Medium CWE-290 CVEs
12 CVEs, 1 exploited, 1 protected by Waratek
Overview 12 matches · 1 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
1
8.3%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
8.3%
No exploit published
10
83.3%
blocked by ARMR today
1
8.3%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
11
91.7%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
8.3%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
11
91.7%
split by
peak 4 / year
20201
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20210
20221
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20231
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20242
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
No public exploit2
20254
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published3
Medium4
not blocked4
Exploited1
No public exploit3
20263
No exploit published3
Medium3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
2020202120222023202420252026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-92899 | Medium | 2026-09-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache WSS4J remembers the Nonce of each UsernameToken it accepts, so a captured token cannot be reused. It stored the Nonce as raw base64 text, but authentication decodes that text and uses the bytes.The same bytes can be written as base64 in several ways. An attacker who captured an authenticated request could re-send it with a space added to the Nonce: the password digest still verified, but the token no longer matched the remembered one, so the replay was accepted. Since a UsernameToken does not cover the message body, the captured token could then be reused on requests of the attacker's choosing until it expired. Affects deployments with a nonce replay cache configured, as Apache CXF has by default, and only tokens using a password digest. The cache is now keyed on the decoded Nonce. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.0.2 or 3.0.6 or 2.4.4, which fix this issue. |
| CVE-2026-85511 | Medium | 2026-09-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in EAP's Elytron. An EAP application whose security domain is backed by an Elytron token-realm with oauth2-introspection would allow parameter substitution due to missing URL encoding. |
| CVE-2026-61217 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Security Service product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Oracle SSL API). The supported version that is affected is 12.2.1.4.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via TLS to compromise Oracle Security Service. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Security Service accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Security Service accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2025-5605 | Medium | 2025-10-24 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the Management Console of multiple WSO2 products. A malicious actor with access to the console can manipulate the request URI to bypass authentication and access certain restricted resources, resulting in partial information disclosure. The known exposure from this issue is limited to memory statistics. While the vulnerability does not allow full account compromise, it still enables unauthorized access to internal system details. |
| CVE-2025-59154 | Medium | 2025-09-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Openfire is an XMPP server licensed under the Open Source Apache License. Openfire’s SASL EXTERNAL mechanism for client TLS authentication contains a vulnerability in how it extracts user identities from X.509 certificates. Instead of parsing the structured ASN.1 data, the code calls X509Certificate.getSubjectDN().getName() and applies a regex to look for CN=. This method produces a provider-dependent string that does not escape special characters. In SunJSSE (sun.security.x509.X500Name), for example, commas and equals signs inside attribute values are not escaped. As a result, a malicious certificate can embed CN= inside another attribute value (e.g. OU="CN=admin,"). The regex will incorrectly interpret this as a legitimate Common Name and extract admin. If SASL EXTERNAL is enabled and configured to map CNs to user accounts, this allows the attacker to impersonate another user. The fix is included in Openfire 5.0.2 and 5.1.0. |
| CVE-2025-22223 | Medium | 2025-03-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Security 6.4.0 - 6.4.3 may not correctly locate method security annotations on parameterized types or methods. This may cause an authorization bypass. You are not affected if you are not using @EnableMethodSecurity, or you do not have method security annotations on parameterized types or methods, or all method security annotations are attached to target methods |
| CVE-2024-23953 | Medium | 2025-01-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Use of Arrays.equals() in LlapSignerImpl in Apache Hive to compare message signatures allows attacker to forge a valid signature for an arbitrary message byte by byte. The attacker should be an authorized user of the product to perform this attack. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.0, which fixes this issue. The problem occurs when an application doesn’t use a constant-time algorithm for validating a signature. The method Arrays.equals() returns false right away when it sees that one of the input’s bytes are different. It means that the comparison time depends on the contents of the arrays. This little thing may allow an attacker to forge a valid signature for an arbitrary message byte by byte. So it might allow malicious users to submit splits/work with selected signatures to LLAP without running as a privileged user, potentially leading to DDoS attack. More details in the reference section. |
| CVE-2024-38807 | Medium | 2024-08-23 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Applications that use spring-boot-loader or spring-boot-loader-classic and contain custom code that performs signature verification of nested jar files may be vulnerable to signature forgery where content that appears to have been signed by one signer has, in fact, been signed by another. |
| CVE-2024-31863 | Medium | 2024-04-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability by replacing to exsiting notes in Apache Zeppelin.This issue affects Apache Zeppelin: from 0.10.1 before 0.11.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.11.0, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2023-41329 | Medium | 2023-09-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | WireMock is a tool for mocking HTTP services. The proxy mode of WireMock, can be protected by the network restrictions configuration, as documented in Preventing proxying to and recording from specific target addresses. These restrictions can be configured using the domain names, and in such a case the configuration is vulnerable to the DNS rebinding attacks. A similar patch was applied in WireMock 3.0.0-beta-15 for the WireMock Webhook Extensions. The root cause of the attack is a defect in the logic which allows for a race condition triggered by a DNS server whose address expires in between the initial validation and the outbound network request that might go to a domain that was supposed to be prohibited. Control over a DNS service is required to exploit this attack, so it has high execution complexity and limited impact. This issue has been addressed in version 2.35.1 of wiremock-jre8 and wiremock-jre8-standalone, version 3.0.3 of wiremock and wiremock-standalone, version 2.6.1 of the python version of wiremock, and versions 2.35.1-1 and 3.0.3-1 of the wiremock/wiremock Docker container. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should either configure firewall rules to define the list of permitted destinations or to configure WireMock to use IP addresses instead of the domain names. |
| CVE-2022-38712 | Medium | 2022-11-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | "IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 Web services could allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to conduct SOAPAction spoofing to execute unwanted or unauthorized operations. IBM X-Force ID: 234762." |
| CVE-2020-4421 | Medium | 2020-05-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Liberty 19.0.0.5 through 20.0.0.4 could allow an authenticated user using openidconnect to spoof another users identify. IBM X-Force ID: 180084. |