Overview 5,424 matches · 584 protected · 86 exploited · 37 CISA KEV · 318 public PoC · 147 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
589
10.9%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
207
3.8%
No exploit published
4,628
85.3%
split by
peak 889 / year
19961
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19970
19980
19992
No exploit published2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
200012
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published6
High5
Medium7
not blocked12
Working exploit published6
No public exploit6
200113
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published10
High7
Medium6
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked12
Working exploit published2
No public exploit11
200237
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate8
No exploit published26
High11
Medium23
Low3
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked34
Working exploit published8
Forecast only2
No public exploit27
200339
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate7
No exploit published30
High9
Medium24
Low6
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked37
Working exploit published8
No public exploit31
200427
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published24
High6
Medium18
Low3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked25
Working exploit published1
No public exploit26
200582
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published75
Critical1
High30
Medium46
Low5
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked79
Working exploit published5
No public exploit77
2006133
Protected by Waratek8
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published121
High66
Medium56
Low11
blocked by ARMR today8
not blocked125
Exploited1
Working exploit published5
No public exploit127
2007150
Protected by Waratek6
Mitigation candidate10
No exploit published134
High68
Medium71
Low11
blocked by ARMR today6
not blocked144
Working exploit published11
No public exploit139
2008136
Protected by Waratek7
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published120
High46
Medium83
Low7
blocked by ARMR today7
not blocked129
Exploited2
Working exploit published12
No public exploit122
2009203
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate13
No exploit published181
High52
Medium129
Low22
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked194
Exploited1
Working exploit published16
No public exploit186
2010183
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published162
Critical1
High27
Medium133
Low22
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked174
Exploited3
Working exploit published14
Forecast only1
No public exploit165
2011193
Protected by Waratek6
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published178
High20
Medium139
Low34
blocked by ARMR today6
not blocked187
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit181
2012311
Protected by Waratek9
Mitigation candidate24
No exploit published278
Critical3
High29
Medium199
Low80
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked300
not established2
Exploited8
Working exploit published19
No public exploit284
2013349
Protected by Waratek26
Mitigation candidate18
No exploit published305
Critical1
High45
Medium249
Low54
blocked by ARMR today26
not blocked322
not established1
Exploited9
Working exploit published17
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit321
2014335
Protected by Waratek41
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published282
High30
Medium256
Low49
blocked by ARMR today41
not blocked294
Exploited4
Working exploit published14
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only2
No public exploit314
2015323
Protected by Waratek32
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published285
Critical4
High42
Medium226
Low51
blocked by ARMR today32
not blocked291
Exploited4
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit310
2016535
Protected by Waratek58
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published465
Critical47
High134
Medium321
Low33
blocked by ARMR today57
partly blocked1
not blocked476
not established1
Exploited8
Working exploit published18
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only5
No public exploit503
2017800
Protected by Waratek104
Mitigation candidate14
No exploit published682
Critical82
High338
Medium355
Low25
blocked by ARMR today102
partly blocked2
not blocked696
Exploited17
Working exploit published19
Proof of concept only3
Forecast only1
No public exploit760
2018889
Protected by Waratek176
Mitigation candidate16
No exploit published697
Critical86
High302
Medium487
Low14
blocked by ARMR today175
partly blocked1
not blocked713
Exploited15
Working exploit published15
Proof of concept only7
Forecast only1
No public exploit851
2019671
Protected by Waratek87
Mitigation candidate20
No exploit published564
Critical65
High254
Medium335
Low17
blocked by ARMR today86
partly blocked1
not blocked583
not established1
Exploited14
Working exploit published20
Proof of concept only7
Forecast only3
No public exploit627
199719992001200320052007200920112013201520172019
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-4305 | Medium | 2019-09-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information caused by the improper setting of a cookie. IBM X-Force ID: 160951. |
| CVE-2019-4304 | Medium | 2019-09-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions caused by improper session validation. IBM X-Force ID: 160950. |
| CVE-2019-16869 | High | 2019-09-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Netty before 4.1.42.Final mishandles whitespace before the colon in HTTP headers (such as a "Transfer-Encoding : chunked" line), which leads to HTTP request smuggling. |
| CVE-2019-10430 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins NeuVector Vulnerability Scanner Plugin 1.5 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10429 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins GitLab Logo Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10428 | High | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Aqua Security Scanner Plugin 3.0.17 and earlier transmitted configured credentials in plain text as part of the global Jenkins configuration form, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10427 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Aqua MicroScanner Plugin 1.0.7 and earlier transmitted configured credentials in plain text as part of the global Jenkins configuration form, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10426 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Gem Publisher Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10424 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins elOyente Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10423 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins CodeScan Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10422 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Call Remote Job Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10420 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Assembla Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10419 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins vFabric Application Director Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10418 | Critical | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Kubernetes :: Pipeline :: Arquillian Steps Plugin provides a custom whitelist for script security that allowed attackers to invoke arbitrary methods, bypassing typical sandbox protection. |
| CVE-2019-10417 | Critical | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Kubernetes :: Pipeline :: Kubernetes Steps Plugin provides a custom whitelist for script security that allowed attackers to invoke arbitrary methods, bypassing typical sandbox protection. |
| CVE-2019-10416 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Violation Comments to GitLab Plugin 2.28 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10415 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Violation Comments to GitLab Plugin 2.28 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10414 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Git Changelog Plugin 2.17 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10413 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Data Theorem: CI/CD Plugin 1.3 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10412 | High | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Inedo ProGet Plugin 1.2 and earlier transmitted configured credentials in plain text as part of the global Jenkins configuration form, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10411 | High | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Inedo BuildMaster Plugin 2.4.0 and earlier transmitted configured credentials in plain text as part of the global Jenkins configuration form, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10410 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Log Parser Plugin 2.0 and earlier did not escape an error message, resulting in a cross-site scripting vulnerability exploitable by users able to define log parsing rules. |
| CVE-2019-10409 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Project Inheritance Plugin 2.0.0 and earlier allowed attackers with Overall/Read permission to trigger project generation from templates. |
| CVE-2019-10408 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Project Inheritance Plugin 2.0.0 and earlier allowed attackers to trigger project generation from templates. |
| CVE-2019-10407 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Project Inheritance Plugin 2.0.0 and earlier displayed a list of environment variables passed to a build without masking sensitive variables contributed by the Mask Passwords Plugin. |
| CVE-2019-10406 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins 2.196 and earlier, LTS 2.176.3 and earlier did not restrict or filter values set as Jenkins URL in the global configuration, resulting in a stored XSS vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Overall/Administer permission. |
| CVE-2019-10405 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Jenkins 2.196 and earlier, LTS 2.176.3 and earlier printed the value of the "Cookie" HTTP request header on the /whoAmI/ URL, allowing attackers exploiting another XSS vulnerability to obtain the HTTP session cookie despite it being marked HttpOnly. |
| CVE-2019-10404 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins 2.196 and earlier, LTS 2.176.3 and earlier did not escape the reason why a queue items is blcoked in tooltips, resulting in a stored XSS vulnerability exploitable by users able to control parts of the reason a queue item is blocked, such as label expressions not matching any idle executors. |
| CVE-2019-10403 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins 2.196 and earlier, LTS 2.176.3 and earlier did not escape the SCM tag name on the tooltip for SCM tag actions, resulting in a stored XSS vulnerability exploitable by users able to control SCM tag names for these actions. |
| CVE-2019-10402 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Jenkins 2.196 and earlier, LTS 2.176.3 and earlier, the f:combobox form control interpreted its item labels as HTML, resulting in a stored XSS vulnerability exploitable by users with permission to define its contents. |
| CVE-2019-10401 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Jenkins 2.196 and earlier, LTS 2.176.3 and earlier, the f:expandableTextBox form control interpreted its content as HTML when expanded, resulting in a stored XSS vulnerability exploitable by users with permission to define its contents (typically Job/Configure). |
| CVE-2019-12407 | Medium | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | On Apache JSPWiki, up to version 2.11.0.M4, a carefully crafted plugin link invocation could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, related to the remember parameter on some of the JSPs, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. |
| CVE-2019-12404 | Medium | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | On Apache JSPWiki, up to version 2.11.0.M4, a carefully crafted plugin link invocation could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, related to InfoContent.jsp, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. |
| CVE-2019-10755 | Medium | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The SAML identifier generated within SAML2Utils.java was found to make use of the apache commons-lang3 RandomStringUtils class which makes them predictable due to RandomStringUtils PRNG's algorithm not being cryptographically strong. This issue only affects the 3.X release of pac4j-saml. |
| CVE-2019-10754 | High | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple classes used within Apereo CAS before release 6.1.0-RC5 makes use of apache commons-lang3 RandomStringUtils for token and ID generation which makes them predictable due to RandomStringUtils PRNG's algorithm not being cryptographically strong. |
| CVE-2019-10090 | Medium | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | On Apache JSPWiki, up to version 2.11.0.M4, a carefully crafted plugin link invocation could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, related to the plain editor, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. |
| CVE-2019-10089 | Medium | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | On Apache JSPWiki, up to version 2.11.0.M4, a carefully crafted plugin link invocation could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, related to the WYSIWYG editor, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. |
| CVE-2019-10087 | Medium | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | On Apache JSPWiki, up to version 2.11.0.M4, a carefully crafted plugin link invocation could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, related to the Page Revision History, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. |
| CVE-2019-4505 | Medium | 2019-09-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 Network Deployment could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by sending a specially-crafted URL. This can lead the attacker to view any file in a certain directory. IBM X-Force ID: 164364. |
| CVE-2019-3739 | Medium | 2019-09-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys. |
| CVE-2019-3738 | Medium | 2019-09-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to a Missing Required Cryptographic Step vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key. |
| CVE-2019-4477 | Medium | 2019-09-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 could allow a user with access to audit logs to obtain sensitive information, caused by improper handling of command line options. IBM X-Force ID: 163997. |
| CVE-2019-4442 | Medium | 2019-09-17 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9,0 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the file system. An attacker could send a specially-crafted URL request to view arbitrary files on the system but not content. IBM X-Force ID: 163226. |
| CVE-2019-4271 | Low | 2019-09-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 Admin console is vulnerable to a Client-side HTTP parameter pollution vulnerability. IBM X-Force ID: 160243. |
| CVE-2019-4268 | Medium | 2019-09-17 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially-crafted URL containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to view arbitrary files on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 160201. |
| CVE-2019-16370 | Medium | 2019-09-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The PGP signing plugin in Gradle before 6.0 relies on the SHA-1 algorithm, which might allow an attacker to replace an artifact with a different one that has the same SHA-1 message digest, a related issue to CVE-2005-4900. |
| CVE-2019-10071 | Critical | 2019-09-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The code which checks HMAC in form submissions used String.equals() for comparisons, which results in a timing side channel for the comparison of the HMAC signatures. This could lead to remote code execution if an attacker is able to determine the correct signature for their payload. The comparison should be done with a constant time algorithm instead. |
| CVE-2019-0207 | High | 2019-09-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Tapestry processes assets `/assets/ctx` using classes chain `StaticFilesFilter -> AssetDispatcher -> ContextResource`, which doesn't filter the character `\`, so attacker can perform a path traversal attack to read any files on Windows platform. |
| CVE-2019-0195 | Critical | 2019-09-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Manipulating classpath asset file URLs, an attacker could guess the path to a known file in the classpath and have it downloaded. If the attacker found the file with the value of the tapestry.hmac-passphrase configuration symbol, most probably the webapp's AppModule class, the value of this symbol could be used to craft a Java deserialization attack, thus running malicious injected Java code. The vector would be the t:formdata parameter from the Form component. |
| CVE-2019-16335 | Critical | 2019-09-15 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.10. It is related to com.zaxxer.hikari.HikariDataSource. This is a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-14540. |
| CVE-2019-14540 | Critical | 2019-09-15 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.10. It is related to com.zaxxer.hikari.HikariConfig. |
| CVE-2019-10400 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.62 and earlier related to the handling of subexpressions in increment and decrement expressions not involving actual assignment allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code in sandboxed scripts. |
| CVE-2019-10399 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.62 and earlier related to the handling of property names in property expressions in increment and decrement expressions allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code in sandboxed scripts. |
| CVE-2019-10398 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Beaker Builder Plugin 1.9 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10397 | Low | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Aqua Security Serverless Scanner Plugin 1.0.4 and earlier transmitted configured passwords in plain text as part of job configuration forms, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10396 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Dashboard View Plugin 2.11 and earlier did not escape build descriptions, resulting in a cross-site scripting vulnerability exploitable by users able to change build descriptions. |
| CVE-2019-10395 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Build Environment Plugin 1.6 and earlier did not escape variables shown on its views, resulting in a cross-site scripting vulnerability in Jenkins 2.145, 2.138.1, or older, exploitable by users able to change various job/build properties. |
| CVE-2019-10394 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.62 and earlier related to the handling of property names in property expressions on the left-hand side of assignment expressions allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code in sandboxed scripts. |
| CVE-2019-10393 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.62 and earlier related to the handling of method names in method call expressions allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code in sandboxed scripts. |
| CVE-2019-10392 | High | 2019-09-12 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | Jenkins Git Client Plugin 2.8.4 and earlier and 3.0.0-rc did not properly restrict values passed as URL argument to an invocation of 'git ls-remote', resulting in OS command injection. |
| CVE-2019-11777 | High | 2019-09-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In the Eclipse Paho Java client library version 1.2.0, when connecting to an MQTT server using TLS and setting a host name verifier, the result of that verification is not checked. This could allow one MQTT server to impersonate another and provide the client library with incorrect information. |
| CVE-2019-12401 | High | 2019-09-10 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Solr versions 1.3.0 to 1.4.1, 3.1.0 to 3.6.2 and 4.0.0 to 4.10.4 are vulnerable to an XML resource consumption attack (a.k.a. Lol Bomb) via it’s update handler.?By leveraging XML DOCTYPE and ENTITY type elements, the attacker can create a pattern that will expand when the server parses the XML causing OOMs. |
| CVE-2019-16148 | Medium | 2019-09-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Sakai through 12.6 allows XSS via a chat user name. |
| CVE-2019-16147 | Medium | 2019-09-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Liferay Portal through 7.2.0 GA1 allows XSS via a journal article title to journal_article/page.jsp in journal/journal-taglib. |
| CVE-2019-10753 | Medium | 2019-09-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In all versions prior to version 3.9.6 for eclipse-wtp, all versions prior to version 9.4.4 for eclipse-cdt, and all versions prior to version 3.0.1 for eclipse-groovy, Spotless was resolving dependencies over an insecure channel (http). If the build occurred over an insecure connection, a malicious user could have perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack during the build and alter the build artifacts that were produced. In case that any of these artifacts were compromised, any developers using these could be altered. **Note:** In order to validate that this artifact was not compromised, the maintainer would need to confirm that none of the artifacts published to the registry were not altered with. Until this happens, we can not guarantee that this artifact was not compromised even though the probability that this happened is low. |
| CVE-2019-5475 | High | 2019-09-03 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | The Nexus Yum Repository Plugin in v2 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution when instances using CommandLineExecutor.java are supplied vulnerable data, such as the Yum Configuration Capability. |
| CVE-2019-15630 | High | 2019-08-30 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Directory Traversal in APIkit, HTTP connector, and OAuth2 Provider components in MuleSoft Mule Runtime 3.2.0 and higher released before August 1 2019, MuleSoft Mule Runtime 4.1.0 and higher released before August 1 2019, and all versions of MuleSoft API Gateway released before August 1 2019 allow remote attackers to read files accessible to the Mule process. |
| CVE-2019-12402 | High | 2019-08-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The file name encoding algorithm used internally in Apache Commons Compress 1.15 to 1.18 can get into an infinite loop when faced with specially crafted inputs. This can lead to a denial of service attack if an attacker can choose the file names inside of an archive created by Compress. |
| CVE-2019-10391 | Medium | 2019-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins IBM Application Security on Cloud Plugin 1.2.4 and earlier transmitted configured passwords in plain text as part of job configuration forms, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10390 | High | 2019-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins Splunk Plugin 1.7.4 and earlier allowed attackers with Overall/Read permission to provide a Groovy script to an HTTP endpoint that can result in arbitrary code execution on the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2019-10384 | High | 2019-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins 2.191 and earlier, LTS 2.176.2 and earlier allowed users to obtain CSRF tokens without an associated web session ID, resulting in CSRF tokens that did not expire and could be used to bypass CSRF protection for the anonymous user. |
| CVE-2019-13237 | Medium | 2019-08-27 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | In Alkacon OpenCms 10.5.4 and 10.5.5, there are multiple resources vulnerable to Local File Inclusion that allow an attacker to access server resources: clearhistory.jsp, convertxml.jsp, group_new.jsp, loginmessage.jsp, xmlcontentrepair.jsp, and /system/workplace/admin/history/settings/index.jsp. |
| CVE-2019-13236 | Medium | 2019-08-27 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | In system/workplace/ in Alkacon OpenCms 10.5.4 and 10.5.5, there are multiple Reflected and Stored XSS issues in the management interface. |
| CVE-2019-13235 | Medium | 2019-08-27 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | In the Alkacon OpenCms Apollo Template 10.5.4 and 10.5.5, there is XSS in the Login form. |
| CVE-2019-13234 | Medium | 2019-08-27 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | In the Alkacon OpenCms Apollo Template 10.5.4 and 10.5.5, there is XSS in the search engine. |
| CVE-2019-15563 | Critical | 2019-08-26 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) WebAPI before 2.7.2 allows SQL injection in FeatureExtractionService.java. |
| CVE-2019-15488 | Medium | 2019-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Ignite Realtime Openfire before 4.4.1 has reflected XSS via an LDAP setup test. |
| CVE-2019-15477 | Medium | 2019-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jooby before 1.6.4 has XSS via the default error handler. |
| CVE-2019-12400 | Medium | 2019-08-23 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In version 2.0.3 Apache Santuario XML Security for Java, a caching mechanism was introduced to speed up creating new XML documents using a static pool of DocumentBuilders. However, if some untrusted code can register a malicious implementation with the thread context class loader first, then this implementation might be cached and re-used by Apache Santuario - XML Security for Java, leading to potential security flaws when validating signed documents, etc. The vulnerability affects Apache Santuario - XML Security for Java 2.0.x releases from 2.0.3 and all 2.1.x releases before 2.1.4. |
| CVE-2019-10086 | High | 2019-08-20 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Apache Commons Beanutils 1.9.2, a special BeanIntrospector class was added which allows suppressing the ability for an attacker to access the classloader via the class property available on all Java objects. We, however were not using this by default characteristic of the PropertyUtilsBean. |
| CVE-2019-10201 | High | 2019-08-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was found that Keycloak's SAML broker, versions up to 6.0.1, did not verify missing message signatures. If an attacker modifies the SAML Response and removes the <Signature> sections, the message is still accepted, and the message can be modified. An attacker could use this flaw to impersonate other users and gain access to sensitive information. |
| CVE-2019-10199 | High | 2019-08-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was found that Keycloak's account console, up to 6.0.1, did not perform adequate header checks in some requests. An attacker could use this flaw to trick an authenticated user into performing operations via request from an untrusted domain. |
| CVE-2019-12397 | Medium | 2019-08-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Policy import functionality in Apache Ranger 0.7.0 to 1.2.0 is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting issue. Upgrade to 2.0.0 or later version of Apache Ranger with the fix. |
| CVE-2019-10389 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Relution Enterprise Appstore Publisher Plugin 1.24 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins initiate an HTTP connection to an attacker-specified server. |
| CVE-2019-10388 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Relution Enterprise Appstore Publisher Plugin 1.24 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins initiate an HTTP connection to an attacker-specified server. |
| CVE-2019-10387 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins XL TestView Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier in XLTestView.XLTestDescriptor#doTestConnection allows users with Overall/Read access to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2019-10386 | High | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins XL TestView Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier in XLTestView.XLTestDescriptor#doTestConnection allows users with Overall/Read access to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2019-10385 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins eggPlant Plugin 2.2 and earlier stores credentials unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10381 | High | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Codefresh Integration Plugin 1.8 and earlier disables SSL/TLS and hostname verification globally for the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2019-10380 | High | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Simple Travis Pipeline Runner Plugin 1.0 and earlier specifies unsafe values in its custom Script Security whitelist, allowing attackers able to execute Script Security protected scripts to execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2019-10378 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins TestLink Plugin 3.16 and earlier stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10377 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Avatar Plugin 1.2 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read access to change the avatar of any user of Jenkins. |
| CVE-2019-10375 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | An arbitrary file read vulnerability in Jenkins File System SCM Plugin 2.1 and earlier allows attackers able to configure jobs in Jenkins to obtain the contents of any file on the Jenkins master. |
| CVE-2019-10372 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An open redirect vulnerability in Jenkins Gitlab Authentication Plugin 1.4 and earlier in GitLabSecurityRealm.java allows attackers to redirect users to a URL outside Jenkins after successful login. |
| CVE-2019-10371 | High | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A session fixation vulnerability in Jenkins Gitlab Authentication Plugin 1.4 and earlier in GitLabSecurityRealm.java allows unauthorized attackers to impersonate another user if they can control the pre-authentication session. |
| CVE-2019-10370 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Mask Passwords Plugin 2.12.0 and earlier transmits globally configured passwords in plain text as part of the configuration form, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10369 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins JClouds Plugin 2.14 and earlier in BlobStoreProfile.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection and JCloudsCloud.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection allowed users with Overall/Read access to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2019-10368 | High | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins JClouds Plugin 2.14 and earlier in BlobStoreProfile.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection and JCloudsCloud.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection allowed users with Overall/Read access to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2019-10367 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Due to an incomplete fix of CVE-2019-10343, Jenkins Configuration as Code Plugin 1.26 and earlier did not properly apply masking to some values expected to be hidden when logging the configuration being applied. |
| CVE-2019-10099 | High | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Prior to Spark 2.3.3, in certain situations Spark would write user data to local disk unencrypted, even if spark.io.encryption.enabled=true. This includes cached blocks that are fetched to disk (controlled by spark.maxRemoteBlockSizeFetchToMem); in SparkR, using parallelize; in Pyspark, using broadcast and parallelize; and use of python udfs. |