup that JDBC driver does in PreparedStatement implementation. |
| CVE-2018-1000153 | High | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins vSphere Plugin 2.16 and older in Clone.java, CloudSelectorParameter.java, ConvertToTemplate.java, ConvertToVm.java, Delete.java, DeleteSnapshot.java, Deploy.java, ExposeGuestInfo.java, FolderVSphereCloudProperty.java, PowerOff.java, PowerOn.java, Reconfigure.java, Rename.java, RenameSnapshot.java, RevertToSnapshot.java, SuspendVm.java, TakeSnapshot.java, VSphereBuildStepContainer.java, vSphereCloudProvisionedSlave.java, vSphereCloudSlave.java, vSphereCloudSlaveTemplate.java, VSphereConnectionConfig.java, vSphereStep.java that allows attackers to perform form validation related actions, including sending numerous requests to the configured vSphere server, potentially resulting in denial of service, or send credentials stored in Jenkins with known ID to an attacker-specified server ("test connection"). |
| CVE-2018-1000152 | Medium | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins vSphere Plugin 2.16 and older in Clone.java, CloudSelectorParameter.java, ConvertToTemplate.java, ConvertToVm.java, Delete.java, DeleteSnapshot.java, Deploy.java, ExposeGuestInfo.java, FolderVSphereCloudProperty.java, PowerOff.java, PowerOn.java, Reconfigure.java, Rename.java, RenameSnapshot.java, RevertToSnapshot.java, SuspendVm.java, TakeSnapshot.java, VSphereBuildStepContainer.java, vSphereCloudProvisionedSlave.java, vSphereCloudSlave.java, vSphereCloudSlaveTemplate.java, VSphereConnectionConfig.java, vSphereStep.java that allows attackers to perform form validation related actions, including sending numerous requests to the configured vSphere server, potentially resulting in denial of service, or send credentials stored in Jenkins with known ID to an attacker-specified server ("test connection"). |
| CVE-2018-1000151 | Medium | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A man in the middle vulnerability exists in Jenkins vSphere Plugin 2.16 and older in VSphere.java that disables SSL/TLS certificate validation by default. |
| CVE-2018-1000150 | Low | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An exposure of sensitive information vulnerability exists in Jenkins Reverse Proxy Auth Plugin 1.5 and older in ReverseProxySecurityRealm#authContext that allows attackers with local file system access to obtain a list of authorities for logged in users. |
| CVE-2018-1000149 | Medium | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A man in the middle vulnerability exists in Jenkins Ansible Plugin 0.8 and older in AbstractAnsibleInvocation.java, AnsibleAdHocCommandBuilder.java, AnsibleAdHocCommandInvocationTest.java, AnsibleContext.java, AnsibleJobDslExtension.java, AnsiblePlaybookBuilder.java, AnsiblePlaybookStep.java that disables host key verification by default. |
| CVE-2018-1000148 | Medium | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An exposure of sensitive information vulnerability exists in Jenkins Copy To Slave Plugin version 1.4.4 and older in CopyToSlaveBuildWrapper.java that allows attackers with permission to configure jobs to read arbitrary files from the Jenkins master file system. |
| CVE-2018-1000147 | Medium | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An exposure of sensitive information vulnerability exists in Jenkins Perforce Plugin version 1.3.36 and older in PerforcePasswordEncryptor.java that allows attackers with insufficient permission to obtain Perforce passwords configured in jobs to obtain them |
| CVE-2018-1000146 | High | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An arbitrary code execution vulnerability exists in Liquibase Runner Plugin version 1.3.0 and older that allows an attacker with permission to configure jobs to load and execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2018-1000145 | Medium | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An exposure of sensitive information vulnerability exists in Jenkins Perforce Plugin version 1.3.36 and older in PerforcePasswordEncryptor.java that allows attackers with local file system access to obtain encrypted Perforce passwords and decrypt them. |
| CVE-2018-1000144 | Medium | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross site scripting vulnerability exists in Jenkins Cucumber Living Documentation Plugin 1.0.12 and older in CukedoctorBaseAction#doDynamic that disables the Content-Security-Policy protection for archived artifacts and workspace files, allowing attackers able to control the content of these files to attack Jenkins users. |
| CVE-2018-1000143 | Medium | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An exposure of sensitive information vulnerability exists in Jenkins GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin version 1.39.0 and older in GhprbCause.java that allows an attacker with local file system access to obtain GitHub credentials. |
| CVE-2018-1000142 | High | 2018-04-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An exposure of sensitive information vulnerability exists in Jenkins GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin version 1.39.0 and older in GhprbCause.java that allows an attacker with local file system access to obtain GitHub credentials. |
| CVE-2018-6660 | Medium | 2018-04-02 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Directory Traversal vulnerability in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) 5.3.2, 5.3.1, 5.3.0 and 5.9.0 allows administrators to use Windows alternate data streams, which could be used to bypass the file extensions, via not properly validating the path when exporting a particular XML file. |
| CVE-2018-6659 | Medium | 2018-04-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Reflected Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) 5.3.2, 5.3.1, 5.3.0 and 5.9.0 allows remote authenticated users to exploit an XSS issue via not sanitizing the user input. |
| CVE-2018-1295 | Critical | 2018-04-02 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Apache Ignite 2.3 or earlier, the serialization mechanism does not have a list of classes allowed for serialization/deserialization, which makes it possible to run arbitrary code when 3-rd party vulnerable classes are present in Ignite classpath. The vulnerability can be exploited if the one sends a specially prepared form of a serialized object to one of the deserialization endpoints of some Ignite components - discovery SPI, Ignite persistence, Memcached endpoint, socket steamer. |
| CVE-2018-9159 | Medium | 2018-03-31 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Spark before 2.7.2, a remote attacker can read unintended static files via various representations of absolute or relative pathnames, as demonstrated by file: URLs and directory traversal sequences. NOTE: this product is unrelated to Ignite Realtime Spark. |
| CVE-2018-8718 | High | 2018-03-27 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Mailer Plugin 1.20 for Jenkins 2.111 allows remote authenticated users to send unauthorized mail as an arbitrary user via a /descriptorByName/hudson.tasks.Mailer/sendTestMail request. |
| CVE-2018-1327 | High | 2018-03-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The Apache Struts REST Plugin is using XStream library which is vulnerable and allow perform a DoS attack when using a malicious request with specially crafted XML payload. Upgrade to the Apache Struts version 2.5.16 and switch to an optional Jackson XML handler as described here http://struts.apache.org/plugins/rest/#custom-contenttypehandlers. Another option is to implement a custom XML handler based on the Jackson XML handler from the Apache Struts 2.5.16. |
| CVE-2017-1788 | Medium | 2018-03-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 9 installations using Form Login could allow a remote attacker to conduct spoofing attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 137031. |
| CVE-2018-1230 | High | 2018-03-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Pivotal Spring Batch Admin, all versions, does not contain cross site request forgery protection. A remote unauthenticated user could craft a malicious site that executes requests to Spring Batch Admin. This issue has not been patched because Spring Batch Admin has reached end of life. |
| CVE-2018-1229 | Medium | 2018-03-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Pivotal Spring Batch Admin, all versions, contains a stored XSS vulnerability in the file upload feature. An unauthenticated malicious user with network access to Spring Batch Admin could store an arbitrary web script that would be executed by other users. This issue has not been patched because Spring Batch Admin has reached end of life. |
| CVE-2018-8088 | Critical | 2018-03-20 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | org.slf4j.ext.EventData in the slf4j-ext module in QOS.CH SLF4J before 1.8.0-beta2 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted data. EventData in the slf4j-ext module in QOS.CH SLF4J, has been fixed in SLF4J versions 1.7.26 later and in the 2.0.x series. |
| CVE-2018-1322 | Medium | 2018-03-20 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | An administrator with user search entitlements in Apache Syncope 1.2.x before 1.2.11, 2.0.x before 2.0.8, and unsupported releases 1.0.x and 1.1.x which may be also affected, can recover sensitive security values using the fiql and orderby parameters. |
| CVE-2018-1321 | High | 2018-03-20 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | An administrator with report and template entitlements in Apache Syncope 1.2.x before 1.2.11, 2.0.x before 2.0.8, and unsupported releases 1.0.x and 1.1.x which may be also affected, can use XSL Transformations (XSLT) to perform malicious operations, including but not limited to file read, file write, and code execution. |
| CVE-2018-1294 | High | 2018-03-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | If a user of Apache Commons Email (typically an application programmer) passes unvalidated input as the so-called "Bounce Address", and that input contains line-breaks, then the email details (recipients, contents, etc.) might be manipulated. Mitigation: Users should upgrade to Commons-Email 1.5. You can mitigate this vulnerability for older versions of Commons Email by stripping line-breaks from data, that will be passed to Email.setBounceAddress(String). |
| CVE-2018-1196 | Medium | 2018-03-19 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Spring Boot supports an embedded launch script that can be used to easily run the application as a systemd or init.d linux service. The script included with Spring Boot 1.5.9 and earlier and 2.0.0.M1 through 2.0.0.M7 is susceptible to a symlink attack which allows the "run_user" to overwrite and take ownership of any file on the same system. In order to instigate the attack, the application must be installed as a service and the "run_user" requires shell access to the server. Spring Boot application that are not installed as a service, or are not using the embedded launch script are not susceptible. |
| CVE-2017-18239 | Critical | 2018-03-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A time-sensitive equality check on the JWT signature in the JsonWebToken.validate method in main/scala/authentikat/jwt/JsonWebToken.scala in authentikat-jwt (aka com.jason-goodwin/authentikat-jwt) version 0.4.5 and earlier allows the supplier of a JWT token to guess bit after bit of the signature by repeating validation requests. |
| CVE-2018-1324 | Medium | 2018-03-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A specially crafted ZIP archive can be used to cause an infinite loop inside of Apache Commons Compress' extra field parser used by the ZipFile and ZipArchiveInputStream classes in versions 1.11 to 1.15. This can be used to mount a denial of service attack against services that use Compress' zip package. |
| CVE-2018-1199 | Medium | 2018-03-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Security (Spring Security 4.1.x before 4.1.5, 4.2.x before 4.2.4, and 5.0.x before 5.0.1; and Spring Framework 4.3.x before 4.3.14 and 5.0.x before 5.0.3) does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with special encodings, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification. Some Servlet containers include path parameters in the value returned for getPathInfo() and some do not. Spring Security uses the value returned by getPathInfo() as part of the process of mapping requests to security constraints. In this particular attack, different character encodings used in path parameters allows secured Spring MVC static resource URLs to be bypassed. |
| CVE-2018-1000134 | Critical | 2018-03-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | UnboundID LDAP SDK version from commit 801111d8b5c732266a5dbd4b3bb0b6c7b94d7afb up to commit 8471904a02438c03965d21367890276bc25fa5a6, where the issue was reported and fixed contains an Incorrect Access Control vulnerability in process function in SimpleBindRequest class doesn't check for empty password when running in synchronous mode. commit with applied fix https://github.com/pingidentity/ldapsdk/commit/8471904a02438c03965d21367890276bc25fa5a6#diff-f6cb23b459be1ec17df1da33760087fd that can result in Ability to impersonate any valid user. This attack appear to be exploitable via Providing valid username and empty password against servers that do not do additional validation as per https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4513#section-5.1.1. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in after commit 8471904a02438c03965d21367890276bc25fa5a6. |
| CVE-2018-1000130 | High | 2018-03-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A JNDI Injection vulnerability exists in Jolokia agent version 1.3.7 in the proxy mode that allows a remote attacker to run arbitrary Java code on the server. |
| CVE-2018-1000129 | Medium | 2018-03-14 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | An XSS vulnerability exists in the Jolokia agent version 1.3.7 in the HTTP servlet that allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript in the victim's browser. |
| CVE-2017-1741 | Medium | 2018-03-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information caused by improper handling of Administrative Console panel fields. When exploited an attacker could read files on the file system. IBM X-Force ID: 134931. |
| CVE-2018-1000114 | Medium | 2018-03-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins Promoted Builds Plugin 2.31.1 and earlier in Status.java and ManualCondition.java that allow an attacker with read access to jobs to perform promotions. |
| CVE-2018-1000113 | Medium | 2018-03-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in Jenkins TestLink Plugin 2.12 and earlier in TestLinkBuildAction/summary.jelly and others that allow an attacker who can control e.g. TestLink report names to have Jenkins serve arbitrary HTML and JavaScript |
| CVE-2018-1000112 | Medium | 2018-03-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins Mercurial Plugin version 2.2 and earlier in MercurialStatus.java that allows an attacker with network access to obtain a list of nodes and users. |
| CVE-2018-1000111 | Medium | 2018-03-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins Subversion Plugin version 2.10.2 and earlier in SubversionStatus.java and SubversionRepositoryStatus.java that allows an attacker with network access to obtain a list of nodes and users. |
| CVE-2018-1000110 | Medium | 2018-03-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins Git Plugin version 3.7.0 and earlier in GitStatus.java that allows an attacker with network access to obtain a list of nodes and users. |
| CVE-2018-1000109 | Medium | 2018-03-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins Google Play Android Publisher Plugin version 1.6 and earlier in GooglePlayBuildStepDescriptor.java that allow an attacker to obtain credential IDs. |
| CVE-2018-1000108 | Medium | 2018-03-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in Jenkins CppNCSS Plugin 1.1 and earlier in AbstractProjectAction/index.jelly that allow an attacker to craft links to Jenkins URLs that run arbitrary JavaScript in the user's browser when accessed. |
| CVE-2018-1000107 | Medium | 2018-03-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins Job and Node Ownership Plugin 0.11.0 and earlier in OwnershipDescription.java, JobOwnerJobProperty.java, and OwnerNodeProperty.java that allow an attacker with Job/Configure or Computer/Configure permission and without Ownership related permissions to override ownership metadata. |
| CVE-2018-1000106 | Medium | 2018-03-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins Gerrit Trigger Plugin 2.27.4 and earlier in GerritManagement.java, GerritServer.java, and PluginImpl.java that allows an attacker with Overall/Read access to modify the Gerrit configuration in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2018-1000105 | Medium | 2018-03-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins Gerrit Trigger Plugin 2.27.4 and earlier in GerritManagement.java, GerritServer.java, and PluginImpl.java that allows an attacker with Overall/Read access to retrieve some configuration information about Gerrit in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2018-1000104 | High | 2018-03-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A plaintext storage of a password vulnerability exists in Jenkins Coverity Plugin 1.10.0 and earlier in CIMInstance.java that allows an attacker with local file system access or control of a Jenkins administrator's web browser (e.g. malicious extension) to retrieve the configured keystore and private key passwords. |
| CVE-2018-1000095 | Medium | 2018-03-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | oVirt version 4.2.0 to 4.2.2 contains a Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the name/description of VMs portion of the web admin application. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in version 4.2.3. |
| CVE-2017-2585 | Medium | 2018-03-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.5.1 has an implementation of HMAC verification for JWS tokens that uses a method that runs in non-constant time, potentially leaving the application vulnerable to timing attacks. |
| CVE-2017-15719 | Medium | 2018-03-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Wicket jQuery UI 6.28.0 and earlier, 7.9.1 and earlier, and 8.0.0-M8 and earlier, a security issue has been discovered in the WYSIWYG editor that allows an attacker to submit arbitrary JS code to WYSIWYG editor. |
| CVE-2016-9589 | High | 2018-03-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Undertow in Red Hat wildfly before version 11.0.0.Beta1 is vulnerable to a resource exhaustion resulting in a denial of service. Undertow keeps a cache of seen HTTP headers in persistent connections. It was found that this cache can easily exploited to fill memory with garbage, up to "max-headers" (default 200) * "max-header-size" (default 1MB) per active TCP connection. |
| CVE-2016-8629 | Medium | 2018-03-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm. |
| CVE-2016-9606 | High | 2018-03-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | JBoss RESTEasy before version 3.1.2 could be forced into parsing a request with YamlProvider, resulting in unmarshalling of potentially untrusted data which could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code with RESTEasy application permissions. |
| CVE-2016-9585 | Medium | 2018-03-09 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Red Hat JBoss EAP version 5 is vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data in the JMX endpoint when deserializes the credentials passed to it. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability resulting in a denial of service attack. |
| CVE-2017-12174 | High | 2018-03-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was found that when Artemis and HornetQ before 2.4.0 are configured with UDP discovery and JGroups discovery a huge byte array is created when receiving an unexpected multicast message. This may result in a heap memory exhaustion, full GC, or OutOfMemoryError. |
| CVE-2018-1062 | Medium | 2018-03-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability was discovered in oVirt 4.1.x before 4.1.9, where the combination of Enable Discard and Wipe After Delete flags for VM disks managed by oVirt, could cause a disk to be incompletely zeroed when removed from a VM. If the same storage blocks happen to be later allocated to a new disk attached to another VM, potentially sensitive data could be revealed to privileged users of that VM. |
| CVE-2018-1316 | High | 2018-03-05 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The ODE process deployment web service was sensible to deployment messages with forged names. Using a path for the name was allowing directory traversal, resulting in the potential writing of files under unwanted locations, the overwriting of existing files or their deletion. This issue was addressed in Apache ODE 1.3.3 which was released in 2009, however the incorrect name CVE-2008-2370 was used on the advisory by mistake. |
| CVE-2018-1286 | Medium | 2018-02-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 - 4.0.1, CRUD operations on privileged users are not password protected allowing an authenticated attacker to deny service for privileged users. |
| CVE-2017-15693 | High | 2018-02-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Apache Geode before v1.4.0, the Geode server stores application objects in serialized form. Certain cluster operations and API invocations cause these objects to be deserialized. A user with DATA:WRITE access to the cluster may be able to cause remote code execution if certain classes are present on the classpath. |
| CVE-2017-15692 | Critical | 2018-02-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Apache Geode before v1.4.0, the TcpServer within the Geode locator opens a network port that deserializes data. If an unprivileged user gains access to the Geode locator, they may be able to cause remote code execution if certain classes are present on the classpath. |
| CVE-2012-3536 | Medium | 2018-02-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Two XSS vulnerabilities were fixed in message list and view in the Hupa Webmail application from the Apache James project. An attacker could send a carefully crafted email to a user of Hupa which would trigger a XSS when the email was opened or when a list of messages were viewed. This issue was addressed in Hupa 0.0.3. |
| CVE-2018-7489 | Critical | 2018-02-26 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.7.9.3, 2.8.x before 2.8.11.1 and 2.9.x before 2.9.5 allows unauthenticated remote code execution because of an incomplete fix for the CVE-2017-7525 deserialization flaw. This is exploitable by sending maliciously crafted JSON input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper, bypassing a blacklist that is ineffective if the c3p0 libraries are available in the classpath. |
| CVE-2018-7485 | Critical | 2018-02-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The SQLWriteFileDSN function in odbcinst/SQLWriteFileDSN.c in unixODBC 2.3.5 has strncpy arguments in the wrong order, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact. |
| CVE-2017-15696 | High | 2018-02-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When an Apache Geode cluster before v1.4.0 is operating in secure mode, the Geode configuration service does not properly authorize configuration requests. This allows an unprivileged user who gains access to the Geode locator to extract configuration data and previously deployed application code. |
| CVE-2018-1417 | High | 2018-02-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Under certain circumstances, a flaw in the J9 JVM (IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 7.1 and 8.0) allows untrusted code running under a security manager to elevate its privileges. IBM X-Force ID: 138823. |
| CVE-2017-12161 | High | 2018-02-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was found that keycloak before 3.4.2 final would permit misuse of a client-side /etc/hosts entry to spoof a URL in a password reset request. An attacker could use this flaw to craft a malicious password reset request and gain a valid reset token, leading to information disclosure or further attacks. |
| CVE-2018-6356 | Medium | 2018-02-20 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins before 2.107 and Jenkins LTS before 2.89.4 did not properly prevent specifying relative paths that escape a base directory for URLs accessing plugin resource files. This allowed users with Overall/Read permission to download files from the Jenkins master they should not have access to. On Windows, any file accessible to the Jenkins master process could be downloaded. On other operating systems, any file within the Jenkins home directory accessible to the Jenkins master process could be downloaded. |
| CVE-2017-15712 | Medium | 2018-02-19 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Vulnerability allows a user of Apache Oozie 3.1.3-incubating to 4.3.0 and 5.0.0-beta1 to expose private files on the Oozie server process. The malicious user can construct a workflow XML file containing XML directives and configuration that reference sensitive files on the Oozie server host. |
| CVE-2016-8750 | Medium | 2018-02-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Karaf prior to 4.0.8 used the LDAPLoginModule to authenticate users to a directory via LDAP. However, it did not encoding usernames properly and hence was vulnerable to LDAP injection attacks leading to a denial of service. |
| CVE-2018-1000068 | Medium | 2018-02-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper input validation vulnerability exists in Jenkins versions 2.106 and earlier, and LTS 2.89.3 and earlier, that allows an attacker to access plugin resource files in the META-INF and WEB-INF directories that should not be accessible, if the Jenkins home directory is on a case-insensitive file system. |
| CVE-2018-1000067 | Medium | 2018-02-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins versions 2.106 and earlier, and LTS 2.89.3 and earlier, that allows an attacker to have Jenkins submit HTTP GET requests and get limited information about the response. |
| CVE-2017-15089 | High | 2018-02-15 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | It was found that the Hotrod client in Infinispan before 9.2.0.CR1 would unsafely read deserialized data on information from the cache. An authenticated attacker could inject a malicious object into the data cache and attain deserialization on the client, and possibly conduct further attacks. |
| CVE-2018-1287 | Critical | 2018-02-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache JMeter 2.X and 3.X, when using Distributed Test only (RMI based), jmeter server binds RMI Registry to wildcard host. This could allow an attacker to get Access to JMeterEngine and send unauthorized code. |
| CVE-2018-1297 | Critical | 2018-02-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When using Distributed Test only (RMI based), Apache JMeter 2.x and 3.x uses an unsecured RMI connection. This could allow an attacker to get Access to JMeterEngine and send unauthorized code. |
| CVE-2017-15709 | Low | 2018-02-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When using the OpenWire protocol in ActiveMQ versions 5.14.0 to 5.15.2 it was found that certain system details (such as the OS and kernel version) are exposed as plain text. |
| CVE-2018-1307 | High | 2018-02-09 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Apache jUDDI 3.2 through 3.3.4, if using the WADL2Java or WSDL2Java classes, which parse a local or remote XML document and then mediates the data structures into UDDI data structures, there are little protections present against entity expansion and DTD type of attacks. Mitigation is to use 3.3.5. |
| CVE-2018-1298 | Medium | 2018-02-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Denial of Service vulnerability was found in Apache Qpid Broker-J 7.0.0 in functionality for authentication of connections for AMQP protocols 0-8, 0-9, 0-91 and 0-10 when PLAIN or XOAUTH2 SASL mechanism is used. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker to crash the broker instance. AMQP 1.0 and HTTP connections are not affected. An authentication of incoming AMQP connections in Apache Qpid Broker-J is performed by special entities called "Authentication Providers". Each Authentication Provider can support several SASL mechanisms which are offered to the connecting clients as part of SASL negotiation process. The client chooses the most appropriate SASL mechanism for authentication. Authentication Providers of following types supports PLAIN SASL mechanism: Plain, PlainPasswordFile, SimpleLDAP, Base64MD5PasswordFile, MD5, SCRAM-SHA-256, SCRAM-SHA-1. XOAUTH2 SASL mechanism is supported by Authentication Providers of type OAuth2. If an AMQP port is configured with any of these Authentication Providers, the Broker may be vulnerable. |
| CVE-2018-1000058 | High | 2018-02-09 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins Pipeline: Supporting APIs Plugin 2.17 and earlier have an arbitrary code execution due to incomplete sandbox protection: Methods related to Java deserialization like readResolve implemented in Pipeline scripts were not subject to sandbox protection, and could therefore execute arbitrary code. This could be exploited e.g. by regular Jenkins users with the permission to configure Pipelines in Jenkins, or by trusted committers to repositories containing Jenkinsfiles. |
| CVE-2018-1000057 | Medium | 2018-02-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Credentials Binding Plugin 1.14 and earlier masks passwords it provides to build processes in their build logs. Jenkins however transforms provided password values, e.g. replacing environment variable references, which could result in values different from but similar to configured passwords being provided to the build. Those values are not subject to masking, and could allow unauthorized users to recover the original password. |
| CVE-2018-1000056 | High | 2018-02-09 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins JUnit Plugin 1.23 and earlier processes XML external entities in files it parses as part of the build process, allowing attackers with user permissions in Jenkins to extract secrets from the Jenkins master, perform server-side request forgery, or denial-of-service attacks. |
| CVE-2018-1000055 | High | 2018-02-09 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins Android Lint Plugin 2.5 and earlier processes XML external entities in files it parses as part of the build process, allowing attackers with user permissions in Jenkins to extract secrets from the Jenkins master, perform server-side request forgery, or denial-of-service attacks. |
| CVE-2018-1000054 | High | 2018-02-09 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins CCM Plugin 3.1 and earlier processes XML external entities in files it parses as part of the build process, allowing attackers with user permissions in Jenkins to extract secrets from the Jenkins master, perform server-side request forgery, or denial-of-service attacks. |
| CVE-2011-4889 | Critical | 2018-02-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The javax.naming.directory.AttributeInUseException class in the Virtual Member Manager in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 before 6.1.0.43, 7.0 before 7.0.0.21, and 8.0 before 8.0.0.2 does not properly update passwords on a configuration using Tivoli Directory Server, which might allow remote attackers to gain access to an application by leveraging knowledge of an old password. IBM X-Force ID: 72581. |
| CVE-2017-7525 | Critical | 2018-02-06 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind, versions before 2.6.7.1, 2.7.9.1 and 2.8.9, which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. |
| CVE-2017-15095 | Critical | 2018-02-06 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind in versions before 2.8.10 and 2.9.1, which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. This issue extends the previous flaw CVE-2017-7525 by blacklisting more classes that could be used maliciously. |
| CVE-2018-1192 | High | 2018-02-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v285; cf-deployment versions prior to v1.7; UAA 4.5.x versions prior to 4.5.5, 4.8.x versions prior to 4.8.3, and 4.7.x versions prior to 4.7.4; and UAA-release 45.7.x versions prior to 45.7, 52.7.x versions prior to 52.7, and 53.3.x versions prior to 53.3, the SessionID is logged in audit event logs. An attacker can use the SessionID to impersonate a logged-in user. |
| CVE-2017-15706 | Medium | 2018-01-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | As part of the fix for bug 61201, the documentation for Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M22 to 9.0.1, 8.5.16 to 8.5.23, 8.0.45 to 8.0.47 and 7.0.79 to 7.0.82 included an updated description of the search algorithm used by the CGI Servlet to identify which script to execute. The update was not correct. As a result, some scripts may have failed to execute as expected and other scripts may have been executed unexpectedly. Note that the behaviour of the CGI servlet has remained unchanged in this regard. It is only the documentation of the behaviour that was wrong and has been corrected. |
| CVE-2017-1731 | High | 2018-01-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 could provide weaker than expected security when using the Administrative Console. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to possibly gain elevated privileges. |
| CVE-2017-12626 | High | 2018-01-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache POI in versions prior to release 3.17 are vulnerable to Denial of Service Attacks: 1) Infinite Loops while parsing crafted WMF, EMF, MSG and macros (POI bugs 61338 and 61294), and 2) Out of Memory Exceptions while parsing crafted DOC, PPT and XLS (POI bugs 52372 and 61295). |
| CVE-2017-1000356 | High | 2018-01-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins versions 2.56 and earlier as well as 2.46.1 LTS and earlier are vulnerable to an issue in the Jenkins user database authentication realm: create an account if signup is enabled; or create an account if the victim is an administrator, possibly deleting the existing default admin user in the process and allowing a wide variety of impacts. |
| CVE-2017-1000355 | Medium | 2018-01-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins versions 2.56 and earlier as well as 2.46.1 LTS and earlier are vulnerable to an XStream: Java crash when trying to instantiate void/Void. |
| CVE-2017-1000354 | High | 2018-01-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins versions 2.56 and earlier as well as 2.46.1 LTS and earlier are vulnerable to a login command which allowed impersonating any Jenkins user. The `login` command available in the remoting-based CLI stored the encrypted user name of the successfully authenticated user in a cache file used to authenticate further commands. Users with sufficient permission to create secrets in Jenkins, and download their encrypted values (e.g. with Job/Configure permission), were able to impersonate any other Jenkins user on the same instance. |
| CVE-2017-1000353 | Critical | 2018-01-29 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Jenkins versions 2.56 and earlier as well as 2.46.1 LTS and earlier are vulnerable to an unauthenticated remote code execution. An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability allowed attackers to transfer a serialized Java `SignedObject` object to the Jenkins CLI, that would be deserialized using a new `ObjectInputStream`, bypassing the existing blacklist-based protection mechanism. We're fixing this issue by adding `SignedObject` to the blacklist. We're also backporting the new HTTP CLI protocol from Jenkins 2.54 to LTS 2.46.2, and deprecating the remoting-based (i.e. Java serialization) CLI protocol, disabling it by default. |
| CVE-2017-1000404 | Medium | 2018-01-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Jenkins Delivery Pipeline Plugin version 1.0.7 and earlier used the unescaped content of the query parameter 'fullscreen' in its JavaScript, resulting in a cross-site scripting vulnerability through specially crafted URLs. |
| CVE-2017-1000403 | High | 2018-01-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Speaks! Plugin, all current versions, allows users with Job/Configure permission to run arbitrary Groovy code inside the Jenkins JVM, effectively elevating privileges to Overall/Run Scripts. |
| CVE-2017-1000402 | Medium | 2018-01-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Swarm Plugin Client 3.4 and earlier bundled a version of the commons-httpclient library with the vulnerability CVE-2012-6153 that incorrectly verified SSL certificates, making it susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks. |
| CVE-2017-1000401 | Low | 2018-01-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Jenkins 2.73.1 and earlier, 2.83 and earlier default form control for passwords and other secrets, <f:password/>, supports form validation (e.g. for API keys). The form validation AJAX requests were sent via GET, which could result in secrets being logged to a HTTP access log in non-default configurations of Jenkins, and made available to users with access to these log files. Form validation for <f:password/> is now always sent via POST, which is typically not logged. |
| CVE-2017-1000400 | Medium | 2018-01-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Jenkins 2.73.1 and earlier, 2.83 and earlier remote API at /job/(job-name)/api contained information about upstream and downstream projects. This included information about tasks that the current user otherwise has no access to, e.g. due to lack of Item/Read permission. This has been fixed, and the API now only lists upstream and downstream projects that the current user has access to. |
| CVE-2017-1000399 | Medium | 2018-01-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Jenkins 2.73.1 and earlier, 2.83 and earlier remote API at /queue/item/(ID)/api showed information about tasks in the queue (typically builds waiting to start). This included information about tasks that the current user otherwise has no access to, e.g. due to lack of Item/Read permission. This has been fixed, and the API endpoint is now only available for tasks that the current user has access to. |