Critical CWE-434 CVEs
13 CVEs, 2 exploited, 9 protected by Waratek
Overview 13 matches · 9 protected · 2 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
9
69.2%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
7.7%
No exploit published
3
23.1%
blocked by ARMR today
9
69.2%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4
30.8%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
15.4%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
1
7.7%
Forecast only
1
7.7%
No public exploit
9
69.2%
split by
peak 3 / year
20161
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20170
20180
20191
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
20200
20213
Protected by Waratek3
Critical3
blocked by ARMR today3
Forecast only1
No public exploit2
20221
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
20233
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published1
Critical3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked1
No public exploit3
20241
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20250
20263
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published2
Critical3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
No public exploit3
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-3418 | Critical | 2026-08-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The System REST API accepts user-supplied file uploads without enforcing sufficient validation on the file type or destination, allowing files to be written to arbitrary server-accessible locations. Exploitation requires authenticated administrative access with publisher privileges. Successful exploitation permits an authenticated publisher to upload files to server-accessible locations. Depending on the deployment environment and how uploaded files are handled, this could lead to the execution of uploaded content, potentially resulting in remote code execution. |
| CVE-2026-24014 | Critical | 2026-07-06 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache IoTDB DataNode’s internal RPC interface for creating Trigger instances uses the uploaded Trigger JAR name to build a file path without sufficient validation. If the internal DataNode RPC port is exposed to an untrusted network, an attacker may use path traversal sequences in the JAR name to write files outside the intended Trigger installation directory. This could allow arbitrary file write with the permissions of the IoTDB process. This issue affects Apache IoTDB: from 1.3.3 before 2.0.8. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.8, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2025-13590 | Critical | 2026-02-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A malicious actor with administrative privileges can upload an arbitrary file to a user-controlled location within the deployment via a system REST API. Successful uploads may lead to remote code execution. By leveraging the vulnerability, a malicious actor may perform Remote Code Execution by uploading a specially crafted payload. |
| CVE-2024-53677 | Critical | 2024-12-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | File upload logic in Apache Struts is flawed. An attacker can manipulate file upload params to enable paths traversal and under some circumstances this can lead to uploading a malicious file which can be used to perform Remote Code Execution. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 before 6.4.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.4.0 at least and migrate to the new file upload mechanism https://struts.apache.org/core-developers/file-upload . If you are not using an old file upload logic based on FileuploadInterceptor your application is safe. You can find more details in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-067 |
| CVE-2022-45802 | Critical | 2023-05-01 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Streampark allows any users to upload a jar as application, but there is no mandatory verification of the uploaded file type, causing users to upload some high-risk files, and may upload them to any directory, Users of the affected versions should upgrade to Apache StreamPark 2.0.0 or later |
| CVE-2023-27603 | Critical | 2023-04-10 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Apache Linkis <=1.3.1, due to the Manager module engineConn material upload does not check the zip path, This is a Zip Slip issue, which will lead to a potential RCE vulnerability. We recommend users upgrade the version of Linkis to version 1.3.2. |
| CVE-2023-27602 | Critical | 2023-04-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Linkis <=1.3.1, The PublicService module uploads files without restrictions on the path to the uploaded files, and file types. We recommend users upgrade the version of Linkis to version 1.3.2. For versions <=1.3.1, we suggest turning on the file path check switch in linkis.properties `wds.linkis.workspace.filesystem.owner.check=true` `wds.linkis.workspace.filesystem.path.check=true` |
| CVE-2022-34115 | Critical | 2022-07-22 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | DataEase v1.11.1 was discovered to contain a arbitrary file write vulnerability via the parameter dataSourceId. |
| CVE-2021-21350 | Critical | 2021-03-23 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.16, there is a vulnerability which may allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.16. |
| CVE-2021-21347 | Critical | 2021-03-23 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.16, there is a vulnerability which may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.16. |
| CVE-2021-21344 | Critical | 2021-03-23 | Protected by Waratek | Forecast only | XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.16, there is a vulnerability which may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.16. |
| CVE-2019-12409 | Critical | 2019-11-18 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | The 8.1.1 and 8.2.0 releases of Apache Solr contain an insecure setting for the ENABLE_REMOTE_JMX_OPTS configuration option in the default solr.in.sh configuration file shipping with Solr. If you use the default solr.in.sh file from the affected releases, then JMX monitoring will be enabled and exposed on RMI_PORT (default=18983), without any authentication. If this port is opened for inbound traffic in your firewall, then anyone with network access to your Solr nodes will be able to access JMX, which may in turn allow them to upload malicious code for execution on the Solr server. |
| CVE-2016-3088 | Critical | 2016-06-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Fileserver web application in Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.14.0 allows remote attackers to upload and execute arbitrary files via an HTTP PUT followed by an HTTP MOVE request. |