Oracle Critical Patch Update October 2023
Released October 2023 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, July 2023 · Critical Patch Update, January 2024 →
245 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
15Protected by Waratek3Mitigation candidate87No exploit published44Outside Waratek scope96Not applicable
8Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 35 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 117 matches · 46 in Waratek scope · 4 protected · 3 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 7 public PoC · 5 EPSS ≥ 0.5
117matches
46in Waratek scope39.3%
4protected3.4%
3exploited2.6%
1CISA KEV0.9%
7public PoC6.0%
5EPSS ≥ 0.54.3%
Protected by Waratek
4
3.4%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
0.9%
No exploit published
41
35.0%
Outside Waratek scope
34
29.1%
Not applicable
37
31.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
4
3.4%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
113
96.6%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
3
2.6%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
13
11.1%
Forecast only
2
1.7%
No public exploit
99
84.6%
split by
peak 55 / quarter
Q2 191
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q3 190
Q4 190
Q1 200
Q2 202
Outside Waratek scope2
Medium2
not blocked2
Exploited2
Q3 200
Q4 201
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 212
No exploit published1
Not applicable1
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q2 210
Q3 212
No exploit published2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q4 213
Outside Waratek scope3
Medium3
not blocked3
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit2
Q1 221
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 223
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable2
Medium3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
No public exploit3
Q3 222
Protected by Waratek1
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only2
Q4 223
No exploit published2
Not applicable1
Medium3
not blocked3
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit2
Q1 2311
No exploit published2
Not applicable9
Medium11
not blocked11
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only1
No public exploit8
Q2 2316
No exploit published7
Not applicable9
Medium16
not blocked16
Proof of concept only4
Forecast only1
No public exploit11
Q3 2315
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published4
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable8
Medium15
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked14
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit12
Q4 2355
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published22
Outside Waratek scope25
Not applicable7
Medium55
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked54
No public exploit55
Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21Q2 22Q4 22Q2 23Q4 23
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-36033 | Medium | 2022-08-29 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | jsoup is a Java HTML parser, built for HTML editing, cleaning, scraping, and cross-site scripting (XSS) safety. jsoup may incorrectly sanitize HTML including `javascript:` URL expressions, which could allow XSS attacks when a reader subsequently clicks that link. If the non-default `SafeList.preserveRelativeLinks` option is enabled, HTML including `javascript:` URLs that have been crafted with control characters will not be sanitized. If the site that this HTML is published on does not set a Content Security Policy, an XSS attack is then possible. This issue is patched in jsoup 1.15.3. Users should upgrade to this version. Additionally, as the unsanitized input may have been persisted, old content should be cleaned again using the updated version. To remediate this issue without immediately upgrading: - disable `SafeList.preserveRelativeLinks`, which will rewrite input URLs as absolute URLs - ensure an appropriate [Content Security Policy](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CSP) is defined. (This should be used regardless of upgrading, as a defence-in-depth best practice.) |
| CVE-2022-31160 | Medium | 2022-07-20 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | jQuery UI is a curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of jQuery. Versions prior to 1.13.2 are potentially vulnerable to cross-site scripting. Initializing a checkboxradio widget on an input enclosed within a label makes that parent label contents considered as the input label. Calling `.checkboxradio( "refresh" )` on such a widget and the initial HTML contained encoded HTML entities will make them erroneously get decoded. This can lead to potentially executing JavaScript code. The bug has been patched in jQuery UI 1.13.2. To remediate the issue, someone who can change the initial HTML can wrap all the non-input contents of the `label` in a `span`. |
| CVE-2022-30115 | Medium | 2022-06-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Using its HSTS support, curl can be instructed to use HTTPS directly insteadof using an insecure clear-text HTTP step even when HTTP is provided in theURL. This mechanism could be bypassed if the host name in the given URL used atrailing dot while not using one when it built the HSTS cache. Or the otherway around - by having the trailing dot in the HSTS cache and *not* using thetrailing dot in the URL. |
| CVE-2022-27779 | Medium | 2022-06-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | libcurl wrongly allows cookies to be set for Top Level Domains (TLDs) if thehost name is provided with a trailing dot.curl can be told to receive and send cookies. curl's "cookie engine" can bebuilt with or without [Public Suffix List](https://publicsuffix.org/)awareness. If PSL support not provided, a more rudimentary check exists to atleast prevent cookies from being set on TLDs. This check was broken if thehost name in the URL uses a trailing dot.This can allow arbitrary sites to set cookies that then would get sent to adifferent and unrelated site or domain. |
| CVE-2022-29577 | Medium | 2022-04-21 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | OWASP AntiSamy before 1.6.7 allows XSS via HTML tag smuggling on STYLE content with crafted input. The output serializer does not properly encode the supposed Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) content. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-28367. |
| CVE-2022-24329 | Medium | 2022-02-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In JetBrains Kotlin before 1.6.0, it was not possible to lock dependencies for Multiplatform Gradle Projects. |
| CVE-2021-41184 | Medium | 2021-10-26 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | jQuery-UI is the official jQuery user interface library. Prior to version 1.13.0, accepting the value of the `of` option of the `.position()` util from untrusted sources may execute untrusted code. The issue is fixed in jQuery UI 1.13.0. Any string value passed to the `of` option is now treated as a CSS selector. A workaround is to not accept the value of the `of` option from untrusted sources. |
| CVE-2021-41183 | Medium | 2021-10-26 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | jQuery-UI is the official jQuery user interface library. Prior to version 1.13.0, accepting the value of various `*Text` options of the Datepicker widget from untrusted sources may execute untrusted code. The issue is fixed in jQuery UI 1.13.0. The values passed to various `*Text` options are now always treated as pure text, not HTML. A workaround is to not accept the value of the `*Text` options from untrusted sources. |
| CVE-2021-41182 | Medium | 2021-10-26 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | jQuery-UI is the official jQuery user interface library. Prior to version 1.13.0, accepting the value of the `altField` option of the Datepicker widget from untrusted sources may execute untrusted code. The issue is fixed in jQuery UI 1.13.0. Any string value passed to the `altField` option is now treated as a CSS selector. A workaround is to not accept the value of the `altField` option from untrusted sources. |
| CVE-2021-36374 | Medium | 2021-07-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When reading a specially crafted ZIP archive, or a derived formats, an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Commonly used derived formats from ZIP archives are for instance JAR files and many office files. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected. |
| CVE-2021-36373 | Medium | 2021-07-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When reading a specially crafted TAR archive an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that finally leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected. |
| CVE-2020-29582 | Medium | 2021-02-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In JetBrains Kotlin before 1.4.21, a vulnerable Java API was used for temporary file and folder creation. An attacker was able to read data from such files and list directories due to insecure permissions. |
| CVE-2020-28493 | Medium | 2021-02-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDoS vulnerability is mainly due to the `_punctuation_re regex` operator and its use of multiple wildcards. The last wildcard is the most exploitable as it searches for trailing punctuation. This issue can be mitigated by Markdown to format user content instead of the urlize filter, or by implementing request timeouts and limiting process memory. |
| CVE-2020-13956 | Medium | 2020-12-02 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Apache HttpClient versions prior to version 4.5.13 and 5.0.3 can misinterpret malformed authority component in request URIs passed to the library as java.net.URI object and pick the wrong target host for request execution. |
| CVE-2020-11023 | Medium | 2020-04-29 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.0.3 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0. |
| CVE-2020-11022 | Medium | 2020-04-29 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | In jQuery starting with 1.12.0 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0. |
| CVE-2019-11358 | Medium | 2019-04-20 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. |