WaratekVRT Sign in

Medium Oracle Utilities Applications Tools (Apache Tomcat) CVEs

3 CVEs, 1 exploited, 1 protected by Waratek

Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Oracle product: Oracle Utilities Applications / Tools (Apache Tomcat)✕
Overview 3 matches · 1 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek 1 33.3% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 2 66.7%
Critical 0 0.0% High 0 0.0% Medium 3 100.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 1 33.3% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 2 66.7% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 1 33.3% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 1 33.3% No public exploit 1 33.3%
split by peak 1 / quarter
Q3 21Q4 21Q1 22Q2 22Q3 22Q4 22Q1 23
3 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2023-28708 Medium 2023-03-22 No exploit published No public exploit When using the RemoteIpFilter with requests received from a reverse proxy via HTTP that include the X-Forwarded-Proto header set to https, session cookies created by Apache Tomcat 11.0.0-M1 to 11.0.0.-M2, 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.5, 9.0.0-M1 to 9.0.71 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.85 did not include the secure attribute. This could result in the user agent transmitting the session cookie over an insecure channel. Older, EOL versions may also be affected.
CVE-2022-34305 Medium 2022-06-23 Protected by Waratek Exploited In Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.0-M16, 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.22, 9.0.30 to 9.0.64 and 8.5.50 to 8.5.81 the Form authentication example in the examples web application displayed user provided data without filtering, exposing a XSS vulnerability.
CVE-2021-33037 Medium 2021-07-12 No exploit published Forecast only Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding.