Oracle Critical Patch Update January 2026
Released January 2026 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, October 2025 · Critical Patch Update, April 2026 →
219 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
15Protected by Waratek2Mitigation candidate58No exploit published14Outside Waratek scope130Not applicable
6Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 26 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 6 matches · 4 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
4
66.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
2
33.3%
blocked by ARMR today
4
66.7%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
2
33.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
6
100.0%
split by
peak 1 / quarter
Q2 201
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q3 200
Q4 200
Q1 211
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q2 210
Q3 210
Q4 211
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q1 220
Q2 220
Q3 220
Q4 220
Q1 230
Q2 230
Q3 230
Q4 230
Q1 240
Q2 240
Q3 240
Q4 241
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q1 250
Q2 250
Q3 250
Q4 251
No exploit published1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 261
No exploit published1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 20Q1 21Q3 21Q1 22Q3 22Q1 23Q3 23Q1 24Q3 24Q1 25Q3 25Q1 26
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-21969 | Critical | 2026-01-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Supplier Portal). The supported version that is affected is 6.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2025-12383 | Critical | 2025-11-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Jersey versions 2.45, 3.0.16, 3.1.9 a race condition can cause ignoring of critical SSL configurations - such as mutual authentication, custom key/trust stores, and other security settings. This issue may result in SSLHandshakeException under normal circumstances, but under certain conditions, it could lead to unauthorized trust in insecure servers (see PoC) |
| CVE-2024-52046 | Critical | 2024-12-25 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The ObjectSerializationDecoder in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization protocol to process incoming serialized data but lacks the necessary security checks and defenses. This vulnerability allows attackers to exploit the deserialization process by sending specially crafted malicious serialized data, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE) attacks. This issue affects MINA core versions 2.0.X, 2.1.X and 2.2.X, and will be fixed by the releases 2.0.27, 2.1.10 and 2.2.4. It's also important to note that an application using MINA core library will only be affected if the IoBuffer#getObject() method is called, and this specific method is potentially called when adding a ProtocolCodecFilter instance using the ObjectSerializationCodecFactory class in the filter chain. If your application is specifically using those classes, you have to upgrade to the latest version of MINA core library. Upgrading will not be enough: you also need to explicitly allow the classes the decoder will accept in the ObjectSerializationDecoder instance, using one of the three new methods: /** * Accept class names where the supplied ClassNameMatcher matches for * deserialization, unless they are otherwise rejected. * * @param classNameMatcher the matcher to use */ public void accept(ClassNameMatcher classNameMatcher) /** * Accept class names that match the supplied pattern for * deserialization, unless they are otherwise rejected. * * @param pattern standard Java regexp */ public void accept(Pattern pattern) /** * Accept the wildcard specified classes for deserialization, * unless they are otherwise rejected. * * @param patterns Wildcard file name patterns as defined by * {@link org.apache.commons.io.FilenameUtils#wildcardMatch(String, String) FilenameUtils.wildcardMatch} */ public void accept(String... patterns) By default, the decoder will reject *all* classes that will be present in the incoming data. Note: The FtpServer, SSHd and Vysper sub-project are not affected by this issue. |
| CVE-2021-43113 | Critical | 2021-12-15 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | iTextPDF in iText 7 and up to (excluding 4.4.13.3) 7.1.17 allows command injection via a CompareTool filename that is mishandled on the gs (aka Ghostscript) command line in GhostscriptHelper.java. |
| CVE-2021-23926 | Critical | 2021-01-14 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The XML parsers used by XMLBeans up to version 2.6.0 did not set the properties needed to protect the user from malicious XML input. Vulnerabilities include possibilities for XML Entity Expansion attacks. Affects XMLBeans up to and including v2.6.0. |
| CVE-2020-10683 | Critical | 2020-05-01 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | dom4j before 2.0.3 and 2.1.x before 2.1.3 allows external DTDs and External Entities by default, which might enable XXE attacks. However, there is popular external documentation from OWASP showing how to enable the safe, non-default behavior in any application that uses dom4j. |