Overview 22 matches · 7 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
22matches
7in Waratek scope31.8%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
7
31.8%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
15
68.2%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
22
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
5
22.7%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
17
77.3%
split by
peak 15 / year
20101
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20110
20120
20130
20140
20150
20160
20170
20180
20191
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20200
20210
20220
20231
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20242
No exploit published2
Medium2
not blocked2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit1
20252
No exploit published1
Not applicable1
Medium2
not blocked2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit1
202615
No exploit published2
Not applicable13
Medium15
not blocked15
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit12
201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-87354 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: Kubernetes Operator). Supported versions that are affected are 22.1-22.1.40.0 and 26.1-26.1.1.2.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-101522 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: TimesTen IMDB). Supported versions that are affected are 22.1-22.1.1.43.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database executes to compromise Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60411 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the TimesTen In-Memory Database product of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: ttcserver). The supported version that is affected is 26.1.1.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with access to the physical communication segment attached to the hardware where the TimesTen In-Memory Database executes to compromise TimesTen In-Memory Database. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of TimesTen In-Memory Database. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60410 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the TimesTen In-Memory Database product of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: Kubernetes Operator). The supported version that is affected is 26.1.1.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise TimesTen In-Memory Database. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of TimesTen In-Memory Database. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L). |
| CVE-2026-60409 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the TimesTen In-Memory Database product of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: Kubernetes Operator). The supported version that is affected is 26.1.1.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where TimesTen In-Memory Database executes to compromise TimesTen In-Memory Database. While the vulnerability is in TimesTen In-Memory Database, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of TimesTen In-Memory Database accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of TimesTen In-Memory Database accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of TimesTen In-Memory Database. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.7 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L). |
| CVE-2026-60408 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the TimesTen In-Memory Database product of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: Kubernetes Operator). The supported version that is affected is 26.1.1.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise TimesTen In-Memory Database. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of TimesTen In-Memory Database accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60407 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the TimesTen In-Memory Database product of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: Kubernetes Operator). The supported version that is affected is 26.1.1.1.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where TimesTen In-Memory Database executes to compromise TimesTen In-Memory Database. While the vulnerability is in TimesTen In-Memory Database, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all TimesTen In-Memory Database accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.6 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60406 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the TimesTen In-Memory Database product of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: Kubernetes Operator). The supported version that is affected is 26.1.1.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where TimesTen In-Memory Database executes to compromise TimesTen In-Memory Database. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of TimesTen In-Memory Database. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.7 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60404 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the TimesTen In-Memory Database product of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: Kubernetes Operator). The supported version that is affected is 26.1.1.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise TimesTen In-Memory Database. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of TimesTen In-Memory Database. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60403 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the TimesTen In-Memory Database product of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: Kubernetes Operator). The supported version that is affected is 26.1.1.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise TimesTen In-Memory Database. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of TimesTen In-Memory Database. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60401 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the TimesTen In-Memory Database product of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: Kubernetes Operator). The supported version that is affected is 26.1.1.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where TimesTen In-Memory Database executes to compromise TimesTen In-Memory Database. While the vulnerability is in TimesTen In-Memory Database, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all TimesTen In-Memory Database accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-42505 | Medium | 2026-07-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Handshakes which used Encrypted Client Hello could be de-anonymized by a passive network observer due to a disclosure of pre-shared key identities in the unencrypted client hello. |
| CVE-2026-42580 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final, Netty's chunk size parser silently overflows int, enabling request smuggling attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final. |
| CVE-2026-41417 | Medium | 2026-05-06 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | Netty allows request-line validation to be bypassed when a `DefaultHttpRequest` or `DefaultFullHttpRequest` is created first and its URI is later changed via `setUri()`. The constructors reject CRLF and whitespace characters that would break the start-line, but `setUri()` does not apply the same validation. `HttpRequestEncoder` and `RtspEncoder` then write the URI into the request line verbatim. If attacker-controlled input reaches `setUri()`, this enables CRLF injection and insertion of additional HTTP or RTSP requests, leading to HTTP request smuggling or desynchronization on the HTTP side and request injection on the RTSP side. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final. |
| CVE-2026-27171 | Medium | 2026-02-18 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | zlib before 1.3.2 allows CPU consumption via crc32_combine64 and crc32_combine_gen64 because x2nmodp can do right shifts within a loop that has no termination condition. |
| CVE-2025-61727 | Medium | 2025-12-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com. |
| CVE-2025-25193 | Medium | 2025-02-10 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | Netty, an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework, has a vulnerability in versions up to and including 4.1.118.Final. An unsafe reading of environment file could potentially cause a denial of service in Netty. When loaded on an Windows application, Netty attempts to load a file that does not exist. If an attacker creates such a large file, the Netty application crash. A similar issue was previously reported as CVE-2024-47535. This issue was fixed, but the fix was incomplete in that null-bytes were not counted against the input limit. Commit d1fbda62d3a47835d3fb35db8bd42ecc205a5386 contains an updated fix. |
| CVE-2024-47554 | Medium | 2024-10-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Apache Commons IO. The org.apache.commons.io.input.XmlStreamReader class may excessively consume CPU resources when processing maliciously crafted input. This issue affects Apache Commons IO: from 2.0 before 2.14.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0 or later, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2024-29025 | Medium | 2024-03-25 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | Netty is an asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients. The `HttpPostRequestDecoder` can be tricked to accumulate data. While the decoder can store items on the disk if configured so, there are no limits to the number of fields the form can have, an attacher can send a chunked post consisting of many small fields that will be accumulated in the `bodyListHttpData` list. The decoder cumulates bytes in the `undecodedChunk` buffer until it can decode a field, this field can cumulate data without limits. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.1.108.Final. |
| CVE-2023-34462 | Medium | 2023-06-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Netty is an asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients. The `SniHandler` can allocate up to 16MB of heap for each channel during the TLS handshake. When the handler or the channel does not have an idle timeout, it can be used to make a TCP server using the `SniHandler` to allocate 16MB of heap. The `SniHandler` class is a handler that waits for the TLS handshake to configure a `SslHandler` according to the indicated server name by the `ClientHello` record. For this matter it allocates a `ByteBuf` using the value defined in the `ClientHello` record. Normally the value of the packet should be smaller than the handshake packet but there are not checks done here and the way the code is written, it is possible to craft a packet that makes the `SslClientHelloHandler`. This vulnerability has been fixed in version 4.1.94.Final. |
| CVE-2019-0201 | Medium | 2019-05-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An issue is present in Apache ZooKeeper 1.0.0 to 3.4.13 and 3.5.0-alpha to 3.5.4-beta. ZooKeeper’s getACL() command doesn’t check any permission when retrieves the ACLs of the requested node and returns all information contained in the ACL Id field as plaintext string. DigestAuthenticationProvider overloads the Id field with the hash value that is used for user authentication. As a consequence, if Digest Authentication is in use, the unsalted hash value will be disclosed by getACL() request for unauthenticated or unprivileged users. |
| CVE-2010-0910 | Medium | 2010-07-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Data Server component in Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database 7.0.6.0 and 11.2.1.4.1 allows remote attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors. |