WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Protection: None✕Product: Struts✕
Overview 18 matches · 0 protected · 5 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 12 EPSS ≥ 0.5
18matches 0protected0.0% 5exploited27.8% 0CISA KEV0.0% 12EPSS ≥ 0.566.7%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 18 100.0% No exploit published 0 0.0%
Critical 3 16.7% High 5 27.8% Medium 9 50.0% Low 1 5.6% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 18 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 5 27.8% Working exploit published 13 72.2% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 5 / year
Mitigation candidate: 18 Low: 1Medium: 9High: 5Critical: 3 not blocked: 18 Working exploit published: 13Exploited: 5
20091 Mitigation candidate1 Medium1 not blocked1 Working exploit published1 20101 Mitigation candidate1 Medium1 not blocked1 Working exploit published1 20111 Mitigation candidate1 Low1 not blocked1 Working exploit published1 20125 Mitigation candidate5 Medium5 not blocked5 Working exploit published5 20134 Mitigation candidate4 High3 Medium1 not blocked4 Exploited1 Working exploit published3 20142 Mitigation candidate2 High1 Medium1 not blocked2 Exploited2 20150 20161 Mitigation candidate1 Critical1 not blocked1 Working exploit published1 20170 20180 20192 Mitigation candidate2 Critical1 High1 not blocked2 Exploited1 Working exploit published1 20200 20210 20220 20231 Mitigation candidate1 Critical1 not blocked1 Exploited1
20092011201320152017201920212023
18 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2023-50164 Critical 2023-12-07 Mitigation candidate Exploited An attacker can manipulate file upload params to enable paths traversal and under some circumstances this can lead to uploading a malicious file which can be used to perform Remote Code Execution. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions Struts 2.5.33 or Struts 6.3.0.2 or greater to fix this issue.
CVE-2012-1592 High 2019-12-05 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published A local code execution issue exists in Apache Struts2 when processing malformed XSLT files, which could let a malicious user upload and execute arbitrary files.
CVE-2011-3923 Critical 2019-11-01 Mitigation candidate Exploited Apache Struts before 2.3.1.2 allows remote attackers to bypass security protections in the ParameterInterceptor class and execute arbitrary commands.
CVE-2016-3087 Critical 2016-06-07 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to an ! (exclamation mark) operator to the REST Plugin.
CVE-2014-0113 High 2014-04-29 Mitigation candidate Exploited CookieInterceptor in Apache Struts before 2.3.20, when a wildcard cookiesName value is used, does not properly restrict access to the getClass method, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code via a crafted request. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-0094.
CVE-2014-0094 Medium 2014-03-11 Mitigation candidate Exploited The ParametersInterceptor in Apache Struts before 2.3.16.2 allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader via the class parameter, which is passed to the getClass method.
CVE-2013-2248 Medium 2013-07-20 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published Multiple open redirect vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15 allow remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in a parameter using the (1) redirect: or (2) redirectAction: prefix.
CVE-2013-2134 High 2013-07-16 Mitigation candidate Exploited Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a request with a crafted action name that is not properly handled during wildcard matching, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-2135.
CVE-2013-2115 High 2013-07-10 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted request that is not properly handled when using the includeParams attribute in the (1) URL or (2) A tag. NOTE: this issue is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-1966.
CVE-2013-1966 High 2013-07-10 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted request that is not properly handled when using the includeParams attribute in the (1) URL or (2) A tag.
CVE-2012-1007 Medium 2012-02-07 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 1.3.10 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) the name parameter to struts-examples/upload/upload-submit.do, or the message parameter to (2) struts-cookbook/processSimple.do or (3) struts-cookbook/processDyna.do.
CVE-2012-1006 Medium 2012-02-07 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.14 and 2.2.3 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) name or (2) lastName parameter to struts2-showcase/person/editPerson.action, or the (3) clientName parameter to struts2-rest-showcase/orders.
CVE-2012-0393 Medium 2012-01-08 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published The ParameterInterceptor component in Apache Struts before 2.3.1.1 does not prevent access to public constructors, which allows remote attackers to create or overwrite arbitrary files via a crafted parameter that triggers the creation of a Java object.
CVE-2012-0392 Medium 2012-01-08 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published The CookieInterceptor component in Apache Struts before 2.3.1.1 does not use the parameter-name whitelist, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted HTTP Cookie header that triggers Java code execution through a static method.
CVE-2011-5057 Medium 2012-01-08 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published Apache Struts 2.3.1.2 and earlier, 2.3.19-2.3.23, provides interfaces that do not properly restrict access to collections such as the session and request collections, which might allow remote attackers to modify run-time data values via a crafted parameter to an application that implements an affected interface, as demonstrated by the SessionAware, RequestAware, ApplicationAware, ServletRequestAware, ServletResponseAware, and ParameterAware interfaces. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this report because of an "easy work-around in existing apps by configuring the interceptor."
CVE-2011-1772 Low 2011-05-13 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in XWork in Apache Struts 2.x before 2.2.3, and OpenSymphony XWork in OpenSymphony WebWork, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving (1) an action name, (2) the action attribute of an s:submit element, or (3) the method attribute of an s:submit element.
CVE-2010-1870 Medium 2010-08-17 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published The OGNL extensive expression evaluation capability in XWork in Struts 2.0.0 through 2.1.8.1, as used in Atlassian Fisheye, Crucible, and possibly other products, uses a permissive whitelist, which allows remote attackers to modify server-side context objects and bypass the "#" protection mechanism in ParameterInterceptors via the (1) #context, (2) #_memberAccess, (3) #root, (4) #this, (5) #_typeResolver, (6) #_classResolver, (7) #_traceEvaluations, (8) #_lastEvaluation, (9) #_keepLastEvaluation, and possibly other OGNL context variables, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-6504.
CVE-2008-6504 Medium 2009-03-23 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published ParametersInterceptor in OpenSymphony XWork 2.0.x before 2.0.6 and 2.1.x before 2.1.2, as used in Apache Struts and other products, does not properly restrict # (pound sign) references to context objects, which allows remote attackers to execute Object-Graph Navigation Language (OGNL) statements and modify server-side context objects, as demonstrated by use of a \u0023 representation for the # character.