Overview 86 matches · 33 in Waratek scope · 3 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
86matches
33in Waratek scope38.4%
3protected3.5%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
3
3.5%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
30
34.9%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
53
61.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
3
3.5%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
83
96.5%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
86
100.0%
split by
peak 25 / year
20196
Not applicable6
Medium6
not blocked6
No public exploit6
202021
No exploit published1
Not applicable20
Critical2
High3
Medium16
not blocked21
No public exploit21
20212
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20221
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20236
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published3
Not applicable2
High2
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked5
No public exploit6
20240
202525
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published17
Not applicable6
Critical7
High5
Medium13
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked23
No public exploit25
202625
No exploit published9
Not applicable16
Critical5
High9
Medium10
Low1
not blocked25
No public exploit25
20192020202120222023202420252026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-3416 | High | 2026-09-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The API Publisher component previously used a non-cryptographic pseudorandom number generator (PRNG) to create shared secrets for Webhook HMAC validation. This PRNG lacks sufficient entropy for security-sensitive operations, allowing a sophisticated attacker to predict future secrets. This enables malicious actors to forge event payloads with valid HMAC signatures, bypassing the API Gateway's authenticity verification. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to predict shared secrets used for Webhook HMAC validation and forge event payloads with valid signatures. This may enable bypassing API Gateway authenticity checks, leading to unauthorized event injection, data manipulation, or downstream system compromise. |
| CVE-2025-12737 | High | 2026-09-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The administrative operations within the Carbon Console do not adequately validate specific user-supplied input. This oversight allows a malicious actor with administrative privileges to inject and execute arbitrary code remotely. Successful exploitation enables a threat actor with administrative privileges and Carbon Console access to execute remote arbitrary code through specific administrative operations, leading to a complete compromise of the affected system. |
| CVE-2026-1728 | Critical | 2026-08-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Tokens issued to a low-privileged user are not sufficiently restricted, allowing them to be used to access product-level Admin REST APIs. Exploitation of this vulnerability allows a low-privileged user to invoke the Admin REST APIs of WSO2 products, potentially leading to full administrative account takeover. This requires the attacker to already possess a low-privileged user account and be able to obtain a valid token for it. |
| CVE-2026-0637 | Medium | 2026-08-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When a proxy server is configured with `customUrl.enabled`, the component accepts user-supplied input within forwarded HTTP headers without enforcing expected validation constraints. A malicious actor can manipulate these headers to influence the URL construction process, leading to an open redirect vulnerability. Additionally, unsanitized header values are written to application logs. An attacker can exploit this to force redirection to arbitrary malicious domains, potentially enabling phishing attacks. Furthermore, they can inject forged entries into application logs, impacting the reliability of security logs and potentially hindering incident investigation. |
| CVE-2025-15039 | Critical | 2026-08-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Conditional Authentication (Adaptive Authentication) script does not correctly enforce the completion of all required authentication steps when a specific multi-step pattern involving certain authenticators is configured. This allows an attacker to bypass intermediate authentication challenges by exploiting how the script handles callbacks and re-execution of authentication steps. Successful exploitation allows a malicious actor to gain unauthorized access to a targeted user account. This vulnerability can only be exploited when all of the following conditions are met: the application login flow contains a specific secondary authenticator, the Conditional Authentication script is configured with particular event callbacks and re-executes an authentication step, the targeted user has one of the impacted authenticators enrolled, and the attacker successfully completes any preceding authentication steps. |
| CVE-2025-13736 | Low | 2026-08-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When Multi-Attribute Login is enabled, the login interface fails to consistently mask the existence of user accounts. For valid users, the server resolves and displays their canonical username, while for non-existent users, it echoes the original input. This occurs regardless of the validate_username configuration. The discovery of valid usernames can increase the risk of brute force attacks, social engineering attacks, and targeted information leakage. Attackers can leverage this information to craft more effective phishing campaigns or social engineering tactics to compromise user accounts or extract sensitive data. |
| CVE-2025-13394 | Medium | 2026-08-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Ajax processor within the Carbon console fails to adequately protect state-changing operations from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. Specifically, it utilizes the HTTP GET method for these operations, and while the SameSite=Lax cookie attribute is employed for mitigation, this mechanism is bypassed as it permits cookies to be sent with cross-origin top-level navigation requests, including GET requests. This allows an attacker to trick an authenticated user's browser into unknowingly executing unintended actions. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to perform unauthorized state-altering requests on behalf of authenticated users. This could lead to consequences such as data modification, account changes, or other actions that could result in data compromise or loss of user control over their account. However, this attack is only feasible if the Carbon console and related services are exposed to the public internet, which is not recommended according to WSO2's security guidelines. |
| CVE-2024-8995 | Medium | 2026-08-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unused authorization codes issued to deleted users are not being properly invalidated or removed from the system. This allows for the persistence of these codes, enabling them to be potentially reused. If an attacker possesses both the authorization code and the associated client credentials (client ID and client secret), they can leverage these unused codes to obtain access tokens on behalf of users who have already been deleted. This may lead to unauthorized access to sensitive resources and services, contingent on the scopes originally authorized for the compromised authorization code. |
| CVE-2024-6832 | High | 2026-08-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The account locking mechanism fails to trigger when secondary user stores are inaccessible. The software does not maintain a consistent state for account locking if it cannot reach all configured user stores, allowing an attacker to repeatedly attempt authentication with invalid credentials without triggering the lockout mechanism for users within active stores. When the account locking mechanism is bypassed due to the inaccessibility of secondary user stores, users in accessible user stores are left vulnerable to brute force attacks. A malicious actor can exploit this by attempting numerous invalid password combinations against a user account without the expected account lockout consequence. |
| CVE-2024-10302 | Medium | 2026-08-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The user self-signup flow in multiple WSO2 products fails to adequately validate user-supplied input. This weakness allows arbitrary unvalidated data to be included within user claims, which are then used by downstream processes. Allowing unvalidated input into user claims can lead to various security risks. Malicious or malformed data injected during signup could be processed by other parts of the application, potentially enabling attacks such as content manipulation, redirection, user interface inconsistencies, unauthorized actions, and data exposure. The actual impact depends on how the compromised data is consumed and the privileges associated with the affected users. |
| CVE-2026-2445 | Medium | 2026-07-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The affected product accepts user-supplied input within a URL parameter without enforcing expected sanitization or encoding before rendering it within the response. This condition allows for the injection of malicious JavaScript payloads. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to cause the user's browser to redirect to a malicious website, modify the user interface of the webpage, or retrieve sensitive information from the browser. However, the impact is mitigated for session hijacking as all session-related sensitive cookies are protected by the httpOnly flag. |
| CVE-2026-4249 | High | 2026-07-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The throttling event handling mechanism in multiple WSO2 products accepts user-supplied JSON payloads without sufficient validation of their structure and content. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to inject malicious JSON data that can lead to a persistent denial of service condition. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can disrupt the API Gateway, preventing legitimate API traffic from being processed and impacting complete service availability. The denial of service is persistent, requiring manual intervention to restore normal operations. |
| CVE-2025-8591 | Medium | 2026-07-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The software accepts user-supplied input via a URL parameter without adequate output encoding before reflecting it back to the user's browser. This condition allows an attacker to inject malicious script content into pages served by the application. By leveraging this weakness, an attacker can cause the user's browser to redirect to a malicious website, modify the UI of the webpage, or retrieve information from the browser. However, the impact is mitigated by the use of httpOnly flags on session-related cookies, preventing session hijacking. |
| CVE-2025-13475 | High | 2026-07-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multi-tenanted deployments, the application consent management mechanism fails to correctly isolate consent scopes between tenants. Consent granted by a user for a specific SaaS application within one tenant can be incorrectly applied to SaaS applications with the same name in other tenants, leading to unintended cross-tenant consent sharing. This vulnerability may result in the exposure of user data across tenants, enabling SaaS applications in different tenants to access and modify information without explicit user authorization. This can lead to unauthorized data access and privacy violations. This vulnerability has no impact if the deployment does not support multi-tenancy. |
| CVE-2024-1248 | Medium | 2026-07-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The silent Just-In-Time (JIT) provisioning feature in federated authentication implementations fails to properly segregate user roles during account creation when a federated user shares a username with a local user. This allows the provisioning process to overwrite existing roles of local users with roles assigned to the federated user. Exploitation requires a federated identity provider (IDP) with silent JIT provisioning enabled and an attacker's knowledge of a local user's username. When these conditions are met, a malicious individual can leverage the JIT provisioning process to modify the roles of local users. The overwritten roles are limited to those defined within the federated IDP, typically granting minimal access rights unless explicitly configured otherwise by the federated IDP administrator. |
| CVE-2026-2053 | Critical | 2026-06-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The WSO2 API Manager's message flow component, when processing WS-Addressing headers, does not sufficiently validate or restrict user-controlled input within these headers. This omission allows an attacker to manipulate WS-Addressing headers to specify arbitrary destinations for server-initiated requests. Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated attacker to control the destination of server-initiated requests originating from the WSO2 API Manager. This direct control can enable unauthorized access to internal network resources or services that would typically be inaccessible from external networks. |
| CVE-2025-8325 | High | 2026-05-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The software fails to enforce role-based access controls for certain Gateway API invocations. Users with the 'Internal/Everyone' role can invoke these APIs, bypassing intended permission checks. This same vulnerability also affects Internal Service APIs, potentially exposing them in WSO2 APIM 3.x versions. A malicious actor with a valid user account on a vulnerable deployment can perform sensitive operations against the Gateway REST API regardless of their actual roles or privileges. This could lead to unintended behavior or misuse, particularly in production environments. |
| CVE-2025-8154 | High | 2026-05-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Webhook API invocations, the component accepts user-supplied input for HTTP request headers without sufficient validation or sanitization, allowing these headers to be injected into HTTP responses. By exploiting this vulnerability, a malicious actor can inject or overwrite arbitrary HTTP response headers. This can lead to various adverse effects, including the manipulation of browser caching, alteration of security-related headers, and the injection of sensitive information such as cookie values, potentially enabling session hijacking or other malicious activities. |
| CVE-2025-6024 | Medium | 2026-04-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The authentication endpoint fails to encode user-supplied input before rendering it in the web page, allowing for script injection. An attacker can leverage this by injecting malicious scripts into the authentication endpoint. This can result in the user's browser being redirected to a malicious website, manipulation of the web page's user interface, or the retrieval of information from the browser. However, session hijacking is not possible due to the httpOnly flag protecting session-related cookies. |
| CVE-2024-8010 | High | 2026-04-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The component accepts XML input through the publisher without disabling external entity resolution. This allows malicious actors to submit a crafted XML payload that exploits the unescaped external entity references. By leveraging this vulnerability, a malicious actor can read confidential files from the product's file system or access limited HTTP resources reachable via HTTP GET requests to the vulnerable product. |
| CVE-2024-4867 | Medium | 2026-04-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The WSO2 API Manager developer portal accepts user-supplied input without enforcing expected validation constraints or proper output encoding. This deficiency allows a malicious actor to inject script content that is executed within the context of a user's browser. By leveraging this cross-site scripting vulnerability, a malicious actor can cause the browser to redirect to a malicious website, make changes to the UI of the web page, or retrieve information from the browser. However, session hijacking is not possible as all session-related sensitive cookies are protected by the httpOnly flag. |
| CVE-2024-2374 | Critical | 2026-04-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The XML parsers within multiple WSO2 products accept user-supplied XML data without properly configuring to prevent the resolution of external entities. This omission allows malicious actors to craft XML payloads that exploit the parser's behavior, leading to the inclusion of external resources. By leveraging this vulnerability, an attacker can read confidential files from the file system and access limited HTTP resources reachable by the product. Additionally, the vulnerability can be exploited to perform denial of service attacks by exhausting server resources through recursive entity expansion or fetching large external resources. |
| CVE-2024-10242 | Medium | 2026-04-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The authentication endpoint fails to adequately validate user-supplied input before reflecting it back in the response. This allows an attacker to inject malicious script payloads into the input parameters, which are then executed by the victim's browser. Successful exploitation can enable an attacker to redirect the user's browser to a malicious website, modify the UI of the web page, or retrieve information from the browser. However, the impact is limited as session-related sensitive cookies are protected by the httpOnly flag, preventing session hijacking. |
| CVE-2024-1524 | High | 2026-02-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When the "Silent Just-In-Time Provisioning" feature is enabled for a federated identity provider (IDP) there is a risk that a local user store user's information may be replaced during the account provisioning process in cases where federated users share the same username as local users. There will be no impact on your deployment if any of the preconditions mentioned below are not met. Only when all the preconditions mentioned below are fulfilled could a malicious actor associate a targeted local user account with a federated IDP user account that they control. The Deployment should have: -An IDP configured for federated authentication with Silent JIT provisioning enabled. The malicious actor should have: -A fresh valid user account in the federated IDP that has not been used earlier. -Knowledge of the username of a valid user in the local IDP. -An account at the federated IDP matching the targeted local username. |
| CVE-2025-13590 | Critical | 2026-02-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A malicious actor with administrative privileges can upload an arbitrary file to a user-controlled location within the deployment via a system REST API. Successful uploads may lead to remote code execution. By leveraging the vulnerability, a malicious actor may perform Remote Code Execution by uploading a specially crafted payload. |
| CVE-2025-9312 | Critical | 2025-11-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A missing authentication enforcement vulnerability exists in the mutual TLS (mTLS) implementation used by System REST APIs and SOAP services in multiple WSO2 products. Due to improper validation of client certificate–based authentication in certain default configurations, the affected components may permit unauthenticated requests even when mTLS is enabled. This condition occurs when relying on the default mTLS settings for System REST APIs or when the mTLS authenticator is enabled for SOAP services, causing these interfaces to accept requests without enforcing additional authentication. Successful exploitation allows a malicious actor with network access to the affected endpoints to gain administrative privileges and perform unauthorized operations. The vulnerability is exploitable only when the impacted mTLS flows are enabled and accessible in a given deployment. Other certificate-based authentication mechanisms such as Mutual TLS OAuth client authentication and X.509 login flows are not affected, and APIs served through the API Gateway of WSO2 API Manager remain unaffected. |
| CVE-2025-6670 | High | 2025-11-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to the use of the HTTP GET method for state-changing operations within admin services, specifically in the event processor of the Carbon console. Although the SameSite=Lax cookie attribute is used as a mitigation, it is ineffective in this context because it allows cookies to be sent with cross-origin top-level navigations using GET requests. A malicious actor can exploit this vulnerability by tricking an authenticated user into visiting a crafted link, leading the browser to issue unintended state-changing requests. Successful exploitation could result in unauthorized operations such as data modification, account changes, or other administrative actions. According to WSO2 Secure Production Guidelines, exposure of Carbon console services to untrusted networks is discouraged, which may reduce the impact in properly secured deployments. |
| CVE-2025-5770 | Medium | 2025-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the authentication endpoints of multiple WSO2 products due to a lack of output encoding. A malicious actor can inject arbitrary JavaScript payloads into the authentication endpoint, which are reflected back in the response, enabling browser-based attacks. Exploitation may result in redirection to malicious websites, UI manipulation, or unauthorized data access from the victim’s browser. However, session-related cookies are protected with the httpOnly flag, which mitigates session hijacking via this vector. |
| CVE-2025-3125 | High | 2025-11-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An arbitrary file upload vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to improper input validation in the CarbonAppUploader admin service endpoint. An authenticated attacker with appropriate privileges can upload a malicious file to a user-controlled location on the server, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE). This functionality is restricted by default to admin users; therefore, successful exploitation requires valid credentials with administrative permissions. |
| CVE-2025-11093 | High | 2025-11-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An arbitrary code execution vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to insufficient restrictions in the GraalJS and NashornJS Script Mediator engines. Authenticated users with elevated privileges can execute arbitrary code within the integration runtime environment. By default, access to these scripting engines is limited to administrators in WSO2 Micro Integrator and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, while in WSO2 API Manager, access extends to both administrators and API creators. This may allow trusted-but-privileged users to perform unauthorized actions or compromise the execution environment. |
| CVE-2025-10907 | High | 2025-11-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An arbitrary file upload vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to insufficient validation of uploaded content and destination in SOAP admin services. A malicious actor with administrative privileges can upload a specially crafted file to a user-controlled location within the deployment. Successful exploitation may lead to remote code execution (RCE) on the server, depending on how the uploaded file is processed. By default, this vulnerability is only exploitable by users with administrative access to the affected SOAP services. |
| CVE-2025-10853 | Medium | 2025-11-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the management console of multiple WSO2 products due to improper output encoding. By tampering with specific parameters, a malicious actor can inject arbitrary JavaScript into the response, leading to reflected XSS. Successful exploitation could result in UI manipulation, redirection to malicious websites, or data theft from the browser. However, session-related sensitive cookies are protected with the httpOnly flag, which mitigates the risk of session hijacking. |
| CVE-2025-10713 | Critical | 2025-11-05 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | An XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to improper configuration of the XML parser. The application parses user-supplied XML without applying sufficient restrictions, allowing resolution of external entities. A successful attack could enable a remote, unauthenticated attacker to read sensitive files from the server's filesystem or perform denial-of-service (DoS) attacks that render affected services unavailable. |
| CVE-2025-9804 | Critical | 2025-10-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper access control vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to insufficient permission enforcement in certain internal SOAP Admin Services and System REST APIs. A low-privileged user may exploit this flaw to perform unauthorized operations, including accessing server-level information. This vulnerability affects only internal administrative interfaces. APIs exposed through the WSO2 API Manager's API Gateway remain unaffected. |
| CVE-2025-9152 | Critical | 2025-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An improper privilege management vulnerability exists in WSO2 API Manager due to missing authentication and authorization checks in the keymanager-operations Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) endpoint. A malicious user can exploit this flaw to generate access tokens with elevated privileges, potentially leading to administrative access and the ability to perform unauthorized operations. |
| CVE-2025-10611 | Critical | 2025-10-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Due to an insufficient access control implementation in multiple WSO2 Products, authentication and authorization checks for certain REST APIs can be bypassed, allowing them to be invoked without proper validation. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to a malicious actor gaining administrative access and performing unauthenticated and unauthorized administrative operations. |
| CVE-2025-5717 | High | 2025-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An authenticated remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to improper input validation in the event processor admin service. A user with administrative access to the SOAP admin services can exploit this flaw by deploying a Siddhi execution plan containing malicious Java code, resulting in arbitrary code execution on the server. Exploitation of this vulnerability requires a valid user account with administrative privileges, limiting the attack surface to authenticated but potentially malicious users. |
| CVE-2025-4760 | Medium | 2025-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An authenticated stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to improper validation of user-supplied input during API document upload in the Publisher portal. A user with publisher privileges can upload a crafted API document containing malicious JavaScript, which is later rendered in the browser when accessed by other users. A successful attack could result in redirection to malicious websites, unauthorized UI modifications, or exfiltration of browser-accessible data. However, session-related sensitive cookies are protected by the httpOnly flag, preventing session hijacking. |
| CVE-2024-6429 | Medium | 2025-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A content spoofing vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to improper error message handling. Under certain conditions, error messages are passed through URL parameters without validation, allowing malicious actors to inject arbitrary content into the UI. By exploiting this vulnerability, attackers can manipulate browser-displayed error messages, enabling social engineering attacks through deceptive or misleading content. |
| CVE-2024-4598 | Medium | 2025-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An information disclosure vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to improper implementation of the enrich mediator. Authenticated users may be able to view unintended business data from other mediation contexts because the internal state is not properly isolated or cleared between executions. This vulnerability does not impact user credentials or access tokens but may lead to leakage of sensitive business information handled during message flows. |
| CVE-2024-3511 | Medium | 2025-06-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An incorrect authorization vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products that allows unauthorized access to versioned files stored in the registry. Due to flawed authorization logic, a malicious actor with access to the management console can exploit a specific bypass method to retrieve versioned files without proper authorization. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized disclosure of configuration or resource files that may be stored as registry versions, potentially aiding further attacks or system reconnaissance. |
| CVE-2024-8008 | Medium | 2025-06-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to insufficient output encoding in error messages generated by the JDBC user store connection validation request. A malicious actor can inject a specially crafted payload into the request, causing the browser to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the vulnerable page. This vulnerability may allow UI manipulation, redirection to malicious websites, or data exfiltration from the browser. However, since all session-related sensitive cookies are protected with the httpOnly flag, session hijacking is not possible. |
| CVE-2024-3509 | Medium | 2025-06-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Management Console of multiple WSO2 products due to insufficient input validation in the Rich Text Editor within the registry section. To exploit this vulnerability, a malicious actor must have a valid user account with administrative access to the Management Console. If successful, the actor could inject persistent JavaScript payloads, enabling the theft of user data or execution of unauthorized actions on behalf of other users. While this issue enables persistent client-side script execution, session-related cookies remain protected with the httpOnly flag, preventing session hijacking. |
| CVE-2024-1440 | Medium | 2025-06-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An open redirection vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to improper validation of the multi-option URL in the authentication endpoint when multi-option authentication is enabled. A malicious actor can craft a valid link that redirects users to an attacker-controlled site. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker may trick users into visiting a malicious page, enabling phishing attacks to harvest sensitive information or perform other harmful actions. |
| CVE-2024-7096 | Medium | 2025-05-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to a business logic flaw in SOAP admin services. A malicious actor can create a new user with elevated permissions only when all of the following conditions are met: * SOAP admin services are accessible to the attacker. * The deployment includes an internally used attribute that is not part of the default WSO2 product configuration. * At least one custom role exists with non-default permissions. * The attacker has knowledge of the custom role and the internal attribute used in the deployment. Exploiting this vulnerability allows malicious actors to assign higher privileges to self-registered users, bypassing intended access control mechanisms. |
| CVE-2024-6914 | Critical | 2025-05-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An incorrect authorization vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to a business logic flaw in the account recovery-related SOAP admin service. A malicious actor can exploit this vulnerability to reset the password of any user account, leading to a complete account takeover, including accounts with elevated privileges. This vulnerability is exploitable only through the account recovery SOAP admin services exposed via the "/services" context path in affected products. The impact may be reduced if access to these endpoints has been restricted based on the "Security Guidelines for Production Deployment" by disabling exposure to untrusted networks. |
| CVE-2024-5962 | Medium | 2025-05-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the authentication endpoint of multiple WSO2 products due to missing output encoding of user-supplied input. A malicious actor can exploit this vulnerability to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the authentication flow, potentially leading to UI modifications, redirections to malicious websites, or data exfiltration from the browser. While this issue could allow an attacker to manipulate the user’s browser, session-related sensitive cookies remain protected with the httpOnly flag, preventing session hijacking. |
| CVE-2025-2905 | Critical | 2025-05-05 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Due to the improper configuration of XML parser, user-supplied XML is parsed without applying sufficient restrictions, enabling XML External Entity (XXE) resolution in multiple WSO2 Products. A successful XXE attack could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to: * Read sensitive files from the server’s filesystem. * Perform denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, which can render the affected service unavailable. |
| CVE-2024-5848 | Medium | 2025-02-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to improper input validation. User-supplied data is directly included in server responses from vulnerable service endpoints without proper sanitization or encoding, allowing an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript. Successful exploitation could lead to UI manipulation, redirection to malicious websites, or data exfiltration from the browser. While session-related sensitive cookies are protected with the httpOnly flag, mitigating session hijacking risks, the impact may vary depending on gateway-level service restrictions. |
| CVE-2024-2321 | Medium | 2025-02-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An incorrect authorization vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products, allowing protected APIs to be accessed directly using a refresh token instead of the expected access token. Due to improper authorization checks and token mapping, session cookies are not required for API access, potentially enabling unauthorized operations. Exploitation requires an attacker to obtain a valid refresh token of an admin user. Since refresh tokens generally have a longer expiration time, this could lead to prolonged unauthorized access to API resources, impacting data confidentiality and integrity. |
| CVE-2023-6911 | Medium | 2023-12-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple WSO2 products have been identified as vulnerable due to improper output encoding, a Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attack can be carried out by an attacker injecting a malicious payload into the Registry feature of the Management Console. |
| CVE-2023-6839 | Medium | 2023-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Due to improper error handling, a REST API resource could expose a server side error containing an internal WSO2 specific package name in the HTTP response. |
| CVE-2023-6838 | Medium | 2023-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Reflected XSS vulnerability can be exploited by tampering a request parameter in Authentication Endpoint. This can be performed in both authenticated and unauthenticated requests. |
| CVE-2023-6837 | High | 2023-12-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple WSO2 products have been identified as vulnerable to perform user impersonatoin using JIT provisioning. In order for this vulnerability to have any impact on your deployment, following conditions must be met: * An IDP configured for federated authentication and JIT provisioning enabled with the "Prompt for username, password and consent" option. * A service provider that uses the above IDP for federated authentication and has the "Assert identity using mapped local subject identifier" flag enabled. Attacker should have: * A fresh valid user account in the federated IDP that has not been used earlier. * Knowledge of the username of a valid user in the local IDP. When all preconditions are met, a malicious actor could use JIT provisioning flow to perform user impersonation. |
| CVE-2023-6836 | High | 2023-12-15 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Multiple WSO2 products have been identified as vulnerable due to an XML External Entity (XXE) attack abuses a widely available but rarely used feature of XML parsers to access sensitive information. |
| CVE-2023-6835 | Medium | 2023-12-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple WSO2 products have been identified as vulnerable due to lack of server-side input validation in the Forum feature, API rating could be manipulated. |
| CVE-2021-42646 | Critical | 2022-05-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in the file based service provider creation feature of the Management Console in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0, 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, and 4.0.0; and WSO2 IS as Key Manager 5.7.0, 5.9.0, and 5.10.0; and WSO2 Identity Server 5.7.0, 5.8.0, 5.9.0, 5.10.0, and 5.11.0. Allows attackers to gain read access to sensitive information or cause a denial of service via crafted GET requests. |
| CVE-2021-36760 | Medium | 2021-12-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In accountrecoveryendpoint/recoverpassword.do in WSO2 Identity Server 5.7.0, it is possible to perform a DOM-Based XSS attack affecting the callback parameter modifying the URL that precedes the callback parameter. Once the username or password reset procedure is completed, the JavaScript code will be executed. (recoverpassword.do also has an open redirect issue for a similar reason.) |
| CVE-2021-22516 | High | 2021-06-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in Micro Focus Secure API Manager (SAPIM) product, affecting version 2.0.0. The vulnerability could lead to sensitive information being in a log file. |
| CVE-2020-27885 | Medium | 2020-10-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability on WSO2 API Manager 3.1.0. By exploiting a Cross-site scripting vulnerability the attacker can hijack a logged-in user’s session by stealing cookies which means that a malicious hacker can change the logged-in user’s password and invalidate the session of the victim while the hacker maintains access. |
| CVE-2020-17454 | Medium | 2020-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | WSO2 API Manager 3.1.0 and earlier has reflected XSS on the "publisher" component's admin interface. More precisely, it is possible to inject an XSS payload into the owner POST parameter, which does not filter user inputs. By putting an XSS payload in place of a valid Owner Name, a modal box appears that writes an error message concatenated to the injected payload (without any form of data encoding). This can also be exploited via CSRF. |
| CVE-2020-24706 | Medium | 2020-08-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in certain WSO2 products. The Try It tool allows Reflected XSS. This affects API Manager through 3.1.0, API Manager Analytics 2.5.0, IS as Key Manager through 5.10.0, Identity Server through 5.10.0, Identity Server Analytics through 5.6.0, and IoT Server 3.1.0. |
| CVE-2020-24705 | High | 2020-08-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in certain WSO2 products. A valid Carbon Management Console session cookie may be sent to an attacker-controlled server if the victim submits a crafted Try It request, aka Session Hijacking. This affects API Manager through 3.1.0, API Manager Analytics 2.5.0, IS as Key Manager through 5.10.0, Identity Server through 5.10.0, Identity Server Analytics through 5.6.0, and IoT Server 3.1.0. |
| CVE-2020-24704 | Medium | 2020-08-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in certain WSO2 products. The Try It tool allows Reflected XSS. This affects API Manager 2.2.0, API Manager Analytics 2.2.0, API Microgateway 2.2.0, Data Analytics Server 3.2.0, Enterprise Integrator through 6.6.0, IS as Key Manager 5.5.0, Identity Server 5.5.0 and 5.8.0, Identity Server Analytics 5.5.0, and IoT Server 3.3.0 and 3.3.1. |
| CVE-2020-24703 | High | 2020-08-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in certain WSO2 products. A valid Carbon Management Console session cookie may be sent to an attacker-controlled server if the victim submits a crafted Try It request, aka Session Hijacking. This affects API Manager 2.2.0, API Manager Analytics 2.2.0, API Microgateway 2.2.0, Data Analytics Server 3.2.0, Enterprise Integrator through 6.6.0, IS as Key Manager 5.5.0, Identity Server 5.5.0 and 5.8.0, Identity Server Analytics 5.5.0, and IoT Server 3.3.0 and 3.3.1. |
| CVE-2020-24591 | Medium | 2020-08-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Management Console in certain WSO2 products allows XXE attacks during EventReceiver updates. This affects API Manager through 3.0.0, API Manager Analytics 2.2.0 and 2.5.0, API Microgateway 2.2.0, Enterprise Integrator 6.2.0 and 6.3.0, and Identity Server Analytics through 5.6.0. |
| CVE-2020-24590 | Critical | 2020-08-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Management Console in WSO2 API Manager through 3.1.0 and API Microgateway 2.2.0 allows XML Entity Expansion attacks. |
| CVE-2020-13883 | Medium | 2020-06-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In WSO2 API Manager 3.0.0 and earlier, WSO2 API Microgateway 2.2.0, and WSO2 IS as Key Manager 5.9.0 and earlier, Management Console allows XXE during addition or update of a Lifecycle. |
| CVE-2020-13226 | Critical | 2020-05-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | WSO2 API Manager 3.0.0 does not properly restrict outbound network access from a Publisher node, opening up the possibility of SSRF to this node's entire intranet. |
| CVE-2020-12719 | High | 2020-05-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | XXE during an EventPublisher update can occur in Management Console in WSO2 API Manager 3.0.0 and earlier, API Manager Analytics 2.5.0 and earlier, API Microgateway 2.2.0, Enterprise Integrator 6.4.0 and earlier, IS as Key Manager 5.9.0 and earlier, Identity Server 5.9.0 and earlier, and Identity Server Analytics 5.6.0 and earlier. |
| CVE-2019-20443 | Medium | 2020-01-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator 6.5.0, WSO2 IS as Key Manager 5.7.0, and WSO2 Identity Server 5.8.0. A potential stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in mediaType has been identified in the registry UI. |
| CVE-2019-20442 | Medium | 2020-01-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator 6.5.0, WSO2 IS as Key Manager 5.7.0, and WSO2 Identity Server 5.8.0. A potential stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in roleToAuthorize has been identified in the registry UI. |
| CVE-2019-20441 | Medium | 2020-01-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. A potential Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the 'implement phase' of the API Publisher. |
| CVE-2019-20440 | Medium | 2020-01-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. A potential Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the update API documentation feature of the API Publisher. |
| CVE-2019-20439 | Medium | 2020-01-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. A potential Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in defining a scope in the "manage the API" page of the API Publisher. |
| CVE-2019-20438 | Medium | 2020-01-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. A potential stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the inline API documentation editor page of the API Publisher. |
| CVE-2019-20437 | Medium | 2020-01-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0, WSO2 IS as Key Manager 5.7.0, and WSO2 Identity Server 5.8.0. When a custom claim dialect with an XSS payload is configured in the identity provider basic claim configuration, that payload gets executed, if a user picks up that dialect's URI as the provisioning claim in the advanced claim configuration of the same Identity Provider. The attacker also needs to have privileges to log in to the management console, and to add and update identity provider configurations. |
| CVE-2019-20436 | Medium | 2020-01-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0, WSO2 IS as Key Manager 5.7.0, and WSO2 Identity Server 5.8.0. If there is a claim dialect configured with an XSS payload in the dialect URI, and a user picks up this dialect's URI and adds it as the service provider claim dialect while configuring the service provider, that payload gets executed. The attacker also needs to have privileges to log in to the management console, and to add and configure claim dialects. |
| CVE-2019-20435 | Medium | 2020-01-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. A reflected XSS attack could be performed in the inline API documentation editor page of the API Publisher by sending an HTTP GET request with a harmful docName request parameter. |
| CVE-2019-20434 | Medium | 2020-01-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. A potential Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Datasource creation page of the Management Console. |
| CVE-2019-15108 | Medium | 2019-08-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0 before WSO2-CARBON-PATCH-4.4.0-4457. There is XSS via a crafted filename to the file-upload feature of the event simulator component. |
| CVE-2019-6513 | Medium | 2019-05-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. It is possible for a logged-in user to upload, as API documentation, any type of file by changing the extension to an allowed one. |
| CVE-2019-6515 | Medium | 2019-05-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. Uploaded documents for API documentation are available to an unauthenticated user. |
| CVE-2019-6512 | Medium | 2019-05-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0. It is possible to force the application to perform requests to the internal workstation (SSRF port-scanning), other adjacent workstations (SSRF network scanning), or to enumerate files because of the existence of the file:// wrapper. |
| CVE-2018-20737 | Medium | 2019-03-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.1.0 and 2.6.0. Reflected XSS exists in the carbon part of the product. |
| CVE-2018-20736 | Medium | 2019-03-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in WSO2 API Manager 2.1.0 and 2.6.0. A DOM-based XSS exists in the store part of the product. |