Camel CVEs
147 CVEs, 5 exploited, 50 protected by Waratek
Overview 147 matches · 50 protected · 5 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 4 public PoC · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
50
34.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
4
2.7%
No exploit published
93
63.3%
blocked by ARMR today
50
34.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
97
66.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
5
3.4%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
6
4.1%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
136
92.5%
split by
peak 99 / year
20131
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20142
Protected by Waratek2
High2
blocked by ARMR today2
No public exploit2
20152
Protected by Waratek2
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today2
No public exploit2
20162
No exploit published2
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20175
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published2
Critical4
High1
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked2
No public exploit5
20182
Protected by Waratek2
Critical1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today2
No public exploit2
20192
Protected by Waratek2
High2
blocked by ARMR today2
No public exploit2
20204
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published2
Critical2
High2
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked2
No public exploit4
20215
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published3
High3
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked3
Exploited1
No public exploit4
20227
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published6
High5
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked6
No public exploit7
20237
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published4
High5
Medium1
Low1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked5
Exploited1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit5
20245
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published3
Critical1
High4
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked3
No public exploit5
20254
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published2
High1
Medium3
not blocked4
Exploited2
No public exploit2
202699
Protected by Waratek30
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published68
Critical31
High32
Medium35
Low1
blocked by ARMR today30
not blocked69
Exploited1
Proof of concept only5
No public exploit93
2014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-30177 | Medium | 2025-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Bypass/Injection vulnerability in Apache Camel in Camel-Undertow component under particular conditions. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.10.0 before 4.10.3, from 4.8.0 before 4.8.6. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.10.3 for 4.10.x LTS and 4.8.6 for 4.8.x LTS. Camel undertow component is vulnerable to Camel message header injection, in particular the custom header filter strategy used by the component only filter the "out" direction, while it doesn't filter the "in" direction. This allows an attacker to include Camel specific headers that for some Camel components can alter the behaviour such as the camel-bean component, or the camel-exec component. |
| CVE-2025-29891 | Medium | 2025-03-12 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Bypass/Injection vulnerability in Apache Camel. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.10.0 before 4.10.2, from 4.8.0 before 4.8.5, from 3.10.0 before 3.22.4. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.10.2 for 4.10.x LTS, 4.8.5 for 4.8.x LTS and 3.22.4 for 3.x releases. This vulnerability is present in Camel's default incoming header filter, that allows an attacker to include Camel specific headers that for some Camel components can alter the behaviours such as the camel-bean component, or the camel-exec component. If you have Camel applications that are directly connected to the internet via HTTP, then an attacker could include parameters in the HTTP requests that are sent to the Camel application that get translated into headers. The headers could be both provided as request parameters for an HTTP methods invocation or as part of the payload of the HTTP methods invocation. All the known Camel HTTP component such as camel-servlet, camel-jetty, camel-undertow, camel-platform-http, and camel-netty-http would be vulnerable out of the box. This CVE is related to the CVE-2025-27636: while they have the same root cause and are fixed with the same fix, CVE-2025-27636 was assumed to only be exploitable if an attacker could add malicious HTTP headers, while we have now determined that it is also exploitable via HTTP parameters. Like in CVE-2025-27636, exploitation is only possible if the Camel route uses particular vulnerable components. |
| CVE-2025-27636 | Medium | 2025-03-09 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Bypass/Injection vulnerability in Apache Camel components under particular conditions. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.10.0 through <= 4.10.1, from 4.8.0 through <= 4.8.4, from 3.10.0 through <= 3.22.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.10.2 for 4.10.x LTS, 4.8.5 for 4.8.x LTS and 3.22.4 for 3.x releases. This vulnerability is present in Camel's default incoming header filter, that allows an attacker to include Camel specific headers that for some Camel components can alter the behaviours such as the camel-bean component, to call another method on the bean, than was coded in the application. In the camel-jms component, then a malicious header can be used to send the message to another queue (on the same broker) than was coded in the application. This could also be seen by using the camel-exec component The attacker would need to inject custom headers, such as HTTP protocols. So if you have Camel applications that are directly connected to the internet via HTTP, then an attacker could include malicious HTTP headers in the HTTP requests that are send to the Camel application. All the known Camel HTTP component such as camel-servlet, camel-jetty, camel-undertow, camel-platform-http, and camel-netty-http would be vulnerable out of the box. In these conditions an attacker could be able to forge a Camel header name and make the bean component invoking other methods in the same bean. In terms of usage of the default header filter strategy the list of components using that is: * camel-activemq * camel-activemq6 * camel-amqp * camel-aws2-sqs * camel-azure-servicebus * camel-cxf-rest * camel-cxf-soap * camel-http * camel-jetty * camel-jms * camel-kafka * camel-knative * camel-mail * camel-nats * camel-netty-http * camel-platform-http * camel-rest * camel-sjms * camel-spring-rabbitmq * camel-stomp * camel-tahu * camel-undertow * camel-xmpp The vulnerability arises due to a bug in the default filtering mechanism that only blocks headers starting with "Camel", "camel", or "org.apache.camel.". Mitigation: You can easily work around this in your Camel applications by removing the headers in your Camel routes. There are many ways of doing this, also globally or per route. This means you could use the removeHeaders EIP, to filter out anything like "cAmel, cAMEL" etc, or in general everything not starting with "Camel", "camel" or "org.apache.camel.". |
| CVE-2024-7885 | High | 2024-08-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Undertow where the ProxyProtocolReadListener reuses the same StringBuilder instance across multiple requests. This issue occurs when the parseProxyProtocolV1 method processes multiple requests on the same HTTP connection. As a result, different requests may share the same StringBuilder instance, potentially leading to information leakage between requests or responses. In some cases, a value from a previous request or response may be erroneously reused, which could lead to unintended data exposure. This issue primarily results in errors and connection termination but creates a risk of data leakage in multi-request environments. |
| CVE-2024-22371 | High | 2024-02-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Exposure of sensitive data by by crafting a malicious EventFactory and providing a custom ExchangeCreatedEvent that exposes sensitive data. Vulnerability in Apache Camel.This issue affects Apache Camel: from 3.21.X through 3.21.3, from 3.22.X through 3.22.0, from 4.0.X through 4.0.3, from 4.X through 4.3.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.21.4, 3.22.1, 4.0.4 or 4.4.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2024-23114 | Critical | 2024-02-20 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Camel CassandraQL Component AggregationRepository which is vulnerable to unsafe deserialization. Under specific conditions it is possible to deserialize malicious payload.This issue affects Apache Camel: from 3.0.0 before 3.21.4, from 3.22.0 before 3.22.1, from 4.0.0 before 4.0.4, from 4.1.0 before 4.4.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.4.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.0.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.0.4. If users are on 3.x, they are suggested to move to 3.21.4 or 3.22.1 |
| CVE-2024-22369 | High | 2024-02-20 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Camel SQL ComponentThis issue affects Apache Camel: from 3.0.0 before 3.21.4, from 3.22.0 before 3.22.1, from 4.0.0 before 4.0.4, from 4.1.0 before 4.4.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.4.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.0.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.0.4. If users are on 3.x, they are suggested to move to 3.21.4 or 3.22.1 |
| CVE-2024-1635 | High | 2024-02-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Undertow. This vulnerability impacts a server that supports the wildfly-http-client protocol. Whenever a malicious user opens and closes a connection with the HTTP port of the server and then closes the connection immediately, the server will end with both memory and open file limits exhausted at some point, depending on the amount of memory available. At HTTP upgrade to remoting, the WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit leaks connections if RemotingConnection is closed by Remoting ServerConnectionOpenListener. Because the remoting connection originates in Undertow as part of the HTTP upgrade, there is an external layer to the remoting connection. This connection is unaware of the outermost layer when closing the connection during the connection opening procedure. Hence, the Undertow WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit is not notified of the closed connection in this scenario. Because WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit creates a timeout task, the whole dependency tree leaks via that task, which is added to XNIO WorkerThread. So, the workerThread points to the Undertow conduit, which contains the connections and causes the leak. |
| CVE-2023-44487 | High | 2023-10-10 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. |
| CVE-2022-4245 | Medium | 2023-09-25 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found in codehaus-plexus. The org.codehaus.plexus.util.xml.XmlWriterUtil#writeComment fails to sanitize comments for a --> sequence. This issue means that text contained in the command string could be interpreted as XML and allow for XML injection. |
| CVE-2022-4244 | High | 2023-09-25 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | A flaw was found in codeplex-codehaus. A directory traversal attack (also known as path traversal) aims to access files and directories stored outside the intended folder. By manipulating files with "dot-dot-slash (../)" sequences and their variations or by using absolute file paths, it may be possible to access arbitrary files and directories stored on the file system, including application source code, configuration, and other critical system files. |
| CVE-2023-4853 | High | 2023-09-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Quarkus where HTTP security policies are not sanitizing certain character permutations correctly when accepting requests, resulting in incorrect evaluation of permissions. This issue could allow an attacker to bypass the security policy altogether, resulting in unauthorized endpoint access and possibly a denial of service. |
| CVE-2023-1108 | High | 2023-09-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in undertow. This issue makes achieving a denial of service possible due to an unexpected handshake status updated in SslConduit, where the loop never terminates. |
| CVE-2023-34442 | Low | 2023-07-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel.This issue affects Apache Camel: from 3.X through <=3.14.8, from 3.18.X through <=3.18.7, from 3.20.X through <= 3.20.5, from 4.X through <= 4.0.0-M3. Users should upgrade to 3.14.9, 3.18.8, 3.20.6 or 3.21.0 and for users on Camel 4.x update to 4.0.0-M1 |
| CVE-2022-4492 | High | 2023-02-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol. |
| CVE-2022-1278 | High | 2022-09-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in WildFly, where an attacker can see deployment names, endpoints, and any other data the trace payload may contain. |
| CVE-2022-2764 | Medium | 2022-09-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow. Denial of service can be achieved as Undertow server waits for the LAST_CHUNK forever for EJB invocations. |
| CVE-2022-1259 | High | 2022-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow. A potential security issue in flow control handling by the browser over HTTP/2 may cause overhead or a denial of service in the server. This flaw exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2021-3629. |
| CVE-2022-0084 | High | 2022-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in XNIO, specifically in the notifyReadClosed method. The issue revealed this method was logging a message to another expected end. This flaw allows an attacker to send flawed requests to a server, possibly causing log contention-related performance concerns or an unwanted disk fill-up. |
| CVE-2021-4178 | Medium | 2022-08-24 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A arbitrary code execution flaw was found in the Fabric 8 Kubernetes client affecting versions 5.0.0-beta-1 and above. Due to an improperly configured YAML parsing, this will allow a local and privileged attacker to supply malicious YAML. |
| CVE-2021-3690 | High | 2022-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow. A buffer leak on the incoming WebSocket PONG message may lead to memory exhaustion. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is availability. |
| CVE-2022-2053 | High | 2022-08-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When a POST request comes through AJP and the request exceeds the max-post-size limit (maxEntitySize), Undertow's AjpServerRequestConduit implementation closes a connection without sending any response to the client/proxy. This behavior results in that a front-end proxy marking the backend worker (application server) as an error state and not forward requests to the worker for a while. In mod_cluster, this continues until the next STATUS request (10 seconds intervals) from the application server updates the server state. So, in the worst case, it can result in "All workers are in error state" and mod_cluster responds "503 Service Unavailable" for a while (up to 10 seconds). In mod_proxy_balancer, it does not forward requests to the worker until the "retry" timeout passes. However, luckily, mod_proxy_balancer has "forcerecovery" setting (On by default; this parameter can force the immediate recovery of all workers without considering the retry parameter of the workers if all workers of a balancer are in error state.). So, unlike mod_cluster, mod_proxy_balancer does not result in responding "503 Service Unavailable". An attacker could use this behavior to send a malicious request and trigger server errors, resulting in DoS (denial of service). This flaw was fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2. |
| CVE-2021-4104 | High | 2021-12-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. |
| CVE-2021-3642 | Medium | 2021-08-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Wildfly Elytron in versions prior to 1.10.14.Final, prior to 1.15.5.Final and prior to 1.16.1.Final where ScramServer may be susceptible to Timing Attack if enabled. The highest threat of this vulnerability is confidentiality. |
| CVE-2020-14326 | High | 2021-06-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in RESTEasy, where RootNode incorrectly caches routes. This issue results in hash flooding, leading to slower requests with higher CPU time spent searching and adding the entry. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service. |
| CVE-2021-3536 | Medium | 2021-05-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Wildfly in versions before 23.0.2.Final while creating a new role in domain mode via the admin console, it is possible to add a payload in the name field, leading to XSS. This affects Confidentiality and Integrity. |
| CVE-2021-20218 | High | 2021-03-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the fabric8 kubernetes-client in version 4.2.0 and after. This flaw allows a malicious pod/container to cause applications using the fabric8 kubernetes-client `copy` command to extract files outside the working path. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to integrity and system availability. This has been fixed in kubernetes-client-4.13.2 kubernetes-client-5.0.2 kubernetes-client-4.11.2 kubernetes-client-4.7.2 |
| CVE-2020-11994 | High | 2020-07-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Template Injection and arbitrary file disclosure on Camel templating components |
| CVE-2020-11973 | Critical | 2020-05-14 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Camel Netty enables Java deserialization by default. Apache Camel 2.22.x, 2.23.x, 2.24.x, 2.25.0, 3.0.0 up to 3.1.0 are affected. 2.x users should upgrade to 2.25.1, 3.x users should upgrade to 3.2.0. |
| CVE-2020-11972 | Critical | 2020-05-14 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Camel RabbitMQ enables Java deserialization by default. Apache Camel 2.22.x, 2.23.x, 2.24.x, 2.25.0, 3.0.0 up to 3.1.0 are affected. 2.x users should upgrade to 2.25.1, 3.x users should upgrade to 3.2.0. |
| CVE-2020-11971 | High | 2020-05-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Camel's JMX is vulnerable to Rebind Flaw. Apache Camel 2.22.x, 2.23.x, 2.24.x, 2.25.x, 3.0.0 up to 3.1.0 is affected. Users should upgrade to 3.2.0. |
| CVE-2019-0188 | High | 2019-05-28 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Camel prior to 2.24.0 contains an XML external entity injection (XXE) vulnerability (CWE-611) due to using an outdated vulnerable JSON-lib library. This affects only the camel-xmljson component, which was removed. |
| CVE-2019-0194 | High | 2019-04-30 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Camel's File is vulnerable to directory traversal. Camel 2.21.0 to 2.21.3, 2.22.0 to 2.22.2, 2.23.0 and the unsupported Camel 2.x (2.19 and earlier) versions may be also affected. |
| CVE-2018-8041 | Medium | 2018-09-17 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Camel's Mail 2.20.0 through 2.20.3, 2.21.0 through 2.21.1 and 2.22.0 is vulnerable to path traversal. |
| CVE-2018-8027 | Critical | 2018-07-31 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Camel 2.20.0 to 2.20.3 and 2.21.0 Core is vulnerable to XXE in XSD validation processor. |
| CVE-2017-12634 | Critical | 2017-11-15 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The camel-castor component in Apache Camel 2.x before 2.19.4 and 2.20.x before 2.20.1 is vulnerable to Java object de-serialisation vulnerability. De-serializing untrusted data can lead to security flaws. |
| CVE-2017-12633 | Critical | 2017-11-15 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The camel-hessian component in Apache Camel 2.x before 2.19.4 and 2.20.x before 2.20.1 is vulnerable to Java object de-serialisation vulnerability. De-serializing untrusted data can lead to security flaws. |
| CVE-2016-8749 | Critical | 2017-03-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Camel's Jackson and JacksonXML unmarshalling operation are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution attacks. |
| CVE-2017-5643 | High | 2017-03-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Camel's Validation Component is vulnerable against SSRF via remote DTDs and XXE. |
| CVE-2017-3159 | Critical | 2017-03-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Camel's camel-snakeyaml component is vulnerable to Java object de-serialization vulnerability. De-serializing untrusted data can lead to security flaws. |
| CVE-2015-5348 | High | 2016-04-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Camel 2.6.x through 2.14.x, 2.15.x before 2.15.5, and 2.16.x before 2.16.1, when using (1) camel-jetty or (2) camel-servlet as a consumer in Camel routes, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object in an HTTP request. |
| CVE-2015-5344 | Critical | 2016-02-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The camel-xstream component in Apache Camel before 2.15.5 and 2.16.x before 2.16.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object in an HTTP request. |
| CVE-2015-0264 | Medium | 2015-06-03 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Multiple XML external entity (XXE) vulnerabilities in builder/xml/XPathBuilder.java in Apache Camel before 2.13.4 and 2.14.x before 2.14.2 allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via an external entity in an invalid XML (1) String or (2) GenericFile object in an XPath query. |
| CVE-2015-0263 | Medium | 2015-06-03 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the XML converter setup in converter/jaxp/XmlConverter.java in Apache Camel before 2.13.4 and 2.14.x before 2.14.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via an external entity in an SAXSource. |
| CVE-2014-0003 | High | 2014-03-21 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The XSLT component in Apache Camel 2.11.x before 2.11.4, 2.12.x before 2.12.3, and possibly earlier versions allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java methods via a crafted message. |
| CVE-2014-0002 | High | 2014-03-21 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The XSLT component in Apache Camel before 2.11.4 and 2.12.x before 2.12.3 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files and possibly have other unspecified impact via an XML document containing an external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue. |
| CVE-2013-4330 | Medium | 2013-10-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Camel before 2.9.7, 2.10.0 before 2.10.7, 2.11.0 before 2.11.2, and 2.12.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary simple language expressions by including "$simple{}" in a CamelFileName message header to a (1) FILE or (2) FTP producer. |