Overview 60 matches · 12 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 6 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
60matches
12in Waratek scope20.0%
1protected1.7%
1exploited1.7%
0CISA KEV0.0%
6public PoC10.0%
2EPSS ≥ 0.53.3%
Protected by Waratek
1
1.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
2
3.3%
No exploit published
9
15.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
1.7%
Not applicable
47
78.3%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
1.7%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
59
98.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 17 / year
20071
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20080
20091
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20103
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published1
Not applicable1
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20110
20125
No exploit published4
Not applicable1
Medium5
not blocked5
No public exploit5
20130
20143
No exploit published1
Not applicable2
Medium3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20151
Not applicable1
Low1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20160
20172
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20181
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20191
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20201
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
20213
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20220
202310
No exploit published1
Not applicable9
Critical2
High6
Medium2
not blocked10
No public exploit10
20245
No exploit published1
Not applicable4
High3
Medium1
Low1
not blocked5
No public exploit5
202517
Not applicable17
Critical1
High4
Medium12
not blocked17
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit16
20266
Not applicable6
Critical1
High5
not blocked6
No public exploit6
2008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-66713 | Critical | 2026-07-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502) in the Tribes-based clustering component in Apache Software Foundation Apache Axis2/Java through 2.0.0 on Apache Tomcat (only when Tribes clustering is enabled, which is off by default) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker with network access to the clustering port to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized Java object delivered to the cluster channel and deserialized in org.apache.axis2.clustering.tribes.Axis2ChannelListener#messageReceived. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.1, which fixes this issue by removing the clustering feature entirely. |
| CVE-2026-1185 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A configuration file on the local file system had improper input validation which could allow code execution and potentially lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability can only be exploited if an attacker can log in to the Axis device using SSH. |
| CVE-2026-0804 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An ACAP configuration file lacked sufficient input validation, which could allow a path traversal attack leading to potential privilege escalation. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. |
| CVE-2026-0802 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An ACAP configuration file lacked sufficient input validation, which could allow command injection and potentially lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. |
| CVE-2026-0541 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ACAP applications can gain elevated privileges due to improper input validation during the installation process, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. |
| CVE-2025-11142 | High | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The VAPIX API mediaclip.cgi that did not have a sufficient input validation allowing for a possible remote code execution. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an operator- or administrator- privileged service account. |
| CVE-2025-66574 | Medium | 2025-12-04 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | TranzAxis 3.2.41.10.26 allows authenticated users to inject cross-site scripting via the `Open Object in Tree` endpoint, allowing attackers to steal session cookies and potentially escalate privileges. |
| CVE-2025-8108 | Medium | 2025-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An ACAP configuration file has improper permissions and lacks input validation, which could potentially lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. |
| CVE-2025-6779 | Medium | 2025-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An ACAP configuration file has improper permissions, which could allow command injection and potentially lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. |
| CVE-2025-6298 | Medium | 2025-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ACAP applications can gain elevated privileges due to improper input validation, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. |
| CVE-2025-5718 | Medium | 2025-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The ACAP Application framework could allow privilege escalation through a symlink attack. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. |
| CVE-2025-5454 | Medium | 2025-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An ACAP configuration file lacked sufficient input validation, which could allow a path traversal attack leading to potential privilege escalation. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. |
| CVE-2025-5452 | Medium | 2025-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A malicious ACAP application can gain access to admin-level service account credentials used by legitimate ACAP applications, leading to potential privilege escalation of the malicious ACAP application. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. |
| CVE-2025-4645 | Medium | 2025-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An ACAP configuration file lacked sufficient input validation, which could allow for arbitrary code execution. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. |
| CVE-2025-3892 | Medium | 2025-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ACAP applications can be executed with elevated privileges, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. |
| CVE-2025-30027 | Medium | 2025-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An ACAP configuration file lacked sufficient input validation, which could allow for arbitrary code execution. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. |
| CVE-2025-0358 | High | 2025-06-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | During an annual penetration test conducted on behalf of Axis Communication, Truesec discovered a flaw in the VAPIX Device Configuration framework that allowed a privilege escalation, enabling a lower-privileged user to gain administrator privileges. |
| CVE-2025-0324 | Critical | 2025-06-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The VAPIX Device Configuration framework allowed a privilege escalation, enabling a lower-privileged user to gain administrator privileges. |
| CVE-2025-0361 | Medium | 2025-04-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | During an annual penetration test conducted on behalf of Axis Communications, Truesec discovered a flaw in the VAPIX Device Configuration framework that allowed for unauthenticated username enumeration through the VAPIX Device Configuration SSH Management API. |
| CVE-2024-47261 | Medium | 2025-04-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | 51l3nc3, a member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API uploadoverlayimage.cgi did not have sufficient input validation to allow an attacker to upload files to block access to create image overlays in the web interface of the Axis device. |
| CVE-2025-0360 | High | 2025-03-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | During an annual penetration test conducted on behalf of Axis Communication, Truesec discovered a flaw in the VAPIX Device Configuration framework that could lead to an incorrect user privilege level in the VAPIX service account D-Bus API. |
| CVE-2025-0359 | High | 2025-03-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | During an annual penetration test conducted on behalf of Axis Communication, Truesec discovered a flaw in the ACAP Application framework that allowed applications to access restricted D-Bus methods within the framework. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. |
| CVE-2024-47259 | High | 2025-03-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Girishunawane, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API dynamicoverlay.cgi did not have a sufficient input validation allowing for a possible command injection leading to being able to transfer files to the Axis device with the purpose to exhaust system resources. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. |
| CVE-2024-8160 | Low | 2024-11-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Erik de Jong, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API ftptest.cgi did not have a sufficient input validation allowing for a possible command injection leading to being able to transfer files from/to the Axis device. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an administrator-privileged service account. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. |
| CVE-2024-6979 | High | 2024-09-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Amin Aliakbari, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found a broken access control which would lead to less-privileged operator- and/or viewer accounts having more privileges than designed. The risk of exploitation is very low as it requires complex steps to execute, including knowing of account passwords and social engineering attacks in tricking the administrator to perform specific configurations on operator- and/or viewer-privileged accounts. Axis has released patched AXIS OS a version for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. |
| CVE-2024-0055 | Medium | 2024-03-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sandro Poppi, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX APIs mediaclip.cgi and playclip.cgi was vulnerable for file globbing which could lead to a resource exhaustion attack. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. |
| CVE-2023-5800 | High | 2024-02-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vintage, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API create_overlay.cgi did not have a sufficient input validation allowing for a possible remote code execution. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an operator- or administrator-privileged service account. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. |
| CVE-2023-51441 | High | 2024-01-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Axis allowed users with access to the admin service to perform possible SSRF This issue affects Apache Axis: through 1.3. As Axis 1 has been EOL we recommend you migrate to a different SOAP engine, such as Apache Axis 2/Java. Alternatively you could use a build of Axis with the patch from https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/685c309febc64aa393b2d64a05f90e7eb9f73e06 applied. The Apache Axis project does not expect to create an Axis 1.x release fixing this problem, though contributors that would like to work towards this are welcome. |
| CVE-2023-5553 | High | 2023-11-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | During internal Axis Security Development Model (ASDM) threat-modelling, a flaw was found in the protection for device tampering (commonly known as Secure Boot) in AXIS OS making it vulnerable to a sophisticated attack to bypass this protection. To Axis' knowledge, there are no known exploits of the vulnerability at this time. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. |
| CVE-2023-21418 | High | 2023-11-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sandro Poppi, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API irissetup.cgi was vulnerable to path traversal attacks that allows for file deletion. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an operator- or administrator-privileged service account. The impact of exploiting this vulnerability is lower with operator service accounts and limited to non-system files compared to administrator-privileges. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. |
| CVE-2023-21417 | High | 2023-11-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sandro Poppi, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API manageoverlayimage.cgi was vulnerable to path traversal attacks that allows for file/folder deletion. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an operator- or administrator- privileged service account. The impact of exploiting this vulnerability is lower with operator service accounts and limited to non-system files compared to administrator-privileges. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. |
| CVE-2023-21416 | High | 2023-11-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sandro Poppi, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API dynamicoverlay.cgi was vulnerable to a Denial-of-Service attack allowing for an attacker to block access to the overlay configuration page in the web interface of the Axis device. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an operator- or administrator-privileged service account however the impact is equal. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. |
| CVE-2023-21415 | High | 2023-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sandro Poppi, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API overlay_del.cgi is vulnerable to path traversal attacks that allows for file deletion. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an operator- or administrator-privileged service account. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. |
| CVE-2023-21414 | High | 2023-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | NCC Group has found a flaw during the annual internal penetration test ordered by Axis Communications. The protection for device tampering (commonly known as Secure Boot) contains a flaw which provides an opportunity for a sophisticated attack to bypass this protection. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. |
| CVE-2023-21413 | Critical | 2023-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | GoSecure on behalf of Genetec Inc. has found a flaw that allows for a remote code execution during the installation of ACAP applications on the Axis device. The application handling service in AXIS OS was vulnerable to command injection allowing an attacker to run arbitrary code. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. |
| CVE-2023-40743 | Critical | 2023-09-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** When integrating Apache Axis 1.x in an application, it may not have been obvious that looking up a service through "ServiceFactory.getService" allows potentially dangerous lookup mechanisms such as LDAP. When passing untrusted input to this API method, this could expose the application to DoS, SSRF and even attacks leading to RCE. As Axis 1 has been EOL we recommend you migrate to a different SOAP engine, such as Apache Axis 2/Java. As a workaround, you may review your code to verify no untrusted or unsanitized input is passed to "ServiceFactory.getService", or by applying the patch from https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/7e66753427466590d6def0125e448d2791723210 . The Apache Axis project does not expect to create an Axis 1.x release fixing this problem, though contributors that would like to work towards this are welcome. |
| CVE-2023-21405 | Medium | 2023-07-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Knud from Fraktal.fi has found a flaw in some Axis Network Door Controllers and Axis Network Intercoms when communicating over OSDP, highlighting that the OSDP message parser crashes the pacsiod process, causing a temporary unavailability of the door-controlling functionalities meaning that doors cannot be opened or closed. No sensitive or customer data can be extracted as the Axis device is not further compromised. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information, mitigation and affected products and software versions. |
| CVE-2023-21404 | Medium | 2023-05-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AXIS OS 11.0.X - 11.3.x use a static RSA key in legacy LUA-components to protect Axis-specific source code. The static RSA key is not used in any other secure communication nor can it be used to compromise the device or any customer data. |
| CVE-2021-31988 | High | 2021-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A user controlled parameter related to SMTP test functionality is not correctly validated making it possible to add the Carriage Return and Line Feed (CRLF) control characters and include arbitrary SMTP headers in the generated test email. |
| CVE-2021-31987 | High | 2021-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A user controlled parameter related to SMTP test functionality is not correctly validated making it possible to bypass blocked network recipients. |
| CVE-2021-31986 | Medium | 2021-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | User controlled parameters related to SMTP notifications are not correctly validated. This can lead to a buffer overflow resulting in crashes and data leakage. |
| CVE-2020-2179 | High | 2020-04-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins Yaml Axis Plugin 0.2.0 and earlier does not configure its YAML parser to prevent the instantiation of arbitrary types, resulting in a remote code execution vulnerability. |
| CVE-2019-0227 | High | 2019-05-01 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affected the Apache Axis 1.4 distribution that was last released in 2006. Security and bug commits commits continue in the projects Axis 1.x Subversion repository, legacy users are encouraged to build from source. The successor to Axis 1.x is Axis2, the latest version is 1.7.9 and is not vulnerable to this issue. |
| CVE-2018-8032 | Medium | 2018-08-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Axis 1.x up to and including 1.4 is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack in the default servlet/services. |
| CVE-2015-8258 | High | 2017-04-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | AXIS Communications products with firmware through 5.80.x allow remote attackers to modify arbitrary files as root via vectors involving Open Script Editor, aka a "resource injection vulnerability." |
| CVE-2015-8255 | High | 2017-04-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | AXIS Communications products allow CSRF, as demonstrated by admin/pwdgrp.cgi, vaconfig.cgi, and admin/local_del.cgi. |
| CVE-2015-1516 | Low | 2015-09-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Polycom RealPresence CloudAXIS Suite before 1.7.0 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2012-6107 | Medium | 2014-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Apache Axis2/C does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. |
| CVE-2014-5639 | Medium | 2014-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The ADT Taxis (aka com.icabbi.adttaxisApp) application 6 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. |
| CVE-2014-3596 | Medium | 2014-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The getCN function in Apache Axis 1.4 and earlier does not properly verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a certificate with a subject that specifies a common name in a field that is not the CN field. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-5784. |
| CVE-2012-5785 | Medium | 2012-11-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Axis2/Java 1.6.2 and earlier does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. |
| CVE-2012-5784 | Medium | 2012-11-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Axis 1.4 and earlier, as used in PayPal Payments Pro, PayPal Mass Pay, PayPal Transactional Information SOAP, the Java Message Service implementation in Apache ActiveMQ, and other products, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. |
| CVE-2012-5351 | Medium | 2012-10-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Axis2 allows remote attackers to forge messages and bypass authentication via a SAML assertion that lacks a Signature element, aka a "Signature exclusion attack," a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4418. |
| CVE-2012-4418 | Medium | 2012-10-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Axis2 allows remote attackers to forge messages and bypass authentication via an "XML Signature wrapping attack." |
| CVE-2012-0907 | Medium | 2012-01-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Directory traversal vulnerability in the web player in NeoAxis NeoAxis web player 1.4 and earlier allows user-assisted remote attackers to write arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in a filename in the neoaxis_web_application_win32.zip ZIP archive. |
| CVE-2010-0219 | High | 2010-10-18 | Not applicable | Exploited | Apache Axis2, as used in dswsbobje.war in SAP BusinessObjects Enterprise XI 3.2, CA ARCserve D2D r15, and other products, has a default password of axis2 for the admin account, which makes it easier for remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by uploading a crafted web service. |
| CVE-2010-1632 | High | 2010-06-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Axis2 before 1.5.2, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0 through 7.0.0.12, IBM Feature Pack for Web Services 6.1.0.9 through 6.1.0.32, IBM Feature Pack for Web 2.0 1.0.1.0, Apache Synapse, Apache ODE, Apache Tuscany, Apache Geronimo, and other products, does not properly reject DTDs in SOAP messages, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, send HTTP requests to intranet servers, or cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via a crafted DTD, as demonstrated by an entity declaration in a request to the Synapse SimpleStockQuoteService. |
| CVE-2010-2103 | Medium | 2010-05-27 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in axis2-admin/axis2-admin/engagingglobally in the administration console in Apache Axis2/Java 1.4.1, 1.5.1, and possibly other versions, as used in SAP Business Objects 12, 3com IMC, and possibly other products, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the modules parameter. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| CVE-2008-5260 | High | 2009-01-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Heap-based buffer overflow in the CamImage.CamImage.1 ActiveX control in AxisCamControl.ocx in AXIS Camera Control 2.40.0.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long image_pan_tilt property value. |
| CVE-2007-2353 | Medium | 2007-04-30 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Axis 1.0 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by requesting a non-existent WSDL file, which reveals the installation path in the resulting exception message. |