Communications Cloud Native Core Network Function Cloud Native Environment CVEs
8 CVEs, 4 exploited, 4 protected by Waratek
Overview 8 matches · 4 protected · 4 exploited · 3 CISA KEV · 4 public PoC · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
4
50.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
12.5%
No exploit published
3
37.5%
blocked by ARMR today
4
50.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4
50.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
4
50.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
4
50.0%
split by
peak 2 / quarter
Q4 191
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q1 200
Q2 200
Q3 202
No exploit published2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q4 200
Q1 210
Q2 211
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 210
Q4 211
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Q1 221
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q2 222
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited2
Q4 19Q1 20Q2 20Q3 20Q4 20Q1 21Q2 21Q3 21Q4 21Q1 22Q2 22
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-22965 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. |
| CVE-2022-22963 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. |
| CVE-2022-22947 | Critical | 2022-03-03 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host. |
| CVE-2021-45105 | Medium | 2021-12-18 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. |
| CVE-2021-33560 | High | 2021-06-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Libgcrypt before 1.8.8 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 mishandles ElGamal encryption because it lacks exponent blinding to address a side-channel attack against mpi_powm, and the window size is not chosen appropriately. This, for example, affects use of ElGamal in OpenPGP. |
| CVE-2020-7017 | Medium | 2020-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Kibana versions before 6.8.11 and 7.8.1 the region map visualization in contains a stored XSS flaw. An attacker who is able to edit or create a region map visualization could obtain sensitive information or perform destructive actions on behalf of Kibana users who view the region map visualization. |
| CVE-2020-7016 | Medium | 2020-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Kibana versions before 6.8.11 and 7.8.1 contain a denial of service (DoS) flaw in Timelion. An attacker can construct a URL that when viewed by a Kibana user can lead to the Kibana process consuming large amounts of CPU and becoming unresponsive. |
| CVE-2019-10219 | Medium | 2019-11-08 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack. |