communications cloud native core policy CVEs

Look up CVE IDs Status Exploitation Severity

Reset

Overview 11 matches · 7 protected · 5 exploited · 3 CISA KEV · 9 public PoC

11matches 7protected63.6% 5exploited45.5% 3CISA KEV27.3% 9public PoC81.8%

Protected by Waratek 7 63.6% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 2 18.2% No exploit published 2 18.2%

Critical 3 27.3% High 4 36.4% Medium 4 36.4% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%

blocked by ARMR today 7 63.6% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 4 36.4% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%

Exploited 5 45.5% Working exploit published 4 36.4% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 2 18.2% No public exploit 0 0.0%

split by StatusSeverityProtectionExploit maturity peak 2 / quarter

Q2 191 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1 Q3 190 Q4 190 Q1 200 Q2 201 Protected by Waratek1 High1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1 Q3 201 Mitigation candidate1 High1 not blocked1 Working exploit published1 Q4 200 Q1 210 Q2 212 Mitigation candidate1 No exploit published1 High1 Medium1 not blocked2 Exploited1 Forecast only1 Q3 212 Protected by Waratek1 No exploit published1 High1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked1 Exploited1 Forecast only1 Q4 211 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 Q1 221 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1 Q2 222 Protected by Waratek2 Critical2 blocked by ARMR today2 Exploited2

Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21Q2 22

11 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.

CVE	Severity	Published▾	Status	Exploitation	Description
CVE-2022-22965	Critical	2022-04-01	Protected by Waratek	Exploited	A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.
CVE-2022-22963	Critical	2022-04-01	Protected by Waratek	Exploited	In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources.
CVE-2021-42392	Critical	2022-01-10	Protected by Waratek	Working exploit published	The org.h2.util.JdbcUtils.getConnection method of the H2 database takes as parameters the class name of the driver and URL of the database. An attacker may pass a JNDI driver name and a URL leading to a LDAP or RMI servers, causing remote code execution. This can be exploited through various attack vectors, most notably through the H2 Console which leads to unauthenticated remote code execution.
CVE-2021-45105	Medium	2021-12-18	Protected by Waratek	Exploited	Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.
CVE-2021-39144	High	2021-08-23	Protected by Waratek	Exploited	XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker has sufficient rights to execute commands of the host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose.
CVE-2021-33037	Medium	2021-07-12	No exploit published	Forecast only	Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding.
CVE-2021-28169	Medium	2021-06-09	Mitigation candidate	Exploited	For Eclipse Jetty versions <= 9.4.40, <= 10.0.2, <= 11.0.2, it is possible for requests to the ConcatServlet with a doubly encoded path to access protected resources within the WEB-INF directory. For example a request to `/concat?/%2557EB-INF/web.xml` can retrieve the web.xml file. This can reveal sensitive information regarding the implementation of a web application.
CVE-2021-28165	High	2021-04-01	No exploit published	Forecast only	In Eclipse Jetty 7.2.2 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.1, CPU usage can reach 100% upon receiving a large invalid TLS frame.
CVE-2020-13935	High	2020-07-14	Mitigation candidate	Working exploit published	The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated in Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56 and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service.
CVE-2020-9484	High	2020-05-20	Protected by Waratek	Working exploit published	When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed.
CVE-2019-3799	Medium	2019-05-06	Protected by Waratek	Working exploit published	Spring Cloud Config, versions 2.1.x prior to 2.1.2, versions 2.0.x prior to 2.0.4, and versions 1.4.x prior to 1.4.6, and older unsupported versions allow applications to serve arbitrary configuration files through the spring-cloud-config-server module. A malicious user, or attacker, can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack.

CVE

Severity

Published▾

Status

Exploitation

Description

CVE-2022-22965

Critical

2022-04-01

Protected by Waratek

Exploited

A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.

CVE-2022-22963

Critical

2022-04-01

Protected by Waratek

Exploited

In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources.

CVE-2021-42392

Critical

2022-01-10

Protected by Waratek

Working exploit published

The org.h2.util.JdbcUtils.getConnection method of the H2 database takes as parameters the class name of the driver and URL of the database. An attacker may pass a JNDI driver name and a URL leading to a LDAP or RMI servers, causing remote code execution. This can be exploited through various attack vectors, most notably through the H2 Console which leads to unauthenticated remote code execution.

CVE-2021-45105

Medium

2021-12-18

Protected by Waratek

Exploited

Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.

CVE-2021-39144

High

2021-08-23

Protected by Waratek

Exploited

XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker has sufficient rights to execute commands of the host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose.

CVE-2021-33037

Medium

2021-07-12

No exploit published

Forecast only

Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding.

CVE-2021-28169

Medium

2021-06-09

Mitigation candidate

Exploited

For Eclipse Jetty versions <= 9.4.40, <= 10.0.2, <= 11.0.2, it is possible for requests to the ConcatServlet with a doubly encoded path to access protected resources within the WEB-INF directory. For example a request to `/concat?/%2557EB-INF/web.xml` can retrieve the web.xml file. This can reveal sensitive information regarding the implementation of a web application.

CVE-2021-28165

High

2021-04-01

No exploit published

Forecast only

In Eclipse Jetty 7.2.2 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.1, CPU usage can reach 100% upon receiving a large invalid TLS frame.

CVE-2020-13935

High

2020-07-14

Mitigation candidate

Working exploit published

The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated in Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56 and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service.

CVE-2020-9484

High

2020-05-20

Protected by Waratek

Working exploit published

When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed.

CVE-2019-3799

Medium

2019-05-06

Protected by Waratek

Working exploit published

Spring Cloud Config, versions 2.1.x prior to 2.1.2, versions 2.0.x prior to 2.0.4, and versions 1.4.x prior to 1.4.6, and older unsupported versions allow applications to serve arbitrary configuration files through the spring-cloud-config-server module. A malicious user, or attacker, can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack.