CWE-918 CVEs
186 CVEs, 10 exploited, 24 protected by Waratek
Overview 186 matches · 24 protected · 10 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 18 public PoC · 6 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
24
12.9%
Rule in development
7
3.8%
Mitigation candidate
8
4.3%
No exploit published
147
79.0%
blocked by ARMR today
24
12.9%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
162
87.1%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 68 / year
20151
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20160
20174
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published1
High3
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
201811
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published8
High3
Medium8
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked8
No public exploit11
201911
Protected by Waratek1
Rule in development1
No exploit published9
Critical4
High1
Medium6
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked10
Exploited1
No public exploit10
20208
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published5
Critical1
High4
Medium3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked6
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit6
202113
Protected by Waratek1
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published10
Critical3
High7
Medium3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked12
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit11
202219
Protected by Waratek2
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published14
Critical5
High9
Medium5
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked17
Exploited1
Proof of concept only4
No public exploit14
202314
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published12
Critical6
High4
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked13
Exploited1
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit11
202414
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published11
Critical6
High5
Medium2
Low1
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked11
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit11
202523
Protected by Waratek3
Rule in development4
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published14
Critical3
High6
Medium11
Low3
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked20
Exploited5
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit14
202668
Protected by Waratek5
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published62
Critical11
High23
Medium30
Low2
Unknown2
blocked by ARMR today5
not blocked63
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only10
No public exploit57
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-22262 | High | 2024-04-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Applications that use UriComponentsBuilder to parse an externally provided URL (e.g. through a query parameter) AND perform validation checks on the host of the parsed URL may be vulnerable to a open redirect https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/601.html attack or to a SSRF attack if the URL is used after passing validation checks. This is the same as CVE-2024-22259 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22259 and CVE-2024-22243 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22243 , but with different input. |
| CVE-2024-1233 | High | 2024-04-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in` JwtValidator.resolvePublicKey` in JBoss EAP, where the validator checks jku and sends a HTTP request. During this process, no whitelisting or other filtering behavior is performed on the destination URL address, which may result in a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-28752 | Critical | 2024-03-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A SSRF vulnerability using the Aegis DataBinding in versions of Apache CXF before 4.0.4, 3.6.3 and 3.5.8 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any type. Users of other data bindings (including the default databinding) are not impacted. |
| CVE-2024-24113 | High | 2024-02-08 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | xxl-job =< 2.4.1 has a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, which causes low-privileged users to control executor to RCE. |
| CVE-2023-51441 | High | 2024-01-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Axis allowed users with access to the admin service to perform possible SSRF This issue affects Apache Axis: through 1.3. As Axis 1 has been EOL we recommend you migrate to a different SOAP engine, such as Apache Axis 2/Java. Alternatively you could use a build of Axis with the patch from https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/685c309febc64aa393b2d64a05f90e7eb9f73e06 applied. The Apache Axis project does not expect to create an Axis 1.x release fixing this problem, though contributors that would like to work towards this are welcome. |
| CVE-2023-48910 | Critical | 2023-12-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Microcks up to 1.17.1 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /jobs and /artifact/download. This vulnerability allows attackers to access network resources and sensitive information via a crafted GET request. |
| CVE-2023-48240 | Critical | 2023-11-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform. The rendered diff in XWiki embeds images to be able to compare the contents and not display a difference for an actually unchanged image. For this, XWiki requests all embedded images on the server side. These requests are also sent for images from other domains and include all cookies that were sent in the original request to ensure that images with restricted view right can be compared. Starting in version 11.10.1 and prior to versions 14.10.15, 15.5.1, and 15.6, this allows an attacker to steal login and session cookies that allow impersonating the current user who views the diff. The attack can be triggered with an image that references the rendered diff, thus making it easy to trigger. Apart from stealing login cookies, this also allows server-side request forgery (the result of any successful request is returned in the image's source) and viewing protected content as once a resource is cached, it is returned for all users. As only successful requests are cached, the cache will be filled by the first user who is allowed to access the resource. This has been patched in XWiki 14.10.15, 15.5.1 and 15.6. The rendered diff now only downloads images from trusted domains. Further, cookies are only sent when the image's domain is the same the requested domain. The cache has been changed to be specific for each user. As a workaround, the image embedding feature can be disabled by deleting `xwiki-platform-diff-xml-<version>.jar` in `WEB-INF/lib/`. |
| CVE-2023-46502 | Critical | 2023-10-30 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | An issue in openCRX v.5.2.2 allows a remote attacker to read internal files and execute server side request forgery attack via insecure DocumentBuilderFactory. |
| CVE-2023-43795 | Critical | 2023-10-25 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | GeoServer is an open source software server written in Java that allows users to share and edit geospatial data. The OGC Web Processing Service (WPS) specification is designed to process information from any server using GET and POST requests. This presents the opportunity for Server Side Request Forgery. This vulnerability has been patched in version 2.22.5 and 2.23.2. |
| CVE-2023-41339 | High | 2023-10-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | GeoServer is an open source software server written in Java that allows users to share and edit geospatial data. The WMS specification defines an ``sld=<url>`` parameter for GetMap, GetLegendGraphic and GetFeatureInfo operations for user supplied "dynamic styling". Enabling the use of dynamic styles, without also configuring URL checks, provides the opportunity for Service Side Request Forgery. This vulnerability can be used to steal user NetNTLMv2 hashes which could be relayed or cracked externally to gain further access. This vulnerability has been patched in versions 2.22.5 and 2.23.2. |
| CVE-2023-25753 | Medium | 2023-10-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | There exists an SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) vulnerability located at the /sandbox/proxyGateway endpoint. This vulnerability allows us to manipulate arbitrary requests and retrieve corresponding responses by inputting any URL into the requestUrl parameter. Of particular concern is our ability to exert control over the HTTP method, cookies, IP address, and headers. This effectively grants us the capability to dispatch complete HTTP requests to hosts of our choosing. This issue affects Apache ShenYu: 2.5.1. Upgrade to Apache ShenYu 2.6.0 or apply patch https://github.com/apache/shenyu/pull/4776 . |
| CVE-2023-41937 | High | 2023-09-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Bitbucket Push and Pull Request Plugin 2.4.0 through 2.8.3 (both inclusive) trusts values provided in the webhook payload, including certain URLs, and uses configured Bitbucket credentials to connect to those URLs, allowing attackers to capture Bitbucket credentials stored in Jenkins by sending a crafted webhook payload. |
| CVE-2023-41327 | Medium | 2023-09-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | WireMock is a tool for mocking HTTP services. WireMock can be configured to only permit proxying (and therefore recording) to certain addresses. This is achieved via a list of allowed address rules and a list of denied address rules, where the allowed list is evaluated first. Until WireMock Webhooks Extension 3.0.0-beta-15, the filtering of target addresses from the proxy mode DID NOT work for Webhooks, so the users were potentially vulnerable regardless of the `limitProxyTargets` settings. Via the WireMock webhooks configuration, POST requests from a webhook might be forwarded to an arbitrary service reachable from WireMock’s instance. For example, If someone is running the WireMock docker Container inside a private cluster, they can trigger internal POST requests against unsecured APIs or even against secure ones by passing a token, discovered using another exploit, via authentication headers. This issue has been addressed in versions 2.35.1 and 3.0.3 of wiremock. Wiremock studio has been discontinued and will not see a fix. Users unable to upgrade should use external firewall rules to define the list of permitted destinations. |
| CVE-2022-44730 | Medium | 2023-08-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache XML Graphics Batik.This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik: 1.16. A malicious SVG can probe user profile / data and send it directly as parameter to a URL. |
| CVE-2022-44729 | High | 2023-08-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache XML Graphics Batik.This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik: 1.16. On version 1.16, a malicious SVG could trigger loading external resources by default, causing resource consumption or in some cases even information disclosure. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.17 or later. |
| CVE-2022-41401 | Medium | 2023-08-04 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | OpenRefine <= v3.5.2 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, which permits unauthorized users to exploit the system, potentially leading to unauthorized access to internal resources and sensitive file disclosure. |
| CVE-2023-3432 | Critical | 2023-06-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository plantuml/plantuml prior to 1.2023.9. |
| CVE-2023-27162 | Critical | 2023-03-31 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | openapi-generator up to v6.4.0 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /api/gen/clients/{language}. This vulnerability allows attackers to access network resources and sensitive information via a crafted API request. |
| CVE-2022-4492 | High | 2023-02-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol. |
| CVE-2022-4725 | Critical | 2022-12-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in AWS SDK 2.59.0. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function XpathUtils of the file aws-android-sdk-core/src/main/java/com/amazonaws/util/XpathUtils.java of the component XML Parser. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. Upgrading to version 2.59.1 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is c3e6d69422e1f0c80fe53f2d757b8df97619af2b. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-216737 was assigned to this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-46364 | Critical | 2022-12-13 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | A SSRF vulnerability in parsing the href attribute of XOP:Include in MTOM requests in versions of Apache CXF before 3.5.5 and 3.4.10 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any type. |
| CVE-2022-43183 | High | 2022-11-17 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | XXL-Job before v2.3.1 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /admin/controller/JobLogController.java. |
| CVE-2022-42890 | High | 2022-10-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to run Java code from untrusted SVG via JavaScript. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics prior to 1.16. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.16. |
| CVE-2022-41704 | High | 2022-10-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to run untrusted Java code from an SVG. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics prior to 1.16. It is recommended to update to version 1.16. |
| CVE-2022-35282 | Medium | 2022-09-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, an attacker with local network access could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. |
| CVE-2022-23464 | High | 2022-09-24 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | Nepxion Discovery is a solution for Spring Cloud. Discovery is vulnerable to a potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). RouterResourceImpl uses RestTemplate’s getForEntity to retrieve the contents of a URL containing user-controlled input, potentially resulting in Information Disclosure. There is no patch available for this issue at time of publication. There are no known workarounds. |
| CVE-2022-40146 | High | 2022-09-22 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to access files using a Jar url. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. |
| CVE-2022-38648 | Medium | 2022-09-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to fetch external resources. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. |
| CVE-2022-38398 | Medium | 2022-09-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to load a url thru the jar protocol. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. |
| CVE-2022-36663 | Critical | 2022-09-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Gluu Oxauth before v4.4.1 allows attackers to execute blind SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) attacks via a crafted request_uri parameter. |
| CVE-2020-23622 | High | 2022-08-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An issue in the UPnP protocol in 4thline cling 2.0.0 through 2.1.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via an unchecked CALLBACK parameter in the request header |
| CVE-2022-32533 | Critical | 2022-07-06 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Jetspeed-2 does not sufficiently filter untrusted user input by default leading to a number of issues including XSS, CSRF, XXE, and SSRF. Setting the configuration option "xss.filter.post = true" may mitigate these issues. NOTE: Apache Jetspeed is a dormant project of Apache Portals and no updates will be provided for this issue |
| CVE-2022-24969 | Medium | 2022-06-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | bypass CVE-2021-25640 > In Apache Dubbo prior to 2.6.12 and 2.7.15, the usage of parseURL method will lead to the bypass of the white host check which can cause open redirect or SSRF vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-29631 | High | 2022-06-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jodd HTTP v6.0.9 was discovered to contain multiple CLRF injection vulnerabilities via the components jodd.http.HttpRequest#set and `jodd.http.HttpRequest#send. These vulnerabilities allow attackers to execute Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via a crafted TCP payload. |
| CVE-2021-40822 | High | 2022-05-02 | Rule in development | Exploited | GeoServer through 2.18.5 and 2.19.x through 2.19.2 allows SSRF via the option for setting a proxy host. |
| CVE-2022-27201 | Medium | 2022-03-15 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins Semantic Versioning Plugin 1.13 and earlier does not restrict execution of an controller/agent message to agents, and implements no limitations about the file path that can be parsed, allowing attackers able to control agent processes to have Jenkins parse a crafted file that uses external entities for extraction of secrets from the Jenkins controller or server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2022-0671 | Critical | 2022-02-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in vscode-xml in versions prior to 0.19.0. Schema download could lead to blind SSRF or DoS via a large file. |
| CVE-2021-27738 | High | 2022-01-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | All request mappings in `StreamingCoordinatorController.java` handling `/kylin/api/streaming_coordinator/*` REST API endpoints did not include any security checks, which allowed an unauthenticated user to issue arbitrary requests, such as assigning/unassigning of streaming cubes, creation/modification and deletion of replica sets, to the Kylin Coordinator. For endpoints accepting node details in HTTP message body, unauthenticated (but limited) server-side request forgery (SSRF) can be achieved. This issue affects Apache Kylin Apache Kylin 3 versions prior to 3.1.2. |
| CVE-2021-41084 | High | 2021-09-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | http4s is an open source scala interface for HTTP. In affected versions http4s is vulnerable to response-splitting or request-splitting attacks when untrusted user input is used to create any of the following fields: Header names (`Header.name`å), Header values (`Header.value`), Status reason phrases (`Status.reason`), URI paths (`Uri.Path`), URI authority registered names (`URI.RegName`) (through 0.21). This issue has been resolved in versions 0.21.30, 0.22.5, 0.23.4, and 1.0.0-M27 perform the following. As a matter of practice http4s services and client applications should sanitize any user input in the aforementioned fields before returning a request or response to the backend. The carriage return, newline, and null characters are the most threatening. |
| CVE-2020-21122 | Medium | 2021-09-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | UReport v2.2.9 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the designer page which allows attackers to detect intranet device ports. |
| CVE-2021-39152 | High | 2021-08-23 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream with a Java runtime version 14 to 8. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the [Security Framework](https://x-stream.github.io/security.html#framework), you will have to use at least version 1.4.18. |
| CVE-2021-39150 | High | 2021-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream with a Java runtime version 14 to 8. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the [Security Framework](https://x-stream.github.io/security.html#framework), you will have to use at least version 1.4.18. |
| CVE-2021-25640 | Medium | 2021-06-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Dubbo prior to 2.6.9 and 2.7.9, the usage of parseURL method will lead to the bypass of white host check which can cause open redirect or SSRF vulnerability. |
| CVE-2021-27905 | Critical | 2021-04-13 | Rule in development | Working exploit published | The ReplicationHandler (normally registered at "/replication" under a Solr core) in Apache Solr has a "masterUrl" (also "leaderUrl" alias) parameter that is used to designate another ReplicationHandler on another Solr core to replicate index data into the local core. To prevent a SSRF vulnerability, Solr ought to check these parameters against a similar configuration it uses for the "shards" parameter. Prior to this bug getting fixed, it did not. This problem affects essentially all Solr versions prior to it getting fixed in 8.8.2. |
| CVE-2021-20480 | Medium | 2021-04-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, and 8.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. IBM X-Force ID: 197502. |
| CVE-2021-22696 | High | 2021-04-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | CXF supports (via JwtRequestCodeFilter) passing OAuth 2 parameters via a JWT token as opposed to query parameters (see: The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR)). Instead of sending a JWT token as a "request" parameter, the spec also supports specifying a URI from which to retrieve a JWT token from via the "request_uri" parameter. CXF was not validating the "request_uri" parameter (apart from ensuring it uses "https) and was making a REST request to the parameter in the request to retrieve a token. This means that CXF was vulnerable to DDos attacks on the authorization server, as specified in section 10.4.1 of the spec. This issue affects Apache CXF versions prior to 3.4.3; Apache CXF versions prior to 3.3.10. |
| CVE-2021-26715 | Critical | 2021-03-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The OpenID Connect server implementation for MITREid Connect through 1.3.3 contains a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The vulnerability arises due to unsafe usage of the logo_uri parameter in the Dynamic Client Registration request. An unauthenticated attacker can make a HTTP request from the vulnerable server to any address in the internal network and obtain its response (which might, for example, have a JavaScript payload for resultant XSS). The issue can be exploited to bypass network boundaries, obtain sensitive data, or attack other hosts in the internal network. |
| CVE-2021-21349 | High | 2021-03-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.16, there is a vulnerability which may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.16. |
| CVE-2021-21342 | Critical | 2021-03-23 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.16, there is a vulnerability where the processed stream at unmarshalling time contains type information to recreate the formerly written objects. XStream creates therefore new instances based on these type information. An attacker can manipulate the processed input stream and replace or inject objects, that result in a server-side forgery request. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.16. |
| CVE-2020-11988 | High | 2021-02-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache XmlGraphics Commons 2.4 and earlier is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the XMPParser. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. Users should upgrade to 2.6 or later. |
| CVE-2020-11987 | High | 2021-02-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Batik 1.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the NodePickerPanel. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. |
| CVE-2020-26258 | High | 2020-12-16 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.15, a Server-Side Forgery Request vulnerability can be activated when unmarshalling. The vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.15. The reported vulnerability does not exist if running Java 15 or higher. No user is affected who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's Security Framework with a whitelist! Anyone relying on XStream's default blacklist can immediately switch to a whilelist for the allowed types to avoid the vulnerability. Users of XStream 1.4.14 or below who still want to use XStream default blacklist can use a workaround described in more detailed in the referenced advisories. |
| CVE-2020-10770 | Medium | 2020-12-15 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | A flaw was found in Keycloak before 13.0.0, where it is possible to force the server to call out an unverified URL using the OIDC parameter request_uri. This flaw allows an attacker to use this parameter to execute a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. |
| CVE-2019-17566 | High | 2020-11-12 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Batik is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the "xlink:href" attributes. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. |
| CVE-2020-9298 | High | 2020-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Spinnaker template resolution functionality is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), which allows an attacker to send requests on behalf of Spinnaker potentially leading to sensitive data disclosure. |
| CVE-2020-11980 | Medium | 2020-06-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Karaf, JMX authentication takes place using JAAS and authorization takes place using ACL files. By default, only an "admin" can actually invoke on an MBean. However there is a vulnerability there for someone who is not an admin, but has a "viewer" role. In the 'etc/jmx.acl.cfg', such as role can call get*. It's possible to authenticate as a viewer role + invokes on the MLet getMBeansFromURL method, which goes off to a remote server to fetch the desired MBean, which is then registered in Karaf. At this point the attack fails as "viewer" doesn't have the permission to invoke on the MBean. Still, it could act as a SSRF style attack and also it essentially allows a "viewer" role to pollute the MBean registry, which is a kind of privilege escalation. The vulnerability is low as it's possible to add a ACL to limit access. Users should update to Apache Karaf 4.2.9 or newer. |
| CVE-2020-13226 | Critical | 2020-05-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | WSO2 API Manager 3.0.0 does not properly restrict outbound network access from a Publisher node, opening up the possibility of SSRF to this node's entire intranet. |
| CVE-2020-4365 | Medium | 2020-05-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery. By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. IBM X-Force ID: 178964. |
| CVE-2020-1925 | High | 2020-01-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Olingo versions 4.0.0 to 4.7.0 provide the AsyncRequestWrapperImpl class which reads a URL from the Location header, and then sends a GET or DELETE request to this URL. It may allow to implement a SSRF attack. If an attacker tricks a client to connect to a malicious server, the server can make the client call any URL including internal resources which are not directly accessible by the attacker. |
| CVE-2019-18394 | Critical | 2019-10-24 | Rule in development | Exploited | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in FaviconServlet.java in Ignite Realtime Openfire through 4.4.2 allows attackers to send arbitrary HTTP GET requests. |
| CVE-2019-9827 | Critical | 2019-07-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Hawt Hawtio through 2.5.0 is vulnerable to SSRF, allowing a remote attacker to trigger an HTTP request from an affected server to an arbitrary host via the initial /proxy/ substring of a URI. |
| CVE-2019-10686 | Critical | 2019-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An SSRF vulnerability was found in an API from Ctrip Apollo through 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT. An attacker may use it to do an intranet port scan or raise a GET request via /system-info/health because the %23 substring is mishandled. |
| CVE-2017-3164 | High | 2019-03-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server Side Request Forgery in Apache Solr, versions 1.3 until 7.6 (inclusive). Since the "shards" parameter does not have a corresponding whitelist mechanism, a remote attacker with access to the server could make Solr perform an HTTP GET request to any reachable URL. |
| CVE-2019-1003028 | Medium | 2019-02-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins JMS Messaging Plugin 1.1.1 and earlier in SSLCertificateAuthenticationMethod.java, UsernameAuthenticationMethod.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to have Jenkins connect to a JMS endpoint. |
| CVE-2019-1003027 | Medium | 2019-02-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins OctopusDeploy Plugin 1.8.1 and earlier in OctopusDeployPlugin.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to have Jenkins connect to an attacker-specified URL and obtain the HTTP response code if successful, and exception error message otherwise. |
| CVE-2019-1003026 | Medium | 2019-02-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins Mattermost Notification Plugin 2.6.2 and earlier in MattermostNotifier.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to have Jenkins connect to an attacker-specified Mattermost server and room and send a message. |
| CVE-2019-1003020 | Medium | 2019-02-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins Kanboard Plugin 1.5.10 and earlier in KanboardGlobalConfiguration.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to submit a GET request to an attacker-specified URL. |
| CVE-2018-1000422 | Medium | 2019-01-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins Crowd 2 Integration Plugin 2.0.0 and earlier in CrowdSecurityRealm.java that allows attackers to have Jenkins perform a connection test, connecting to an attacker-specified server with attacker-specified credentials and connection settings. |
| CVE-2018-1000421 | Medium | 2019-01-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins Mesos Plugin 0.17.1 and earlier in MesosCloud.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read access to initiate a test connection to an attacker-specified Mesos server with attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2018-14721 | Critical | 2019-01-02 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.7 might allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks by leveraging failure to block the axis2-jaxws class from polymorphic deserialization. |
| CVE-2018-1999039 | Medium | 2018-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins Confluence Publisher Plugin 2.0.1 and earlier in ConfluenceSite.java that allows attackers to have Jenkins submit login requests to an attacker-specified Confluence server URL with attacker specified credentials. |
| CVE-2018-1999026 | Medium | 2018-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins TraceTronic ECU-TEST Plugin 2.3 and earlier in ATXPublisher.java that allows attackers to have Jenkins send HTTP requests to an attacker-specified host. |
| CVE-2018-1000606 | Medium | 2018-06-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins URLTrigger Plugin 0.41 and earlier in URLTrigger.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read access to cause Jenkins to send a GET request to a specified URL. |
| CVE-2018-1000188 | Medium | 2018-06-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins CAS Plugin 1.4.1 and older in CasSecurityRealm.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read access to cause Jenkins to send a GET request to a specified URL. |
| CVE-2018-1000185 | Medium | 2018-06-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins GitHub Branch Source Plugin 2.3.4 and older in Endpoint.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read access to cause Jenkins to send a GET request to a specified URL. |
| CVE-2018-1000184 | Medium | 2018-06-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins GitHub Plugin 1.29.0 and older in GitHubPluginConfig.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read access to cause Jenkins to send a GET request to a specified URL. |
| CVE-2018-1000182 | Medium | 2018-06-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins Git Plugin 3.9.0 and older in AssemblaWeb.java, GitBlitRepositoryBrowser.java, Gitiles.java, TFS2013GitRepositoryBrowser.java, ViewGitWeb.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read access to cause Jenkins to send a GET request to a specified URL. |
| CVE-2018-1000067 | Medium | 2018-02-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins versions 2.106 and earlier, and LTS 2.89.3 and earlier, that allows an attacker to have Jenkins submit HTTP GET requests and get limited information about the response. |
| CVE-2018-1000056 | High | 2018-02-09 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins JUnit Plugin 1.23 and earlier processes XML external entities in files it parses as part of the build process, allowing attackers with user permissions in Jenkins to extract secrets from the Jenkins master, perform server-side request forgery, or denial-of-service attacks. |
| CVE-2018-1000055 | High | 2018-02-09 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins Android Lint Plugin 2.5 and earlier processes XML external entities in files it parses as part of the build process, allowing attackers with user permissions in Jenkins to extract secrets from the Jenkins master, perform server-side request forgery, or denial-of-service attacks. |
| CVE-2018-1000054 | High | 2018-02-09 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins CCM Plugin 3.1 and earlier processes XML external entities in files it parses as part of the build process, allowing attackers with user permissions in Jenkins to extract secrets from the Jenkins master, perform server-side request forgery, or denial-of-service attacks. |
| CVE-2017-3546 | Medium | 2017-04-24 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools component of Oracle PeopleSoft Products (subcomponent: MultiChannel Framework). Supported versions that are affected are 8.54 and 8.55. Easily "exploitable" vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools accessible data. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2016-7051 | High | 2017-04-14 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | XmlMapper in the Jackson XML dataformat component (aka jackson-dataformat-xml) before 2.7.8 and 2.8.x before 2.8.4 allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via vectors related to a DTD. |
| CVE-2017-5643 | High | 2017-03-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Camel's Validation Component is vulnerable against SSRF via remote DTDs and XXE. |
| CVE-2017-5617 | High | 2017-03-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The SVG Salamander (aka svgSalamander) library, when used in a web application, allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via an xlink:href attribute in an SVG file. |
| CVE-2015-1775 | Medium | 2015-11-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the proxy endpoint (api/v1/proxy) in Apache Ambari before 2.1.0 allows remote authenticated users to conduct port scans and access unsecured services via a crafted REST call. |