Tuxedo CVEs
16 CVEs, 2 exploited, 9 protected by Waratek
Overview 16 matches · 8 protected · 2 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 6 public PoC · 7 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
9
56.2%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
6.2%
No exploit published
6
37.5%
blocked by ARMR today
8
50.0%
partly blocked
1
6.2%
not blocked
7
43.8%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 7 / year
20033
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published2
Medium3
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20040
20050
20060
20071
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20080
20090
20100
20110
20120
20130
20140
20150
20160
20171
Protected by Waratek1
High1
partly blocked1
Exploited1
20187
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published3
Critical2
High2
Medium3
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit4
20190
20200
20211
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20223
Protected by Waratek3
Critical1
High2
blocked by ARMR today3
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only2
2004200620082010201220142016201820202022
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-23307 | High | 2022-01-18 | Protected by Waratek | Forecast only | CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists. |
| CVE-2022-23305 | Critical | 2022-01-18 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. |
| CVE-2022-23302 | High | 2022-01-18 | Protected by Waratek | Forecast only | JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. |
| CVE-2021-4104 | High | 2021-12-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. |
| CVE-2018-8032 | Medium | 2018-08-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Axis 1.x up to and including 1.4 is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack in the default servlet/services. |
| CVE-2018-1258 | High | 2018-05-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Framework version 5.0.5 when used in combination with any versions of Spring Security contains an authorization bypass when using method security. An unauthorized malicious user can gain unauthorized access to methods that should be restricted. |
| CVE-2018-1257 | Medium | 2018-05-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Framework, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.6, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.17, and older unsupported versions allows applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a regular expression, denial of service attack. |
| CVE-2018-1275 | Critical | 2018-04-11 | Protected by Waratek | Forecast only | Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.16 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. This CVE addresses the partial fix for CVE-2018-1270 in the 4.3.x branch of the Spring Framework. |
| CVE-2018-1272 | High | 2018-04-06 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, provide client-side support for multipart requests. When Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux server application (server A) receives input from a remote client, and then uses that input to make a multipart request to another server (server B), it can be exposed to an attack, where an extra multipart is inserted in the content of the request from server A, causing server B to use the wrong value for a part it expects. This could to lead privilege escalation, for example, if the part content represents a username or user roles. |
| CVE-2018-1271 | Medium | 2018-04-06 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources (e.g. CSS, JS, images). When static resources are served from a file system on Windows (as opposed to the classpath, or the ServletContext), a malicious user can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack. |
| CVE-2018-1270 | Critical | 2018-04-06 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. |
| CVE-2017-12617 | High | 2017-10-04 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | When running Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0, 8.5.0 to 8.5.22, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.46 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.81 with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the readonly initialisation parameter of the Default servlet to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server. |
| CVE-2007-5576 | Medium | 2007-10-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | BEA Tuxedo 8.0 before RP392 and 8.1 before RP293, and WebLogic Enterprise 5.1 before RP174, echo the password in cleartext, which allows physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information via the (1) cnsbind, (2) cnsunbind, or (3) cnsls commands. |
| CVE-2003-0623 | Medium | 2003-12-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Administration Console for BEA Tuxedo 8.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script via the INIFILE argument. |
| CVE-2003-0622 | Medium | 2003-12-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Administration Console for BEA Tuxedo 8.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (hang) via pathname arguments that contain MS-DOS device names such as CON and AUX. |
| CVE-2003-0621 | Medium | 2003-12-01 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The Administration Console for BEA Tuxedo 8.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to determine the existence of files outside the web root via modified paths in the INIFILE argument. |