WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
EPSS ≥ 0.5✕Product report manager✕
Overview 5 matches · 2 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC
5matches 2protected40.0% 1exploited20.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 2public PoC40.0%
Protected by Waratek 2 40.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 3 60.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 2 40.0% Medium 3 60.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 2 40.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 3 60.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 1 20.0% Working exploit published 1 20.0% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 3 60.0% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 1 / quarter
No exploit published: 3Protected by Waratek: 2 Medium: 3High: 2 not blocked: 3blocked by ARMR today: 2 Forecast only: 3Working exploit published: 1Exploited: 1
Q2 201 Protected by Waratek1 High1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1 Q3 200 Q4 200 Q1 211 No exploit published1 Medium1 not blocked1 Forecast only1 Q2 211 No exploit published1 High1 not blocked1 Forecast only1 Q3 211 No exploit published1 Medium1 not blocked1 Forecast only1 Q4 211 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1
Q2 20Q3 20Q4 20Q1 21Q2 21Q3 21Q4 21
5 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2021-45105 Medium 2021-12-18 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.
CVE-2021-33037 Medium 2021-07-12 No exploit published Forecast only Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding.
CVE-2021-28165 High 2021-04-01 No exploit published Forecast only In Eclipse Jetty 7.2.2 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.1, CPU usage can reach 100% upon receiving a large invalid TLS frame.
CVE-2020-13947 Medium 2021-02-08 No exploit published Forecast only An instance of a cross-site scripting vulnerability was identified to be present in the web based administration console on the message.jsp page of Apache ActiveMQ versions 5.15.12 through 5.16.0.
CVE-2020-9484 High 2020-05-20 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed.