Overview 11 matches · 7 protected · 8 exploited · 6 CISA KEV · 9 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
7
63.6%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
4
36.4%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
7
63.6%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4
36.4%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
8
72.7%
Working exploit published
2
18.2%
Proof of concept only
1
9.1%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 4 / year
20101
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20110
20120
20130
20140
20150
20162
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited2
20170
20181
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20190
20200
20212
Protected by Waratek2
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
20224
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate1
Critical4
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked1
Exploited3
Proof of concept only1
20231
Mitigation candidate1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
2011201320152017201920212023
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-44487 | High | 2023-10-10 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. |
| CVE-2022-22965 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. |
| CVE-2022-22963 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. |
| CVE-2022-22947 | Critical | 2022-03-03 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host. |
| CVE-2022-23221 | Critical | 2022-01-19 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | H2 Console before 2.1.210 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a jdbc:h2:mem JDBC URL containing the IGNORE_UNKNOWN_SETTINGS=TRUE;FORBID_CREATION=FALSE;INIT=RUNSCRIPT substring, a different vulnerability than CVE-2021-42392. |
| CVE-2021-45105 | Medium | 2021-12-18 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. |
| CVE-2021-28164 | Medium | 2021-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | In Eclipse Jetty 9.4.37.v20210219 to 9.4.38.v20210224, the default compliance mode allows requests with URIs that contain %2e or %2e%2e segments to access protected resources within the WEB-INF directory. For example a request to /context/%2e/WEB-INF/web.xml can retrieve the web.xml file. This can reveal sensitive information regarding the implementation of a web application. |
| CVE-2018-8006 | Medium | 2018-10-10 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | An instance of a cross-site scripting vulnerability was identified to be present in the web based administration console on the queue.jsp page of Apache ActiveMQ versions 5.0.0 to 5.15.5. The root cause of this issue is improper data filtering of the QueueFilter parameter. |
| CVE-2016-3427 | Critical | 2016-04-21 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99, and 8u77; Java SE Embedded 8u77; and JRockit R28.3.9 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to JMX. |
| CVE-2015-7450 | Critical | 2016-01-02 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Serialized-object interfaces in certain IBM analytics, business solutions, cognitive, IT infrastructure, and mobile and social products allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the InvokerTransformer class in the Apache Commons Collections library. |
| CVE-2010-1587 | Medium | 2010-04-28 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The Jetty ResourceHandler in Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.3.2 and 5.4.x before 5.4.0 allows remote attackers to read JSP source code via a // (slash slash) initial substring in a URI for (1) admin/index.jsp, (2) admin/queues.jsp, or (3) admin/topics.jsp. |