Overview 2,937 matches · 209 protected · 40 exploited · 16 CISA KEV · 198 public PoC · 86 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
210
7.2%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
153
5.2%
No exploit published
2,574
87.6%
split by
peak 408 / year
19961
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19970
19980
19992
No exploit published2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
200012
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published6
High5
Medium7
not blocked12
Working exploit published6
No public exploit6
200113
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published10
High7
Medium6
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked12
Working exploit published2
No public exploit11
200237
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate8
No exploit published26
High11
Medium23
Low3
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked34
Working exploit published8
Forecast only2
No public exploit27
200339
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate7
No exploit published30
High9
Medium24
Low6
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked37
Working exploit published8
No public exploit31
200427
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published24
High6
Medium18
Low3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked25
Working exploit published1
No public exploit26
200582
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published75
Critical1
High30
Medium46
Low5
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked79
Working exploit published5
No public exploit77
2006133
Protected by Waratek8
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published121
High66
Medium56
Low11
blocked by ARMR today8
not blocked125
Exploited1
Working exploit published5
No public exploit127
2007150
Protected by Waratek6
Mitigation candidate10
No exploit published134
High68
Medium71
Low11
blocked by ARMR today6
not blocked144
Working exploit published11
No public exploit139
2008136
Protected by Waratek7
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published120
High46
Medium83
Low7
blocked by ARMR today7
not blocked129
Exploited2
Working exploit published12
No public exploit122
2009203
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate13
No exploit published181
High52
Medium129
Low22
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked194
Exploited1
Working exploit published16
No public exploit186
2010183
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published162
Critical1
High27
Medium133
Low22
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked174
Exploited3
Working exploit published14
Forecast only1
No public exploit165
2011193
Protected by Waratek6
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published178
High20
Medium139
Low34
blocked by ARMR today6
not blocked187
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit181
2012311
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate24
No exploit published278
Critical3
High29
Medium199
Low80
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked300
not established2
Exploited8
Working exploit published19
No public exploit284
2013349
Protected by Waratek26
Mitigation candidate18
No exploit published305
Critical1
High45
Medium249
Low54
blocked by ARMR today26
not blocked322
not established1
Exploited9
Working exploit published17
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit321
2014335
Protected by Waratek41
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published282
High30
Medium256
Low49
blocked by ARMR today41
not blocked294
Exploited4
Working exploit published14
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only2
No public exploit314
2015323
Protected by Waratek32
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published285
Critical4
High42
Medium226
Low51
blocked by ARMR today32
not blocked291
Exploited4
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit310
2016408
Protected by Waratek46
Mitigation candidate8
No exploit published354
Critical35
High84
Medium261
Low28
blocked by ARMR today45
partly blocked1
not blocked361
not established1
Exploited8
Working exploit published13
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only5
No public exploit381
19961998200020022004200620082010201220142016
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-1776 | Medium | 2016-04-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Hadoop 2.6.x encrypts intermediate data generated by a MapReduce job and stores it along with the encryption key in a credentials file on disk when the Intermediate data encryption feature is enabled, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the file. |
| CVE-2015-5348 | High | 2016-04-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Camel 2.6.x through 2.14.x, 2.15.x before 2.15.5, and 2.16.x before 2.16.1, when using (1) camel-jetty or (2) camel-servlet as a consumer in Camel routes, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object in an HTTP request. |
| CVE-2016-4003 | Medium | 2016-04-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the URLDecoder function in JRE before 1.8, as used in Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.28, when using a single byte page encoding, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via multi-byte characters in a url-encoded parameter. |
| CVE-2016-2166 | Medium | 2016-04-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The (1) proton.reactor.Connector, (2) proton.reactor.Container, and (3) proton.utils.BlockingConnection classes in Apache Qpid Proton before 0.12.1 improperly use an unencrypted connection for an amqps URI scheme when SSL support is unavailable, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive information or modify data via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2016-2162 | Medium | 2016-04-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.25 does not sanitize text in the Locale object constructed by I18NInterceptor, which might allow remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via unspecified vectors involving language display. |
| CVE-2016-0785 | High | 2016-04-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.28 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a "%{}" sequence in a tag attribute, aka forced double OGNL evaluation. |
| CVE-2016-0733 | Critical | 2016-04-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Admin UI in Apache Ranger before 0.5.1 does not properly handle authentication requests that lack a password, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging knowledge of a valid username. |
| CVE-2015-5167 | Medium | 2016-04-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Policy Admin Tool in Apache Ranger before 0.5.1 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions via the REST API. |
| CVE-2016-2164 | High | 2016-04-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The (1) FileService.importFileByInternalUserId and (2) FileService.importFile SOAP API methods in Apache OpenMeetings before 3.1.1 improperly use the Java URL class without checking the specified protocol handler, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files by attempting to upload a file. |
| CVE-2016-2163 | Medium | 2016-04-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache OpenMeetings before 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the event description when creating an event. |
| CVE-2016-0784 | Medium | 2016-04-11 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Directory traversal vulnerability in the Import/Export System Backups functionality in Apache OpenMeetings before 3.1.1 allows remote authenticated administrators to write to arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in a ZIP archive entry. |
| CVE-2016-0735 | High | 2016-04-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Ranger 0.5.x before 0.5.2 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended parent resource-level access restrictions by leveraging mishandling of a resource-level exclude policy. |
| CVE-2016-0712 | Medium | 2016-04-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache Jetspeed before 2.3.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the PATH_INFO to portal. |
| CVE-2016-0711 | Medium | 2016-04-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Apache Jetspeed before 2.3.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the title parameter when adding a (1) link, (2) page, or (3) folder resource. |
| CVE-2016-0710 | High | 2016-04-11 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the User Manager service in Apache Jetspeed before 2.3.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) role or (2) user parameter to services/usermanager/users/. |
| CVE-2016-0709 | High | 2016-04-11 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Directory traversal vulnerability in the Import/Export function in the Portal Site Manager in Apache Jetspeed before 2.3.1 allows remote authenticated administrators to write to arbitrary files, and consequently execute arbitrary code, via a .. (dot dot) in a ZIP archive entry, as demonstrated by "../../webapps/x.jsp." |
| CVE-2015-5349 | High | 2016-04-11 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The CSV export in Apache LDAP Studio and Apache Directory Studio before 2.0.0-M10 does not properly escape field values, which might allow attackers to execute arbitrary commands by leveraging a crafted LDAP entry that is interpreted as a formula when imported into a spreadsheet. |
| CVE-2015-0266 | High | 2016-04-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Policy Admin Tool in Apache Ranger before 0.5.0 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions via direct access to module URLs. |
| CVE-2015-0265 | Medium | 2016-04-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Policy Admin Tool in Apache Ranger before 0.5.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the HTTP User-Agent header. |
| CVE-2016-2510 | High | 2016-04-07 | Protected by Waratek | Forecast only | BeanShell (bsh) before 2.0b6, when included on the classpath by an application that uses Java serialization or XStream, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data, related to XThis.Handler. |
| CVE-2016-0792 | High | 2016-04-07 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple unspecified API endpoints in Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via serialized data in an XML file, related to XStream and groovy.util.Expando. |
| CVE-2016-0791 | Critical | 2016-04-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 do not use a constant-time algorithm to verify CSRF tokens, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism via a brute-force approach. |
| CVE-2016-0790 | Medium | 2016-04-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 do not use a constant-time algorithm to verify API tokens, which makes it easier for remote attackers to determine API tokens via a brute-force approach. |
| CVE-2016-0789 | Medium | 2016-04-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | CRLF injection vulnerability in the CLI command documentation in Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2016-0788 | Critical | 2016-04-07 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The remoting module in Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by opening a JRMP listener. |
| CVE-2016-0734 | Medium | 2016-04-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The web-based administration console in Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.13.2 does not send an X-Frame-Options HTTP header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web page that contains a (1) FRAME or (2) IFRAME element. |
| CVE-2016-0793 | High | 2016-04-01 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Incomplete blacklist vulnerability in the servlet filter restriction mechanism in WildFly (formerly JBoss Application Server) before 10.0.0.Final on Windows allows remote attackers to read the sensitive files in the (1) WEB-INF or (2) META-INF directory via a request that contains (a) lowercase or (b) "meaningless" characters. |
| CVE-2016-0283 | Medium | 2016-03-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the OpenID Connect (OIDC) client web application in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) Liberty Profile 8.5.5 before 8.5.5.9 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. |
| CVE-2016-0763 | Medium | 2016-02-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The setGlobalContext method in org/apache/naming/factory/ResourceLinkFactory.java in Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M3 does not consider whether ResourceLinkFactory.setGlobalContext callers are authorized, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager restrictions and read or write to arbitrary application data, or cause a denial of service (application disruption), via a web application that sets a crafted global context. |
| CVE-2016-0706 | Medium | 2016-02-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.45, 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 does not place org.apache.catalina.manager.StatusManagerServlet on the org/apache/catalina/core/RestrictedServlets.properties list, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager restrictions and read arbitrary HTTP requests, and consequently discover session ID values, via a crafted web application. |
| CVE-2015-5351 | High | 2016-02-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The (1) Manager and (2) Host Manager applications in Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 establish sessions and send CSRF tokens for arbitrary new requests, which allows remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism by using a token. |
| CVE-2015-5345 | Medium | 2016-02-25 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The Mapper component in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.45, 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.30, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 processes redirects before considering security constraints and Filters, which allows remote attackers to determine the existence of a directory via a URL that lacks a trailing / (slash) character. |
| CVE-2015-5174 | Medium | 2016-02-25 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Directory traversal vulnerability in RequestUtil.java in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.45, 7.x before 7.0.65, and 8.x before 8.0.27 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager restrictions and list a parent directory via a /.. (slash dot dot) in a pathname used by a web application in a getResource, getResourceAsStream, or getResourcePaths call, as demonstrated by the $CATALINA_BASE/webapps directory. |
| CVE-2015-8805 | Critical | 2016-02-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The ecc_256_modq function in ecc-256.c in Nettle before 3.2 does not properly handle carry propagation and produces incorrect output in its implementation of the P-256 NIST elliptic curve, which allows attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8803. |
| CVE-2015-8804 | Critical | 2016-02-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | x86_64/ecc-384-modp.asm in Nettle before 3.2 does not properly handle carry propagation and produces incorrect output in its implementation of the P-384 NIST elliptic curve, which allows attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2015-8803 | Critical | 2016-02-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The ecc_256_modp function in ecc-256.c in Nettle before 3.2 does not properly handle carry propagation and produces incorrect output in its implementation of the P-256 NIST elliptic curve, which allows attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8805. |
| CVE-2015-8797 | Medium | 2016-02-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in webapp/web/js/scripts/plugins.js in the stats page in the Admin UI in Apache Solr before 5.3.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the entry parameter to a plugins/cache URI. |
| CVE-2015-8796 | Medium | 2016-02-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in webapp/web/js/scripts/schema-browser.js in the Admin UI in Apache Solr before 5.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted schema-browse URL. |
| CVE-2015-8795 | Medium | 2016-02-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Admin UI in Apache Solr before 5.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via crafted fields that are mishandled during the rendering of the (1) Analysis page, related to webapp/web/js/scripts/analysis.js or (2) Schema-Browser page, related to webapp/web/js/scripts/schema-browser.js. |
| CVE-2016-0956 | High | 2016-02-10 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The Servlets Post component 2.3.6 in Apache Sling, as used in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2015-7539 | High | 2016-02-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Plugins Manager in Jenkins before 1.640 and LTS before 1.625.2 does not verify checksums for plugin files referenced in update site data, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted plugin. |
| CVE-2015-7538 | High | 2016-02-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins before 1.640 and LTS before 1.625.2 allow remote attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2015-7537 | High | 2016-02-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.640 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that have unspecified impact via vectors related to the HTTP GET method. |
| CVE-2015-7536 | Medium | 2016-02-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.640 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors related to workspaces and archived artifacts. |
| CVE-2015-5344 | Critical | 2016-02-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The camel-xstream component in Apache Camel before 2.15.5 and 2.16.x before 2.16.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object in an HTTP request. |
| CVE-2015-7521 | High | 2016-01-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The authorization framework in Apache Hive 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.1.0, 1.1.1, 1.2.0 and 1.2.1, on clusters protected by Ranger and SqlStdHiveAuthorization, allows attackers to bypass intended parent table access restrictions via unspecified partition-level operations. |
| CVE-2015-7417 | Medium | 2016-01-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0 before 7.0.0.41, 8.0 before 8.0.0.12, and 8.5 before 8.5.5.9 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via crafted data from an OAuth provider. |
| CVE-2016-0614 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle BI Publisher component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 11.1.1.7.0, 11.1.1.9.0, and 12.2.1.0.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-0591 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Purchasing component in Oracle PeopleSoft Products 9.1 and 9.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Supplier Change. |
| CVE-2016-0590 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Order Management component in Oracle PeopleSoft Products 9.1 and 9.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-0589 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Application Object Library component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-0588 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle General Ledger component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Consolidation Hierarchy Viewer. |
| CVE-2016-0587 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools component in Oracle PeopleSoft Products 8.53, 8.54, and 8.55 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to File Processing. |
| CVE-2016-0586 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Application Object Library component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to iHelp. |
| CVE-2016-0585 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Application Object Library component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect availability via vectors related to ICX Error. |
| CVE-2016-0584 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle CRM Technology Foundation component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via vectors related to BIS Common Components, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0579, CVE-2016-0582, and CVE-2016-0583. |
| CVE-2016-0583 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle CRM Technology Foundation component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via vectors related to BIS Common Components, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0579, CVE-2016-0582, and CVE-2016-0584. |
| CVE-2016-0582 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle CRM Technology Foundation component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via vectors related to BIS Common Components, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0579, CVE-2016-0583, and CVE-2016-0584. |
| CVE-2016-0581 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Approvals Management component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via vectors related to AME Page rendering. |
| CVE-2016-0580 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Report Manager component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-0579 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle CRM Technology Foundation component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via vectors related to BIS Common Components, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0582, CVE-2016-0583, and CVE-2016-0584. |
| CVE-2016-0578 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle CRM Technology Foundation component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via vectors related to BIS Common Components. |
| CVE-2016-0577 | High | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 10.3.6, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, and 12.2.1 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to WLS Core Components, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0574. |
| CVE-2016-0576 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Application Object Library component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via vectors related to ICX LOVs. |
| CVE-2016-0575 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Learning Management component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via vectors related to OTA Self Service. |
| CVE-2016-0574 | High | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 10.3.6, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, and 12.2.1 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to WLS Core Components, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0577. |
| CVE-2016-0573 | High | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 10.3.6, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, and 12.2.1 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to WLS Java Messaging Service. |
| CVE-2016-0572 | High | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 10.3.6, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, and 12.2.1 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Coherence Container. |
| CVE-2016-0571 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Balanced Scorecard component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 and 12.1 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-0570 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle HCM Configuration Workbench component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-0569 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle E-Business Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-0568 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Email Center component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Server Components. |
| CVE-2016-0567 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle E-Business Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Embedded Data Warehouse. |
| CVE-2016-0566 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Marketing component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, and 12.2.5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Deliverables. |
| CVE-2016-0565 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Marketing component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-0564 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle E-Business Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0561. |
| CVE-2016-0563 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle CRM Technical Foundation component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Common Techstack. |
| CVE-2016-0562 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Common Applications component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote authenticated users to affect integrity via vectors related to CRM User Management Framework. |
| CVE-2016-0561 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle E-Business Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0564. |
| CVE-2016-0560 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Customer Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, and 12.2.5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0545, CVE-2016-0551, CVE-2016-0552, and CVE-2016-0559. |
| CVE-2016-0559 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Customer Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, and 12.2.5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0545, CVE-2016-0551, CVE-2016-0552, and CVE-2016-0560. |
| CVE-2016-0558 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Service Contracts component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Renewals. |
| CVE-2016-0557 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Advanced Collections component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Administration, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0556. |
| CVE-2016-0556 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Advanced Collections component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Administration, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0557. |
| CVE-2016-0555 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle CADView-3D component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Studio. |
| CVE-2016-0554 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Interaction Center Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Business Intelligence. |
| CVE-2016-0553 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle E-Business Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-0552 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Customer Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, and 12.2.5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0545, CVE-2016-0551, CVE-2016-0559, and CVE-2016-0560. |
| CVE-2016-0551 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Customer Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, and 12.2.5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0545, CVE-2016-0552, CVE-2016-0559, and CVE-2016-0560. |
| CVE-2016-0550 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle CRM Technical Foundation component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, and 12.2.5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via vectors related to CRM HTML Administration. |
| CVE-2016-0549 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle E-Business Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Common Components, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0511, CVE-2016-0547, and CVE-2016-0548. |
| CVE-2016-0548 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle E-Business Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Common Components, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0511, CVE-2016-0547, and CVE-2016-0549. |
| CVE-2016-0547 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle E-Business Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Common Components, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0511, CVE-2016-0548, and CVE-2016-0549. |
| CVE-2016-0545 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Customer Intelligence component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, and 12.2.5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0551, CVE-2016-0552, CVE-2016-0559, and CVE-2016-0560. |
| CVE-2016-0544 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Marketing component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Architecture. |
| CVE-2016-0543 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Marketing component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Preview. |
| CVE-2016-0542 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Field Service component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, and 12.2.5 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Field Service Map. |
| CVE-2016-0541 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Configurator component in Oracle Supply Chain Products Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1, and 12.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to UI Servlet, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0540. |
| CVE-2016-0540 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Configurator component in Oracle Supply Chain Products Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1, and 12.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to UI Servlet, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0541. |
| CVE-2016-0539 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Report Manager component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, and 12.2.4 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. |