WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕EPSS ≥ 0.5✕Oracle product: Oracle Virtualization✕
Overview 19 matches · 3 in Waratek scope · 2 protected · 5 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 13 public PoC
19matches 3in Waratek scope15.8% 2protected10.5% 5exploited26.3% 1CISA KEV5.3% 13public PoC68.4%
Protected by Waratek 2 10.5% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 1 5.3% Outside Waratek scope 10 52.6% Not applicable 6 31.6% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 3 15.8% High 5 26.3% Medium 9 47.4% Low 2 10.5% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 2 10.5% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 17 89.5% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 5 26.3% Working exploit published 7 36.8% Proof of concept only 2 10.5% Forecast only 5 26.3% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 5 / year
Not applicable: 6Outside Waratek scope: 10No exploit published: 1Protected by Waratek: 2 Low: 2Medium: 9High: 5Critical: 3 not blocked: 17blocked by ARMR today: 2 Forecast only: 5Proof of concept only: 2Working exploit published: 7Exploited: 5
20143 Outside Waratek scope3 High1 Medium1 Low1 not blocked3 Exploited1 Working exploit published1 Proof of concept only1 20152 Outside Waratek scope1 Not applicable1 Medium1 Low1 not blocked2 Proof of concept only1 Forecast only1 20162 Not applicable2 High1 Medium1 not blocked2 Working exploit published1 Forecast only1 20175 Protected by Waratek2 Not applicable3 Critical2 High2 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today2 not blocked3 Exploited2 Working exploit published1 Forecast only2 20183 Outside Waratek scope3 Medium3 not blocked3 Exploited1 Working exploit published2 20192 Outside Waratek scope2 High1 Medium1 not blocked2 Working exploit published2 20200 20212 No exploit published1 Outside Waratek scope1 Critical1 Medium1 not blocked2 Exploited1 Forecast only1
20142015201620172018201920202021
19 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2021-40438 Critical 2021-09-16 Outside Waratek scope Exploited A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier.
CVE-2021-33037 Medium 2021-07-12 No exploit published Forecast only Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding.
CVE-2019-10092 Medium 2019-09-26 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0-2.4.39, a limited cross-site scripting issue was reported affecting the mod_proxy error page. An attacker could cause the link on the error page to be malformed and instead point to a page of their choice. This would only be exploitable where a server was set up with proxying enabled but was misconfigured in such a way that the Proxy Error page was displayed.
CVE-2019-0227 High 2019-05-01 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affected the Apache Axis 1.4 distribution that was last released in 2006. Security and bug commits commits continue in the projects Axis 1.x Subversion repository, legacy users are encouraged to build from source. The successor to Axis 1.x is Axis2, the latest version is 1.7.9 and is not vulnerable to this issue.
CVE-2018-11784 Medium 2018-10-04 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published When the default servlet in Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.11, 8.5.0 to 8.5.33 and 7.0.23 to 7.0.90 returned a redirect to a directory (e.g. redirecting to '/foo/' when the user requested '/foo') a specially crafted URL could be used to cause the redirect to be generated to any URI of the attackers choice.
CVE-2018-11763 Medium 2018-09-25 Outside Waratek scope Exploited In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.17 to 2.4.34, by sending continuous, large SETTINGS frames a client can occupy a connection, server thread and CPU time without any connection timeout coming to effect. This affects only HTTP/2 connections. A possible mitigation is to not enable the h2 protocol.
CVE-2017-5715 Medium 2018-01-04 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and indirect branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis.
CVE-2017-3737 Medium 2017-12-07 Not applicable Forecast only OpenSSL 1.0.2 (starting from version 1.0.2b) introduced an "error state" mechanism. The intent was that if a fatal error occurred during a handshake then OpenSSL would move into the error state and would immediately fail if you attempted to continue the handshake. This works as designed for the explicit handshake functions (SSL_do_handshake(), SSL_accept() and SSL_connect()), however due to a bug it does not work correctly if SSL_read() or SSL_write() is called directly. In that scenario, if the handshake fails then a fatal error will be returned in the initial function call. If SSL_read()/SSL_write() is subsequently called by the application for the same SSL object then it will succeed and the data is passed without being decrypted/encrypted directly from the SSL/TLS record layer. In order to exploit this issue an application bug would have to be present that resulted in a call to SSL_read()/SSL_write() being issued after having already received a fatal error. OpenSSL version 1.0.2b-1.0.2m are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. OpenSSL 1.1.0 is not affected.
CVE-2015-7501 Critical 2017-11-09 Protected by Waratek Exploited Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library.
CVE-2017-9798 High 2017-09-18 Not applicable Exploited Apache httpd allows remote attackers to read secret data from process memory if the Limit directive can be set in a user's .htaccess file, or if httpd.conf has certain misconfigurations, aka Optionsbleed. This affects the Apache HTTP Server through 2.2.34 and 2.4.x through 2.4.27. The attacker sends an unauthenticated OPTIONS HTTP request when attempting to read secret data. This is a use-after-free issue and thus secret data is not always sent, and the specific data depends on many factors including configuration. Exploitation with .htaccess can be blocked with a patch to the ap_limit_section function in server/core.c.
CVE-2017-3731 High 2017-05-04 Not applicable Forecast only If an SSL/TLS server or client is running on a 32-bit host, and a specific cipher is being used, then a truncated packet can cause that server or client to perform an out-of-bounds read, usually resulting in a crash. For OpenSSL 1.1.0, the crash can be triggered when using CHACHA20/POLY1305; users should upgrade to 1.1.0d. For Openssl 1.0.2, the crash can be triggered when using RC4-MD5; users who have not disabled that algorithm should update to 1.0.2k.
CVE-2017-5645 Critical 2017-04-17 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2016-6304 High 2016-09-26 Not applicable Forecast only Multiple memory leaks in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u, 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i, and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via large OCSP Status Request extensions.
CVE-2016-2107 Medium 2016-05-05 Not applicable Working exploit published The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169.
CVE-2015-3183 Medium 2015-07-20 Not applicable Forecast only The chunked transfer coding implementation in the Apache HTTP Server before 2.4.14 does not properly parse chunk headers, which allows remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks via a crafted request, related to mishandling of large chunk-size values and invalid chunk-extension characters in modules/http/http_filters.c.
CVE-2015-4000 Low 2015-05-21 Outside Waratek scope Proof of concept only The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue.
CVE-2014-3566 Low 2014-10-15 Outside Waratek scope Proof of concept only The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, aka the "POODLE" issue.
CVE-2014-0226 Medium 2014-07-20 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published Race condition in the mod_status module in the Apache HTTP Server before 2.4.10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow), or possibly obtain sensitive credential information or execute arbitrary code, via a crafted request that triggers improper scoreboard handling within the status_handler function in modules/generators/mod_status.c and the lua_ap_scoreboard_worker function in modules/lua/lua_request.c.
CVE-2014-0224 High 2014-06-05 Outside Waratek scope Exploited OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the "CCS Injection" vulnerability.