Oracle Critical Patch Update October 2019
Released October 2019 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, July 2019 · Critical Patch Update, January 2020 →
180 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
23Protected by Waratek63No exploit published57Outside Waratek scope37Not applicable
6Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 56 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 6 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 2 CISA KEV · 5 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
1
16.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
4
66.7%
Not applicable
1
16.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
16.7%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
5
83.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
6
100.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 3 / quarter
Q1 181
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q2 180
Q3 180
Q4 180
Q1 191
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q2 193
Protected by Waratek1
Outside Waratek scope2
High2
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
Exploited3
Q3 190
Q4 191
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q1 18Q2 18Q3 18Q4 18Q1 19Q2 19Q3 19Q4 19
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-3010 | High | 2019-10-16 | Not applicable | Exploited | Vulnerability in the Oracle Solaris product of Oracle Systems (component: XScreenSaver). The supported version that is affected is 11. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Solaris executes to compromise Oracle Solaris. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Solaris, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Solaris. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2019-11358 | Medium | 2019-04-20 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. |
| CVE-2019-0232 | High | 2019-04-15 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | When running on Windows with enableCmdLineArguments enabled, the CGI Servlet in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.17, 8.5.0 to 8.5.39 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.93 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution due to a bug in the way the JRE passes command line arguments to Windows. The CGI Servlet is disabled by default. The CGI option enableCmdLineArguments is disable by default in Tomcat 9.0.x (and will be disabled by default in all versions in response to this vulnerability). For a detailed explanation of the JRE behaviour, see Markus Wulftange's blog (https://codewhitesec.blogspot.com/2016/02/java-and-command-line-injections-in-windows.html) and this archived MSDN blog (https://web.archive.org/web/20161228144344/https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/twistylittlepassagesallalike/2011/04/23/everyone-quotes-command-line-arguments-the-wrong-way/). |
| CVE-2019-0211 | High | 2019-04-08 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | In Apache HTTP Server 2.4 releases 2.4.17 to 2.4.38, with MPM event, worker or prefork, code executing in less-privileged child processes or threads (including scripts executed by an in-process scripting interpreter) could execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the parent process (usually root) by manipulating the scoreboard. Non-Unix systems are not affected. |
| CVE-2019-6109 | Medium | 2019-01-31 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to missing character encoding in the progress display, a malicious server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can employ crafted object names to manipulate the client output, e.g., by using ANSI control codes to hide additional files being transferred. This affects refresh_progress_meter() in progressmeter.c. |
| CVE-2015-9251 | Medium | 2018-01-18 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | jQuery before 3.0.0 is vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) attacks when a cross-domain Ajax request is performed without the dataType option, causing text/javascript responses to be executed. |