WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕ARMR rules: Filesystem✕EPSS ≥ 0.5✕
Overview 14 matches · 12 protected · 13 exploited · 9 CISA KEV
14matches 12protected85.7% 13exploited92.9% 9CISA KEV64.3%
Protected by Waratek 14 100.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 0 0.0% Not applicable 0 0.0% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 5 35.7% High 8 57.1% Medium 1 7.1% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 12 85.7% partly blocked 2 14.3% not blocked 0 0.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 13 92.9% Working exploit published 1 7.1% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 2 / year
Protected by Waratek: 14 Medium: 1High: 8Critical: 5 partly blocked: 2blocked by ARMR today: 12 Working exploit published: 1Exploited: 13
20101 Protected by Waratek1 High1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 20110 20121 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 20130 20141 Protected by Waratek1 High1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 20151 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 20161 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 20172 Protected by Waratek2 High2 partly blocked2 Exploited2 20180 20191 Protected by Waratek1 High1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 20200 20212 Protected by Waratek2 High1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today2 Exploited2 20221 Protected by Waratek1 High1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 20231 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 20241 Protected by Waratek1 High1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1 20251 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1
20112013201520172019202120232025
14 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2025-61757 Critical 2025-10-21 Protected by Waratek Exploited Vulnerability in the Identity Manager product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: REST WebServices). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Identity Manager. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Identity Manager. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
CVE-2024-38819 High 2024-12-19 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published Applications serving static resources through the functional web frameworks WebMvc.fn or WebFlux.fn are vulnerable to path traversal attacks. An attacker can craft malicious HTTP requests and obtain any file on the file system that is also accessible to the process in which the Spring application is running.
CVE-2023-37582 Critical 2023-07-12 Protected by Waratek Exploited The RocketMQ NameServer component still has a remote command execution vulnerability as the CVE-2023-33246 issue was not completely fixed in version 5.1.1. When NameServer address are leaked on the extranet and lack permission verification, an attacker can exploit this vulnerability by using the update configuration function on the NameServer component to execute commands as the system users that RocketMQ is running as. It is recommended for users to upgrade their NameServer version to 5.1.2 or above for RocketMQ 5.x or 4.9.7 or above for RocketMQ 4.x to prevent these attacks.
CVE-2022-21371 High 2022-01-19 Protected by Waratek Exploited Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.3.0.0, 12.2.1.3.0, 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.1.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebLogic Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle WebLogic Server accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).
CVE-2021-4104 High 2021-12-14 Protected by Waratek Exploited JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.
CVE-2021-34429 Medium 2021-07-15 Protected by Waratek Exploited For Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.37-9.4.42, 10.0.1-10.0.5 & 11.0.1-11.0.5, URIs can be crafted using some encoded characters to access the content of the WEB-INF directory and/or bypass some security constraints. This is a variation of the vulnerability reported in CVE-2021-28164/GHSA-v7ff-8wcx-gmc5.
CVE-2019-0193 High 2019-08-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited In Apache Solr, the DataImportHandler, an optional but popular module to pull in data from databases and other sources, has a feature in which the whole DIH configuration can come from a request's "dataConfig" parameter. The debug mode of the DIH admin screen uses this to allow convenient debugging / development of a DIH config. Since a DIH config can contain scripts, this parameter is a security risk. Starting with version 8.2.0 of Solr, use of this parameter requires setting the Java System property "enable.dih.dataConfigParam" to true.
CVE-2017-12617 High 2017-10-04 Protected by Waratek Exploited When running Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0, 8.5.0 to 8.5.22, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.46 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.81 with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the readonly initialisation parameter of the Default servlet to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server.
CVE-2017-12615 High 2017-09-19 Protected by Waratek Exploited When running Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 to 7.0.79 on Windows with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the readonly initialisation parameter of the Default to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server.
CVE-2016-3088 Critical 2016-06-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited The Fileserver web application in Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.14.0 allows remote attackers to upload and execute arbitrary files via an HTTP PUT followed by an HTTP MOVE request.
CVE-2015-1427 Critical 2015-02-17 Protected by Waratek Exploited The Groovy scripting engine in Elasticsearch before 1.3.8 and 1.4.x before 1.4.3 allows remote attackers to bypass the sandbox protection mechanism and execute arbitrary shell commands via a crafted script.
CVE-2014-3120 High 2014-07-28 Protected by Waratek Exploited The default configuration in Elasticsearch before 1.2 enables dynamic scripting, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary MVEL expressions and Java code via the source parameter to _search. NOTE: this only violates the vendor's intended security policy if the user does not run Elasticsearch in its own independent virtual machine.
CVE-2012-0391 Critical 2012-01-08 Protected by Waratek Exploited The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during certain exception handling for mismatched data types of properties, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code via a crafted parameter.
CVE-2010-1871 High 2010-08-05 Protected by Waratek Exploited JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for JBoss Expression Language (EL) expressions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when the Java Security Manager is not properly configured.